-Caveat Lector- This guy has always had a great understanding of the NWO. Nicky -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thursday, 30 December 1999 20:14 Subject: [prj] Last Post of the Millenium (Or Whatever It Is) Free Rare/Out-of-Print Book Searches - Ruling Class/Conspiracy Experts: E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] **************************************************************************** *** << END This is hopefully my last post ever, perhaps save for posting my website address should I get it up on another server. If not, then I hope that this will be my last post. Then again, it may not be, but I feel the need to move on from this project of uncovering a very stale "truth" that, once known, simply demands more and more of my mental attention and never really frees me to do anything positive in the world. I plan to use the next millenium (or last year of this millenium, whichever) to devote more time to the role of positive action and less to simply understanding what is wrong. I would like to devote more time to spirituality and true freedom, and less time to the ultimate neutralizer. Conspiracy is real, but will continue to be real until we are spiritually liberated. Until then, we simply replace one sinister ideology/conspiratorial faction with another, or else the same one in different form. It is simply new lies for old. Even truth itself can be a neutralizer if all we focus on is Rockefeller, Rothschild, Nazi, Communist, EU or Satanic manipulation. G-d's Universe is too great for any of these to usurp His Power. They exist as powerful factions on their own levels, as does the totality of the New World Order. What are the conspiracy factions in the ultimate cosmic scope? None of these have even quite conquered one planet yet. Certainly if they pushed out in to space, someone much more powerful than they would knock them down to size, a move I would almost assuredly agree with. Before more advanced civilizations, the global controllers are insignifigant. Before G-d the Infinite, they are nothing. This does not mean that their existence can be ignored, but they must not shape us. If they shape us, by our conformity OR our rebellion, then they have won. If they loose to us, the energy behind them may well win through us. Our real freedom lies in trascendence and not simply opposition. The struggle against injustice is never over. I would rather it be a struggle FOR justice, in its primary sense, than a struggle AGAINST injustice, because this is what renews my strength. This, I hope, will be the emphasis of the 2000 phase of my existence, along with the emphasis on outer peace and freedom backed up by inner peace and freedom. Up to now, I have actually shared with those whom I considered my ideological opponents a bias in favor of political realities leading to personal realities, whereas I now am believing that the opposite is the actual case. "They" have come so far, and came close to winning entirely until this month, because of our own dishonest minds (dishonest money is simply a manifestation of dishonest mind, imo). Over the years, I have shared a great deal of information---or mis/disinformation if you prefer---and have modified my views when I felt it was necessary. I have swum in a sea of ideologies. I have fought the good fight, as I see it, on multiple fronts. Frankly, I'm kinda' sick of it. I don't want them to win on my planet. I feel, however, that my own approach needs as much critiquing as I have been willing to give others. Uncovering "who they are" is important in its own right, but there seem to be many ways of looking at the problem and one can get lost in the maze, fascinated by the sinister beauty that evil can sometimes deceive us with, perhaps even manipulated by it, as opposed to following the path of truth that can never steer us wrong, even if we are ignorant of certain facts or perspectives. Who are "they"? Well, I have suggested many possibilities over the years. I postulated a general struggle between the City and the Rockefellers over the years, initially focusing on the struggle between the Old Order and the multi-nationals, with Rockefeller and the "Illuminati" battling the Kings of Europe. Slowly this modified, leading me to a more geo-political interpretation of events, leading to the City versus Rockefeller, Germany, Russia and China; with the US national security state tagging on to Rockefeller for the most part. There may be truth to these, and innumerable perspectives. The problem is that these do not exactly describe what the "New World Order" is. There are probably isolationist and internationalist factions within all of these, and the Rockefellers and Rothschilds themselves waver between support of nationalism and support of internationalism when it suits their agendas. The Kings of Europe, another popular target, are international. They certainly seem to have a covert blood lineage that is an interesting study in its own right. Dishonest money ties in to this whole thing in a very sinister way, adding deception and Malthusian control to a globalism that would otherwise be primarily a dangerous Utopianism. To really understand, the New World Order, however, we need to stop focusing on personalities and focus on ideology and spiritual influences (the "Herman" approach). I would start with H.G. Wells. His Utopia postulated that current factions, including the bankers of London, would be usurped by a world government built on techno-utopian ideology, imposing a humanist world-view. The Pope and Orthodox Jews seemed to be the primary targets of Wells' "New World Order". Interestingly, these are the people most blamed for the world's ills by certain "conspiracy theoriests" who are supposedly at the cutting edge of truth. Wells was not a Marxist. He believed that Marxist socialism was essentially petty-bourgeois, rooted as it was in the Enlightenment and the Bavarian Illuminist tradition as manifested in the Conspiracy of Equals, long a rival for British Imperials in control of post-Vatican Europe. Wells was also not an apologist for the dishonest monetary system, a situation that was problematic for the dominant Imperials of the Round Table. Some of Wells' ideas were more Rome-Berlin in their orientation than British Imperial, but his anti-Papal loyalism made him a willing ally of the Round Table, but I believe his agenda actually transcended theirs in scope. His agenda was not a global British Empire, but a global techno-humanism that would try and work through all factions. In fact, one of his friends was Huey Long, an adherent of Anglophobic populism. Wells rejected the scientific humanism of the Enlightenment in favor of a collectvism appealing to many on the Left and some on the Right. More blatantly occult philsophies may posit New World Orders somewhat different than his. There are globalisms for and against the dishonest monetary manipulators. Some are reactionary, others revolutionary. Some favor a conservative rule of the great powers and powerful families such as the Rockefellers, others work against this rule. Some are openly coercive, others claim to be individualist. All are philosophies that work together to the same end as manipulated by the same forces. Here is the important point. Not all of what the globalists believe should be discarded. What should be understood is that even the good ideas are pawns of the evil forces because they are manifestations of a view of the cosmos without humility. If a world government whether through conquest or consent, why not a cosmic government? Such a view would usurp the Creator. This does not mean that Rockefeller or Kissinger are anything less than full human beings, with human complexity. It means, however, that wealth and power can have a strange influence on families of multi-generational wealth, leading them to philosophies that glorify anthrocentric ideologies. The ancient Pharaohs were human beings caught in the same unfortunate net, deserving of compassion along with the proper censure. Well, truth may lie here, or elsewhere. G-d alone knows. I must move on for my own sake. I will try my best to do my best, and I hope this will simply be a move DEEPER in to cosmic responsibility. Rockefeller and Kissinger believe they are fulfilling their cosmic responsibilities. This is scary to us, but true. I respect and honor their wish to fulfil their cosmic responsibilities, but believe that humility is the path. (Albert Pike's ego glorification, in some sense an influence on Rockefeller, perhaps indirectly as it is on modern man in general, stands in direct opposition to all major spiritual paths, East and West, including the Masonry previous to the last two hundred years or so.) It is a bit frightening that, in fact, Kissinger has done more for his world view than I have done for mine. I realize that time wasted on simply "uncovering the truth" about Kissinger leaves the world devoid of whatever positive actions I could do on behalf of a true new world order of sovereign nations at peace (the causes of war being removed without need for top-down "world government"), and of sovereign individuals unhampered by Malthusianism and oligarchicalism. Kissinger would be as welcome in such a world as anyone else. If not, I would be guilty of Jacobinism, a degeneration of previous visions of world renewal and human "illumination" made necessary by lack of love and compassion. Am I still talking? It's hard to say goodbye. I do think the challenge of the new year calls me. G-d willing, we will all still be here. I can only pray. Yes, I hope to continue "lurking", and would post my website if I get a server. I might continue to post, but I really hope and plan to go. If an interesting post comes up, I will try and leave it to others to respond to it. Even as far as a morally irresponsible post is concerned, I will try and leave to others to combat. Goodbye. I hope my information has been useful. If not, may you find what you are looking for in the new years ahead. G-d bless you all, MHO "All I know is that I know nothing"-Socrates <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>><><><><><><><><>< > A Growing Selection of A-albionic's Books Can Be Browsed and Purchased Conveniently in the Shopping Cart at http://a-albionic.com/shopping.html << END DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic screeds are not allowed. Substance�not soapboxing! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at: http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
