-Caveat Lector-

Dave Hartley
http://www.Asheville-Computer.com/dave



WSWS  (World Socialist Web Site) 8 January 2000
 www.wsws.org

Another Kosovo lie exposed: NATO used doctored video to justify bombing of
passenger train

By Ute Reissner

In the Frankfurter Rundschau of January 6 reporter Arnd Festerling
documented how NATO used falsified video recordings to justify its conduct
of the war in Kosovo.

At least 14 people died on April 12, 1999 when a US Airforce bomber fired
on a railway bridge near the Serbian village of Grdenicka just as a
passenger train was crossing the bridge. Following the initial strike of
the train, the pilot returned to make a second sweep of the burning bridge
and dropped a bomb on a carriage that had not been hit by the first
assault.

At the time NATO described the bombing of the commuter train as a tragic
accident. NATO's presentation of events, it now emerges, was based on
doctored video recordings and misleading descriptions of what took place
aboard the fighter plane.

One day after the strike, in an effort to demonstrate that the attack was
a case of inadvertent collateral damage, General Wesley Clark, the Supreme
Commander of NATO forces, called a press conference and showed two video
films taken by cameras located in the noses of the remote control-guided
bombs. According to Clark, the films made clear that the passenger train
was approaching too fast for the pilot, who was concentrating on the
difficult business of guiding the bombs, to react. The pilot had less than
a second to abort the strike, Clark asserted.

Of course, this version of events did not explain why the plane turned
round and dropped a second bomb. But the official NATO account given by
Clark was misleading in two further respects.

First, the video film sped up the actual sequence by a factor of at least
three. Second, the fighter plane used in the attack - type F15E - had a
crew of two, a pilot and a weapons systems officer. The pilot played no
role in directing the bombs and could not have been diverted by that task.
In this type of plane the bombs find their own way to the target as soon
as the target co-ordinates have been set by the weapons systems officer,
who can, however, intervene to stop or divert them.

Festerling pointed out that status signals giving technical information
and a running clock normally shown on such videos did not appear on the
videos shown to the press public by Clark. Festerling explained:

        According to the video 2.3 seconds elapse from the time the train
        clearly enters the field of vision to the time the bomb strikes
        home. This implies the train was travelling at 300 kilometres per
        hour. If one assumes, for the purpose of making calculations, that
        the train was actually travelling at 100 kilometres per hour (a figure
        which is probably far too high, bearing in mind the antiquated
        state of the Serbian rail system) the video [shown by Clarke] is
        running at least three times faster than real time. This means the
        weapons systems officer had at least 6.9 seconds to react, instead
        of 2.3 seconds which Clark, in his presentation, had reduced to
        less than a second'.

NATO therefore showed a film which was totally unreliable with regard to
the crucial question of when the attack took place. On the basis of these
unreliable videos and a misleading choice of words, the NATO Supreme
commander in Europe led the public to believe that the attack on the train
was unavoidable because of time pressure.

NATO has now largely conceded that this is, in fact, what happened.

Festerling quoted an official of Shape, the central NATO command in
Europe, who said, Yes, the video ran considerably faster. The headquarters
of the US Air Force in Europe, located in Ramstein, Germany, also
confirmed this fact, but then went on to speak of a regrettable hardware
error, which they attributed to the firm of Sun Microsystems.

According to their account, the speeding up of the film took place
unnoticed as the video was being transformed into mpeg-format. The main
concern was to make the material available to the public as soon as
possible, and therefore a supposedly arduous stage in the conversion of
the film was neglected. The status signals did not appear on the video
because, for some unexplained reason, the film taken came from the
accompanying plane and not the plane responsible for the attack. The
bombing videos from the attack plane itself are no longer available.

This whole explanation is extremely dubious. One can only assume that
anybody with experience working with of this type of weapons technology
would have been able to immediately identify the speeding up of the tape.
Furthermore, the technology necessary for the supposedly arduous
conversion of the film into mpeg-format takes, in fact, just a few
minutes. At a cost of a few hundred dollars it can be loaded onto any
standard personal computer. NATO's explanation assumes that it possesses
technology inferior to that at the disposal of the average video amateur.

The revelations concerning the bombing of the passenger train are only the
latest exposure of NATO lies and distortions in connection with the Kosovo
War. Last October the British newspaper Observer published reports
detailing the NATO bombardment of the Chinese embassy in Belgrade. The
reports made clear that, contrary to NATO's version of events, the bombing
was deliberate.

=================================

DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance�not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to