<tt>From:</tt> <tt> Bob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]></tt> <br><br> <!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en"> <html> Mike Ruppert wrote: <blockquote TYPE=CITE><tt>From:</tt> <tt>"Mike Ruppert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]></tt> <p><tt>I was talking with an LAPD Sergeant yesterday. The corruption being so</tt> <br><tt>widely publicized here is nothing new for Chicago, NY, Detroit, New Orleans</tt> <br><tt>or anyplace else.</tt></blockquote> I've mentioned the DC rapist in squad car while on duty cop, <br>the cop in uniform on duty shaking down johns with his <br>badge number showing, cops with sub-machine guns on <br>Quantico range firing high trajectory into neighborhood <br>then going there in cars and firing pistol shots to generate <br>cover story that the full-auto volley was gangs beefin', <br>Whitehurst complained so he's history and FBI built a new <br>Waco front-door disappearing lab at Quantico where <br>Lon Horiuch's HRT is trained and where the Russians <br>train with FBI and Russian psychologist was involved in <br>Waco ops, and BATF gets their very own lab, too, now here is <br>the perennial favorite DC court-room drug expert imperially <br>stark naked of any real credentials. It was lies, all lies... <br>similar to CIA Charles A. Briggs affidavit in Wilson case... <p><A HREF="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/WPlate/2000-02/04/177l-020400-idx.html">http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/WPlate/2000-02/04/177l-020400-idx.html</A> <p> Narcotics 'Expert' Said to Be Fraud <br> Witness in D.C. Criminal Cases Is <br> Charged With Perjury <p> By Bill Miller <br> Washington Post Staff Writer <br> Friday, February 4, 2000; Page B08 <p> A former narcotics expert for the D.C. police <br> department, who testified as a government witness in <br> thousands of criminal cases, has been charged with <br> perjury following the discovery that he had <br> misrepresented his credentials. <p> Johnny St. Valentine Brown Jr. was a fixture in the <br> courts, helping prosecutors win convictions with his <br> easy-to-understand tutorials about the drug trade. <br> But his police career ended abruptly last summer <br> when a lawyer on a civil case checked Brown's <br> background and questioned key claims made by the <br> detective in court and on his resume. <p> Brown had told juries that he had a degree in <br> pharmacology from Howard University and that he <br> was a board-certified pharmacist in the District. Both <br> claims suggested he had a special knowledge about <br> the chemical makeup and workings of drugs. As it <br> turned out, he had no such degree or certification <br> from any institution, prosecutors said. <p> Prosecutors charged Brown on Wednesday in U.S. <br> District Court with eight counts of perjury, saying he <br> misled them, too, citing testimony he provided in eight <br> trials. They alleged that Brown didn't even attend <br> Howard's school of pharmacy and said he also lied <br> when he claimed under oath to have worked as a <br> pharmacist at stores. <p> The charging document cited specific statements <br> gleaned from trial transcripts, including one passage <br> from April in which Brown testified: "My knowledge <br> of the drug field is further enhanced by the fact that I <br> am a board-certified pharmacist as well. I receive, <br> maintain, compound and dispense narcotic as well as <br> non-narcotic substances per prescription. . . . I <br> finished Howard's School of Pharmacy in 1968." <p> The filing in U.S. District Court came in a "criminal <br> information," which is different from a grand jury <br> indictment. A criminal information can be filed only <br> with the consent of the defendant, who waives a <br> grand jury review of the evidence. The filing of a <br> criminal information often is a signal that a defendant <br> intends to plead guilty. <p> Channing D. Phillips, a spokesman for U.S. Attorney <br> Wilma A. Lewis, declined to say if prosecutors expect <br> a guilty plea. Brown did not return calls seeking <br> comment. <p> Brown, 57, worked 29 years for the police department <br> before resigning in July. Nicknamed Jehru, he had <br> extensive street experience on narcotics cases, and <br> had such a charismatic courtroom demeanor that <br> attorneys rarely challenged his expertise. He would <br> explain the significance of the prosecutors' evidence to <br> jurors, tying it all together. <p> Brown's troubles began last summer when attorney <br> Peter C. Grenier quizzed him at a deposition and did <br> some follow-up digging. Grenier represented Terry <br> Butera, the mother of Eric Butera, a D.C. police <br> informant who was slain in December 1997 while <br> trying to help homicide detectives solve a triple killing <br> at a Starbucks coffee shop. Brown was to be the <br> District's expert witness, but Grenier doubted his <br> claims about a pharmacology degree and made calls <br> to Howard University. That led to Brown's removal <br> from the case. <p> Senior U.S. District Judge June L. Green refused to <br> permit the District to name a replacement expert, and <br> a jury ultimately awarded Butera $98 million, the <br> largest verdict ever returned against the D.C. <br> government. The case is being appealed. <p> Grenier expressed surprise yesterday that none of the <br> charges stemmed from the deposition in his case. "I <br> have Mr. Brown on videotape stating his credentials," <br> Grenier said. <p> The developments have led numerous defense <br> attorneys to ask that convictions be overturned in <br> cases that featured Brown as the expert. Two judges <br> have ruled so far. <p> U.S. District Judge Thomas F. Hogan found that the <br> evidence against Gregory Williams was so <br> overwhelming that Brown's testimony made no <br> difference, and he upheld the conviction. In the other <br> case, Senior U.S. District Judge Stanley Sporkin found <br> that Brown played a pivotal role in a jury's conviction <br> of Raymond Jones Jr. and ordered a new trial. Even <br> though Brown did not discuss his credentials in the <br> Jones case, Sporkin found that Brown's credibility <br> was so shattered that his testimony was in question. <p> © Copyright 2000 The Washington Post Company</html> <hr> <!-- begin ONElist Sponsor --> <center> <iframe width=468 height=60 noresize scrolling=no frameborder=0 marginheight=0 marginwidth=0 src="http://adforce.imgis.com/?adiframe|2.0|2|82050|1|1|ADFORCE;"> <a href="http://adforce.imgis.com/?adlink|2.0|2|82050|1|1|misc=8101;loc=300;" target=_top><img src="http://adforce.imgis.com/?adserv|2.0|2|82050|1|1|misc=8101;loc=300;" border=0 width=468 height=60 alt="ONElist Sponsor"></a> </iframe> <br><font size=1>Please click above to support our sponsor</font><br> </center> <!-- end ONElist Sponsor --> <hr>