Kris,
We were in contact when I first joined the conspiracy list which I get
in digest form. I have never posted there, and frankly do not know
how. Now I do wish to post something, and in fact wish it distributed
as wide as possible. I think perhaps this is your list. Even if it is
not, could you forward the below to that list? Believe me, I would be
ever so grateful
Michael Donovan
Below is the letter to Judge Walter S. Smith which I just mailed
certified return receipt requested this afternoon November 15, 1999. In
this issue over the years there has been heavy mail tampering, as well
as heavy computer monitoring, FedEX tampering, and of course, phone.
Because of the mail tampering, I wish to post this on the internet as
far and wide a possible. If you know any other boards or forums that
has an interest in these matters, please forward.
Michael Donovan
Norfolk, Virginia
(copy of letter follows)
Honorable Walter S. Smith
U.S. District Judge
United States District Court
800 Franklin
Waco, Texas 76701 Phone (254) 750 1519
Dear Judge Smith,
Your Honor, I have filed a federal civil RICO case pro se in the
Federal Court in Norfolk, Virginia. The case relates to a series of
events that explain motive for the assault on the Branch Davidians in
1993. I had met Mr. Koresh on the motor vessel Schmonchi out of New
Bedford when he was a resident of Massachusetts, while I was under heavy
watch by who I now assume to be Treasury.
The RICO case alleges a pattern of racketeering, by persons and
entities within both State and Federal governments, which started
shortly after correspondence between Shelby T. Brewer, Department of
Energy to the Honorable Senator Kennedy copied to the plaintiff,
correspondence from the Honorable Senator Moynihan, Senate Intelligence
Committee to both the Honorable Senator Kennedy and the plaintiff, and
the Offices of Naval Research in Arlington to the plaintiff copied to
the Honorable Senator Edward M. Kennedy. This resulted in further
correspondence, from the plaintiff, as directed, to Commander Troutman,
Underwater Systems Command, Groton Sub Base. In that correspondence
security concerns resulting from knowledge from the plaintiff�s family
(then deceased Father) were included. This resulted in written
accusations in many printed accusations both published and unpublished
to Senators Kennedy and Moynihan and Coast Guard Command concerning the
validity of an order.
While on the Schimonchi the plaintiff passed to Mr. Koresh copies of a
pamphlet which explained the new geometry of Pavlita, a source of keen
interest to intelligence committees. (It was heretofore not
understood).
This meeting with Mr. Koresh was subsequent to my being interrogated on
Groton Sub base by naval intelligence concerning the work of the
Taiwanese mathematician, C.W. Cho, Czech Robert Pavlita, and the Soviet
Astrophysicist Niccoli Kosyrev. This interrogation was suddenly
interrupted by a phone call. I was driven out in the middle of nowhere
where I was assaulted my unknown parties, who I first thought ONI, now
more Treasury. However, by my complaint, and the help of the office of
the Honorable Senator Edward Kennedy, who had prior helped with making
contact with proper entities within the Navy, a copy of an order from
Office of Naval Intelligence Command, Washington, the Commander of the
base, Captain Ransom, was ordered to explain to both the Senator and
myself the actions of the Navy on that occasion. The Navy never
responded to the order (I still have reference number). The head of the
Senator's Boston office found this highly unusual indicating that either
the order was ignored or countermanded.
By coincidence Mr. Koresh (though he was self-educated) had the wits to
understand many of the basics and related it to passages in the Bible in
which he had a keen interest. The validity of the passages relationship
is not as important as Mr. Koresh's ability to make a case for this. It
appears that parties inside of government wanted very much to curtail
public understanding of this. A small example of the implications, Your
Honor, might here help:
Pavlita was able to demonstrate in test after test certain anomalies of
physics. All this was primarily based on a relationship between form,
shape, and energy. Prior to Pavlita, another Czech obtained a patent on
a specific pyramid shape. It sharpened razor blades. He did not know
how it worked. He did not need to. Pavlita clearly demonstrated that
he did know how it worked, but would not give out the secret. It went
behind the Iron Curtain when the Soviet tanks rolled into Prague.
Another man used a specific shape to help preserve milk. My
understanding is that he too did not understand how it worked, but
patented instead a method of folding milk cartons into this shape. The
point is that he used this to take over the entire milk distribution
system of Europe and has become a multi billionaire. Your Honor, this
was just one small thing not even knowing how the geometry worked!
I allege in my suit that these parties racketeering inside of
government were worried that this get into the hands of the public. The
concern with Koresh was that he would be able to use his knowledge of a
very popular subject, 'Bible Prophesy', to launch this into the public
mind. There, with possibly a million readers, there would by exposure
be a small base of those who both could grasp the basic concepts, and
develop them as well. Self published books in that area have sold
millions. In other words, Your Honor, the 'clear and present' danger as
seen by these racketeers was the exposure factor.
From a strictly military standpoint it is clear that the Davidians were
placed in a position, at the onset, the first assault by BATF, wherein a
stand-off would be created. They broke all normal procedure to do
this. For example, this was done during daylight where standard
procedure would call for darkness, late night. In other words a
stand-off was created so that they could kill them all. Part of this
'clear and present danger' was the worry that if just Koresh and some of
his near followers were killed, a posthumous publication could make his
book even more popular. It would seem that an order was given to kill
all. And this, Your Honor, explains what has been so perplexing to all
investigating; the motive.
Other theories of motive for what was clearly done have been put forth,
mind control operations among them. None of these theories explains the
gross actions that occurred. My RICO case does.
Further, Your Honor, there was another telling action by Mr. Koresh,
just prior to the final assault of 4/19/93 which was odd at the time,
but very telling with the proper background.
Please, Your Honor, bear with me for a short digression the point of
which will be made apparent.
The discoveries of Czech Robert Pavlita were based on a new way of
looking at geometry. This geometry only works in three dimensions;
there are no lines or points. The basis of the geometry are core
relationships between 'equal sized balls', 'spheres' (as defined by
lines and points) becoming an impossibility. There have been two times
in history when this underlying new geometry almost came out. The first
was hundreds of years ago with J.Kepler (laws of planetary motion), and
the second was with early x-ray defraction studies around Roentgen in
the 1920s (Roentgen, Peck, and Cowen). On both those occasions there
were hints of a core relationship to a three dimensional form, namely
the manners of the way 12 balls exactly fit around one, and in this
there are two manners, two possibilities. The most 'regular' of these
above manners has been carefully studied for may years, in such areas as
'sphere packing', as it relates to the manner in which, for example,
cannonballs pile. The other manner was on a strange interface, seemed
very confusing, and was thrown out of study. Later, we see that it was
this second shape which is very core to some unexplained measures of
science. The second shape, though not 'symmetrical' within our standard
view of geometry, is ultimately symmetrical within the new geometry. It
was this second shape that led to the explanations of some core limits
in nature, the limit of 12 quarks and the limit of the 232/230 crystal
symmetry limit. Your Honor, if you would just glance at an entry, say
under 'crystallography' in a common science encyclopaedia such as
Nostrums, you will see that the origins of these symmetry conditions,
though classified now for over one hundred years, is central to many
puzzles of science.
It is virtually impossible (and the major part of why this has been
hidden from some of the best minds) to make headway understanding
Pavlita's new geometry without working in 3-D, that is you must actually
construct the problems with ping pong balls, marbles, or Styrofoam. A
notation was needed for the core 12 ball around one ball construction.
If standard numerics were used, 1.., 2�, to 12 it would be confusing in
other ways. I chose to use the 'astrological signs' (glyphs) in my
notation. Also, unlike other symbol sets, those glyphs can be read in
all directions without confusion, for example a 6 could not be confused
with a 9. These 'astrological signs' were what I used to explain the
basis to Koresh.
Mr. Koresh's excitement seemed more focused on the aspect that he could
relate something new about the Bible. It would not be hard to make a
case for this. In explaining the geometry, only those who have made the
effort to work in three dimensions have made progress. Many, even given
the keys, got nowhere with pencil and paper. If Koresh's book sold
anything like 'Late Great Planet Earth", another self published book in
that area, out of the million or so readers, a few would take this
trouble. Again, as Killing Koresh could have made posthumous
publication even more popular.
During the standoff I was living in Onset, MA. At that time a lady
with very obvious security connections made great effort to make friends
with me. Her on-and-off-again boyfriend being ex Turkish Secret Service
then high in UN Security. Except for some new aspects in development of
the geometry, (I now had things of proprietary interest), I was very
open with her. I saw no reason to be coy. At that time Mr. Koresh made
a strange statement that was put forth all over the press, mostly I
think, because it made him look nuts. Mr. Koresh (by this time I had
recognised him) stated that he was, "Waiting for an astrological sign",
after which he would come out with his followers. This was
specifically an 'astrological sign, not an astrological sign. Astrology
and fundamental Christianity usually do not mix. I then, at that time
Your Honor, understood the reason for the government's actions. I
reasoned then, as I do now, that he had understood the issue and was
signalling his dilemma. Right away I started working on a letter to the
Department of Justice. I was taking my time with this as I felt 1- the
standoff would remain in place, and 2- it is a complex subject indeed.
On April 20th, the day after the final assault, I heard about what
happened and stopped writing the letter. I was horrified. Then, having
no trust in the Department of Justice, I did send one angry letter to
the local Sheriff.
Your Honor, as a child from the ages of about nine to sixteen I was
trained in a very little known manner in which critical intelligence
information is hidden in major publications. My Father taught this as
'reading the billboards' and only in the past year did I even know that
there was a specific cryptology word for it 'stenanography'. The person
best in naval intelligence after WW II, Hedley Donovan, was made head of
Time Magazine, not head of the newly formed CIA. He taught my Father,
the mapmaker of Time, who taught me. This inside knowledge, and my
Father's prediction of some events regarding the Soviet navy on his
deathbed got me into some hot water with the intelligence community
which unfortunately very much confuses the issue in Waco.
The filing itself is lengthy and a very difficult read. First, Your
Honor, I needed to make constant reference to the parts that filled the
stringent requirements of RICO law. Though financial gain was involved,
it was hard to show in certain areas, as was definition of
'enterprise'. This was covered by (NOW vs. Scheider et al: U.S. 249,
(1994), the ruling from Chief Justice Rehnquest stating that, regarding
RICO classification that parties working for a united purpose, the
united purpose being curtailing of plaintiff's rights are to be
considered an enterprise.
It is also confusing, as are most all racketeering cases, in that clear
evidence was gathered only for near parties, (defendants). Also, the
amount of written evidence gathered by the plaintiff, myself, is
massive. Massive also is the amount of records held by government
agencies, etc, starting with the Mass Office of Public Safety.
BATF Office of Inspection in Arlington, then under Agent John Malone
stated that the BATF's roll in stopping information (this was in regard
to multiple arson and multiple murders on Cape Cod) would be
investigated. At one point I was told that the investigation was
complete and a letter was forthcoming. When the letter did not arrive,
I called back and the new Agent in Charge, Agent Tate, stated that the
BATF had no records of this.
The case is further confused by issues of patent law. Two requests for
classification were sent to the Department of Commerce. In the first I
got a rejection. I then had to send much information on Robert
Pavlita. I won the argument and the classification was given.
Apparently, I sparked some strong interest there. When the second
request was sent in I received classification in an unheard of ten days,
(the usual turnaround being about 90).
Of more recent I wrote to the Attorney defending the government in this
matter, Assistant U.S. Attorney Larry Leonard, Department of Justice in
Norfolk. In the matter of my case Mr. Leonard always returned calls and
answered communications. This time I asked for specific directions in
writing as to how I could connect my case to the Waco case before you,
and I specifically requested a written response. I can copy you on that
communication if you wish. I do know that in some federal court areas,
in the initial filings, it is asked if any other pending cases relate.
On this I absolutely expected an answer. The DOJ seems to be balking on
this. I also noticed that Attorney Danforth stated in the media that
his investigation will only cover 'wrongful acts', that motive will not
be even considered for the acts. This upset me because, if not by legal
definition, it at least gave to me the appearance of pre stated
nonfeasance of office.
My mail has very often been tampered with over the course of the last
16 years. I am therefore sending this by certified mail and return
receipt requested.
As I am pro se, I would like to know what further steps would be
necessary to relate the evidence to the RICO case filed in Norfolk to
the Waco case before you.
Respectfully,
Michael Donovan (date: 11/15/1999)
1508 Maury Cres.
Norfolk, Virginia 23509
(757) 623 7222
Sent certified mail, number: Z_395_061_867, Tidewater 23509
Original signed.
