-Caveat Lector-

Hi !

I heard about this article from the "One Voice Update" 12/14/99 - Vol 2 Issue
2
I believe this issue has some excellent articles on current court cases.
Their E-mail is [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Sincerely,  Neil Brick

Our listing these resources does not necessarily constitute our endorsement
of them. Resources mentioned in this resource list are mentioned for
educational value only. Using these resources may or may not help your
recovery process, so use caution when reading anything or contacting anyone
mentioned in this resource list.
This may be triggering for survivors.

Excerpt from: http://www.mhsource.com/pt/p991201a.html

Recovered Memory Lawsuit Sparks Litigation
by Michael Jonathan Grinfeld.
Psychiatric Times  December 1999  Vol. XVI  Issue 12
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In a stunning move made to avoid a trial, an October 1997 settlement totaling
$10.75 million ended one of the most controversial and widely publicized
lawsuits ever brought against a psychiatrist by a former patient who later
retracted memories of recovered abuse. Patty Burgus and other family members
had sued Bennett G. Braun, M.D., an internationally renowned expert in the
field of dissociative identity disorder, and the prestigious
Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke's Hospital in Chicago, among others. The suit
claimed that bizarre recollections of satanic ritual abuse and other trauma,
which were recovered during the course of psychiatric treatment, were false
and the result of negligent care over a six-year period.

But in what may become yet another trend in recovered memory litigation,
Braun has decided to fight back. In June, a 22-page complaint filed on his
behalf in a Cook County, Ill., circuit court claimed that Braun's defense
lawyers, the insurance companies and their claims managers settled the Burgus
litigation without his consent, even though it was "totally defensible as to
Dr. Braun."

The problem is not with the legal system, but with insurers, Braun said in an
interview with Psychiatric Times. Describing his involvement in the Burgus
case as a "horrible experience," Braun added, "The insurers did what they
believed was in their best interests, no matter what the policy said. They
didn't do what was in my best interest, and the policy calls for them to do
that."

Braun believes bringing this suit is a way for him to finally get the
opportunity to defend himself. When this case goes to trial, he will have to
prove that he would have been exonerated if the defendants had not settled
the case against his wishes, as he now alleges. Of the total settlement sum
paid to Burgus, Braun's share amounted to $4.75 million, all of it covered by
Braun's insurers, according to the complaint.

"I think psychiatry as a whole is under assault and [suits by retractors] are
only the first wave. It's going to spread to other diagnoses," said Braun,
who added that eating disorders and self-mutilation might also become targets.

DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance�not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to