-Caveat Lector- U.S Immigration Policy Means Ethnic Cleansing of Euro-Americans, CoCC Meeting Told The opening session of the semi-annual meeting of the Council of Conservative Citizens addressed the topic: Immigration -- Is the Debate Over? In the US, unlike Absurdistan (Canada), immigration is still a legitimate concern. The CoCC debate enjoyed live covereage over C-SPAN. Despite establishment efforts to all but declare the debate over, the panelists made it clear that Euro-America will not quietly accept its fate. Speakers emphasized that current immigration trends are nothing more than an invasion and the results will be not the joys of diversity, but the ethnic cleansing of the founding European people. John Vinson of the American Immigration Control Foundation insisted that far from being over, the immigration debate has never really begun. He explained that 1.2-million immigrants, legal and illegal flood into the U.S. annually. "Within 50 years, demographics will shift and Europeans will be a minority and culture will shift in the U.S. toward the Third World." There are already dark shadows of what is to come. Vinson cited the case of Mario Obledo, a California Hispanic leader who professes to be concerned about racism. Yet, Obledo has said: "California is going to be a Hispanic state and anyone who doesn't like it should leave." How can this be happening, Vinson wondered. "Greed and treason are the reason. America's elites don't want any barriers to their profit making and don't want to pay the American worker a decent wage." An example of this greed elite, said Vinson, "is Jewish Internationalist George Soros, a passionate advocate of immigration. His Emma Lazarus Foundation gives money to pro-immigration groups." Soros has been linked to massive currency speculation which has destabilized the economies of several Asian states. ` "They call us Nazis," said Vinson, but it is the pro-immigration lobby "who see immigration as their final solution." What is happening, argued Vinson, is that the rule of law is being confronted by the Third World's philopsophy that might makes right and elites rule,when might makes right. Then, when there are no legal barriers, all men beneath them are "equal" he said Concluding, Vinson told the meeting of 200 activists in Fairfax, Virginia: "We have to get over the idea that all cultures are equal. People came here to America because they see our culture is better." The second panelist was Virginia Abernethy, professor emeritus at Vanderbilt University. "Our own poor people, including minorities, are hurt first and worst by immigration," she said. "The charge that we're racist is ludicrous." Professor Abernethy focused on the demographic and financial impacts of massive Third World immigration. "The foreign born are 10 per cent of the population," she said, "but 18 per cent of the births. We've been propelled into a birthrate that's approaching that of the Third World.." One per cent population growth per year means we'll double our population inside 70 years, she warned. "By 2050, we'll be half a billion." "Population growth leads to serious environmental impacts, environmental degradation and higher taxes," she cautioned. Following the pattern of many Third World countries, America is seeing a widening gap between a rich elite and the rest of the population. Citing a recent study by Dr. Donald Huddle, Professor Emeritus of Economics at Rice University, warned: "The nearly 26-million legal and illegal immigrants settling in the United States since 1970 cost the taxpayers a net $69-billion in 1997 alone, in excess of taxes those immigrants paid." Most of this burden falls on local taxpayers, she explained, particularly in the area of education. For instance, in California, just to keep up with the soaring population, "the state must build one new school a day!" Abernethy, who is a member of the national board of directors of the Washington-based Carrying Capacity Network, said: "Blacks and Whites are fleeing California. Therefore, California's real population growth is more than 100 per cent immigrant driven." There are hefty capital expenditures needed to accommodate this new growth, especially schools and roads. "Each new person costs a community $15,000 in capital investment." She pointed to the fact that, on average, taxes in larger communities are 25 per cent higher than in smaller communities. As for the alleged economic benefits of immigration, most of the GNP generated by the newcomers goes to the immigrants themselves as wages. The competition for jobs caused by immigration drives down wages, Dr. Abernethy said. "Immigration is costing wage earners $33-billion per year in lost wages. That goes into the pockets of the employers. It's destroying our middle and working class," she charged. The Huddle report found that during 1996, approximately 2.3-million predominantly low-skill American workers were displaced from their jobs due to the continued heavy influx of immigrant workers since 1970. That cost taxpayers, who paid more than $15.2-billion in public assistance for those displaced. Dr. Abernethy echoed John Vinson in warning of "a growing disparity between rich and poor not seen since the Great Depression." The more people there are the more pressure there is on the environment, she warned. The topsoil in the U.S. is being destroyed 18 per cent faster than it can be replaced. "We're doing this to export food. At some point, our soil will be depleted and we won't be able to feed ourselves," she cautioned. "At the Carrying Capacity Network, we advocate a moratorium on immigration of 100,000 per year," Prof. Abernethy said. "This is what polls show the American people want." We'll pay a terrible price to cater to the elite employers who want a nanny and a gardener cheap, she concluded. Dr. Wayne Lutton, editor of the Social Contract journal, warned: "If President Clinton and his cronies have their way, we'll have a very dark future indeed." "We really haven't had a debate on immigration in America. One reason is that at no time has there ever been a general demand for more immigration," Lutton argued. Doris Meisner, the head of President Clinton's Immigration Service chortled: "We're transforming ourselves," as immigration lawyers cheered. "What she should have said," insisted Dr. Lutton, "is 'we're transforming and deconstructing you!'" Did the politicians ever ask Americans: "Are your taxes too low? Is your air too clean? Do your children have enough playmates to play with? Are your roads too uncongested?" The 1924 Immigration Act signed by President Coolidge was a rational response to the Balkanization which touched off World War I, Dr. Lutton argued. President Coolidge very naturally tried to head off the ethnic conflicts that had plagued Europe. Early immigration programmes hoped to avoid a similar fate by placing the emphasis on selecting those "likely" to assimilate, he explained. The 1924 Immigration Act, former college instructor Lutton explained, "limited immigration to 150,000 per year and tried to attract people similar to those here and, therefore, people who could be easily assimilated." The 1965 Immigration Act changed all that. The 1986 amnesty for illegals and the 1990 Act, which actually increased the number of immigrants annually even more, succeeded in increasingly immigration from 150,000 per year, mostly from Europe, to over 1.2-million per year, with 70 per cent of these being from backgrounds dissimilar to those of the founders of America.This has led to the family-driven chain-immigration that we have seen over the past 30 years "The INS admits there are about 300,000 illegals annually in addition to the 1.2-million legal immigrants," Dr. Lutton said. "Immigration is not a single issue," Dr. Lutton explained. "There's an immigration impact on many other issues. We must help Americans see these links." He mentioned such problems as crime, environmental degradation and the deterioration in education. Recently, 29 per cent of adults surveyed in a Wall Street Journal poll said reducing immigration was their number one issue. More Americans, he explained, chose such issues as reducing crime, improving education and preventing U.S. jobs from going overseas. "The point is," Lutton stressed, "is that all these issues have an immigration component. For instance, at any given time, 30 per cent of the prison population is foreign born and the drug trade is largely controlled by immigrants." As for welfare, he noted, recent immigrants have a far higher rate of welfare usage than do native-born Americans. Even if they have jobs, they're usually poor-paying jobs. "Therefore," Dr. Lutton emphasized, "these immigrants will be a drain on our social services especially in their later years." "If we want to reduce crime, lower taxes and help the environment, we must reduce immigration. It will have an immediate impact," Dr. Lutton stressed. Mokita is a word used by Pacific Islanders, Dr. Lutton said. "It means 'what everybody knows, but dares not say. We must say it: 60 to 70 per cent of adult Americans agree. America is not just a geographical entity. It is a nation with certain values." "I'd go beyond the proposal of a zero immigration moratorium and say we should begin deportation. Deportation now!" Dr. Lutton concluded to thunderous applause. Californian Glen Spencer, head of Voices of Citizens Together, said: "it's often said that California is America's future. Let me tell you about your future. Los Angeles schools have sunk to the 20th percentile. There's a 50 per cent dropout rate. Many graduates can't read. People are fleeing the system.. This is your future," thanks to immigration, he warned. Don't fool yourselves, he cautioned his activist audience. The problem will not be "contained" in California, Already, in the heartland, in Iowa, 90 per cent of domestic crime is associated with Mexicans, while, in Salt Lake City, in Mormon Utah, 80 per cent of drugs arrests are "illegals. In 1998, Democrat Ray Davis was elected Governor of California. "Republic Dan Lungren lost the election because he refused to talk about immigration. Why would neither candidate talk about immigration in a state facing traffic gridlock, environmental meltdown and education disaster?" Spencer demanded. Lungren had no credibility, Spencer charged. During 8 years in Congress on the Immigration Committee, he helped other Republicans to grant amnesty to 3-million illegals." Therefore," concluded Spencer, "he couldn't talk on immigration" reform. He could have told voters about Art Torres, the Chairman of the Democratic Party in California who said Proposition 187 "was the last gasp of White America in California." Spencer insisted that Torres has as much as stated that, when Mexicans take over, they'll discriminate against White Californians. Panelist and national newspaper columnist San Francis has said:" Former Rep. Robert Dornan, who opposed illegal but supported legal immigration, commented in 1996: 'I want to see America stay a nation of immigrants. ... If we lose our Northern European stock, your colouring and mine, blue eyes and fair hair -- tough! Soon after his statement, Mr. Dornan lost his seat to a Democratic rival who emphasized her Hispanic identity." The self-denigrating Dornan lost not only to the immigrant vote he welcomed, but, ironically, to widespread voter fraud perpetrated by many of these very immigrants Latino legislators in California are now pushing for the issuing of driver's licences to illegals, Spencer revealed. Bill Clinton "attacked ethnic cleanser Slobodan Milosevic but gave the Presidential Medal of Freedom to ethnic cleanser Mario Obledo," Spencer said. Spencer also quoted Mexican President Zedillo telling a Chicago audience, June 23, 1997:: "I proudly affirm that the Mexican nation extends beyond the territory enclosed by its borders." Isn't it refreshing to hear a politician speak the truth, however unpalatable, about immigration Multiculturalism and the Future of America: "Bitter Bread And Wine" Speakers on the opening panel of the Council of Conservative Citizens semi-annual meeting in Fairfax, Virginia grappled with the problem of multiculturalism in an increasingly diverse and fractious America, where even once remote areas of rural Virginia swarm with newcomers from Mexico, Central America and the Orient, many of them unable to speak English. The panel chairman and opening speaker was Atlanta attorney Sam Dickson. "Those of us who believe in a White European America must confront some lies," said Dickson. He went on to skewer some of the common lies that float around the immigration debate. The first lie, said Dickson, is "America is a nation of immigrants." It is not. Most Americans are native born. The second lie, Dickson explained to the July 10 meeting is "Diversity is our strength." There ought to be a bumper sticker, the distinguished lawyer told the crowd of 200, that says: "Diversity is strength. Say it until you believe it!" Quite the opposite is true. "Diversity is not strength; it is weakness." Dickson cited Northern Ireland and Sri Lanka. "There diversity is not a source of strength but a source of hardships," he said. "If this country goes on fostering every group but the founding group, you'll have to look to Bosnia-Hercegovina for the future, and it's not a pretty one," he warned. Some will say that Americans are different, that "we're nice and it won't happen here. We're not different and we're not going to repeal the lessons of history," he insisted. The third lie, said Dickson, is that multiculturalism leads to a greater and grander culture. Again, this is untrue. "Great cultures," Dickson explained, " are the results of small localities." Cohesive, exclusionist societies, like Periclean Athens, Renaissance Florence, or Shakespeare's Elizabethan England produce great cultures, the much-travelled attorney explained. The fourth lie is that opposition to multiculturalism is racism. "This lie is a club invented by the liberals to conduct intellectual terrorism and to prevent debate," Dickson charged. "What we're experiencing in Dade County [Florida] and other places around the country is ethnic cleansing not multiculturalism," he argued. It is replacement of Anglo-Americans by Hispanics. This displacement of an existing population is genocide, as defined by the UN Genocide Treaty. In fact, said Dickson, "multiculturalism, as practised in America, is racist!" The fifth lie, said Dickson, is that those imposing the immigration flood and multicultural agenda are morally superior. "Actually," Dickson countered, ":they are not nice people. We know this: they certainly don't practise what they preach. The Kennedys don't practise multiculturalism in Palm Beach or Hyannisport." Multiculturalism and the effects of massive Third World immigration are to apply to middle and working-class Americans. "This elite that governs us," said Dickson, "lives outside the rules they impose on us. "All below them are equal. The elite lives outside the rules. They live in almost exclusively White communities and send their kids to mostly all-White schools. You could not find a French aristocrat who behaved with more contempt for the people than these multicultural liberals." The final lie, said Dickson, is "It's inevitable:" that the rapid transformation of America into a Third World nation is in the cards and cannot be avoided. "On the contrary," said Dickson, "we have a wealth of talent in our race. We've produced outstanding scientists and artists." If tiny Latvia, its population diluted almost in half during the 50 year Russian/Soviet occupation can regain its independence, why can't we with 170-million people of European descent and still the Majority? As a message of hope, he added: "ur race has done improbable things over and over again." In his conclusion, Dickson emphasized?: "All is not lost!" Dickson then introduced syndicated columnist Dr. Samuel Francis. "He's the leading strategist of our cause. He was fired from his job at the Washington Times for his support for our people." "Immigration is not the only thing driving multiculturalism," Francis explained. "Many of think multiculturalism is just an add-on to Western culture." Some think that if people from Latin America wish to celebrate Cinco de Mayo Day, as Irishmen celebrate St. Patrick's Day, then just let them have it. "This is really a very inadequate concept of multiculturalism." In fact, insisted Dr. Francis, "multiculturalism is really a demand for the destruction of our culture, of our race. It's a question of which culture is going to be dominant. The whole point of multiculturalism is get rid of our culture and enthrone theirs. It is a power struggle to overthrow the hegemony of one race (ours) and replace it with another (theirs)," he said. Jared Taylor, a Yale graduate and translator of Japanese, is the author of Paved With Good Intentions: The Failure of Race Relations in Contemporary America. He is also the founder and editor of the monthly newsletter American Renaissance. Taylor insisted: "Multiculturalism puts more and more constraints on our discussion and twists the noose tighter and tighter around what we can say." He gave the example of the fate of a recent study commissioned by American Renaissance. Called The Colour of Crime. The study found that of 1.7-million crimes between the races in America, a shocking 90 per cent were committed by Blacks against Whites. Furthermore, despite all the media frenzy about skinheads and former members of the World Church of the Creator, Blacks are twice as likely as Whites to commit a "hate crime." "All of this," argued Taylor, "is relevant to the current controversy over racial profiling. Police departments, instead of saying, 'Of course, we do it,' deny it. They'd be fools not to do it, just as we know that young people and males are more likely to commit crimes than older people and females." "When this report was to be released in June," Taylor recounted, "we had advance interest from a number of media outlets, like Time, NBC News, and the Washington Post and others. They were eager to receive advance copies of this time-embargoed report. Yet, when we had our press conference, they totally ignored us. Not a word appeared." Later, the conservative Washington Times did run a substantial part of the report. Taylor has since discussed the controversial report on over 40 radio interviews and talk shows However, said Taylor, "if the findings had been reversed, if we had found that Whites were twice as likely as Blacks to commit a crime, there'd have been great publicity." Taylor gave another example of media bias. In 1998, a project called Violence Free Duluth, decided to study every gun-related crime in that Minnesota city and examine all factors, including the sex and race of the victim and perpetrators, as well as the relationship, if any, between these two parties. In April, 1999, they released their report but did not make public the statistics about race.. Frank Jewel, the director of the organization, said: "We did not include it because it might have been misinterpreted." In truth, said Taylor, "he's saying the people of Duluth are stupid and won't interpret the crime statistics right. Even worse, the deputy police chief of Duluth remarked that, if minorities are heavily involved in gun crimes, it would let Whites park their prejudices. 'We want to concentrate on gun control.'" "In fact, argued Taylor, it might we be that Duluth does not have a gun control problem, but a minority problem." "In our own case, we saw a totally unscientific approach to suppress data that was inconvenient. Weren't those media, like the Washington Post, saying, 'We're smarter than those rubes out there'?" In its July 7, 1999 issue the New York Times front page asserted "no one knows" to the mystery of why Blacks consistently do worse in IQ scores than Whites. Even poor Whites do better than rich Blacks. Taylor explained: "The author asks why and then says, 'No one knows.' However, Arthur Jensen knew 30 years ago; Phil Rushton of the University of Western Ontario knows today." 'Multiculturalism leads to the suppression of information," Taylor charged. "An ignorant people is easier to govern." Taylor praised former British Prime Minister Lady Thatcher for a recent comment about the U.S. in which she said that the Utopia of multiculturalism involves a bureaucratic class distributing wealth among groups and looking increasingly like the Soviet Union and equally doomed to fail. Taylor concluded with a stirring reading of Rudyard Kipling's poem The Stranger, which celebrates the joys of kinship and a homogeneous society. He warned, as did Kipling, of "the bitter bread and wine" produced by a multicultural society. The Stranger within my gate, He may be true or kind, But he does not talk my talk -- I cannot feel his mind. I see the face and the eyes and the mouth, But not the soul behind. The men of my own stock, They may do ill or well, But they tell the lies I am wonted to, They are used to the lies I tell; And we do not need interpreters When we go to buy or sell. The Stranger within my gates. He may be evil or good, But I cannot tell what powers control -- What reasons sway his mood; Nor when the gods of his far-off land, Shall repossess his blood. The men of my own stock, Bitter bad they may be, But, at least, they hear the things I hear, And see the things I see; And whatever I think of them and their likes They think of the likes of me. This was my father's belief And this is also mine: Let the corn be all of one sheaf -- And the grapes be all one vine, Ere our children's teeth are set on edge By bitter bread and wine." -- Rudyard Kipling DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic screeds are not allowed. Substance�not soapboxing! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at: http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
