-Caveat Lector-
Hello Terry,
They've already tried to clone the stains on the shroud. So far, no luck.
But, then again, there are prominent groups who have significant proof
that the shroud is bogus. WHO really knows? Carbon dating isn't always so
reliable.
You can see an article about the shroud though, at http://www.shroud.com/
As far as Jesus with dark complexion? Who really knows? His body was never
found. And really, what does it matter what color his skin was? However,
if we follow the heritage, his skin was most likely what we know today as
European caucasian. Tracing the skin color isn't that difficult. Jesus'
claimed ancestry is directly from Adam, which the word Adam in Hebrew means
"ruddy complected" or "able to show blood in the face". It tells us really
nothing more. If you follow the Biblical historical record, his mother was
Jewish and of the Levites. Chances are most likely he was fair complected.
Regardless.
Those who are considered "Arabic" or dark complected, are technically from
the premature liason of Abraham with the bond woman, which produced and
whose descendants are of Ishmael, not the sons (descendants) of Isaac.
Historically, it can all be proven by Biblical history, for those who are
willing to do the research, and not listen to what some man says about it.
eagle 1
http://www.lambsheart.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Terry Trainor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 1999 7:07 AM
Subject: Re: [CTRL] Politically Correct Jesus
> -Caveat Lector-
>
> I would agree with the dark complexion; probably look like
> someone that would not be allowed to sit at the front of
> the bus in the 60's.
>
> As soon as some idiot clones from blood stains on the shroud, I guess
> we'll know for sure, huh?
>
> :^)
>
> AmPat
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: YnrChyldzWyld [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 1999 7:01 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: [CTRL] Politically Correct Jesus
> >
> >
> > -Caveat Lector-
> >
> > >The TRUTH is that Jesus probably looked like Woody Allen without
> > >glasses. Or perhaps, Gene Wilder. Or, if Christians are
> > really lucky,
> > >Bernard Schwartz a.k.a. Tony Curtis.
> >
> > The TRUTH is that Jesus would probably NOT have looked like
> > the men you
> > mentioned, who are of European ancestry (albeit Judaic), rather Jesus
> > probably looked just like any other modern
> > Palestinian...which means he
> > was NOT blond-haired and blue-eyed, but of a somewhat dark
> > complexion...
> >
> > More of a chance of him looking like Arafat than Allen...
> >
> >
> > June ;-)
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance�not soapboxing! These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
