-Caveat Lector-

 >  Studies now show no significant behavioural differences between children
>  diagnosed ADHD and children without the diagnosis.  Ritalin, then, becomes
>  a vast, institutional MC programme.  Geri & Alfred, Vancouver, BC
>
>  =====
>  >  12.3.99
>  >  Ian Goddard on Mass Psych Drugging of Children
>  >
>  >
>  >  Ian strikes again with some more research and commentary on the
>  >  terrible, grotesque and unfortunately fast-growing trend in modern
>  >  Western society to drug our kids (especially male) into oblivion at the
>  >  slightest sign of the questionably-named "hyper-activity" (what used to
>  >  be called boys being boys), not to mention inquisitiveness,
>  >  individuality, originality or creativity.
>  >
>  >
>  >  NewsHawk� Inc.
>  >
>  >  -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
>  >
>  >  -------- Original Message --------
>  >  Subject: Mass Psychotropic Drugging
>  >  Date: Fri, 03 Dec 1999 22:14:36 -0500
>  >  From: Ian Goddard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >  It's amazing to think that as of 1996, 10 to 12 percent
>  >  of schoolboys in the U.S were on an addictive drug, Ritalin,
>  >  about which the manufacture states: "Sufficient data on safety
>  >  and efficacy of long-term use of Ritalin in children are not yet
>  >  available. ... Long-term effects of Ritalin in children have not
>  >  been well established." (1998) While the statements are an effort
>  >  to avoid liability for any harm caused by their product, they're
>  >  also largely true: after being on the market for decades, there
>  >  are few if any long-term studies on Ritalin use. But there are
>  >  some clues. The manufacture's insert also notes that growth
>  >  suppression has been reported.  Some research suggests
>  >  the possibility of brain atrophy after chronic use.
>  >
>  >  Those concerns may prove unfounded, but what if they prove
>  >  true and millions of lives are forever diminished during a
>  >  reckless diagnostic fad that redefines normal young-male
>  >  behavior as a psychiatric disorder requiring drug addiction?
>  >
>  >  It's good to see a popular columnist like George Will take on
>  >  this reckless and even totalitarian venture into mass drugging:
>  >
>  >  Boys Will Be Boys, or you can just drug them. George F. Will:
>  >  http://www.sacbee.com/voices/national/will/will_19991202.html
>  >  ==============================================================
>  >  The subtitle appears in The Washington Post (12/02/99, A39).
>  >  Here's a select excerpt:
>  >  ==============================================================
>  >
>  >  Boys Will Be Boys, or you can just drug them.
>  >
>  >  By George F. Will (12/02/99)
>  >
>  >  [...]
>  >
>  >  One theory holds that ADHD is epidemic because of the modern
>  >  acceleration of life--the environmental blitzkrieg of MTV,
>  >  video games, e-mail, cell phones, etc. But the magazine Lingua
>  >  Franca reports that Ken Jacobson, a doctoral candidate in
>  >  anthropology at the University of Massachusetts, conducted a
>  >  cross-cultural study of ADHD that included observation of two
>  >  groups of English school children, one diagnosed with ADHD,
>  >  the other not. He observed them with reference to 35 behaviors
>  >  (e.g., "giggling," "squirming," "blurting out") and found no
>  >  significant differences between the groups.
>  >
>  >  Children, he says, tend to talk, fidget and fool around--
>  >  "all the classical ADHD-type behaviors. If you're predisposed
>  >  to label any child as ADHD, the distracted troublemaker or the
>  >  model student, you'll find a way to observe these behaviors."
>  >  So what might explain such a predisposition? Paul R. McHugh,
>  >  professor of psychiatry at Johns Hopkins, writing in Commentary,
>  >  argues that ADHD, "social phobia" (usual symptom: fear of
>  >  public speaking) and other disorders certified by the American
>  >  Psychiatric Association's "Diagnostic and Statistical Manual
>  >  of Mental Disorders" are proliferating rapidly. This is
>  >  because of a growing tendency to regard as mental problems
>  >  many characteristics that are really aspects of individuality.
>  >
>  >  So pharmacology is employed to relieve burdensome aspects of
>  >  temperament. "Psychiatric conditions," says McHugh, "are
>  >  routinely differentiated by appearances alone," even when it
>  >  is "difficult to distinguish symptoms of illness from normal
>  >  variations in human life," or from the normal responses of
>  >  sensitive people to life's challenges. But if a condition
>  >  can be described, it can be named; once named, a distinct
>  >  disorder can be linked to a particular treatment. McHugh
>  >  says some experts who certify new disorders "receive
>  >  extravagant annual retainers from pharmaceutical companies
>  >  that profit from the promotion of disorders treatable by
>  >  the companies' medications."
>  >
>  >  The idea that most individuals deficient inattentiveness
>  >  or confidence are sick encourages what McHugh calls
>  >  pharmacological "mental cosmetics." This "should be
>  >  offensive to anyone who values the richness of human
>  >  psychological diversity. Both medically and morally,
>  >  encumbering this naturally occurring diversity with the
>  >  terminology of disease is a first step toward efforts,
>  >  however camouflaged, to control it." Clearly some children
>  >  need Ritalin. However, Ken Livingston, of Vassar's department
>  >  of psychology, writing in the Public Interest, says Ritalin
>  >  is sometimes used as a diagnostic tool--if it improves a
>  >  child's attention, ADHD is assumed.
>  >
>  >  [...]
>  >
>  >  READ FULL GEORGE WILL EDITORIAL:
>  >  =========================================================
>  >  http://sacbee.com/voices/national/will/will_19991202.html
>  >  =========================================================
>  >  http://washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/WPlate/1999-12/02/110l-120299-idx.html
>  >  =========================================================
>  >
>  >  Peter Breggin's letter to JAMA on Ritalin:
>  >  http://users.erols.com/igoddard/breggin.htm
>  >  Can child Ritalin use violate anti-Nazi law?:
>  >  http://users.erols.com/igoddard/nazi-rit.htm
>  >  Young boy on Ritalin goes on shooting spree:
>  >  http://www.erols.com/igoddard/conyers.htm
>  >  Excerpts from Breggin's book on Ritalin:
>  >  http://breggin.com/ritalinbkexcerpt.html
>  >
>  >  ------------------------------------------------------------
>  >  GODDARD'S JOURNAL: http://www.erols.com/igoddard/journal.htm
=====

DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance�not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to