-Caveat Lector- <A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"> </A> -Cui Bono?- This stuff may be difficult to understand - if understood difficult to believe - if believed difficult to bear. I believe it is important to remove the veil of secrecy behind which such activity can take place. I've been studying corruption and crime on high government & corporate levels for several years, and for the past year or so, have been focussing on the area where Mike Ruppert has spent the last 20 years - importation of heroin & cocaine, and money laundering by CIA & associates, including many politicians & military personnel. This goes into another area of covert trafficking in human misery. Don't read it if you're not ready for some upsetting stuff. Dave Hartley http://www.Asheville-Computer.com/dave -----Original Message----- From: Mike Ruppert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2000 11:58 AM Subject: RE: E systems importing cocaine and kidnapping children for sale overseas(copy of pleading) For the record - I have slept in Win Richardson's home in Lone Oak, Texas. I have stood on the lake shore where private E-Systems planes used to drop bales of cocaine. I visited a small sail boat on the lake that was set up as an ELINT Intelligence eavesdropping post on Win's house. I have met his wife and daughter - the same daughter whose boyfriend was suicided. Another brave former E-Systems employee (an accountant) named Michelle Cooper, had once shared a lot of information with Win and me. She produced documents showing how E-System funded Top Secret weapons and communications research with drug money which they called "Black Rock" money. Win Richardson is a solid, solid man. I have delivered documents for him to investigator from the U.S. Senate. It is no coincidence that E-Systems (now Raytheon) has always had a retired or current DCI on it's Board. Years ago it was Adm. William Raborn. Today it's (guess who?) John Deutch. Mike Ruppert www.copvcia.com -----Original Message----- From: Herbert Jamieson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2000 1:05 AM To: cia Subject: E systems importing cocaine and kidnapping children for sale overseas(copy of pleading) From: "Herbert Jamieson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ----- Original Message ----- From: Winfred Richardson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2000 10:08 PM Subject: [patriotawareness] Re: Proof gov is kidnapping andsellingchildren overs... > Attached is the brief filed in %th Circuit. Its long but will give a lot of > insight. > > Case No. 99-10682 > United States of America, ex rel, WINFRED E. RICHARDSON > Plaintiff - Appellant > v. > E-SYSTEMS INC > Defendant - Appellee > > Brief In Support Of Appeal > Plaintiff/Appellant Winfred E. Richardson files this appeal. because the > lower court erred in its decision. > INTRODUCTION and ARGUMENT > The Court should grant Plaintiffs' because: > 1) The ruling denies appellant the right to a trial by jury as guaranteed > by the Constitution. > · In Apodaca v. Oregon, Justice White observed: "Our inquiry must focus > upon the function served by the jury in contemporary society. As we said in > Duncan, the purpose of trial by jury is to prevent oppression by the > Government by providing a 'safeguard against the corrupt or overzealous > prosecutor and against the compliant, biased, or eccentric judge.' In > Williams; 'This is the fundamental of jury trial which brings it within the > mandate of Due Process' was added. > a. One thing that is obviously clear is how far individuals in the > government has gone, including breaking the law and trampling on the > Constitution, in order to cover up wrong doing committed at and by E-Systems. > b. A case in point is the DoJ's involvement in setting up 30 year IG/DCIS > SSA Chris Hallien and it's attempt to falsely imprison him in order to > cover up The DoJ, DoD and E-Systems RICO activities. > c. E-Systems legal staff attempted to do the same to me by filing knowingly > false charges against me with FBI National Security Agent Danny James.(A > tape of the conversation with Agent James and the head of the Dallas office > of the FBI has been entered in the records). > d. E-Systems delivered what looked like a 'wanted poster' (in the records) > to the Hunt County Sheriffs Department at which time the Sheriff informed > deputies that I was possibly a terrorist and they should use extreme > caution when approaching me. An obvious attempt to have me legally > murdered. When I asked the sheriff why he did it he informed me E-Systems > wanted him to as they thought we were taking pictures of them changing the > tail numbers on aircraft (Tpe entered of this conversation). In the State > of Texas v. Michael Ferris the attorney for the Northeastern Drug > Interdiction Task Force admitted knowing about the drug (cocaine) smuggling > by or through E-Systems (transcript entered in records). > > · William's v Florida > Mr. Justice White delivered the opinion of the Court.*** > In Duncan v. Louisiana we held that the fourteenth Amendment guarantees a > right to a trial by jury in all criminal cases which--were they to be tried > in a federal court would come within the Sixth Amendments guarantee. > Although this was a criminal case Justice Whites statements shows it is > applicable to civil cases as well and maybe more so. > Justice White went on to state; Indeed, pending and after he adoption of > the Constitution, fears were expressed that Article III's provision failed > to preserve the common law right to be tried by a "jury of the vicinage." > That concern, as well as the right to jury in civil as well as criminal > cases, furnished part of the impetus for introducing Amendments to the > Constitution which ultimately resulted in the jury provisions of the Sixth > and Seventh Amendments..............Finally, contemporary legislative and > Constitutional provisions indicate that where Congress wanted to leave no > doubt that it was incorporating existing common law features of the jury > system, it knew how to use express language to that effect. Thus, the > Judiciary bill, signed by the President on the same day that the House and > Senate finally agreed on the form of the Amendments to be submitted to the > States, provided in certain cases for the narrower "vicinage" requirements > which the House had wanted to include in the Amendments. And the Seventh > Amendment, providing for a trial in civil cases, explicitly added that "no > fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the > United States, than according to common law.' > > Denying me a trial by jury is depriving me of Due Process. > 2. Cruel and Unusual Punishment > Any normal person would have to agree that it is cruel and unusual > punishment to punish someone for obeying the law and rewarding the guilty > party while doing so, and this is what the courts ruling does. All records > prove the guilt of the defendant in this case. The law proscribes criminal > prosecution for anyone who has knowledge of wrong doings and does not > report them. Yet I followed the law and was punished by being ordered to > pay the defendants court cost and attorneys fees! > · In District of Columbia v. Carter, the Court held that the District of > Columbia is not a "State or Territory" within the meaning of s 1983. None > the less, although no federal statue expressly provides civil remedies for > a federal officer's violation of a person's federal constitutional rights, > the Court, in Bivins v. Six unknown named agents, held that the federal > courts could award money damages, relying on Bell v. Hood for the principle > that "where federally protected rights have been violated, it has been the > rule from the beginning that courts will be alert to adjust their remedies > so as to grant the necessary relief." > 2) The Court erred in its decision due to false, misleading or incomplete > information. > A. The first thing every Judge instructs a jury to do is hear all the > evidence before making its decision. In this case the Judge heard only one > side before doing what he instructs jurors not to do. He ruled after > hearing only one side. > B. Plaintiffs' allegations are obviously well founded, and not baseless, as > Congressional and DoD investigators was able to find and confirm > Plaintiffs' allegations and Defendants' on Illegal and Conspiratorial > actions has kept Plaintiff for being able to keep Plaintiff out of court. > Allegations plaintiff made are still being investigated and confirmed as > shortly as a few months ago (tape confirming entered). > 3) The fact that the que tam was kept sealed over six (6) years instead of > the six (6) months shows there is problems and if it had been opened in the > six months, as it should have been, if it were not for DoJ personnel as > well as possibly my E-Systems furnished attorney, there would be no questions. > 4) Investigators will confirm that, due to potential baggage, they used > other peoples names on their reports, but will confirm it is my allegations > and the others just confirmed them. > · The defendant has stated it has thousands of employees but wants to argue > that because more than one knew of the wrong doings the allegations could > not be his and this is ludicrous and an insult to any honest persons > intelligence! > 5) Due to a compromised or incompetent attorney, compromised possibly by > the defendant there is no telling what has or has not be entered. > · In the defendants opposition to plaintiffs motion to proceed IFP the > defendant entered the courts ruling where my wrongful termination lawsuit > was thrown out because of something not being filed. > a. My attorney had told me it was thrown out because of it being part of > this action. > b. The court records prove otherwise. > c. I was introduced to my attorney by a confirmed (by the AF/OSI, IG/DCIS > and GAO) E-Systems plant. Ike Ellis stated an attorney had recommended Mr. > Baxter to him. Mr. Ellis was claiming problems with E-Systems at the time > and even filed a civil action himself, which he later dropped. > d. The filed affidavit of Granville Gwin states; "You've reported us to the > OFCCP, NLRB and other government agencies and we are terminating you for it". > e. The DoD and GAO both confirmed I was terminated for blowing the whistle > and that there was fifteen (15) confirmed cases of retaliation and > termination of witnesses and this was relay to Mr. Baxter. > f. Col. Manning Crump admitted under oath he had given my name and > information to the defendant. This lead to my termination. The Supreme > Court has made a ruling that when names are to be kept in confidence and > that confidence is betrayed then the individual and agency is responsible. > g. Based on the above facts I ask the following question: How do you feel > about an attorney that would lose well over one hundred thousand dollars > ($100,000) in his own fees by not filing documents with the court in a case > and would now be in excess of a million? Incompetent or compromised? > 6) Plaintiff reported Common Practice acts as Common Practice acts in a > Conspiracy to Defraud the United States Government and his allegations has > been confirmed by Congressional and DoD investigators and depended on his > attorney to do the proper filing and it not being properly listed may > possibly be due to illegal and conspiratorial acts by the Defendant as > shown above. > 7) Plaintiff has made it well known that he desired a jury trial. If it has > not been requested then it is possibly due to illegal and conspiratorial > acts by the Defendant. > a. It has been confirmed by Congressional and DoD investigators that the > Defendant had a plant by the name of Ike Ellis to "get close to the > Defendant" obviously with the intent to gain information and to mislead the > Plaintiff. Mr. Ellis has admitted he was planted by the Defendant and that > he is a friend and neighbor of E-Systems President and General Manager > Brian Cullen. > > b. Mr. Ellis asked Plaintiff if he had an attorney. When the Plaintiff > stated 'not yet' Mr. Ellis stated an attorney had recommended Mr. Lance > Baxter and that he, Mr. Ellis, had made an appointment with Mr. Baxter for > himself and Plaintiff. Mr. Ellis and Plaintiff went to see and retained Mr. > Baxter to represent them. Mr. Ellis dropped his suit shortly after filing. > Mr. Baxter, the attorney the Defendant led the Plaintiff to, is the > attorney that was representing the Plaintiff in this suit and the attorney > that did the filing for the Defendant. If the Defendant controls the > attorneys for both sides it is understandable the Plaintiff has not got > anywhere, and why former CEO A.L. Lawson stated in a news interview, 'well, > they may spank our hands and tell us not to do it anymore'. > c. I was told by my former attorney Mr. Baxter that my wrongful termination > suit was thrown out because it was part of this suit and only found out in > Defendant/Appellee Raytheon E-Systems response to Plaintiffs' Motion to > Proceed In Forma Pauperis attachment E, which states it was because > Plaintiff made no response. It appears the Defendant did control my former > attorney and could only be more obvious if Mr. Broodo represented both. > > 8) The Defendant has used others to 'get close' to the Plaintiff and gather > information. Two of these who have admitted their use by the Defendant > against the Plaintiff is Mr. Guy Morphew and Mr. Billy Rath (affidavit > already submitted). > 9) The Defendant Has Been Dishonest During Government Investigations and > Had Others To Give False Information And Used Threats and Intimidation to > Get People To Give False Or Misleading Information > a. When the investigation began the government contacted the OFCCP to > obtain records. Shortly after the Director of the OFCCP in Dallas wanted me > to come in to see him. I went with my attorney Mr. Baxter. The Union > Officials interviewed by the OFCCP were former Union Officials and not the > officials who were involved during the termination. One statement I saw was > openly false and will be easy to prove in court. > b. The Defendants legal staff and others used threats and intimidation to > get employees to give false information to investigators as well as > instructing employees what to say and threatening to fire them if they > deviated. This has been confirmed by investigators but the AUSA's involved > refused to do anything about it. > 10) The Defendant, And Defendants Legal Staff, Has Used Corrupt Officials > In A Conspiracy To Falsely Imprison, Allegedly To Cover Up The Defendants > RICO Activities. > a. Defendants General Council sent AUSA Lynn Hastings a memo stating; it > appears Mr. Richardson has went to the Congress and Washington press. AUSA > Hastings then called the defendant in to her office and threatened to file > charges on me if I talked to any current or former E-Systems employees, > Congressional Committees or the press. SA Richard Bollinger, SA Ed Dowling > and 'Carlos' was at the meeting and will confirm this. > b. The Defendant had made up what looked just like a 'wanted poster' from > the Plaintiff and Mr. Lewis Sams badge pictures and had it delivered to the > Hunt County Sheriffs Department. The sheriff posted it and informed > deputies the Plaintiff and Mr. Sams were possibly terrorist and to use > extreme caution when approaching them, in an attempt, Plaintiff believes, > to have the Plaintiff and Mr. Sams killed legally. > c. When the Plaintiff and Mr. Sams went to the Hunt County Sheriff and > asked why he had put up the wanted poster and told deputies that, the > sheriff stated the Defendant wanted him to as the Defendant was afraid the > Plaintiff and Mr. Sams was afraid they were taking pictures of the > Defendant changing the tail numbers on some of the aircraft at E-Systems. > In The State of Texas v. Michael Ferris, Kent Williams, attorney for the > Northeast Texas Drug Interdiction Task Force, admitted knowing about the > drug smuggling by or through E-Systems. These were the planes in question. > d. After a meeting at my house at which AF/OSI SA Richard Bollinger, DoD > IG/DCIS SSA Chris Hallien, FBI SA Mark Briant and a judge met with the > Plaintiff, the three agents were followed to Greenville, around Greenville > as they met others, then to the Hunt County line by Hunt County Deputies. > e. Plaintiff had reported to the agents how employees of the Defendant, > Hunt County Sheriffs Department, the then DIS agent at E-Systems and others > were following and harassing witnesses and their families. The agents had > been skeptical of the reported incidents until the actions mentioned in 1, > 2 and 3 above. After the above mentioned incidents thirty (30) year IG/DCIS > SSA Chris Hallien began investigating the Sheriff's Department. > f. A deputy informed me the sheriff informed deputies not to worry about > SSA Hallien because the Defendant was going to have SSA Hallien indicted. I > informed SSA Hallien and other Congressional and DoD investigators of this. > g. In a conversation with Mr. Sams and his wife I was informed: the > government had threatened to file criminal charges against him if he didn't > drop his wrongful termination suit against E-Systems, as he would have > continued to mischarge if he had not been terminated. Mr. Sams was called > before a grand jury and told what to say, and that if he deviated the > government would file the criminal charges against him, and this testimony > was used to get an indictment against SSA Hallien, which forced his > retirement. > h. Mr. Billy Rath, who was being used by Defendants legal staff to keep > track of me, was called in by Ms. Nancy Hampton, one of the Defendants > attorneys, and asked if he thought the Plaintiff would ever quit pursuing > his case. Mr. Rath stated no, that Plaintiff felt he had been cheated out > of his job and until he got his job back or compensation for his job he > would keep pursuing it. Ms. Hampton then picked up the phone and called FBI > National Security Agent Danny James, in the Dallas office, and knowingly > filed the false charge of extortion against the Plaintiff. > i. Twenty-year employee, Mr. Billy Rath was also a senior estimator. Mr. > Rath had informed me how Defendants legal staff was using him and also gave > that and other information to the government investigators. The Defendant > has a fire block that stops employees from gaining access to pornography on > the Internet. The Defendant checked Mr. Rath's computer for pornography and > found none. At this point they brought in a specialist who put in a disk > and found pornography they claimed Mr. Rath had pulled up. Mr. Rath was > fired or forced to resign. The specialist's wife was living with Mr. Rath. > Mr. Rath invited her to leave around the first part of December. Three > months later she filed some kind of assault with a weapon against Mr. Rath. > 154th District Judge Beacum changed court dates, moving them up, Mr. Rath > would not be notified and would be arrested for not being in court. > j. Judge Beacum was also the visiting judge when the pedophile that > molested my daughter was captured after jumping probation and was wanted > for over six years. Judge Beacum ruled the pedophile had not broken any > laws and turned the pedophile loose. > k. I went to the courthouse to get a list of Judge Beacum's contributors > and it was not on file and his office refused to give me a copy. > 11) Possible Reasons The Government or Corrupt Officials Are Aiding E-Systems > > a. Defendant's documents shows where there was bribery or attempted bribery > of a government official. > b. The governments knowledge of defective aircraft as well as crashes with > loss of life which it refused to do anything about and this includes the > Presidents aircraft as well as King Fauds. > c. Defendant's documents shows Defendants and NSA's involvement in the > German bribery scandal. > d. The Defendants or governments involvement in the before mentioned drug > smuggling using government aircraft and operated under AFSOC contracts. > e. The treasonist sale of state of the art technology that comprises the > security of Israel as well as our on military in that region. > f. I was asked, by a Congressional Committee, to see if there was certain > individuals still working for the Defendant that was involved with the > 'Finders' a group that was/is kidnapping then selling children overseas on > a scale that requires a money laundering operation. It is supported by a > ten page Treasury Department, Customs Agents report. > g. I was asked, by a Congressional Committee, if I knew of, or had > information concerning Defendants possible involvement in 'Brownstone'. > This is where government officials were photographed with young boys > performing oral sex on them. > h. Per Senator John DeCamp children were provided for the entertainment > certain officials at the Republican Convention when it was held in Dallas. > This may have ties to Raytheon Systems, 'Brownstone' and the 'Finders'. > i. I was informed a couple of weeks after President Clinton's election in > November 1992 that word had come down from Washington for the DoJ to > decline on all issues before Clinton is sworn in. I reported this to > Congressional and DoD investigators. January 10 1993, days before President > Clinton was sworn in, the DoJ declined on all issues. > j. The preparer of the GAO Report on E-Systems, SA William Davis, stated > that he had been forced to rewrite the report, watering it down, several > times in order to make it acceptable to the Republicans. > k. When the Republicans gained the majority in the House and Senate, the > first thing they did, even before they were sworn in, closed this and other > investigations, which the Democrats say they are going to reopen when they > gain back the majority. > l. The DoD refuses to do anything about the confirmed firing of Defendants > employees for blowing the whistle and/or giving information, although the > terminations are confirmed. > m. The DoD admitted to Government Affairs, and an employee of the DoD > confirmed it to the Plaintiff, the DoD has never ruled in favor of a > defense contractor whistleblower. > n. Allegedly a report was given to Government Affairs that there is an > agreement between the DoD and DoJ not to prosecute certain government > contractors. > o. Given all of the above information, and the fact that judges are > political appointees, what sane or semi-sane person would not want a jury > trial. It also shows the Defendants and Defendants legal staffs lack of > credibility. > p. The Defendants council mentioned to the judge, in a telephone meeting, > that due to the amount of monies involved a settlement was impossible, as > if this was a reason for the judge to throw out this complicated case. The > government estimate of the rip off's is 25 to 30% of all contracts and this > company is/was doing over three billion dollars a year in business with the > government. The Defendant never tried to settle and why should they when > they own enough political influence and officials to get away with > anything, not to mention the probability of controlling my former attorney, > and the tens, if not hundreds, of millions of dollars, confirmed by the > government investigators, which also prove plaintiffs allegations are not > baseless, and they have ripped the tax payers off for enough to buy off > almost anyone. > CONCLUSION > Almost daily there is even politicians speaking about how corrupt the > system is and how it is corrupted by 'donations'. If this is not true then > why would the Republicans close an investigation when it has been confirmed > the tax payers has been ripped of for hundreds of millions of dollars? Why > did the DoJ close their part of the investigation after the word come down > from Washington to decline on all issues before Clinton took office? Was it > to cove up the kidnapping then sale of children overseas or the drug > smuggling or the donations? I realize I must now file a separate civil > action against the corrupt government officials involved, but I listed the > actions to show how they have effected this action. The same thing happened > in Irwin Rautenbergs case Air Sea Forwarders v. E-Systems after E-Systems > purchased Air America and took over the CIA's contracts with that company. > The government did everything it could to aid E-Systems but in that case > Mr. Rautenberg had the money to fight, which I have been illegally denied, > to prevent me from obtaining justice and proper fight this action. I, > Winfred E. Richardson, Plaintiff, therefore requests that the Court grant > Plaintiffs appeal. > > > Respectfully submitted, > > ____________________ > Winfred E. Richardson > P.O. Box 94 > Lone Oak, Tx 75453 > 903-447-4211 > _________________ > The recovered monies are a matter of record shown on the investigators > reports. > > At 12:36 PM 1/30/00 -0600, you wrote: > >Pool of children for sexual purposes: > > Harris,etc. > >The two INSIGHT articles , by Timothy W. Maier, in my estimation, prove > >conclusively that sex with children is on the agenda of Democrats ANd > >Republicans and U.N. Diplomats. There is a sighting of 121 children in a > >mechanically disabled plane at Denver Airport headed for Europe. I cannot > >prove this. It is anecdotal ,therefore. However, children were definitely > >used for sex at the 1993 APEC Pacific Rim APEC COnference, contractred by > >FBI,National Security Agency, and Ron Browb abd Bill CLinton. They were > >placed there to be videotaped by having sex with dignitaries from 15 naTIONS > >at the 1993 Pacific Rim Conference in Seattle.I personally think this alone > >is enough to impeach Clinton, but I have found no SUpreme COurt of > >Congressman who agrees with me, so they much be indulgindg in the same?? > >Herb Jamieson > >Houston > > <A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A> DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soap-boxing! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at: http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
