-Caveat Lector-

Davidian lawyer raises questions on Delta Force
He says testimony leaves gap in siege account

12/21/99

By Lee Hancock / The Dallas Morning News

Sworn testimony from two members of the Army's secret Delta Force unit
raises questions about the actions of a third Delta soldier during the
last hours of the Branch Davidian standoff, a lawyer for the sect said
Monday.

Two technical specialists from the classified anti-terrorist unit were
among 24 government witnesses questioned in recent depositions by
lawyers for the Branch Davidians, and their testimony indicated that
"there's a combat guy [from the same unit] whose time is not accounted
for on April 19," said Mike Caddell, lead lawyer for the Branch
Davidians.

Mr. Caddell said a protective order in the sect's wrongful-death lawsuit
against the federal government prohibits divulging exact testimony of
the government witnesses. They were questioned during two weeks of
depositions in Washington that ended Friday.

Justice Department officials did not return telephone calls for comment
Monday. An FBI spokesman said he was unfamiliar with the matter. Justice
Department spokesmen have previously declined to comment on depositions
in the case.

Mr. Caddell said the depositions left unanswered key questions about
Delta Force's involvement in an FBI tank and tear-gas assault on the
Branch Davidian compound. He said the questioning of FBI and military
personnel also failed to resolve whether Delta Force soldiers or any
other government agents fired guns into the building on April 19, 1993 -
a charge that the government has denied.

Pressed on the issue of government gunfire, the FBI's hostage rescue
team members questioned during the depositions said they did not
personally fire or witness any government gunfire April 19, Mr. Caddell
said.

But neither they nor FBI technical experts who operated FBI infrared
cameras during the standoff could explain the origin of repeated flashes
on an infrared videotape recorded by an airborne camera during the last
hours of the tear-gas assault, Mr. Caddell said.

Experts hired by the plaintiffs have said the flashes could have come
only from government gunfire. Government experts dispute that, but an
independent expert hired by the House Government Reform Committee to
examine the infrared video has said he also thought that flashes were
thermal signatures from gunfire.

"One thing that became clear from this first round of depositions:
Whatever really happened on April 19, there's only a handful of people
that really know," Mr. Caddell said. "This operation obviously proceeded
on a need-to-know basis. I would say fewer than a dozen people really
knew what was going to happen or what did happen that day."

Government officials and lawyers have adamantly denied that any Delta
Force personnel were actively involved in the April 19 assault, which
ended in a massive fire that consumed the Branch Davidian compound with
more than 80 people inside. Government officials maintain that members
of the sect set the fire.

The Branch Davidians' federal lawsuit, set for trial in May in Waco,
alleges that government negligence and actions caused the deaths of
dozens of innocent women and children and other Branch Davidian
followers.

Lawyers for the sect have alleged that government agents, possibly
including Delta Force members, repeatedly fired guns into the compound
in the last hours of the siege.

Justice Department lawyers initially tried to limit the Branch Davidian
lawyers to written questioning of Delta Force members who were in Waco
on April 19.

Secret units

Defense Department documents indicate that three soldiers from a secret
military unit were present as observers on April 19 and that other
Special Forces personnel from a classified military unit were shuttled
in and out of Waco during the 51-day standoff. Delta Force is a
classified military unit so secret that the Defense Department routinely
refuses to acknowledge its existence.

Defense Department officials ultimately allowed Branch Davidian lawyers
to question the Delta Force soldiers who were at Waco on April 19 only
if the soldiers could sit behind a protective screen during the
deposition, Mr. Caddell said. Lawyers for the sect also had to agree
that the soldiers would not have to divulge identifying information, Mr.
Caddell said.

The two soldiers who were questioned, both technical equipment
specialists, denied active involvement in FBI operations in Waco,
including the final assault, Mr. Caddell said. But they acknowledged
that they could not account for the whereabouts of their unit's combat
arms representative April 19 until after the compound burned.

"Frankly, their explanation for that, the cover story that was given to
explain his absence, was preposterous," Mr. Caddell said, adding that he
could not divulge details of that story because of the court's
protective order.

Mr. Caddell said he hoped to question the third soldier during the next
series of depositions.

The first round of depositions included FBI agents assigned to the
airplanes that circled the compound April 19 with infrared and still
cameras, Mr. Caddell said.

The agents, including the bureau's most experienced infrared camera
operator, acknowledged that they "had not ever seen flashes before" like
those that appeared repeatedly on the Waco video during the last hour
before the compound burned.

"They searched their files to try to find an explanation for them, and
they could find nothing similar," Mr. Caddell said.

He said the agents acknowledged that the only video footage in the FBI's
archives that included remotely similar flashes was a brief snippet
recorded by another FBI infrared camera in an unrelated kidnapping case
in April 1993.

That footage depicts white blips emanating from a car as it is driven
down a highway. That tape has been shown to the news media, including
The Dallas Morning News, in recent months as bureau officials have
sought to dispel the Branch Davidians' allegations about the Waco
infrared tape.

Field tests

Questions about the flashes on the April 19 infrared tape recently
prompted U.S. District Judge Walter Smith, who is overseeing the
wrongful-death case, to ask both sides to recommend scientific experts
to develop field tests aimed at identifying their source.

Mr. Caddell said he expected another round of depositions in January and
a final round in February. He said the depositions completed last week
included about half the government witnesses he will seek to question
before the case goes to trial.

"Based on what I've heard so far, I think people would be genuinely
distressed if they knew their FBI agents had such poor powers of
recollection," he said. "I think you could fairly say that the phrases
we heard most often were, 'I don't know,' and 'I don't recall.' It does
undermine your confidence in the FBI."


�1999 The Dallas Morning News
This site is best viewed using Netscape 4.0 or IE 4.0.

Bard

THE CREATURE FROM JEKYLL ISLAND -
A SECOND LOOK AT THE FEDERAL RESERVE

"The most important book after The Bible."
http://www.jbs.org/aobs/

DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance�not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to