-Caveat Lector-

Tenorlove wrote:
>
> Note: forwarded message attached.
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Thousands of Stores.  Millions of Products.  All in one place.
> Yahoo! Shopping: http://shopping.yahoo.com
>
>   --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Subject: Chuck Baldwin's Food for Thought from the Chuck Wagon for 12/07/99
> Date: 07 Dec 99 06:44:39 -0600
> From: "Chuck Baldwin"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> The Rising Sun of International Government
>
> December 7, 1999
>
> What Japan could not do by bombing Pearl Harbor, today’s
> political and commercial elite are quietly accomplishing
> without a shot being fired. So successful is their attempt to
> globalize the economies and militaries of the world that many
> no longer bother to hide it.
>
snip>

> Through the IMF, the World Bank, the under-construction World
> Financial Organization, so-called "free trade" agreements and
> organizations like NAFTA, GATT and the WTO, the much-touted
> "global economy" is fast becoming global government. The US
> Senate is even considering legislation to authorize a study
> considering the potential benefits of hiring police officers of
> other nations by federal law enforcement agencies, according to
> World Net Daily.

This is now all BS. Before Seattle.

>
> It seems clear to me that the presidential election next year
> will be more about American sovereignty and independence versus
> globalism and internationalism than any other single issue.
> Sadly, I find little significant difference on this issue
> between the establishment front runners of both parties.
>
> Both Bush and Gore support NAFTA, GATT, the WTO, MFN for Red
> China, the entrance of China into the WTO,

ALL OF THEM. Not just Gore and Bush. They ALL came out early as
supporters of " Free Trade." And you know why??? Because " Free
Trade " benefits the Rich and THEY ARE ALL MILLIONAIRES. Duh!!!
And all candidates are funded by millionaires.

> virtually all
> international trade deals, the IMF, the World Bank, ad
> infinitum. Neither candidate appears likely to stand against
> the UN and its desire to create a socialist New World Order.

Oh Jeez! What isn't wrong with this diatribe? First of all, in
typical right wing stupidity, you STILL fail to admit that ALL
the major players pushing the New World Order are Capitalists.
CAPITALISTS! It's time to stop with this Socialist Boogeyman crap.
The demonstrators in Seattle were ALMOST ALL LEFTIES!!! You Right
Wing Nuts owe them BIGTIME for stopping the WTO.

> Our choice seems to be between a New World Order Republican and
> a New World Order Democrat. I choose neither.
>
> I resent the two major parties’ constant compromise of American
> sovereignty and independence. I refuse to vote for the "lesser
> of two evils" if I’m convinced the lesser evil is still going
> to lead my country further down the road to internationalism.

Good point.
Joshua2

DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to