-Caveat Lector- <A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"> </A> -Cui Bono?- Dave Hartley http://www.Asheville-Computer.com/dave Over 200,000 people a year die from "adverse reactions" from drugs, and another 80,000 die from medical malpractice, whereas 41,000 die in auto accidents, according to the pharmacy industry magazine, Drug Topics, October 23, 1995, pg. 14-16! That's one death every two minutes! Last year, the pharmaceutical industry did $182 billion in drug sales world wide. In contrast to that figure, it cost approximately $183 billion to treat adverse reactions from all of those drugs. The following admissions were taken from JAMA (Journal of the American Medical Association): The top five causes of death in the United States, in order, are: 1) Tobacco 2) Alcohol 3) Medical malpractice 4) Traffic accidents 5) Firearms According to JAMA, doctors kill more people than auto accidents and guns put together. The number of people that doctors kill per day from allopathic medical malpractice is roughly equal to the amount of people that would die if every day, three jumbo jets crashed and killed everybody on board. Just imagine what headlines would result if a chiropractor or a naturopath accidentally killed just one patient? hmmmmmmmmm...... More from NBC: http://www.msnbc.com/news/340525.asp?cp1=1#BODY -------- AIDS Cure Invented By Oklahoma General Practitioner By Forres McGraw http://www3.50megs.com/medical/aids/aidscure.html MIRACLE GIRL OR MIRACULOUS CURE? Seven year old Precious Thomas, by most standards, is like any other bright, happy seven year old. Precious' most incredible attribute is that she used to have AIDS. No, that is not a typo. During March, 1998, Precious was included in studies and clinical trials at the National Institutes for Health, one of the leading research centers for AIDS. On March 23, 1998 in a viral-load test administered by NIH, Precious' viral-load was 186,119. It went to ZERO. What NIH did not know at the time was Precious had stopped taking the drugs it prescribed her under its protocol. What has the NIH discovered since, that it hasn't disclosed? Precious' mother, Rocky Thomas will admit, though her daughter is an exceptional child, she has not performed any miracles. The "miraculous cure" comes from the brilliance and perseverance of Dr. Gary R. Davis, M.D. of Tulsa, Oklahoma. Dr. Davis developed his treatment three years ago. Two years ago, Dr. Davis applied for FDA approval to administer a clinical trial using his treatment. The application for clinical trial was approved initially, only to be revoked hours prior to its beginning. While comforting her daughter, who was in the hospital and not being helped by the protocol being administered by NIH, Rocky recalled a news story she had seen about Dr. Davis, a General Practitioner who has created a goat serum based treatment he is forbidden by law to administer. Like any mother, Rocky vowed to do anything to ease her child,s suffering. Rocky took Precious to Tulsa to see Dr. Davis. However, the FDA had not and has not to date approved Dr. Davis' treatment. As much as he would have loved to help her, he was barred from doing so. Though he could not treat her, he spent much of his afternoon with Rocky and Precious. Sharing his knowledge of the disease and answering questions regarding his treatment proposed to the FDA in his application for approval of clinical trial. In the end there was still nothing he could do for Precious. Fortunately for Precious, the mother was willing to do anything for her child, and did just that. Rocky now admits, she stole a vial of Dr. Davis' serum that day from his office, and administered it to Precious. In five doses, consisting of less than 2cc's each, over a forty-four day period beginning March 26, 1998, Rocky administered the stolen serum to her daughter recalling all she could about her conversation with Dr. Davis. Precious is still being monitored by her doctors at NIH, Dr. Predita Taylor and Dr. Anthony Falchia. In fact NIH has run viral load tests on her twelve times since March 23, 1998. The last six tests have shown undetectable levels of the virus in Precious. Surprisingly, or not, depending upon your view, these doctors, charged with the care of many AIDS infected patients and knowing now that Precious has been cured, have yet to call Dr. Davis to find out more about his treatment. The reality is the National Institute of Health felt vilified by the usurpation of their protocol by Mrs. Thomas. Prior to learning the girl was treated with Dr. Davis' serum, Dr. Perdita Taylor had just taken credit for the cure of Precious Thomas. When told the truth she shriveled into a "no comment" posture. The FDA, instead of offering to help expedite Dr. Davis, application, has continually stalled the process. As many questions as this may raise, one demands our immediate attention. Why is the brilliant work of an African American General Practitioner being suppressed? This may be the answer to saving millions of lives! Is it simply because Dr. Davis does not belong to the Official Aid Research Community? That seems to be what is happening here. There are many other terminally ill patients choosing to live who are barred by the FDA from availing themselves of the opportunity to be cured, if indeed this serum proves to be a universal cure. Every taxpayer should be demand some answers from his or her congressional representative, senator, and the FDA. �1998 Forres McGraw/Greenwich Village Gazette ____________________________________________________________________________ _____________________ AIDS TREATMENT FOR THE WORLD HAS BEEN SUPPRESSED FOR OVER TWO YEARS By Forres McGraw The Greenwich Village Gazette featured the story above nearly two years ago. At the time it told a most incredulous tale--a supposed cure by a back country Doctor for the worst illness of mankind, made from a Goat Serum. A little girl named Precious Thomas was free from all viral count, according to the National Institute of Health. The NIH had been treating the child with their protocol. Unknown to them, the girl's mother, Rocky, had taken the new, unrecognized treatment from the offices of Dr. Gary Davis. That first article was featured on an obscure CBS affiliate program out of Houston, Texas. Mr. McGraw brought it to our attention. After the Gazette published it here in New York, it was picked up by Fox, ABC and PBS. In fact, Little Precious was a guest at the White House and was a guest at the National Convention Of the NAACP in November 1999. SINCE THE ARTICLE ABOVE, I have joined forces with Dr. Gary Davis and we are still fighting a losing war with the United States Food & Drug Administration, although we are now, at long last, working under a memorandum of understanding with National Institute of Health to replicate the antibody used so successfully with Precious Thomas. Currently we have had to take Dr. Davis treatment out of our own country, north to Cananda where the medication can be used without governmental approvals. This is based on the Canadian personal use law, which allows Canadian citizens to purchase, for their own personal use, a three month supply of any non-approved drugs or biologics. Due to this wonderful access law of our civilized Canadian neighbors, Dr. Davis was able to treat a 12 year old boy in Canada three weeks ago. The boy's family asked that he go unnamed. Like little Precious Thomas, this boy was also born with the virus, and by both his doctor's and father's account has been subjected to every viable treatment available worldwide. They avoided putting him on the toxic drugs until June, when he was hospitalized, his lungs filling with fluid. Fortunately, the father and doctor had finally agreed to give him any drugs, to stabilize his viral load, which resulted in his recovery and release from the hospital. The drugs were so strong that the one time he missed the sequence of his daily medication regimen, the boy was left bed ridden for twenty-four hours. That is where Dr. Davis came in. During the examination prior to administering our treatment the boy was asked how he felt, having recovered from the nasty bout he had. He told us that he rated his current status of well being as an "eight on a ten-point" scale. Then Dr. Davis gave him the medication that had been given to Precious Thomas. In the next six hours as we observed the twelve year old, color came back to his face. The marked increase in his energy level was obvious. After just six hours, when asked again how he felt, he rated it a "30 on a 10-point" scale, relative to how he felt immediately before receiving Davis's treatment. No side effects have been observed so far in the three weeks since his treatment and he has taken no other medication since. We are currently waiting on lab results, which we will publish as soon as they become available.. Dr. Davis and I have all but given up on the FDA, and we are seeking more and expanded international venues for treatment. Precious Thomas was the keynote speaker at the national NAACP meeting in DC on November 20th. Being a US citizen, Precious is not allowed to continue the medication that had brought her Viral Count Load down to ZERO and kept it there for three months. She cannot take it because there is no money in this for the large Drug Companies. Precious does have a viral load back again, though small. But we can not treat her here, or any other American Citizen. Dr. Davis's calculations show she got less than half of the medicine required to maintain a viral load of zero. She only got that because her mother, Rocky Thomas took it from Davis without his knowledge. To complain about the FDA to the FDA feel free to email them at: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]@oc.fda.gov or here <http://www.fda.gov/oashi/comoshi.htmlhttp://www.fda.gov/oashi/comoshi.html You can also call the FDA toll-free 1-888-INFO-FDA (1-888-463-6332) for comments and suggestions Direct inquiries about this article to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] subject = Aids Cure Article ____________________________________________________________________________ _____________________ FDA Attacks The Internet By William Faloon The FDA's history is one of incompetence, fraud, deceit and the continuous striving for more power. Over the past 25 years, the Food and Drug Administration has sought to gain authoritarian control that Congress never intended it to have. In every attempt to seize this kind of power, the FDA has been beaten back by a swell of public protest. The FDA has just launched a disinformation campaign to deceive Congress into believing that the agency needs to "protect" the public from health information on the Internet. The FDA is seeking ten million tax dollars a year to attack alternative health and pharmacy web sites. If the FDA convinces Congress to give it the power and money to do this, American consumers will be denied access to innovative therapies, and will be forced to pay a good deal more for the nutrient and drug therapies the FDA allows them to buy over the Internet. One of the FDA's proposals is to be able to fine Internet pharmacies $500,000 every time they dispense a drug without a prescription authorized by the agency. With this kind of excessive fining power, the FDA will be able to bankrupt any online pharmacy it targets. To make it easy for them to shut down large numbers of web sites, the FDA wants the power to issue subpoenas without first obtaining a court order, a totalitarian tactic the American public revolted against when the agency proposed it in 1990. Finally, the FDA says it wants to set up "a rapid response team" to identify, investigate, and prosecute web sites. In other words, the FDA is seeking to establish an army of cyberspace storm-troopers to enable it to shut down large numbers of web sites quickly. The alleged purpose of these new powers is to "target and punish those who engage in illegal drug sales over the Internet." This may sound reasonable to the average person, but as members of The Life Extension Foundation well know, the FDA's history is one of ineptitude and corruption that has caused millions of Americans to suffer and die needlessly. In 1994, the FDA Museum was established to document FDA malfeasance, and show that the agency hasn't the scientific legitimacy to be allowed to police the healthcare of the American people.A flagrant example of FDA deception can be found in their current attempt to control the Internet. The FDA has identified one person who died after obtaining Viagra from a Web pharmacy without a prescription. The FDA is using this one death as an example of why the FDA needs to impose dictatorial power over all health Web sites. One problem with this position is that, as of November 1998, at least 130 Americans died from taking Viagra legally prescribed by their doctors. (The total number of Viagra-related deaths for 1999 has not yet been calculated.) The FDA approved Viagra as being safe, even though many Americans have died when the drug has been legally prescribed. The FDA failed to detect this lethal side effect of Viagra, yet it is now seeking gestapo-like power to attack any Internet health company it wishes to, without due process. It's time for the public to speak up again to let Congress know that this kind of FDA tyranny will not be tolerated by tax payers. Why Internet Regulation is Doomed to Fail The powers the FDA is seeking are unconstitutional, and the agency has neither the competence nor the integrity to police the Internet, but even if it did, it would be impractical for the agency to do so. There are currently an estimated 8,000 health sites on the Internet. If Congress gives the FDA $10 million a year, the best the agency could do is shut down a couple of hundred sites a year. Within a few years, the FDA would create a litigation monster whose appetite would far exceed their $10 million annual budget. The FDA would be bogged down in a quagmire of judicial proceedings, while thousands of new health Web sites would be springing up that the agency would be at an utter loss to control. The end result of the FDA's war against the free flow of information on the Internet would be tens of millions of tax dollars wasted, with less so-called consumer "protection" than exists today. The FDA Already Has The Legal Power It Needs The charade the FDA is parading before Congress is that they need more money and stricter laws to regulate e-commerce. The facts are that the FDA already has the regulatory structure to "protect" the consumer on the Internet. Much of what the FDA wants is already covered by existing Federal and State law, but the agency is seeking to add another bureaucratic layer of law and money to suppress the dissemination of health information. An Alternative Proposal The FDA has its own Web site (www.fda.gov) For a fraction of the cost of becoming the health police of the Internet police, the agency could post its own evaluation of alternative health Web sites that it thought were promoting fraudulent or dangerous products. Americans would then be free to make their own decisions about whether to believe what the FDA says about health web sites. However, the FDA has no interest in trying to persuade Americans with evidence. It wants (and has always wanted) authoritarian powers and as much money as possible from Congress because it is a political organization rather than a scientific one. As a result, FDA suppression of information has been, historically, the leading cause of death in the United States, while adverse reactions to FDA approved drugs is currently the 4th-to-6th leading cause of death. Clearly, the FDA lacks the constitutional authority, the competence, the integrity or the scientific credibility to be given additional power and money to police the Internet. A History of Victories Over the FDA The Federal Courts, Congress and the public have dealt the FDA severe losses over the past 25 years. The first citizens' victory occurred in the 1970's when the FDA tried to turn vitamin supplements into prescription drugs. An uproar from the public resulted in Congress unanimously rejecting FDA's brazen arguments that vitamins are so "dangerous" that they should only be prescribed by doctors. This blatant power grab came at a time when the vast majority of doctors had little or no knowledge of the health benefits of vitamins. In 1990, the FDA tried to have a law passed that would have enabled the agency to make summary seizures of products from companies, and institute wire taps without a court warrant. The public again defended the Bill of Rights by inundating Congress with so much mail that the FDA's proposed law was abandoned. In 1993, the FDA stated that it wanted to classify all amino acids and many minerals as prescription drugs. The public expressed such a high degree of outrage over the FDA's draconian proposition, that Congress passed the Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act (in 1994) that significantly limited the FDA's authority to regulate dietary supplements. Since 1994, the FDA has circumvented the will of the people and Congress by seeking to censor what the public is allowed to hear about supplements and drugs. The FDA has been defeated repeatedly in the counts, and has been forced to retreat because of an onslaught of public opposition to all forms of censorship the agency has proposed. Orwellian Computer Robots A nightmare scenario sometimes portrayed in science fiction novels involves a totalitarian government using advanced computers to monitor the activities of citizens. In these novels, people who don't behave according to government standards are targeted for persecution or summary elimination. The Orwellian prophesy is becoming reality as the FDA is proposing to spend a million dollars a year on artificial intelligence computer robots that would scan the Internet for phrases such as "prevents cancer" and "prescription drug" so the FDA could "swiftly gather the information needed to prosecute." The new law the FDA is proposing would mandate that on-line pharmacies first receive FDA-approval to operate. Pharmacies are currently regulated by the States, but the FDA is seeking to impose a new Federal bureaucratic layer that will greatly increase the cost of purchasing products on the Internet. The FDA needs to convince Congress that American citizens should be subjected to Orwellian investigative tactics and that tax payer dollars should be appropriated to pay for these Web robots to assist the FDA in detecting words it does not want Americans to read. American citizens who cherish their Constitutional rights against undue government intrusion should contact their members of Congress and demand that the FDA not be given the money, nor the legal authority to control the Internet. This is more than just a health freedom issue. The FDA's Orwellian proposals are unprecedented and would create lead to a serious breakdown of our civil liberties if enacted into law. Just Tell Congress To Say "No" to The FDA The FDA is using the free-flowing popularity of the Internet in a ploy to deceive Congress into appropriating ten million tax dollars a year to fund an unconstitutional witch hunt against free speech. The new powers the FDA is seeking are blatantly un-American and resemble the kinds of police-state tactics employed by totalitarian regimes such as communist China. The FDA's latest fabrication will fail if Americans tell their Congressional representatives to say NO to any new proposal or law that would give the FDA more power or money. Included in this message is a letter that can be sent to Congress. To obtain the name, e-mail address, voice phone number, and fax number of your member of Congress, check http://www.house.gov or phone the Congressional switchboard at 1-202-224-3121. AOL users can click here: <A HREF="http://www.house.gov">http://www.house.gov</A> <Note: the House Directory at www.house.gov was not working despite repeated attempts between 7:30 and 8:00 pm EST 1/5/00 but you can find both e-mail and mailing information for your Representative by selecting Member Offices". We suggest that you also send a copy of this letter to: The President The White House Washington, DC 20500 You can E-mail the President at this White House page http://www.whitehouse.gov/WH/Mail/html/Mail_President.html You can access the Foundation's Website at http://www.lef.org to obtain additional information about the FDA's track record of unlawfully suppressing life saving information. AOL users can click here: <A HREF="http://www.lef.org">http://www.lef.org</A> We encourage Foundation members to defend the Constitution against the FDA's latest attempt to gain repressive power over the individual's right to choose. Please send the following letter (and/or your own letter) to your Congressional representative: To the Honorable ____________________ Date:____________________ U.S. House of Representatives Washington, D.C. 20515 The Fiscal Year 2001 budget to be submitted by the Executive Branch of the government contains a provision whereby the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is to be appropriated ten million dollars a year to police the Internet. I am vehemently opposed to my tax dollars being used to fund the FDA for this purpose. I believe that additional FDA power and funding would be used to deprive the American people of valuable health information and health products. In the FY 2001 budget proposal, the FDA is asking Congress to pass new law that would give the agency repressive powers that would restrict the free flow of information on the Internet. I ask that you vote against any proposed law that gives the FDA more control over what I am allowed to read and put into my body. Some of the unconstitutional authority the FDA is seeking includes: 1) Issuing subpoenas without a court order. Giving the FDA this new power is unconstitutional, and would will create a litigation monster whose annual appetite would rapidly exceed the ten million dollars a year the agency is seeking. 2) Fining Internet pharmacies $500,000.00 every time they sell a drug that does not meet the FDA's definition of a legal prescription. This type of excessive fine would enable the FDA to bankrupt any online pharmacy it decides to target in a capricious and arbitrary manner. 3) Setting up "a rapid response team" to identify, investigate, and prosecute Web sites, i.e., the FDA is seeking to establish an army of storm-troopers to summarily shut down any web site it chooses. Please do not be misled by the FDA's attempts to convince you that they are trying to protect the health of the American people by regulating the Internet. According to the April 15, 1998 issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association, adverse reactions to legally prescribed FDA-approved drugs are the fourth-to-sixth leading cause of death in the United States. Since this article was published almost two years ago, the FDA has done nothing to reduce the number of Americans dying from dangerous drugs, yet the FDA now seeks ten million tax dollars a year to attack health and pharmacy Web sites. If the FDA convinces Congress to grant it more power and money to attack health web sites, American consumers will be denied access to innovative therapies and pay a lot more for their prescription drugs. I therefore ask that you write to me with your position on this issue so I will know how to cast my ballot when you up for election. Sincerely, Name___________________________________________ Street___________________________________________ City_______________________ST_______ Zip_________ ____________________________________________________________________________ _____________________ Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2000 From: "Jennie Gorman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (by way of Palden Jenkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) Subject: Shoot your-self in the Foot !!! Interesting! From a friend in Awstrylya. Palden Hi A new light on "modern medicine" and practice by doctors trained only in drugs--and not in health knowledge. Interesting reading! This is a US statistic, but I am sure Australia is equal on a pro rata basis!!! Jennie DOCTORS KILL MORE THAN GUNS AND AUTO ACCIDENTS MEDICINE THROUGHOUT THE AGES ;-) 0001 AD - Here, eat this root. 1000 AD - That root is heathen. Here, say this prayer. 1850 AD - That prayer is superstition. Here, swallow this potion. 1940 AD - That potion is snake oil. Here, swallow this pill. 1985 AD - That pill is ineffective. Here, take this antibiotic. 2000 AD - That antibiotic is dangerous. Here, eat this root. DOCTORS KILL MORE THAN GUNS AND AUTO ACCIDENTS PUT TOGETHER.... AS SEEN ON NATIONAL NEWS Over 200,000 people a year die from "adverse reactions" from drugs, and another 80,000 die from medical malpractice, whereas 41,000 die in auto accidents, according to the pharmacy industry magazine, Drug Topics, October 23, 1995, pg. 14-16! That's one death every two minutes! Last year, the pharmaceutical industry did $182 billion in drug sales world wide. In contrast to that figure, it cost approximately $183 billion to treat adverse reactions from all of those drugs. The following admissions were taken from JAMA (Journal of the American Medical Association): The top five causes of death in the United States, in order, are: 1) Tobacco 2) Alcohol 3) Medical malpractice 4) Traffic accidents 5) Firearms According to JAMA, doctors kill more people than auto accidents and guns put together. The number of people that doctors kill per day from allopathic medical malpractice is roughly equal to the amount of people that would die if every day, three jumbo jets crashed and killed everybody on board. Just imagine what headlines would result if a chiropractor or a naturopath accidentally killed just one patient? hmmmmmmmmm...... More from NBC: http://www.msnbc.com/news/340525.asp?cp1=1#BODY <A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A> DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are not allowed. Substance�not soap-boxing! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at: http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
