-Caveat Lector- >From Pioneer Planet, http://www.pioneerplanet.com/seven-days/1/news/docs/010067.htm - Published: Sunday, November 28, 1999 Arms experts cite minor possibility of Y2K missile launch ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- JOHN DONNELLY BOSTON GLOBE ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- WASHINGTON It would be the world's most extreme Y2K computer glitch. As improbable as it may be, the possibility of a mistaken launch of nuclear missiles just as the world celebrates the new millennium has antiatomic activists pushing anew for disarmament of all U.S. and Russian nuclear missiles. U.S. officials say flatly that Y2K computer problems will not cause any accidental launch of a nuclear missile. But arms-control specialists cannot completely rule out a Y2K doomsday scenario, which could start with computer malfunctions in Russia that cause early-warning systems to give erroneous indications of a missile attack. Then, under this hypothetical scenario, Russian President Boris Yeltsin could order the activation of the country's ``dead hand'' system, which ensures nuclear retaliation in case an attack kills the entire Moscow leadership. Next, the Y2K bug could shut down the communication between Russia's central command and the ``dead hand'' computer apparatus, which would proceed to launch missiles on the basis of the false indications of an incoming attack. And that, according to some disarmament activists, could bring nuclear holocaust as Russia sends hundreds of nuclear missiles toward the United States. Much would have to go wrong for such a cataclysmic event to occur, but such technical and human error is not absolutely out of the question, some arms specialists warn. Earlier this year, to add another layer of safety to prevent an accidental launch, President Clinton and Yeltsin created a joint Y2K control room at Peterson Air Force Base in Colorado Springs. There, Russian and U.S. officials will sit side-by-side beginning in late December to minimize the chances of a Y2K-triggered false alarm. But the scenario described above is based on a ``Dr. Strangelove''-like system that exists in Russia, notably the ``dead hand'' computer program, which remains in the hands of Moscow despite the joint command center in Colorado. And the scenario comes against a backdrop of rising Russian anger against the United States, the most recent point of conflict occurring in Clinton's recent pointed criticism of the war in Chechnya. Pentagon officials say Russia has embarked on a campaign of nuclear muscle-flexing to show its displeasure, including a recent test of two submarine-launched missiles and threats to send nuclear bombers to Cuba and Vietnam. But an ongoing worry persists around Russia's deteriorating and incomplete early-warning system, underscoring the dangers of having an estimated 5,000 Russian and U.S. nuclear missiles on a hair-trigger -- Y2K or no Y2K. While the missiles no longer are targeted on cities and nuclear sites, they are loaded with guidance systems that, on the U.S. side, can be programmed in as little time as 10 seconds, literally a flip of the switch and then two computer keystrokes, analysts said. ``Even if the Y2K risks are low, it's important for people to appreciate the overall risks here,'' said Bruce Blair, a Brookings Institution senior fellow and a recipient this year of a MacArthur Foundation ``genius grant,'' who has written extensively about possible doomsday nuclear scenarios, including the ``dead hand'' possibility. In the view of Blair and others, Y2K is a unique event, and thus the threat cannot be calculated. ``It is inestimable,'' Blair said. ``Anyone who claims to know the probability of Y2K early-warning failure in Russia is pulling it out of thin air.'' In recent months, U.S. and Russian officials have tried to assure the public that Y2K poses no risk of a nuclear shoot-out. Following a federal government report on the Y2K problem earlier this month, the White House said, ``Y2K problems will not cause nuclear weapons to launch themselves. Nuclear weapons launch requires human intervention.'' A Pentagon official, speaking on the condition of anonymity, said the worries of Y2K problems with Russia's nuclear system ``have gotten blown way out of proportion. We expect minor glitches in Russia, nothing of great severity.'' But distrust lingers, even at the joint command center. U.S. officials will not share everything from the early-warning network for fear of giving away secrets to the Russians, and the Russians have rejected U.S. requests to set up another joint Y2K control center in Russia because of their own wariness of giving away intelligence secrets. Five U.S. arms-control specialists, some working for the Clinton administration or Congress and some at universities, have said recently that their contacts in Russia have dried up because Russian intelligence agents have told scientists to cease contacts with Americans. In the past month, the possible Y2K threat has galvanized many antinuclear activists, including Helen Caldicott, author Jonathan Schell and former arms negotiator Paul Nitze, who have called on Clinton in full-page newspaper advertisements to ``de-alert'' thousands of nuclear missiles. De-alerting literally means taking missiles off high alert, removing the hair trigger by dismantling missile components. ``As long as the U.S. and Russia see each as potential adversaries, this is going to be the situation'' of missiles on hair-trigger, said Theodore Postol, professor of science, technology and national security policy at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. ``That will also be the situation if one side sees itself as vulnerable to a damaging strike.'' That now would be Russia, because its nuclear forces are ``extremely vulnerable to a U.S. strike,'' Postol said. Many Russian nuclear missiles are either in silos or are collected together in corrugated steel buildings, making them a possible lucrative target in a nuclear war. Many U.S. nuclear missiles, in comparison, are on submarines, which can evade detection. A U.S. arms-control official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said de-alerting would be extremely difficult in practice because of the difficulty of verification. ``You have to imagine all sorts of shenanigans there would be over verification,'' the official said. ``Once you mention the word `verification,' the idea loses some of its attractiveness.'' But for some arms-control analysts, there seems little reason to keep so many missiles on high alert a decade after the fall of the Berlin Wall. ``What's the threat? Does anybody think there is going to be a bolt-out-of-the-blue attack?'' said Joseph Cirincione, senior associate at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, a Washington think tank. ``Does anyone believe that the Russians would do this for some reason, that they would try to do a pre-emptive strike? I think it's just insane at this point.'' Blair, the Brookings analyst who has had extensive contacts with Russian counterparts, said while both the United States and Russia find a pre-emptive strike scenario ``bizarre,'' the issue cannot be totally dismissed because of Russia's rising distrust of the United States. Asked if the Y2K doomsday scenario, which has been so roundly dismissed by U.S. officials, was cause for losing sleep, Blair did not respond reassuringly. ``Why should you sleep at night? Why should you sleep if nobody knows? Maybe you need a sleeping pill,'' he said. ``You can hope and trust that the probability is extremely small. But we certainly don't know that.'' -- Dan S DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic screeds are not allowed. Substance�not soapboxing! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at: http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
