-Caveat Lector-   <A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">
</A> -Cui Bono?-

Ex-CIA chief may lose all clearances

Cohen: Deutch retains access to some secret information

ASSOCIATED PRESS

WASHINGTON, Feb. 7 — The Pentagon is examining whether to end all security
clearances for former CIA director John Deutch, Defense Secretary William
Cohen said Monday.


         COHEN ACKNOWLEDGED for the first time that Deutch has maintained
access to “some top-secret information in terms of a narrow area of
technology,” even though the CIA revoked his clearances at the agency last
summer because he had kept classified documents on a home computer.
       The Pentagon’s inspector general has now asked the CIA for its
evidence on Deutch’s security breaches, Cohen said at a news conference. “I
think it should have been done sooner, but it was not,” Cohen said.
       He said the CIA apparently had offered no information about Deutch
previously, so his industrial security clearance at the Pentagon was not
reviewed. Limited industrial clearances are normally given to defense
contractors.
       Cohen said the Pentagon revoked Deutch’s broad security clearances
last August, including access to the Defense Intelligence Agency, the nation
’s main military intelligence service. But as a defense industry consultant,
Deutch retained limited clearances, Cohen said. He said taking them away
would require a legal determination.
       “There must be a compelling level of evidence that would support
removing him from income-producing activities,” Cohen said.
       Defense Department lawyers will have to decide whether the evidence
against him is “sufficient that we can, with due-process, terminate the
relationship,” he said.
       Before becoming CIA director, Deutch had served as deputy secretary
of defense from 1994 to 1995. He now acts as a consultant for several
organizations with defense contracts.
       Cohen said he has no evidence Deutch had compromised any Pentagon
intelligence or operations in his activities. He described Deutch as “fairly
aggressive in his work habits in working long hours, and I assume that had
something to do with” his taking work home. But he said the Pentagon had not
determined whether he had done that with defense documents.


After news reports Saturday that Deutch retained industrial security
clearances at the Pentagon, the Defense Department inspector general
contacted the CIA to provide evidence to help determine whether all Deutch’s
clearances can be dropped, Cohen said.
       The industrial clearance allows Deutch, a professor at Massachusetts
Institute of Technology, to serve as a paid consultant on defense contracts
with the MIT, SAIC Corp. and Raytheon Corp., Pentagon officials said.
       Meanwhile, House Intelligence Committee Chairman Porter Goss, R-Fla.,
expressed surprise Monday that Deutch had kept his Pentagon security
clearances even after having his CIA ones revoked.
       “I believe that the removal of access to sensitive material should
apply universally,” Goss said in an interview.
       A former CIA intelligence officer himself, Goss said Deutch’s
“admission that he used bad judgment” should result in a penalty that would
apply equally to the Pentagon.
       He said his panel is continuing to review the matter and has not
decided whether to attempt to get testimony from Deutch.
       The Senate Intelligence Committee, meanwhile, was to meet privately
Tuesday with the CIA’s inspector general, Britt Snider, and was waiting to
hear whether Deutch would agree to its request that he appear.

       © 2000 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not
be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.


--------

Sec. 107. Limitations on exclusive rights: Fair use

Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a
copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or
phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes
such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple
copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement
of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any
particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include -

(1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a
commercial nature or is for nonprofit
educational purposes;
(2) the nature of the copyrighted work;
(3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the
copyrighted work as a whole; and
(4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the
copyrighted work. The fact that a work is unpublished shall not itself bar a
finding of fair use if such finding is made upon consideration of all the
above factors.
--
He who sees the truth, let him proclaim it, without asking who is for it or
who is against it. -Henry George

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soap-boxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to