American Dissident Voices Broadcast of February 12, 2000

The Club
by Dr. William Pierce

I've been following with interest the reaction of politicians and media
spokesmen in Europe to recent developments in Austria.  Basically, what
has happened is that a man named J�rg Haider won enough votes in
Austria's parliamentary elections last October so that his party, the
Freedom Party of Austria, became the second strongest faction in the
Austrian parliament. Last week members of the Freedom Party became
ministers in a coalition government with the Austrian People's Party,
which has the largest faction. That's the way the system is supposed to
work in a democracy, right?  So why are the Jews and their hangers-on
around the world screeching and threatening and generally acting as if
the sky were falling?

Actually, that's not the way the system is supposed to work. The way
it's supposed to work is that the only people who get elected are those
who have been given a stamp of approval by the Jews, those who have been
certified as "Politically Correct." Really, it's worse than that: to
have a major policy role in the U.S. government or the government of any
major European country, any major White country, you're supposed to be a
member of what amounts to a private club -- the Club -- in which you
have been carefully checked out and determined to be "safe": which is to
say, determined to be willing to take orders from the secret bosses of
the New World Order. You can be a "conservative," a la Ronald Reagan or
George Bush, and be admitted to membership in the Club, so long as the
Club's bosses are sure you'll do what you're told to do, or you can be a
flaming leftist, a la Bill Clinton or Al Gore. The one requirement is
that you be corrupt, that you be a traitor to your people, that you sell
your soul in return for the privilege of Club membership and the
concomitant possibility of wealth and status and at least the semblance
of power.

If you have been accepted into the Club, then you can run for public
office, and the controlled media will treat you as a legitimate
candidate. If you're not in the Club, you will be treated as a threat to
public safety. You'll be treated as dangerous, irresponsible, and
hateful. Which is to say, you'll get the treatment J�rg Haider has been
getting for the past couple of years, the sort of treatment Patrick
Buchanan gets whenever he makes a run for public office. In nearly all
cases, this hysterically hostile treatment by the controlled media will
frighten enough voters away from you to keep you from being elected. 
Only if you are a member of the Club and have sworn obedience to the
Club's bosses, and they believe that you are in fact corrupt and that
they own your soul, can you avoid this hysterical hostility.

Of course, this rule only applies to positions of real power. You can
still be elected county dog catcher without having been a Rhodes
scholar. In fact, you may even become president of Lower Slobbovia , if
the New World Order bosses are too busy with matters elsewhere to
control the elections in Lower Slobbovia. But if the president of Lower
Slobbovia ever gets too uppity, then the Lower Slobbovians may find
cruise missiles and smart bombs coming their way as part of some United
Nations  "humanitarian" mission, ostensibly to keep the Lower
Slobbovians from ethnically cleansing the Upper Slobbovians, or
whatever.

Or one may be elected governor of some remote, mountainous province in
Austria, if the New World Order bosses are pretty sure they have the
rest of Austria firmly under control. That's the way it was with J�rg
Haider. Working through a small, conservative party -- the Freedom Party
-- he got himself elected governor of the province of  Carinthia, or
K�rnten, as the Austrians call it. That's a mountainous, out-of-the-way
part of the country down against the border with Slovenia.

Even in such a seemingly harmless position, the Jews didn't like Haider,
and they soon began raising the alarm against him. For one thing,
Haider's father had been an SS soldier during the war, a member of
Hitler's elite fighting force, and Haider recklessly made a public
statement to the effect that the SS soldiers really weren't a bad bunch:
-- quote -- "Our soldiers were not criminals. . . . They were decent
people of good character," he said. That made the Jews go ballistic.
Club members are under strict orders never to say anything which might
be considered even remotely favorable to Hitler. It's OK to praise
Stalin, whose regime murdered 30 million Russians and Ukrainians,
because Stalin worked hand in glove with the Jews, but one must treat
Hitler as worse than the devil himself, because Hitler is the one man
who gave the Jews a real scare in this century.

Then Haider made other public statements: he pointed out that Hitler had
had some very good economic policies and employment policies before and
during the Second World War, and that the Austrians should consider
adopting similar policies today. He also gave voice to the exasperation
many Austrians and Germans feel about the Jews eternally having their
hands out and demanding more money -- more "reparations" -- for their
alleged losses during the war. He said that continued payments to Israel
would be appropriate only if the Germans who had been driven out of
their ancestral lands by the victorious democratic and communist allies
after the war also were compensated. Twelve million German civilians
were brutally expelled from territories the victorious conquerors
decided should be given to Poland and Czechoslovakia, and nearly three
million of them were murdered or died from exposure and starvation
during the course of the expulsions. When Haider compared the suffering
of these German expellees to those of Jewish forced laborers and
concentration camp inmates, the Jews exploded with rage and hatred. They
began screaming that Haider is a "Nazi."

But of course, Haider is nothing of the sort, unfortunately. He is only
a conservative. Like Atlanta Braves pitcher John Rocker, however, he is
a conservative with a habit of occasionally saying what is on his mind.
And when the Jews began screaming at him and calling him a "Nazi,"
Haider, like Rocker, groveled and apologized. But he also became more
and more popular with the Austrians. Despite all of the Jewish hate
propaganda directed against him, Haider's Freedom Party continued
winning more and more votes in Austria's national elections.

The Haider policy which has done most to make him popular with his
fellow Austrians is his anti-immigration policy. The Jews and the other
members of the Club have been pouring immigrants from the Third World
into Austria since the 1960s,  in line with their program to
de-Europeanize Europe. Haider has campaigned against this policy,
calling for an end to immigration and an end to special benefits for
immigrants, and Austrians have responded by voting for him. Immigration
from the non-White areas of the world is increasingly unpopular
everywhere in Europe, but with Club members in the top governmental
posts everywhere, this popular discontent has been ignored by
governments and condemned by the media as "racism." In countries such as
France, where the National Front of Jean-Marie Le Pen has campaigned on
anti-immigrant issues, the uncompromising hostility of the controlled
media and a solid front among Club members in the government have kept
the nationalists under control. And that's also the way it has been
nearly everywhere else, including the United States.

When Haider surprised everyone last October by winning enough votes for
his Freedom Party to become the second-largest faction in Austria's
parliament, the Jews and their servants everywhere unleashed a non-stop
torrent of abuse on Haider and on Austria. "His party may be the second
largest now," the Jews declared, "but Haider must have no role in the
Austrian government. He must have no control over government policies.
The government must remain entirely in the hands of people obedient to
us. Otherwise we will punish Austria severely." Of course, the Jews
didn't use exactly those words, but that's exactly what they meant.

Then, as it became clear a couple of weeks ago that Haider's Freedom
Party would indeed have a major role in Austria's government, the
shrillness of the anti-Austrian abuse increased still further. We had
the fascinating spectacle of leading politicians everywhere -- France,
Belgium, Britain, the Netherlands, Germany, Scandinavia, Spain, Portugal
-- demanding that the will of the Austrian people be ignored, that the
results of Austria's democratic election be set aside: whatever was
necessary to keep Haider's party out of the Austrian government. And
these leading politicians everywhere are democrats, men supposedly
devoted to the idea that the will of the majority is sacred. They also
are all members of the Club; they are all men who have made a secret
pact with the Jews, and that, really, is what counts. Democracy, the
will of the people, majority rule: those are just words, just
ideological flypaper for keeping the masses of voters confused. 

This really is an important point, and I want to emphasize it. The Jews
and their fellow Club members always push democracy. Democracy, they
declare, is the only acceptable form of government anywhere, except in
various little Third World bantustans, where it's OK to have a
head-witchdoctor-for-life, or whatever, because there's no chance that
such a system will catch on elsewhere. Everywhere in the White world,
however, democracy is required. But the reason that the Jews love
democracy so much is only because it is the easiest system for them to
control. Whoever controls the media controls the majority of the votes.
Democracy works just the way the Jews want it to work -- except when
someone who isn't a member of the Club slips through a crack and gets
elected, as in Austria. Then we get a chance to see what the Jews and
their lackeys really think about democracy. To restate the obvious:
what's important to the Jews and the other members of the Club is not
democracy, but continued control by themselves. When democracy serves
the purpose of keeping them in power, they are fervent democrats. But
when democracy instead becomes a threat to continued Jewish rule, they
are just as fervent anti-democrats.

So last week, as Haider's people entered the Austrian government and
took over the key ministries of defense, justice, and finance -- and
also the ministry of social security, which handles welfare payments and
other special benefits to immigrants -- Israel's ambassador left in a
huff, followed shortly by the ambassador of the ever-obedient United
States, while the top politicians in other countries blustered and
threatened economic sanctions, a severing of political contacts with
countries belonging to the so-called European Union, exclusion from NATO
participation, and so on. The media were full of dire warnings that
allowing Austrian voters to run their own country poses a major threat
to democracy everywhere. 

Jews in Vienna used megaphones to whip up mobs of angry immigrants, who
smashed store windows and overturned and burned police cars. More than
30 policemen were injured by the rioters. One Jew protester in Vienna,
Paul Rubinstein,  told a reporter: "This is no longer a Viennese problem
or even an Austrian one, but a world one." There really seems to be no
limit to Jewish impudence. Can you imagine a gang of Austrians going to
Israel and stirring up a mob of Palestinians in Tel Aviv, say, to burn
Jewish police cars and then making arrogant statements to the press
about what would and would not be tolerated in the makeup of the Jewish
government? Mr. Rubinstein, of course, is right about one thing: what's
happening now is a world problem. It's not just the Austrians who have a
problem, but also the Russians and the Serbs and the Germans and the
people in every country -- including America -- who want to regain their
freedom and their national sovereignty.

It really is unfortunate that J�rg Haider isn't the "new Hitler" that
the Jewish hate propaganda makes him out to be. His party is still
increasing in popularity, primarily the result of Austrian resentment
against the anti-Haider pressure being applied by Jews and other Club
members. If new elections were held today, polls indicate, the Freedom
Party would gain another 15 per cent of the vote and  become the largest
party in Austria. But as a conservative, Haider will compromise with his
people's enemies. He will slow the rate of decline in Austria for a few
years, but he will not make the fundamental changes in Austrian society
needed for renewed health, nor will he ignite the revolution needed to
cleanse Europe. It is notable, however, that most of the Freedom Party's
support comes from young people, not elderly conservatives. It is
conceivable that the party could evolve in a more radical direction,
although that is not likely.

The two main benefits for the world in the recent success of the Freedom
Party in Austria are, first, that this success certainly will encourage
nationalists in other countries by demonstrating that the Club is not
always able to have its way; and second, the Jewish reaction and the
reaction of the other Club members to the Freedom Party's success
provide for the world as clear a demonstration as we could want of the
totally corrupt nature of the clique which now rules the world: the New
World Order clique. Watching all of these supposed "democrats" suddenly
change their tune on command and begin denouncing the democratic process
in Austria when it doesn't produce the results they want is a truly
enlightening experience.

Now I want to give you a five-minute synopsis of the political history
of our world. This synopsis will be greatly oversimplified, of course,
and it certainly will be based on an incomplete knowledge of the facts.
I don't have any secret pipeline to the truth. But I do observe what is
happening in the world around me, and I do try to make sense of it. I do
look for patterns. I do look for common threads. I do try to understand
what's behind it all. And this is what I see: I see that for 10,000
years or so we pretty much ran our own affairs in Europe. Different
groups of us did things in different ways. Some of us governed ourselves
with a council of elders, a gerousia; others had a tribal chieftain;
some of us had kings. At the dawn of history, aristocracy was the
general rule for our people, but here and there we tried different
things at different times. In Greece and in Rome monarchical aristocracy
evolved into a sort of aristocratic democracy, where the nobles, the
landowners, got together in a senate or a boule and voted on policies.
Sometimes these aristocratic legislators became sloppy or lazy or
careless, and they got too many people involved in the voting. Things
became too democratic, and then either the people would be conquered by
their more fit neighbors, or a strong man, a dictator, a Caesar, would
take charge and straighten things out for a while, and a republic would
become an empire.

At any given time, some people liked the system, and some people didn't.
No matter what the system, some of our people were happy, and some
weren't. Sometimes things were stable for a long time, and sometimes we
had much turmoil, with one war or revolution after another. But the
important thing -- the most important thing -- is that we ran things
ourselves. We conducted our own affairs, for better or for worse. And on
the whole we did a better job of conducting our affairs than
non-Europeans anywhere. We fought among ourselves almost continually,
but we prospered nevertheless. We advanced. We made progress. Sometimes
we had temporary setbacks, as when the Moors conquered Spain in the 8th
century and the Mongols conquered Russia in the 13th century. But nearly
always we whipped anybody who got in our way. We ruled the world, and
ruled it as we pleased, at the beginning of the 20th century. We had
many different sorts of government and leaders with different
ideologies. We had many rivalries and conflicts among ourselves. But we
Europeans, we White people, ran the show.

Some very unhealthy changes had occurred in the White world during the
19th century, however. During the Napoleonic Wars, in the first part of
the 19th century, the Jews in western Europe were permitted to leave
their ghettoes and were given civil rights. Until the 19th century wise
rulers had protected their people from the Jews by keeping the Jews
isolated. But in the 19th century they began infiltrating European
political, cultural, and social institutions. They began agitating among
the lowest European social classes, among the rabble and the resentful
pseudo-intellectuals. One of them, Karl Marx, the father of communism,
called for the communist overthrow of Gentile society. By the beginning
of the 20th century, the Jews had organized two strong movements aimed
at acquiring power for themselves: the communist movement, directed
outward toward Gentile society. and the Zionist movement, directed
inward.

Then came two ruinous, fratricidal wars, each more destructive than any
previous war in the history of mankind, and in both of these wars the
Jews played a major role behind the scenes. The first of these wars
served not only to destroy the long-established social and political
order in Europe, but to empower both Jewish movements, communism and
Zionism. The behind-the-scenes dealing, in which the Jews promised
British politicians to bring America into the First World War on the
side of Britain in return for Palestine being given to the Jews, is
especially illuminating. This undercover deal, between Britain's
politicians and world Jewry, resulted in U.S. President Woodrow Wilson,
a Club member who had campaigned on an anti-war platform, suddenly
switching his position and demanding U.S. involvement in the war in
Europe, even though no vital U.S. interests were served thereby. It made
a world war out of the European war and prolonged it by two years,
leaving the Russian monarchy so weakened that it could not resist a
communist takeover.

The second war finished the job started by the first. With no vital
American interests threatened, Club member Franklin Roosevelt again
converted a European war into a world war, which rescued both communism
and Jewish power in Europe from Hitler -- and finished the destruction
of Europe's old power structures and institutions and values. It
established the Club -- this kosherised old-boy fraternity of corrupt
politicians -- as the hidden but nonetheless supreme political
institution; it homogenized political structures and ideologies
everywhere in the West, making mass democracy and Political Correctness
mandatory; and it elevated the Jews to the status of Those Who Can Do No
Wrong. And that's the way it has been ever since, in Austria and
elsewhere.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
The text above is based on a broadcast of the American Dissident
Voices radio program sponsored by National Vanguard Books.
It is distributed by e-mail each Saturday to subscribers of ADVlist.

To subscribe to ADVlist send an e-mail message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (The subject and body of the message don't
matter.)

For more information about National Vanguard Books or the
National Alliance see our web site at http://www.natvan.com or
http://www.natall.com

==> The National Alliance has a strict anti-spamming policy.  This 
information is intended for interested parties only and is not to be 
indiscriminately distributed via mass e-mailing or newsgroup posting.

To contact us, write to:
     National Vanguard Books
     Attention:  ADVlist
     P.O. Box 330
     Hillsboro, WV  24946

or e-mail:  [EMAIL PROTECTED] please tell us if we can post your
comments and if so whether you want your name or e-mail address
given.

==>  TO BE REMOVED from ADVlist, send an e-mail message to:  
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (The subject and body of the message don't
matter.)

(c) 2000 National Vanguard Books



Reply via email to