-Caveat Lector-

from:
http://208.138.42.193/forum/a37f592f42625.htm
Click Here: <A HREF="http://208.138.42.193/forum/a37f592f42625.htm">Shadow
Government of The United States and the …</A>
-----
Since WWII, the CFR has filled key positions in virtually every
administration since then. Furthermore, since Eisenhower, every man who has
won the nomination for either party (except Goldwater in 1964 and Reagan in
1980) has been a member of the CFR:

DEMOCRATS

1. John W. Davis(1924)
2. Adlai Stevenson (1952,56)
3. John F. Kennedy (196b)
4. Hubert Humphrey (1968)
5. George McGovern (1972)
6. Jimmy Carter (1976,80)
7. Walter Mondale (1984)
8. Michael Dukakis (1988)
9. Bill Clinton (1992)

REPUBLICANS

1. Herbert Hoover (1928,32)
2. Wendell Wilkie (1940)
3. Thomas Dewey (1944,48)
4. Dwight Eisenhower (1952,56)
5. Richard Nixon (1960,68,72)
6. Gerald Ford (1976)
7. George Bush (1988,92) (who was also a director of the CFR 1977-1979)

An important point must be stressed: By controlling the candidates we vote
for, the CFR is assured their goal of world government.

Why? Because CFR presidents fill key positions with CFR members by
APPOINTMENT. (List of 110 Nixon appts. can be found in "None Dare Call it
Conspiracy, by Gary Allen, 1972; available from General Birch Services, P.O.
Box 8040, Appleton, Wis. 54913)

Since 1973, Tri Lat members have also filled key positions. One of the first
members of the Tri Lat was Jimmy Carter, whose administration had 19 Tri
Lateralists including:

1. Vice President Mondale
2. Secretary of State Vance
3. Secretary of the Treasury Blumenthal
4. Secretary of Defense Brown
5. National Security Advisor Bzrezinski

These five positions made up the National Security Council, and were held by
members of an organization which advocates world government - was their oath
of office to uphold the Constitution a mere formality? Others included:

1) nearly all of the undersecretaries of State;
2) nearly all of the undersecretaries of Treasurer;
3) the Panama Canal Treaty negotiator;
4) the Salt Treaty negotiator;
5) the Ambassador to the U.N. Andrew Young; and
6) the Ambassador to Italy, Richard Gardner (remember, the Israel Moses Sief
Banks of Italy are top stockholders in the Fed, and Gardner advocated an
"...end run around our national Sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece.")

An article about Bzrezinski(Carter's National Security Advisor, executive
director of the Tri Lat, and author of "Between Two Ages") and Carter
appeared in the March 1, 1978 New York Times:

"The two men met for the first time about four years ago, when Mr. Bzrezinski
was the executive director of the Tri Lateral Commission, and had the
foresight to ask the then obscure governor of Georgia to join its ranks.
Their initial teacher-student relationship blossomed during the campaign and
appears to have grown closer still."

Bzrezinski(teacher)praises Marxism, thinks the U.S. is in obsolescence, and
advocates a world government; the student was the President of the United
States!

Another article, written by CFR past president Winston Lord, appeared in the
August 4-ll, 1978 issue of "W" magazine. He boasted:

"The Tri Lateral Commission doesn't secretly run the world, the Council of
Foreign Relations does that."

Winston Lord is currently the Assistant Secretary for East Asian/Pacific
Affairs (State Dept.) and special envoy to Red China.

Contrary to candidate Clinton's "stand" on human rights, Red China has
recently received an unconditional MFN trade status with the U.S.; never mind
that over 10,000 Chinese dissidents have been murdered since Tianemen Square.

The CFR domination of just the last three Administrations reveals:

1. 347 under Reagan;
2. 382 under Bush, and
3. 387 under Clinton (over 1 in 8 of their total membership)

The following CFR members hold top positions in our current Administration:

1. President Bill Clinton
2. Vice President Al Gore
3. Secretary of State Warren Christopher
4. Deputy Secretary of State Clifton R. Wharton
5. CIA Director R. James Woolsey
6. National Security Advisor W. Anthony Lake
7. Deputy National Security Advisor Samuel R. Berger
8. Secretary of Defense Les Aspen
9. Chrmn., Intel. Adv. Bd. William J. Crowe
10. U.N. Ambassador Madeleine Albright
11. Sec. H.& H.S. Donna E. Shalala
12. OMB Alice M. Rivlin
13. Secretary H.U.D. Henry G. Cisneros
14. Chrmn., Council Ec. Advisors Laura D. Tyson
15. Secretary of the Treasury Lloyd M. Bentsen (former CFR)
16. Secretary of the Interior Bruce Babbitt
17. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg

There are 370 others as well.

Have you ever wondered why, since WWII, U.S. foreign policy has allowed
Communist expansion? Consider the roles of the following CFR members since
WWII:

1. George Marshall and Dean Acheson engineered the betrayal of Chiang
Kai-shek, allowing communist takeover of China;
2. Dean Acheson and Dean Rusk arranged the no-win undeclared war in Korea and
the removal of General McArthur;
3. John Foster Dulles and Allen Dulles, under CFR President Eisenhower
betrayed Hungarian freedom fighters and knowingly brought Fidel Castro to
power in Cuba;
4. McGeorge Bundy, Adlai Stevenson, and John J. McCloy saw to it that the Bay
of Pigs invasion to oust Castro failed;
5. Dean Rusk, Robert McNamara, and Henry Cabot Lodge pushed the U.S. into
Vietnam - and then drew up the rules making victory impossible;
6. Richard Nixon and Henry Kissinger continued these policies, which led to
communist takeover of South Vietnam, Cambodia, and Laos;
7. Henry Kissinger, Ellsworth Bunker, and Sol Linowitz arranged for the
Panama Canal giveaway - and gave $400 million dollars to that Marxist
dictatorship to take it;
8. Under leadership of Zbigniew Bzrezinski, Cyrus Vance, and Warren
Christopher, the Carter Administration undermined U.S. allies in Iran and
Nicaragua;
9. Under Reagan, George Schultz, William J. Casey, and Malcom Baldridge
arranged U.S. foreign aid to communist Romania, communist Poland, and the
U.S.S.R.; they also impeded anti-Communists in El Salvador and Nicaragua.

Why? It is easier to control oppressive Marxist regimes than nations of free
men - in a one-world socialist government.

Yes, Col. House's agenda of controlling both political parties in the U.S.
has been achieved, through, as Madison warned, "silent and gradual
encroachment." An excellent history of the CFR is found in "The Shadows of
Power" (James Perloff, 1988, Western Island Publishers, P.O. Box 8040,
Appleton, Wis. 54913, 1-414-749-3783).

Just as Col. House led an American contingent to Paris in 1919, there are
also powerful like-minded organizations in Europe, through financial control,
promoting a one-world government.

The most prominent of these is the Bilderbergers (est. in 1954), and is
largely responsible for the unification of Europe through the Treaty of Rome
(1957).

Regardless of where these groups are from, their goal is a world government,
and the U.N.. which they established, is the platform from which it will be
launched.

The Rockefellers play a key role in America's financial and political life.
Currently, David Rockefeller is the honorary chairman of both the CFR and the
Tri Lateral Commission, as well as (through his Chase Manhattan Bank) a top
stockholder in the Federal Reserve.

The Rockefeller influence goes back to 1890, when John D. Rockefeller was
refining nearly 90% of all crude oil in the country, and frequently worked in
concert with Wall Street banker J.P. Morgan. By the turn of the century, John
D. purchased the Chase Bank and brother William bought the National City Bank
of New York, and in 1913, became part of the Federal Reserve System.

The Rockefeller Foundation was also in full operation by that time,
effectively nullifying the "tax on the wealthy" as the proponents of 16th
Amendment had sought.

According to the Sept. 16, 1916 New York Times, the Rockefeller oil holdings
alone were worth $500 million. By 1930, the 200 largest corporations, under
Rockefeller and Morgan influence, held over 49% of the assets of all 40,000
corporations in the country.

AT&T (controlled by Morgan) had greater assets than the total wealth in 21
states.

The influence of the Rockefeller and Morgan groups was so great, they could
affect the economic life of the country to a large degree and almost control
its political life on the Federal level.

The Rockefellers increased their leverage over the economy throughout the
Depression years:

1) many of their competitors were hard-hit by the Stock Market Crash;
2) and, being a part of the Fed, the Rockefellers benefited from massive
government borrowing;
3) which, in turn, furthered their control of industry, soon to be mobilized
for war production.

America's entry into WWII enhanced all of the above, and their wealth
continued to be funneled into the tax-exempt foundations.

Following the War, the U.S. was in such bad economic condition, that in 1950,
it declared bankruptcy a second time and the Secretary of Treasury was
appointed as "Receiver" in the Bankruptcy (Reorganization Plan No. 26, Title
5 U.S.C.A 903, Public Law 94-564, Legislative History, page 5967).

In 1953, Congressman Carroll Reese of Tennessee initiated a Congressional
Committee to investigate the tremendous influence of the huge tax-exempt
foundations and their control over the economy.

Yet, even Congress had little influence in diminishing the tremendous
influence and control the international bankers exercised in the economy. The
Rockefeller's wealth continued to expand - their foundations allows their
wealth to compound.

Each year the Rockefellers can dump up to half of their income into their
foundations and deduct these donations from their income tax. Nelson
Rockefeller admitted at his confirmation hearings (for V.P.):

"The foundation pays no capital gains tax and no income tax, so those funds
can continue to multiply."

And indeed they have. The following information on the Rockefeller's more
current wealth is derived from Congressman Patman's Report in the
Congressional Record. What I am about the give you is direct ownership of
stock; pay particular attention to the oil companies.

In direct stock, they own: Exxon - 156.7 million; Rockefeller Center - 98
million; Standard of California - 85 million; IBM - 72.6 million; Chase
Manhattan Bank - 18 million. Others that they have 10 million or more in are:
Mobil Oil, Eastman Kodak, General Electric, Texas Instruments, Minnesota
Mining & Mfg., and they own significant portions of about 50 other major
American companies.

A look at their security holdings reveals: They control Chase-Manhattan Bank,
City National Bank of New York, and Chemical Bank, among others; these are in
the top of the list.

The Chase Manhattan Bank deals in many foreign countries as well as
corporations: well over 100 countries with about 50,000 affiliated banks.

A look at the interlocking boards of directors in the insurance industry, at
the time this data was compiled, the Rockefellers controlled 3 of the 4
largest insurance companies in the world, that being Metropolitan Life,
Equitable Life, and New York Life.

The assets of these three at that time was $113 billion. They control others
as well.

Just to summarize the banks and insurance companies, this amounts to 25% of
all the assets of the 50 largest banks, and 30% of all the assets of the 50
largest life insurance companies. This gives them leverage over the economy
that goes far beyond direct ownership.

Congressman Patman also found that if you control 5% or more of the stock in
a corporation, whose stock is widely held, you have in effect, minority
control. If we take those corporations that the Rockefeller family has 10%
control, or 5%, and at least two members of their board of directors, we have
the following: Exxon, Mobil Oil, Standard of California, Standard of Indiana,
International Harvester, Inland Steel, Marathon Oil, Quaker Oats,
Wheeling-Pittsburgh Steel, Freeport Sulphur, and International Basic Economy
Corporation.

Corporations which are probably under Rockefeller influence, and I say
probably, because it's extremely difficult to trace stock ownership through
trusts and foundations, are these: Texaco, IT&T, Westinghouse, Boeing,
International Paper, Sperry Rand, Xerox, National Cash Register, National
Steel, American Home Products, Pfizer, Avon, and Merck.

Merck has just agreed to buy Medco Containment, the nation's largest marketer
of discount prescription medicines. The acquisition makes Merck, by far, the
biggest integrated producer and distributor of pharmaceuticals in the
country. (Wall Street Journal, 7-29-93).

Transportation companies under the Rockefeller influence include Penn
Central, TWA, Eastern Airlines, United Airlines, National Airlines, Delta,
Braniff, and Consolidated Freightways.

Others they control through interlocking boards of directors are: Allied
Chemical, Annaconda Copper, DuPont, Monsanto, Olin-Mathison, Borden, National
Distillers, Shell, Gulf, Union Oil,.Dow, Celanese, Pittsburgh Plate Glass,
Cities Service, Stauffer Chemical, Continental Oil, Union Carbide, American
Cyanamid, American Motors, Bendix, and Chrysler. Isn't that odd?

Who's the biggest stock holders in Chrysler and you had to bail them out?
Other's are CIT Financial, SS Kresge and RH Macy.

To summarize what I've just given you, that's 37 of the top 100 industrials,
9 of the top 20 transportation firms, the nation's No. 1 utility, three of
the top four insurance companies, plus scores of smaller companies engaged in
manufacturing, distribution, retail sales, loans or investments. These are
just the known figures.

So can you start to see the economic power the Rockefeller family Now, in
addition to this, recognize the power they have through the membership in the
Tri Lateral Commission and the CFR through other heads of multi national
corporations.

There were published several reports under the Senate Investigating
Subcommittee on Reports, Accounting, and Management." They're under the
"Committee on Governmental Affairs, United States Senate, January 1978."

The first report is entitled " Interlocking Boards of Directors Among Major
U.S. Corporations".

This Senate study looked at the top 130 corporations and placed every name of
every board of directors into a computer and found this: 70% of the top 130
corporations are interlocked directly or indirectly with the lower companies.
They even found many competing companies and corporations have the same board
of directors and several members of the same board of directors, which is
illegal according to Section 8 of the Clayton Act.

When this point is reached, you don't have competition anymore, you have
price-fixing. Some of these people were sitting on 16 difference boards of
directors! In the April 1993 IBM proxy statement, this can be demonstrated.
Also, 8 of these 18 directors are CFR. (IBM Notice of 1993 Annual Meeting and
Proxy Statement; IBM, Armonk, N.Y. 10504)

The second report the same committee did was called "Voting Rights-Major U.S.
Corporations". They looked at 122 corporations and found this: One
corporation, Morgan Guaranty and Trust, was in the top five vote-holders of
57 of those corporations; another, City National Bank of New York, was in the
top five voteholders of 36 of those.

That's 93 of the top 122 corporations. Now, who was the top vote-holder in
the parent company of Morgan Guaranty and Trust? Number one was City National
Bank of New York, and number two was the Chase Manhattan Bank, which means
that the Rockefellers controlled Morgan Guaranty and Trust and also the City
National Bank of New York. The Rockefellers are in the top five voteholders
in 93 of those 122 corporations. This is what the Subcommittee found in 1978.
Why didn't we hear about it? At that time, half of the members of the Senate
Subcommittee over this study were CFR/Tri Lat.

There shouldn't be much doubt who controls the oil here. But what about the
Middle East oil? Now, supposedly, OPEC has nationalized, in most cases, the
oil fields over there. Aramco, an oil consortium of Exxon, Mobil, Texaco, and
SOCAL got 42% on every petrodollar and OPEC 58% during the late 70's "energy
crisis ". Do you think it bothered them that the price of gas doubled while
the media was telling us there was an oil shortage?

The Tri Lat "engineered" the crisis. Its planning publication is called the
"Triangle Papers". On page 73 of Publication No. 17, entitled "Energy:
Managing the Transition (1978), we find this:

"We therefore urge each Tri Lateral government to review its tax structure
and develop specific energy taxes. An obvious example here is a higher
federal excise tax on gasoline in the United States."

In other words, they created the crisis, and we paid for it at the pumps
through higher prices and higher taxes. Who got blamed? OPEC.

The same people who control the oil here also exercise control in the Middle
East. According to the 1974 report of the Senate Foreign Relations
Subcommittee on Multinational Corporations, the Aramco consortium attempted
to block America's emergency airlift to Israel, during the Yom Kippur War of
1973.

These companies cooperated closely with Saudi Arabia to deny oil and fuel to
the U.S. Navy. In the 1930's, it was Standard Oil (Rockefeller) money that
established the oil industry over there - Makes one wonder about Desert
Storm.

Remember, it is Kissinger's belief that a world government can be brought
about by controlling an international monetary system, oil/energy, and food.
Consider how far the control of food has gotten:

In the seventies, Senator Gannon ran a study in five counties of Kansas. He
found that 85,000 acres over the 8,OOO acres legal limit were illegally owned
by large multinational corporations.

The American Agriculture paper also reported that six coal companies, who
were in turn controlled by the oil companies, owned somewhere in the
neighborhood of 80% of the farm land in Illinois. These are just a few
examples.

Remember, in 1973, the Tri Lateral Commission was formed, and in 1973 the
large multinational corporations started diversifying. Into what? Food.

Through interlocking directors, at the time of this study, Gulf was
interlocked with General Foods and Ralston Purina; Mobil Oil with General
Foods and H.J. Heinz; Standard of California with American Potato, Basic
Vegetable Products, and Broadway Hale Stores; Atlantic Richfield Co. with
Lincoln County Livestock, and Diamond A Cattle; Philips Petroleum with
Campbell Soup; Citgo with Kraft and Campbell Soup; Getty Oil with A&P and
Carnation; Standard Oil Of Ohio with National Biscuit; Hesslup with Borden;
Safeway is controlled by the Chase Manhattan Bank; Tenneco controlled. at the
time Of this report, approximately one and a half million acres of land, gas,
oil, and chemicals; IT&T is interlocked with Wonderbread;

Case (farm implements) and International Harvester are controlled by the
Rockefellers and John Deere S president, at that time, a member of the Tri
Lateral Commission.

Who was the biggest beef producer through feedlots and fatteners? Greyhound
bus. Who was the biggest pork producer in the world? Arnior, owned by
Greyhound bus. One Of the largest cattle feeders by volume in the U.S. as
well as one Of the largest grain companies is Cargill, (run by Whitney
McMillan, Tri Lat member), and they bought Missouri Beef, one Of the largest
beef packing plants.

Does the recent "collapse" of the U.S.S.R. tie into the New World Order? The
plans to bring the Soviet Union into a one-world government goes back to
1907. The very same people who established the Federal Reserve Act, the
graduated income tax, and the CFR also bankrolled the Bolshevik Revolution.
This was a well-known fact in intelligence circles at that time.

In 1953, CFR member H. Rowan Gaither (Chairman of Ford Foundation) made a
statement to Norman Dodd (chief investigator for the special Congressional
Committee to Investigate Tax-Exempt Foundations):

"We shall use our grant-making power to SO alter life in the United States
that we can be comfortably inerged with the Soviet Union."

Consider the following excerpts from the Washington Post Weekly (May 4,
1992):

"The IMF, the World Bank, and the major industrial nations have decided to
take a risk with Russia and former Soviet Republics... Russian Deputy Prime
Minister Yegor Gaidar...last week swept through Washington, reassuring
business leaders, as well as finance ministers and central bankers from the
Group Of Seven major industrial nations."

"In an effort to get the banking system under control, Gerald Corrigan, the
President Of the New York Federal Reserve Bank (CFR/Tri Lat), has been
visiting Moscow regularly since September (1991) to advise the Central bank
and commercial banks. An acquaintance Of former Fed Chairman Paul A. Volcker
(CFR/Tri Lat), Says Volcker is close to an agreement that would make him
consultant to Russian President Boris Yeltzin."

"In addition, David Rockefeller (CFR/Tri Lat), a former Chairman Of the Chase
Manhattan Bank, says he has agreed to be part Of a group Corrigan is
assembling that might help establish banking business in Russia."

"Once the IMF program is in place, the World Bank will supply direct support
to the agriculture and oil sectors Of the Russian economy."

"The oil Sector is enough to solve any financial Crisis they (the Russians)
might have", says World Bank President Lewis Preston (CFR & formerly with
Morgan Guaranty). He says there are 33 undeveloped fields in W. Siberia."

Isn't that interesting? The World Bank and the IMF are "supporting" the
agriculture and oil sectors thereby controlling the food and energy. It would
be more accurate to say that the CFR/Tri Lat are controlling the agriculture
and oil sectors.

Furthermore, the CFR/Tri Lat involvement in Russia's central bank has
recently (July 26, 1993) mandated a call in of all pre-1993 rubles, crippling
the ability of the Russian citizen to provide for his family.

Not only does the U.S. taxpayer underwrite about 20% of the IMF and World
Bank funding, but the afore-mentioned "G-7i' central bankers are also
stockholders in our Federal Reserve.

Yeltzin is working closely with the CFR/Tri Lat - what about Gorbachev? I
have a transcript of Gorbachev's May 6, 1992 speech given at Westminster
College. On page 9 he states:

"However, even now, at a time of sharply increased interdependence in the
world, many countries are morbidly jealous of their sovereignty, many peoples
of their national independence and identity - This is one of the newest
global contradictions, one which must be overcome by joint effort." (Speech
May 6, 1992, Westminster College, "The River of Time and the Imperative of
Action" pg 9, by Mikhail Sergeyevich Gorbachev.)

In Vancouver earlier this year, President Clinton promised Yeltzin $1.6
billion in direct assistance, in addition to the billions promised by the
G-7; Yet most Americans have no idea as to how long and how much Western aid
and trade has gone into the USSR since 1917.

1) After the Bolshevik Revolution, Standard Oil of New Jersey (Rockefeller)
bought 50% of Nobel's huge Caucasus oil fields;

2) In 1927, Standard Oil of New York (Rockefeller) built a refinery in
Russia;

3) In 1928, Rockefeller's Chase Bank was involved in selling Bolshevik Bonds
in the U.S. - patriotic organizations denounced Chase as an "international
fence".

In the Congressional Record of June 15, 1933, Congressman Louis McFadden
said:

"The Soviet government has been given U.S. Treasury funds by the Federal
Reserve Banks acting through the Chase Bank and Morgan Guaranty Trust Co. and
other banks in New York City...Open up the books of Amtorg, the trading
organization of the Soviet government in New York, and of Gostorg, the
general office of the Soviet Trade Organization, and the State Bank of the
U.S.S.R. and you will be staggered to see how much American money has been
taken from the U.S. Treasury for the benefit of Russia. Find out what
business has been transacted for the State Bank of Soviet Russia by its
correspondent, the Chase Bank of New York".

I might add that Congressman McFadden later died under "mysterious
circumstances".

The following information is derived from Antony Sutton's comprehensive book
"Best Enemy Money Can Buy", ( by Antony Sutton, 1986, Liberty House Press,
2027 Iris Ln., Billings, Montana 59102) Sutton is acknowledged as the
foremost expert on western technology and Soviet economic development.

He was a research fellow at the Hoover Institute On War & Peace; and
therefore had access to information most researchers outside establishment
circles were denied. Revealing this information cost him his job. Sutton
documents that:

1) Ford set up the Gorki vehicle plant in 1929, upgraded by the Lend-Lease
programs of WWII; vehicles produced in this plant were used against U.5.
troops in Korea and Vietnam;

2) The Soviet tank industry began in 1929 under the guise of producing
tread-type tractors; The Stalingrad plant was entirely constructed in the
U.S., dismantled, and re-erected in the U.S.S.R. by American engineers. This
was just one of several which utilized American machine tools and equipment;

3) In 1946, the Soviets bought 55 Rolls Royce turbo-jet engines from Great
Britain, and reproduced them in quantity on American and German machine
tools. These engines powered the MiG-15 fighters, used against our F-86 Sabre
jets in Korea;

4) 37 of the 96 Soviet ships regularly employed on the "Haiphong Run" during
the Vietnam War (keeping North Vietnam supplied) used diesel engines of
western origin. The missile-carrying Soviet ships of the 1962 Cuban Missile
Crisis were propelled by engines produced in Denmark - a NATO ally;

5) From 1960 until 1972, the Soviets sought acquisition of a specialized
machine tool manufactured by the Bryant Chucking Company of Springfield,
Vermont. This machine, the "Centalign B", produced high-precision miniature
ball bearings, supplying 85% of its output to the U.S. defense industry for
guidance systems in our missiles. Under President Nixon and National Security
Advisor Henry Kissinger, approval was given in 1972 to export 164 of these
machines to the U.S.S.R. By 1974, the Soviets had MIRV'd their ICBMs. This
was made public on March 8, 1983 by Secretary of Defense Casper Weinberger,
stating that the greatly improved accuracy of Soviet missiles was derived
from U.S. technology;

6) In the 70's, the Kama River truck plant was built in the Soviet Union. It
covers 36 square miles and can produce 100,000 multiaxle 10-ton trucks/year.
75% of the equipment and technology is from the U.S.; 25% is Italian and
European, including European subsidiaries of U.S. companies. American
taxpayers underwrote the Kama River financing through the Export/Import Bank.
Chase Manhattan (Rockefeller was the lead financier. It was built by the
Pullman - Swindell Co. (a subsidiary of M.W. Kellogg Co.) of Pittsburgh;

7) The Volgograd automobile plant, built 1968-1971, has a capacity of 600,000
vehicles/year. Three-fourths of the equipment were U.S. manufacture,
including key transfer lines and automated tools. The construction contract
was awarded to Fiat S.P.A., a firm closely associated with the Chase
Manhattan Bank;

8) The 647 mile highway which connects the U.S.S.R. with Kabul, Afghanistan
was under construction in 1966, built with Soviet money and U.S. foreign aid
money. A 67 mile stretch of road through the Salang Pass cost $42 million,
prompting a U.S. engineer to say it was the costliest section of road he had
ever seen. This highway felt the rumble of Soviet tanks, heavy trucks, and
military vehicles (many produced with American equipment and money) in
December, 1979 when the Soviets invaded Afghanistan. The results - over one
million casualties.

Richard F. Starr, a former U.S. Ambassador, has said that the former Soviet
Union has stored at least 362 million metric tons of grain (much of it from
the West), in fallout shelters. These supplies, according to University of N.
Carolina economist Steven Rosefield, could feed the entire population of the
former U.S.S.R. for 3-4 years.

In addition, there are reserves in 87 cities throughout the U.S.S.R. giving
them total reserves in excess of 5 years. By contrast, the U.S. has 30-45
days of reserves. These Soviet reserves, given to them by the U.S. through
credits with deferred payments, are being paid for by the U.S. taxpayer.

Senator Malcom Wallop (R-Wy.) pointed out that Soviet indebtedness is
estimated to be at least $100 billion and that Western loans to Soviet banks
located in the West are not included in that figure; 80% of these loans are
"untied", not restricted to any program or project. As of 1990, $700 million
a month were being loaned to the Soviet government.

In the meantime, the U.S. has spent billions in defense budgets to protect us
from those who are recipients of not only loans and credits, but our
technology as well! ("Best Enemy Money Can Buy" contains Appendix F:
"U.S.firms trading with the Soviet Union in the 1960-1986 period, pages
231-235).

David Funderburk, a former Ambassador to Romania under the Reagan
Administration, stepped down from his post in protest of U.S. policy toward
Communist Romania and Eastern Europe. In his book, "Betrayal of America", he
documents the collaboration between the leadership elite of the State
Department and the Communist countries:

"...we're propping up Communist regimes which are bankrupt and would fall
without our aid...aid from the U.S. government, from big business, and from
big banks in America..." (Betrayal of America" by David B. Funderburk, former
U.S. Ambassador to Romania, 1991, Dist. by Betrayal of America, P.O. Box
1124, Dur.n, N. Carolina 28334).

In his book, "Reminiscences", John D. Rockefeller informs us:

"One of our greatest helpers has been the State Department in Washington. Our
ambassadors, and ministers, and consuls have aided to push our way into new
markets to the utmost corners of the world."

Is it any wonder? The CFR has dominated the State Department since WWII.

Why don't we hear about these things from the media? At the 1991
Bilderbergers' (European-based globalists) meeting in Baden Baden, Germany,
the opening speaker was David Rockefeller. He said this:

"We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time magazine,
and other publications whose directors have attended our meetings, and
respected their promises of discretion for almost 40 years...It would have
been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been
subject to the bright lights of publicity during these years."

Who was among the invited guests? Bill Clinton and Dan Quayle. Among the
communication corporations represented in the CFR/Tri Lat are these:

1. CBS
2. NBC
3. ABC
4. PBS
5. CNN
6. Washington Post
7. New York Times Co.
8. Wall Street Journal
9. Newsweek
10. U.S. News and World Report
11. Time, Inc
12. Associated Press and Reuters (both of which local papers rely upon)

CFR members who are TV news personalities include:

1. Dan Rather
2. Tom Brokaw
3. David Brinkley
4. John Chancellor
5. Barbara Walters
6. Diane Sawyer
7. Robert NcNeil
8. Jim Lehrer
9. Daniel Schorr

David Brinkley (CFR), to a meeting of the American TV/Radio Broadcasters
Association, said this of the American people:

"All they know about public policy is what we tell them."

Sadly enough - true.

Scripture warns us about ignorance. Hosea 4:6:

"My people are destroyed from a lack of knowledge."

Public ignorance and apathy are allies of the globalists, and only recently
have we heard the brazen call for a New World Order. Yet this phrase is
nothing new - It has been on the back of a one dollar bill since 1935. Under
the pyramids the Latin phrase "Novus Ordo Seclorum", which means a "new
secular order of the age;" in other words, a new world order without God.

The conspirators are confident of bringing in a one-world government, which
includes plans to scrap our Constitution. They have been quietly acquiring
the necessary 34 states' approval to call up a Constitution Convention
(ConCon) in an effort to install a new constitution. ("New States of America"
from "The Emerging Constitution", by Rexford G. Tugwell, 1974, Harper & Row).
it is already written, and has been largely promoted by a group called the
"Committee on a Constitutional System" (C.C.S). 19 of its 51-member board of
directors are also members of the CFR. C. Douglas Dill (CFR, former Sec.
Treasury) said:

"Such a significant shift in our Constitution is unlikely to come about
except as a result of a crisis that is very grave indeed."

A financial crisis today would further their goals just as it did in 1929.

Will the new "deficit reduction bill" help the country or hasten a crisis?
The majority of the bill's spending cuts will not take place until the
President's term is over; in the meantime, over $800 million interest each
and every day will be added to the debt.

Will a balanced budget amendment (BBA) reign in spending? Every BBA proposal
in Washington today would allow Congress to override any such amendment by a
60% vote. If Congress was sincere, a simple majority vote in the House (218)
and the Senate (51) would balance the budget.

Remember, the country is still bankrupt; Furthermore, the Secretary of the
Treasury is also the Governor of the International Monetary Fund (IMF). This
is an alien/foreign financial institution (22 U.S.C.A. 286).

What does this mean? Look on the back of any returned check you mailed to the
IRS for federal taxes since 1976: you will find that it has been endorsed by
a Federal Reserve Bank.

Who owns the Fed? Your tax payment was allowed to go right out of the
country! The definition of the national debt means all obligations owed by
the Treasury Department to its creditors - i.e., the international bankers.

The real motive behind a balanced budget amendment is not to reign in
spending, but to adopt a new Constitution. How close are they? They have 32
of the required 34. The American public got duped into the Federal Reserve
Act and the 16th Amendment. Would it be any different now? Hosea 4:6:

"My people are destroyed from a lack of knowledge."

A number of things could precipitate a crisis, and like in 1929, could bring
about a run on the banks. The President could invoke "Emergency Banking
Regulation No. 1", which would restrict your right to withdraw on your bank
account, and "...prohibit withdrawals of cash in any case...that such
withdrawal is sought for the purpose of hoarding."

The following Executive Orders were combined by Richard Nixon into E.O. No.
11490, which activates all of the following under national emergency
conditions:

* EO 10995 provides for the control of the communications media
* EO 10997 provides for the control of the power, fuels, and minerals
* EO 10998 provides for the control of all food and farms
* EO 10999 provides for the control of all transportation, highways, etc.
* EO 11000 provides for the mobilization of all civilians into work brigades
under government supervision
* EO 11001 provides for control of all health, education, and welfare
* EO 11002 designates the postmaster to operate a national registration of
all persons
* EO 11003 provides for control of all airports and aircraft
* EO 11004 provides for relocation of any populations
* EO 11005 provides for control of railroads, waterways, and public storage
facilities

A one-world government would require a world law, a world court, and for
enforcement, a world army. You can understand why our Constitution must be
scrapped, because Article 1, Section 8, clauses 13-16 gives Congress
exclusive power over our armed forces. The sovereignty of our nation depends
upon its ability to defend itself. Period.

What provisions would place our armed forces under a one-world government?

In Volume 9, of the 25 Volume set of the 1982 United States Code, on pages
554-558, you will find Public Law 87-297, which calls for the disarmament of
the U.S. This has been in force since 1961.

This is further explained in "The Blueprint for Peace Race" as "Publication
No. 4, General Series 3" published by the U.S. Arms Control and Disarmament
Agency, May, 1962. An abridged version of this is State Department Document
7277. (Department of State, Disarmament Series 5, released September 1961,
Office of Public Services, Bureau of Public Affairs, U.S. Government Printing
Office, Washington, D.C.)

The armed forces of this country are to be, in three stages, placed under the
U.N. Undersecretary for Political and Security Council Affairs. This position
has always overseen all U.N. military operations since 1946 - it has also
been held by a Soviet this entire time (except 1954-1957, held by a communist
from Yugoslavia). At the present, our troops in Somalia serve under Turkish
General Bir, who answers to Russian U.N. Undersecretary Vladimir Petrovsky.
The American public is being warmed up to the idea of U.S. troops serving a
foreign flag, under the auspices of "humanitarian assistance."

Furthermore, the disarmament plan has provisions to permanently station
foreign U.N. troops in our closed military bases, for "training". Of course,
the media will tell us how much this will help the local economies.

At the end of stage 1 (of 3 stages), one half of our armed forces are to be
placed under U.N. control, and all citizen-owned guns banned, hence the myth
that gun control is crime control. What they don't say is that, under a world
government, all populations must be disarmed. In this country, names would be
collected from registration forms required by the 1968 Gun Control Act (which
is patterned from the 1938 Nazi "Law on Weapons").

Why would the military leadership of this country, sworn to defend it, allow
the armed forces to be placed under a U.N. flag?

CFR members, Defense Department

1. Sec. Defense Les Aspin
2. Undersec. for Policy Frank G. Wisner II
3. Asst. Sec. Internat'l Security Affairs Henry S. Rowen
4. Deputy Asst. Sec. Nuclear Fcs./Arms Control Frank C. Miller
5. Deputy Asst. Sec. Europe and NATO W. Bruce Weinrod
6. Chmn. Defense Policy Bd. Adm. Seymour Weiss
7. Sec. Army Michael P.W. Stone
8. Sec. Air Force Donald B. Rice CFR members, Joint Chiefs of Staff

1. Chairman Gen. Colin Powell
2. Army Gen. Carl E. Vuono
3. CO Pac AF Gen. Merrill A. McPeak
4. Dir. Strat. Plans/Policy Lt. Gen. George L. Butler
5. Com., Air Univ Lt. Gen. Charles T. Boyd
6. AF Inspector Gen. Lt. Gen. Bradley C. Hosmer

CFR members, past Sec. of Defense CFR members, past Allied Supreme Commanders

1. 1957-59 McElroy 1949-52 Eisenhower
2. 1959-61 Gates 1952-53 Ridgeway
3. 1961-63 McNamara 1953-56 Gruenther
4. 1969-73 Laird 1956-63 Norstad
5. 1973 Richardson 1963-69 Lemnitzer
6. 1975-77 Rumsfeld 1969-74 Goodpaster
7. 1977-81 Brown 1974-79 Haig
8. 1981-87 Weinberger 1979-87 Rogers
9. 1987-89 Carlucci
10. 1989-93 Cheney
11. 1993- Aspin

There are, however, many in our armed forces who are patriotic to this
nation. Pray for them.

As James Madison warned, there has been a:

"silent and gradual encroachment of those in power."

We are on the verge of "global tyranny", as Jasper so aptly states.

We are a Constitutional Republic, steeped in Christian heritage and
guaranteed certain God-given inalienable rights. I will repeat this again: we
have God-given rights - we are accountable to Him for everything, including
our liberty and freedom.

Our rights carry responsibilities. To dismiss those responsibilities is a sin
of omission, no different than a sin of commission - God detests both.
Proverbs 13:22 says:

"A good man leaves an inheritance to his children's children."

Over 957,000 patriotic Americans have given their lives in defense of our
country. Their legacy is the freedom and liberty we now have. We are their
posterity. Don't let their sacrifice become in vain.

Although we are not on the battlefields of France, or an atoll in the
Pacific, or a hill in Korea, or a jungle in Vietnam, or even a desert in
Saudi Arabia, we are indeed engaged in a battle.

That battlefield is in America. A war is being waged against God, country,
and family. Why? We are not only the last bastion of freedom, but 85% of the
Great Commission (Mt. 28:19, 20) emanates from America.

What can we do?

1) Invite the Lord into your life. Greater is He who is in you than he who is
in the world (I John 4:4);

2) Become informed, not misinformed. You know whose camp the major media is
in - and it's not in yours. The best publication I know of for becoming
informed is "The New American" magazine, a bi-weekly publication written by
people who embrace the same ideals as our Founders (P.O. Box 8040, Appleton,
Wisconsin 54913, 1-800-341-1522),

3) Pray for your elected representative - many have forgotten what
"representative" means. Voice your concerns to them - but do so from a
perspective of knowledge and insight. There are many groups who address the
effects - but have no insight as to the cause.

4) Are you one of those people who say, "I don't know where the money goes -
it costs twice as much to live beyond my means as it use to"? Romans 13:8
says:

"Let no debt remain outstanding, except the continuing debt to love one
another."

If you live by the world system, you will be subjugated by the same.

Alexis De Tocqueville, in 1840, made the following observation after his
visit in America:

"I sought for the key to the greatness and genius of America in her
harbors...; in her fertile fields and boundless forests; in her rich mines
and vast world commerce; in her public school system and institutions of
higher learning. I sought for it in her democratic Congress and in her
matchless Constitution. Not until I went into the churches of America and
heard her pulpits flame with righteousness did I understand the secret of her
genius and power. America is great because America is good, and if America
ever ceases to be good, America will cease to be great."

What is the alternative? A New World Order, which will make us, as Paul
warns, slaves of men. Amen.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Despite ones opinion of philosophy, religion, government or the New World
Order, I'm interested if anyone can find errors in this?
1 Posted on 10/01/1999 22:07:00 PDT by Uncle Bill
[ Reply | Top | Last ]

------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----
Aloha, He'Ping,
Om, Shalom, Salaam.
Em Hotep, Peace Be,
Omnia Bona Bonis,
All My Relations.
Adieu, Adios, Aloha.
Amen.
Roads End

DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to