-Caveat Lector-

from:
http://www.lycaeum.org/drugwar/DARKALLIANCE/ciah2.html
Click Here: <A HREF="http://www.lycaeum.org/drugwar/DARKALLIANCE/ciah2.html">T
he CIA and The Politics of Heroin</A>
-----
An Interview with Alfred McCoy


by David Barsamian

Conducted at University of Wisconsin-Madison, February 17,1990

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Part Two
Under this forced regime of occupation where you had the Nationalist Chinese
forces backed by the CIA occupying the mountain areas, the prime opium
growing areas in northeastern Burma, Burma went from maybe 7 or 8 tons of
opium production per annum to anywhere up to 1,000 tons of production by the
time the CIA's mercenaries were driven out in 1961. A thousand tons would
have been, in any given year, up to 60 and 70% of the world's total illicit
opium production coming from this one area as a result of a decade of
CIA-Nationalist Chinese occupation.

The other Southeast Asian area was as you describe. Until 1950 France had an
opium monopoly in Indochina. They were under pressure from the United States
and UN to clean up. They signed the Segal(?) Convention on Narcotic Drugs
with the United Nations and they abolished the opium monopoly. But it didn't
disappear. The opium dens and opium shops were simply transferred from the
French Ministry of Finance to French military intelligence and they, in turn,
turned them over to a criminal syndicate that was running Saigon for the
French, using their funds to buy daily intelligence and ferret out communist
terrorists in the streets of Saigon.

The communists were running a terrorist campaign against the French. A
Frenchman would sit down in a cafe and a 12-year-old boy would come up to him
and put a gun to the back of his head and shoot him and disappear into a
crowd. That's the kind of operation. The French were powerless to control
that and they set up a very elaborate intelligence apparatus to try and stop
that terror. Money was the fuel that drove that engine and the money came
from drugs.

Moreover, there were Corsican syndicates that dominated the inner-city
economy of Indochina, based in Saigon. They began exporting to Europe where
part of the so-called Marseilles connection which has been celebrated in
films - the connection where it's supposed to be opium from Turkey coming
through the laboratories of Marseilles and then on to the United States -
part of that production - we don't know how much - in fact, came from Saigon.
So, it's as a result of French counter-insurgency efforts in Indochina where
they integrate narcotics into their intelligence operations, but primarily
it's as a result of CIA operations in Burma that we get the so-called Golden
Triangle where it's northeastern Burma and the adjacent area of northern Laos
going into high-scale production.

When the Americans moved into Indochina after the French departed in 1955, we
picked up the same tribes, the Hmong, the same politics of narcotics, the
politics of heroin, that the French had established. By the 1960s we were
operating, particularly the CIA, in collusion with the major traffickers
exporting from the mountains not only to meet the consumption needs of
Southeast Asia itself, but in the first instance America's combat forces
fighting in Vietnam and ultimately the world market. Southeast Asia today, by
the way, is the number one source of American heroin. That's our major
source. So it's those very mountains of Burma, those very fields that were
cleared and put to the poppy as a result of this Nationalist Chinese-CIA
counterinsurgency intervention policy - that army that the CIA maintained
there - that's supplying America's addicts today with illicit heroin.

Barsamian: Was the anti-communist ideology so powerful and so strong that the
CIA would risk the worldwide opprobrium of being linked with drug
trafficking? Why would they take that risk?

McCoy: It's easy. Look, it's effective. I interviewed a guy named Lt. Col
Lucien Conein who, since I published my book now despises me, and I asked Col
Conein why they worked with the Corsicans in Saigon, for example. He said
that there aren't very many groups that know the clandestine arts. When you
think about the essential skills it takes to have an extra-legal operation -
to have somebody killed, to mobilize a crowd, to do what it does when
societies are in flux, when power is unclear and to be grabbed and shaped and
molded into a new state - you want to overthrow a government and put a new
one in - how do you do it? Who does this? Accountants? - They go to the
office every day. Students? They go to classes - they're good for maybe one
riot or something, but they've got to get on to medical school or law or
whatever they're doing. Where do you get people who have this kind of skill?
You have your own operatives and they're limited. Particularly if you're a
foreigner, your capacity to move something in the streets is very limited.
You know, sometimes you can turn to a state intelligence agency in a country
you're working with, but most effectively you can turn to the underworld.
That's why the CIA always worked very effectively with the warlords of the
Golden Triangle. It's worked very effectively with Corsican syndicates in
Europe, worked very effectively and continuously with American Mafia -
because they have the same clandestine arts. They operate with the same
techniques.

And they have the same kind of amorality. They are natural allies. There was
a conversion of cultures between the milieu of the underworld and the world
of the clandestine operative.

Barsamian: The French intelligence services used the services of the Corsican
Mafia during the first Indochina war and many of those Corsicans remained
behind and the Americans picked them up. But then you have the introduction
of the American Mafia itself with the full-scale American intervention in
Indochina: people like Santo Trafficante getting involved.

McCoy: I was interested in discovering during the course of my research in
Saigon in 1971 that the last of the founding generation of the Mafia - I read
these Mafia histories and I wonder if they're accurate, but you know, if you
read enough of them and they're talking about the formation of a Commission,
the big five families getting together and setting this thing up - but
sometimes you wonder if it isn't a fairy tale but everybody keeps repeating
it. So let's just assume as kind of a footnote that this may not be accurate.
But let's assume this is some kind of story that's accurate. The last of the
founding generation of Mafia titans was Santo Trafficante, Jr. He was the
boss of Tampa. He also ran Cuba for the Mafia. Cuba was one of the major
conduits of Marseilles heroin. The raw opium would come from Indochina
through the Suez Canal, across the Mediterranean to Marseilles - or it would
come through Turkey, down through Lebanon, then across the Mediterranean to
the port of Marseilles. There it was refined and it would enter the United
States.

Back in 1950, because of the very substantial Mafia presence in Cuba - they
owned most of the casinos, they operated a lot of the prostitution industry
and they were on good terms with the Batista dictatorship. It was their major
offshore operating zone. It was a kind of vice free port. Santo Trafficante
is believed to have been heavily involved in narcotics importation operations
in a general kind of way as somebody who was very heavily involved in Cuba.
Cuba was supposed to be - again, in these Mafia fairy tales - something of a
neutral zone. It was nobody's territory. But Trafficante kind of ran it,
providing a certain amount of protection and order for organized crime
because he was southern Florida and it was a natural territory for him to
expand into.

Well, in the late 1960s, Trafficante and his consigliere, his counselor -
again, in these Mafia charts, the number three man was a guy named Dominic
Furchi(?). Dominic Furchi and Santo Trafficante took a trip and went to Hong
Kong and they went to Saigon. When they were in Saigon they met with old man
Furchi's kid, Frank Furchi. Now, Frank Furchi had set himself up in Saigon
and was involved in this shady world of contracting all of these kind of
murky private business operations that were what you might call black
marketeering on the fringes of this massive U.S. war effort. Wherever you get
armies operating in the midst of war zones you get an enormous amount of
black market activity. Prostitution, clubs, entertainment, purloining of
military equipment - you know, there's just so much men and movement and
violence and such a risk that freelancers would come in there and wheel and
deal and make money.

This young Furchi was in there. There was a group of Corsicans that was still
operating left over from the first Indochina war and they were dealing. Some
of them were ex-nazi Gestapo officers that had come out there as well. It was
a remarkable polyglot group of adventurers. Trafficante is believed,
according to Hong Kong police intelligence, to have explored getting an Asian
heroin connection. Some police I talked to during this period were convinced
that, in fact, he did provide the basic contacts and connections during his
trip which began to see the start of substantial flows of heroin from
Southeast Asia to the United States. Now, whether or not, again, this is a
Mafia fairy tale, nonetheless statistically it is after about 1970 that we
see the flow of Number 4 pure white powder heroin moving from Southeast Asia
to the United States, being detected in chemical analysis of street samples.

Barsamian: One thing that has kind of perplexed me on this particular issue -
you know, the CIA being involved in drug trafficking in Southeast Asia - very
soon we see that heroin flowing into the veins of the American GIs stationed
in Southeast Asia who are reputedly there to defeat the communists. That's
kind of bizarre to say the least.

McCoy: When I published my book I got a lot of flak from people on the left
saying that I was probably a CIA agent because I was so moderate in my
analysis. The thesis in the heated political times of the early 1970s about
drugs was this. The CIA had two problems - or the American ruling class -
whoever these invisibles are that control this complex uncontrollable country
- supposedly had two problems. One was insurgency of minorities
I'm speaking of black uprisings in the cities of America. Another was winning
the war in Vietnam. So they put one and one together and they came up with
two: the Southeast Asian drug trade. Their vision was - you know, like the
CIA Deputy Director in charge of global narcotics trafficking sort of telling
the Hmong caravans to get moving out of the highlands of Southeast Asia.
"Let's get that caravan now into the lab. Okay, let's get that heroin loaded
onto the aircraft right. Okay, now we've got it into Harlem. Okay, get that
kid, Kid, step forward and buy the bag." Okay, you know, that's it.
Potentially insurgent youth has been narcotized. Write him off for black
power.

I didn't see things operating quite so comprehensively. What I saw going on
was like this. And this is why I was accused by people on the left of being
moderate and cowardly in my analysis. When you do this kind of research, when
you move into this murky world of rumors, conspiracy, the shadow universe
that is organized crime, narcotics and intelligence, you've got to adopt, I
think, a minimalist approach. You can't say anything you don't have a source
for. You can suspect all you want. But when you speak or write, you just
don't say it. That's speculation. You have a drink and you talk it over when
you're working with your colleagues trying to figure it out, then you can go
into anything you want. But when you actually speak or write, you've got to
stick to the facts. Otherwise, you're not doing your job ... it's nonsense.
So I adopted a policy that I had to have sources. In fact, my book when it
was published was gone over by a corporate lawyer at Harper & Row which is a
big publishing firm. The CIA actually got a copy of the manuscript and tried
to get certain passages deleted and removed. They pressured the corporation
for the right to do that. Ultimately I had to stand behind every sentence. I
had to have sources for it. The lawyers went through every sentence and said,
"Where's this?" I had to have an interview notebook, I had to show my logic.

What I found was this. This is my image. In effect the CIA's involvement in
narcotics was originally specific. It was going on in Laos and it didn't get
much beyond Laos. The Agency in Laos was, just like the agency globally in
the 1940s and 50s, myopic, short-sighted. It was fighting a war. It was
trying to stop the Ho Chi Minh trail from operating. In order to do so it had
a 30,000 man mercenary army made up largely of Hmong hill tribesmen who lived
in the area and were opium growers. The consequences of their complicity in
the narcotics traffic was something they just weren't interested in. From
1964-65 to 1975 they ran this secret war with a massive army of 30,000 men -
an operation of an unequaled duration and size. The CIA has never, ever run
as big an operation. I think that's even bigger than the Burma operation they
ran. The Nationalist Chinese forces never got to that size.

Barsamian: What about Afghanistan?

McCoy: That didn't last eleven years. When did it start? About '81 and it's
already over. It didn't make it. It lasted eight years. I don't think also ..
you see, the Mujahadin are not as integrated with the CIA. Those were just
rebels that the CIA was backing. This is a 30,000 man army that the CIA ran.
It was their army. They bought every bullet, they trained every soldier, they
had a mercenary officer corps under General Vang Pao that they ran. It wasn't
a "hands-off' operation. It was their army. That's why we've got all these
Hmong in Los Angeles and Minnesota and Wisconsin because we're looking after
our loyal tribe that fought and died for us in some kind of twisted logic.
But that's why they're all here. That's why we have all these mountain
peasants trying to adapt to life in this country.

Anyway, the CIA was complicitous in the Laotian drug trade at a number of
levels. First of all, let's look at the situation. Why would the CIA be
complicitous in the drug trade? Okay. They are allying themselves with a
people which grows two products up in the mountains: they grow rice for
subsistence and they grow opium for cash. They've grown opium really at a
high level since World War II. They grew small amounts before, but with the
boom in production in the Golden Triangle their production of opium expanded
and they became dependent upon it as a source for cash.

When the CIA allied itself with this tribe, after a few years, by 1970, the
economy, the culture, the whole of Hmong tribal society and the CIA's secret
army were one. It was a total merger. It was as much an alliance between the
CIA and the Hmong as it was between the United States and Great Britain in
World War II. We just didn't give the British bullets, we financed their
whole economy. We integrated our economy, our polity with Britain. Two
societies, two states merged.

Well, in a funny kind of way, that's what's going on in Laos right now. The
rice crop disappears because of the Meo policy of slash and burn - they chop
down the trees, they burn it, that clears the land and leaves ash and
phosphate on the ground and you get maybe two or three rice crops out of it
before the land goes bad and the men, because there's a distribution of labor
in the tribes, the men have to cut down the trees. The women till the crop,
harvest the rice crop. Now, opium, well done, can go ten or twelve years
whereas rice can only go two or three. So once it was started, very quickly
the Hmong ran out of rice and the CIA began dropping rice to them. But they
still had their opium. Now, the Hmong growing opium meant the CIA felt that
they had to support the Meo's opium crop because there's only two cash crops.
So they started actually using their remarkably extensive energistics network
of light aircraft and helicopters to actually move the opium out of the
mountains for the Meo because the war had disrupted the normal caravan routes
of Chinese merchants that comb the hills for the opium. That was gone by 1966
as the war spread. So the CIA collected the opium and became the major source
of transport, moving the opium from field to market, getting into the actual
flow of regional international commerce.

Barsamian: This is the Air America fleet?

McCoy: This is the Air America fleet, yeah. It's the CIA's contract airline.
It's just a fig leaf. It was the CIA's airline.

Barsamian: I notice you use Hmong and Meo interchangeably. Is that correct?

: Yes. The word has been used traditionally, Hmong, but it means slave in
Chinese. But if you look at all the ethnographic literature before the Hmong
migrated to this country, it always refers to them as Meo. Since they've
gotten here, the Hmong have regarded Meo as an impolite term and everybody...
You know, one of the dynamics of a multi-cultural society is that the group
gets to pick its own name. If African-Americans want to be African-Americans,
that's what you call them and you don't worry about it. The oppressed get to
pick the label of their oppression. So if the Hmongs want to be called
Hmongs, we call them Hmong.

Anyway, the CIA was absolutely aware of what it was doing. I went into a Meo
district - I spent ten days there in 1971 - and I went house to house and
asked every farmer how much opium they grew this year, last year, the year
before. I went back ten years. I said, "Okay, now, how much do you grow."
They said, "Well, we each grow about ten kilos," which will make you one kilo
of heroin by the time you boil it down and combine it." Most of them grow
about ten kilos from their fields. So, "What do you do with your ten kilos?"
"Well, up to about five years the Chinese used to come through with their
mules and we'd sell it to them and they'd give us some cloth, some money,
this or that and flashlight batteries, whatever, and we'd deal with them. Or
sometimes we'd take it down to the market down in the provincial capital."
"So what have you done over the last few years?" "What happens is the Air
America helicopter comes in and officers in the army, Hmong officers in the
army, get out and we sell them our opium."

Opium stinks. It's like wrapping up cow dung in leaves. You've got a whole
helicopter full of cow dung and you'd say to the pilot, the American CIA
pilot - do you know what you're carrying? He'd say, "Yeah, I'm carrying cow
dung." "How do you know?" "Well, I can smell it." Opium, in that kind of
confined space, load up a helicopter with opium and you know what you're
carrying. Everybody knows what it smells like. So they all knew that they
were carrying it. This entire district that I interviewed established a
pattern beyond doubt. The helicopters came there and left.

Where did it go? It went down to a place name Long Tien. Long Tien was one of
the most secret U.S. installations anywhere in the world. It was the
headquarters of the whole secret war in Laos, this attempt to fight the Ho
Chi Minh trail, to cut it with this mercenary army. Long Tien was closed to
any American other than somebody that had top intelligence classification.
I learned from Hmong sources that Vang Pao operated a very large heroin lab
there. At this point the CIA got hands off. They didn't mind moving the opium
out of the hills, but when it came to actually carrying the Number 4 heroin
that came out of that lab, they wouldn't touch that. What they did was they
established a private air line for Vang Pao called Zeng Kwan(?) Air
Transport, the province where he came from was Zeng Kwan. So they created,
you know, home-town province airlines and gave it to Vang Pao. They were
hands-off from that point.

Then what happened was there was a flow, there were other labs, and the Chief
of Staff of the Royal Laotian army - 99% of the Royal Laotian army's budget
came from the United States - the Chief of Staff of the Laotian army operated
the largest heroin refinery in the world in northwestern Laos. This flow of
heroin went down to southern Laos where Nguyen Cao Ky's sister ran a hotel.
There were three routes into Vietnam from southern Laos. One was Nguyen Cao
Ky's pilots would fly over from Tonsonhut(?) Airport in Saigon and would pick
up and fly back in. The Prime Minister of Vietnam, the President of Vietnam
also had their own distribution apparatuses. Our allies in Vietnam, the three
major political players, ran heroin distribution networks. There was a time
in the 1970s when I think half a dozen members of the South Vietnamese
parliament were picked up by customs by mistake carrying heroin in from Laos
and Thailand. You know, the whole South Vietnamese government was dealing
heroin to our troops. That was where it was coming from.
--[cont]--
Aloha, He'Ping,
Om, Shalom, Salaam.
Em Hotep, Peace Be,
Omnia Bona Bonis,
All My Relations.
Adieu, Adios, Aloha.
Amen.
Roads End

DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance�not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to