-Caveat Lector- <A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"> </A> -Cui Bono?- from:alt.conspiracy As, always, Caveat Lector Om K ----- Click Here: <A HREF="aol://5863:126/alt.conspiracy:596645">NASA Masonic Conspiracy</A> ----- Subject: NASA Masonic Conspiracy From: "Ron Birkinshaw" <A HREF="mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]">randomevent@zoo m.co.uk</A> Date: Sun, Feb 20, 2000 12:28 PM Message-id: <88piqr$2mpa$[EMAIL PROTECTED]> NASA Masonic Conspiracy Apollo Missions - Masonic Symbols To make interstellar travel believable NASA was created. The Apollo Space Program foisted the idea that man could travel to, and walk upon, the moon. Every Apollo mission was carefully rehearsed and then filmed in large sound stages at the Atomic Energy Commissions Top Secret test site in the Nevada Desert and in a secured and guarded sound stage at the Walt Disney Studios within which was a huge scale mock-up of the moon. All names, missions, landing sites, and events in the Apollo Space Program echoed the occult metaphors, rituals, and symbology of the Illuminati's secret religion. The most transparent was the faked explosion on the spacecraft Apollo 13, named "Aquarius" (new age) at 1:13 (1313 military time) on April 13, 1970 which was the metaphor for the initiation ceremony involving the death (explosion), placement in the coffin (period of uncertainty of their survival), communion with the spiritual world and the imparting of esoteric knowledge to the candidate (orbit and observation of the moon without physical contact), rebirth of the initiate (solution of problem and repairs), and the raising up (of the Phoenix, the new age of Aquarius) by the grip of the lions paw (reentry and recovery of Apollo 13). 13 is the number of death and rebirth, death and reincarnation, sacrifice, the Phoenix, the Christ (perfected soul imprisoned in matter), and the transition from the old to the new. Another revelation to those who understand the symbolic language of the Illuminati is the hidden meaning of the names of the Space Shuttles, "A Colombian Enterprise to Endeavor for the Discovery of Atlantis... and all Challengers shall be destroyed." Exploration of the moon stopped because it was impossible to continue the hoax without being ultimately discovered. And of course they ran out of pre-filmed episodes. No man has ever ascended higher than 300 miles, if that high, above the Earth's surface. No man has ever orbited, landed on, or walked upon the moon in any publicly known space program. If man has ever truly been to the moon it has been done in secret and with a far different technology. The tremendous radiation encountered in the Van Allen Belt, solar radiation, cosmic radiation, temperature control, and many other problems connected with space travel prevent living organisms leaving our atmosphere with our known level of technology. Any intelligent high school student with a basic physics book can prove NASA faked the Apollo moon landings If you doubt this please explain how the astronauts walked upon the moons surface enclosed in a space suit in full sunlight absorbing a minimum of 265 degrees of heat surrounded by a vacuum. NASA tells us the moon has no atmosphere and that the astronauts were surrounded by the vacuum of space. Heat is defined as the vibration or movement of molecules within matter. The faster the molecular motion the higher the temperature. The slower the molecular motion the colder the temperature. Absolute zero is that point where all molecular motion ceases. In order to have hot or cold molecules must be present. A vacuum is a condition of nothingness where there are no molecules. Vacuums exist in degrees. Some scientists tell us that there is no such thing as an absolute vacuum. Space is the closest thing to an absolute vacuum that is known to us. There are so few molecules present in most areas of what we know as "space" that any concept of "hot" or "cold" is impossible to measure. A vacuum is a perfect insulator. That is why a "Thermos" or vacuum bottle is used to store hot or cold liquids in order to maintain the temperature for the longest time possible without re-heating or re-cooling. Radiation of all types will travel through a vacuum but will not affect the vacuum. Radiant heat from the sun travels through the vacuum of space but does not "warm" space. In fact the radiant heat of the sun has no affect whatsoever until it strikes matter. Molecular movement will increase in direct proportion to the radiant energy which is absorbed by matter. The time it takes to heat matter exposed to direct sunlight in space is determined by its color, its elemental properties, its distance from the sun, and its rate of absorption of radiant heat energy. Space is NOT hot. Space is NOT cold. Objects which are heated cannot be cooled by space. In order for an object to cool it must first be removed from direct sunlight. Objects which are in the shadow of another object will eventually cool but not because space is "cold". Space is not cold. Hot and cold do not exist in the vacuum of space. Objects cool because the laws of motion dictate that the molecules of the object will slow down due to the resistance resulting from striking other molecules until eventually all motion will stop provided the object is sheltered from the direct and/or indirect radiation of the sun and that there is no other source of heat. Since the vacuum of space is the perfect insulator objects take a very long time to cool even when removed from all sources of heat, radiated or otherwise. NASA insists the space suits the astronauts supposedly wore on the lunar surface were air conditioned. An air conditioner cannot, and will not work without a heat exchanger. A heat exchanger simply takes heat gathered in a medium such as freon from one place and transfers it to another place. This requires a medium of molecules which can absorb and transfer the heat such as an atmosphere or water. An air conditioner will not and cannot work in a vacuum. A space suit surrounded by a vacuum cannot transfer heat from the inside of the suit to any other place. The vacuum, remember, is a perfect insulator. A man would roast in his suit in such a circumstance. NASA claims the spacesuits were cooled by a water system which was piped around the body, then through a system of coils sheltered from the sun in the backpack. NASA claims that water was sprayed on the coils causing a coating of ice to form. The ice then supposedly absorbed the tremendous heat collected in the water and evaporated into space. There are two problems with this that cannot be explained away. 1) The amount of water needed to be carried by the astronauts in order to make this work for even a very small length of time in the direct 55 degrees over the boiling point of water (210 degrees F at sea level on Earth) heat of the sun could not have possibly been carried by the astronauts. 2) NASA has since claimed that they found ice in moon craters. NASA claims that ice sheltered from the direct rays of the sun will NOT evaporate destroying their own bogus "air conditioning" explanation. Remember this. Think about it the next time you go off in the morning with a "vacuum bottle" filled with hot coffee. Think about it long and hard when you sit down and pour a piping hot cup from your thermos to drink with your lunch four hours later... and then think about it again when you pour the last still very warm cup of coffee at the end of the day. The same laws of physics apply to any vehicle traveling through space. NASA claims that the spacecraft was slowly rotated causing the shadowed side to be cooled by the intense cold of space... an intense cold that DOES NOT EXIST. In fact the only thing that could have been accomplished by a rotation of the spacecraft is a more even and constant heating such as that obtained by rotating a hot dog on a spit. In reality a dish called Astronaut a la Apollo would have been served. At the very least you would not want to open the hatch upon the crafts return. NASA knows better than to claim, in addition, that a water cooling apparatus such as that which they claim cooled the astronauts suits cooled the spacecraft. No rocket could ever have been launched with the amount of water needed to work such a system for even a very short period of time. Fresh water weighs a little over 62 lbs. per cubic foot. Space and weight capacity were critical given the lift capability of the rockets used in the Apollo Space Program. No such extra water was carried by any mission whatsoever for suits or for cooling the spacecraft. On the tapes the Astronauts complained bitterly of the cold during their journey and while on the surface of the moon. They spoke of using heaters that did not give off enough heat to overcome the intense cold of space. It was imperative that NASA use this ruse because to tell the truth would TELL THE TRUTH. It is also proof of the arrogance and contempt in which the Illuminati holds the common man. What we heard is in reality indicative of an over zealous cooling system in the props used during the filming of the missions at the Atomic Energy Commissions Nevada desert test site, where it is common to see temperatures well over 100 degrees. In the glaring unfiltered direct heat of the sun the Astronauts could never have been cold at any time whatsoever in the perfect insulating vacuum of space. NASA claims that the space suits worn by the astronauts were pressurized at 5 psi over the ambient pressure (0 psi vacuum) on the moon's surface. We have examined the gloves NASA claims the astronauts wore and find they are made of pliable material containing no mechanical, hydraulic, or electrical devices which would aid the astronauts in the dexterous use of their fingers and hands while wearing the gloves. Experiments prove absolutely that such gloves are impossible to use and that the wearer cannot bend the wrist or fingers to do any dexterous work whatsoever when filled with 5 psi over ambient pressure either in a vacuum or in the earth's atmosphere. NASA actually showed film and television footage of astronauts using their hands and fingers normally during their EVAs on the so-called lunar surface. The films show clearly that there is no pressure whatsoever within the gloves... a condition that would have caused explosive decompression of the astronauts resulting in almost immediate death if they had really been surrounded by the vacuum of space. If you don't believe it try it yourself... it is a very simple experiment and does not require a rocket scientist to perform. These are just two of over a hundred very simple and very easy to prove valid scientific reasons why NASA and the Apollo Space Program are two of the biggest lies ever foisted upon the unsuspecting and trusting People of the world. In addition most, if not all, of the photos, films, and videotape of the Apollo Moon Missions are easily proven to be fake. Anyone with the slightest knowledge of photography, lighting, and physics can easily prove that NASA faked the visual records of the Apollo Space Program. Some are so obviously fake that when the discrepancies are pointed out to unsuspecting viewers an audible gasp has been heard. Some have actually gone into a mild state of shock. Some People break down and cry. I have seen others become so angry that they have ripped the offending photos to shreds while screaming incoherently. C. Fred Kleinknect, head of NASA at the time of the Apollo Space Program, is now the Sovereign Grand Commander of the Council of the 33rd Degree of the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite of Freemasonry of the Southern Jurisdiction. It was his reward for pulling it off. All of the first astronauts were Freemasons. There is a photograph in the House of the Temple in Washington DC of Neil Armstrong on the moons surface (supposedly) in his spacesuit holding his Masonic Apron in front of his groin. The effect upon the people of the world was, that if we could go to the moon other creatures from other worlds could travel to our Earth. The escalation of the artificial alien threat scenario since that time is obvious. The recent revelations of the fraudulent nature of NASA and the Apollo space program by the Intelligence Service and others has resulted in a flood of propaganda, television programs, and films designed to keep the sheople trapped in a deep ignorant sleep. The most ambitious are "Apollo 13" and "From the Earth to the Moon", both involving the actor/producer Tom Hanks. The latter opens with a monologue by Mr. Hanks who walks forward revealing a huge representation of the "God" Apollo (Sun, Osiris, lost word, etc.) guiding his chariot pulled by 4 horses through the heavens. ===== Subject: Re: NASA Masonic Conspiracy From: Ed King <A HREF="mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]">[EMAIL PROTECTED]</ A> Date: Sun, Feb 20, 2000 8:01 PM Message-id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> In article <88piqr$2mpa$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ron Birkinshaw wrote a whole bunch of stuff he copied off of someone's web site (looks like William Cooper, actually) about which I'll just address one very specific piece for the sake of brevity: > C. Fred Kleinknect, head of NASA at the time of the Apollo Space Program, is > now the Sovereign Grand Commander of the Council of the 33rd Degree of the > Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite of Freemasonry of the Southern > Jurisdiction. It was his reward for pulling it off. You know, I've seen this charge several times so tonight decided to check it out, just for the heck of it. I remembered that Fred was the Grand Secretary for MANY, MANY years so I wondered how he managed to attain such an important position direction after a supposed position with NASA. Was there really some truth to the charge? Well, guess what: it's YET ANOTHER LIE!!! Christian Frederick Kleinknecht (you left out the "h", dear child) was born in 1924 and became an employee of the Scottish Rite in 1947! Now perhaps you could explain - since you seem to know all this stuff about the Masons - how a fellow who was working in an administrative position in Washington, DC, would have found the spare time to head up NASA - and never miss a beat.... Ah, yes: another diatribe against Freemasonry shot to pieces! Sources: Who is Who in Freemasonry 1988 Edition, Anchor Press NASA Biographies (which don't mention a single Kleinknecht!) but which do mention everyone and his twin sister practically including folks like Henry Kissinger and many folks who're now deceased (so the antis can't claim that it's a partial biography) online at <A HREF="http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/biosk-n.html">http://www.hq.na sa.gov/office/pao/History/biosk-n.html</A> Ed King <A HREF="http://www.masonicinfo.com">http://www.masonicinfo.com</A> -- Anti-Masonry: Points of View Internet newsgroup posting. Copyright 2000. All rights reserved. ===== Subject: Re: NASA Masonic Conspiracy From: <A HREF="mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ">[EMAIL PROTECTED] </A> (Mav) Date: Sun, Feb 20, 2000 10:42 PM Message-id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> On Sun, 20 Feb 2000 23:01:49 EST, Ed King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >In article <88piqr$2mpa$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ron Birkinshaw wrote a >whole bunch of stuff he copied off of someone's web site (looks like William >Cooper, actually) about which I'll just address one very specific piece for >the sake of brevity: > ehhh....no need, Bro. Ed. This particular piece of nonsense seems to pop up here every once in a while. I remember Danny Sale posting this crap about 5 years ago......then "Don", then Kansan....it never ends. Regurgitated claptrap from the same old twits. You'd think they'd get new material, eh? Originality is NOT the strong suit of our local psychoceramics, apparantly.... Dave Mavity MM ===== Subject: Re: NASA Masonic Conspiracy From: <A HREF="mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]">[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A> Date: Wed, Feb 23, 2000 8:53 AM Message-id: <8913ad$2fm$[EMAIL PROTECTED]> My belief is that it is actually the nazis, not the freemasons who are conspiring within Nasa. They came to influence nasa through Werner von Braun. Actually the nazis were big enemies of the freemasons. Nazis had an occult background as well, for an example the Thule Society, Edelweiss society and the Vril society. Actually it is possible that the Aryans Adolf Hitler referred to were actually so-called Nordic aliens. This might explain some policies of NASA, for an example the allged "failure" of the Mars probes... Tommy Idiot Sent via Deja.com <A HREF="http://www.deja.com/">http://www.deja.com/</A> Before you buy. ===== Subject: NASA Moronic Conspiracy? From: "Ragnar (no, not THE Ragnar)" <A HREF="mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]">rwor [EMAIL PROTECTED]</A> Date: Sun, Feb 20, 2000 9:38 PM Message-id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Kenneth S. Kleinknecht was manager of the Mercury Project. If the rest of your "sdcholarship" is as poorly researched, I'm afraid the anti-masonic cause is in bad shape. Ron Birkinshaw wrote: > > C. Fred Kleinknect, head of NASA at the time of the Apollo Space Program, is > now the Sovereign Grand Commander of the Council of the 33rd Degree of the > Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite of Freemasonry of the Southern > Jurisdiction. It was his reward for pulling it off. All of the first > astronauts were Freemasons. There is a photograph in the House of the Temple > in Washington DC of Neil Armstrong on the moons surface (supposedly) in his > spacesuit holding his Masonic Apron in front of his groin. > ===== Subject: Re: NASA Masonic Conspiracy From: <A HREF="mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ">[EMAIL PROTECTED] </A> (David T.) Date: Wed, Feb 23, 2000 2:28 PM Message-id: <38b44bdb.106383290@news> Ahem... On Sun, 20 Feb 2000 20:28:35 -0000, "Ron Birkinshaw" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >NASA Masonic Conspiracy >If you doubt this please explain how the astronauts walked upon the moons >surface enclosed in a space suit in full sunlight absorbing a minimum of 265 >degrees of heat surrounded by a vacuum. NASA tells us the moon has no >atmosphere and that the astronauts were surrounded by the vacuum of space. <snip almost, but not quite, accurate basic radiation physics> >Space is NOT hot. Space is NOT cold. True. >Objects which are heated cannot be cooled by space. False. >Objects which are in the shadow of another object will eventually cool True. >Objects cool because the laws of motion dictate that the molecules of the >object will slow down due to the resistance resulting from striking other >molecules until eventually all motion will stop provided the object is >sheltered from the direct and/or indirect radiation of the sun and that >there is no other source of heat. False. Okay, now I'll explain your error. Heat is the motion of energy from one location to another. A hot object does not contain heat; it contains energy, in the form of molecular vibration. Heat occurs when a cooler object comes into thermal contact with the warmer object. It moves from hot to cold. There are 3 forms of heat transfer. The first, conduction, is when two items of different temperatures touch each other and the energy in the hot one flows as heat into the cold one. The second, convection, is when a fluid such as air or water or ethylene glycol flows over a hot object. Thermal energy moves into the fluid (or out of it if the fluid is hotter), then the fluid flows away taking the energy with it. The third is radiation. We're talking thermal radiation here, not the emissions of radioactive elements during their decay into other elements. Any two objects that have a line of sight on each other can transfer heat through the mechanism of radiation. This is how heat from the sun can be felt on Earth. There is no material connection required for radiation transfer to occur, no medium. The molecular vibration in one object produces infrared radiation that crosses through the intervening distance to the other object, where it gets absorbed and increases the vibration of the other object's molecules. In normal Earth conditions, radiation tends to be a much smaller factor than the other two. When two objects are the same temperature, they radiate the same amount into each other, so neither one warms or cools. There's an important concept you need to grasp for what comes next to make sense. The vacuum of space is neither hot nor cold. However, it is a large volume into which energy can be radiated. Radio waves can go off into empty space. The light from stars head off into the eternal night with only a vanishingly small chance of ever intersecting another particle of matter. These radiations do not affect the fabric of space in any meaningful way, yet they propogate through just the same, just like gamma rays and microwaves. Radiant heat works exactly the same way, because it's all part of the same electromagnetic spectrum. You can think of the vast nothingness of space as a sink into which you can pour as much energy as you like without worrying that it will ever get full, or in fact ever change at all. It is a boundary, an effectively fixed state. Fortunately, it is a state some of whose properties we understand. Enough, at least, that we can use the boundary in working out heat transfer problems. Now then, you, me, the chair you're probably sitting on, a cow, and the Eiffel Tower are all warmer than absolute zero. That's -273.15(6?) degrees Celsius or 0 degrees Kelvin for those of you playing along at home. As such, we all generate infrared radiation. This is what those nifty helicopter-mounted body heat scanners are looking for. Another name for infrared radiation is heat. Everything that is not at a temperature of 0 Kelvin radiates some amount of heat. The sun radiates heat to Earth, then Earth turns around (1/2 revolution to be precise) and re-radiates it to that deep space heat sink I was talking about before. Everything that is exposed to the sky has a radiation heat link to the deep space heat sink, which I will from this point refer to as Murray. For example, suppose there are two identical cars parked right next to one another in Colorado on a night when the temperature get close to, but not below, freezing. The only difference is that Car A is parked inside a closed, unheated garage while Car B is parked just outside. Neither engine is left running, nor are there any people or pets around to disturb things. There is also no wind and no clouds. Because Car A is enclosed, it has no radiation link to Murray. Car B, OTOH, is radiating heat to Murray on the cloudless night in question. The heat lost to Murray overnight will cool Car B's windshield enough drop it below freezing and allow frost to form, despite the fact that it was never cold enough outside to freeze water. Car A will have no frost on its windshield precisely because it didn't radiate heat into space. The same holds true for a ship in space or a man on the moon. One side of the ship will heat because the sun is shining on it. The other side will cool because the sun is not shining on it and it is exposed to Murray. A man standing on the moon gets heated on his sunward side and cooled on the other. If he goes behind a boulder, he will cool by radiating to space and to the surrounding rocks. If there is any rock within sight of him that is hotter than he is because it's still in direct sunlight, it will radiate heat into him. Remember, a thing does not need to be incandescent to radiate heat. The inside surface of the space shuttle's cargo bay doors are radiators that release the excess heat built up within the shuttle into space to keep it habitably cool. If what I have just explaining were false, they would not and could not do that. >NASA claims the spacesuits were cooled by a water system which was piped >around the body, then through a system of coils sheltered from the sun in >the backpack. NASA claims that water was sprayed on the coils causing a >coating of ice to form. The ice then supposedly absorbed the tremendous heat >collected in the water and evaporated into space. I admit I'm not familiar with the technical aspects of the space suit coolant system. However, assuming your description is at least somewhat accurate, I speculate that the water sprayed onto the radiator is still enclosed inside the cooling system. The heat gets transferred from the water to the radiator, then transfers from the radiator to the environment. The water gets reused. If they ejected the water after collecting all that heat into it, there would be no need for any radiator. They would simply dump the hot water overboard. When the water leaves, the heat goes with it. Therefore, you probably misunderstood whatever source you read about the function of space suit coolant systems. >Remember this. Think about it the next time you go off in the morning with a >"vacuum bottle" filled with hot coffee. Think about it long and hard when >you sit down and pour a piping hot cup from your thermos to drink with your >lunch four hours later... and then think about it again when you pour the >last still very warm cup of coffee at the end of the day. As a heat transfer mechanism, radiation is orders of magnitude smaller than conduction or convection in the range of temperatures experienced by the common thermos. By putting the vacuum layer between the coffee inside the thermos and the outside world, the thermos minimizes the conduction and convection heat transfer between the coffee and the world. The only heat transfer mechanism left is radiation, which is much less efficient than conduction or convection. Therefore, the coffee can't get rid of its energy as quickly. Therefore, it stays hot longer. >In addition most, if not all, of the photos, films, and videotape of the >Apollo Moon Missions are easily proven to be fake. Anyone with the slightest >knowledge of photography, lighting, and physics can easily prove that NASA >faked the visual records of the Apollo Space Program. Funny how no one ever lists any specifics. David (In your reply, please explain why you want to disbelieve one of man's greatest achievements.) ===== Subject: Re: NASA Masonic Conspiracy From: <A HREF="mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ">[EMAIL PROTECTED] </A> (David T.) Date: Thu, Feb 24, 2000 11:42 AM Message-id: <38b5829f.185951125@news> On Thu, 24 Feb 2000 17:31:26 GMT, 23skid5*[EMAIL PROTECTED] (23Skidooooo) wrote: >On 23 Feb 2000 22:28:31 GMT, some virtual stranger calling themself >[EMAIL PROTECTED] (David T.) decided to voice their opinion, of which I had >this to say: ><snip> >>The vacuum of space is neither hot nor cold. > >You're absolutely right about everything, but I don't grok this statement. >Aren't hot or cold just subjective terms? I mean, you can call A0 cold, >because you can't get any colder, but what of a steaming cup of coffee? >Is it not "cold" compared to the sun? I mean, I usually refer to "cold" as >something with less thermal energy per volume than myself, so I'd look at >"Murray" as something cold--> I would lose heat to it. So then, how could >something be neither hot nor cold? What are you comparing? What I meant was that if you stuck a thermometer out into deep space, you wouldn't be able to measure a temperature. There's nothing there to measure the temperature of. The thermometer might catch some passing rays and get heated by them, or radiate its own heat into the cosmos, but that wouldn't be an indicator of local ambient. Temperature is a property of mass. Since vacuum has no mass (other than the constant boil of virtual particle pairs (which don't count (except near black holes))), it can't be hot, and it can't be cold. That's what I meant. None of which precludes Murray from being an effectively infinite heat sink. Interesting side note, BTW: if the universe is finite, then eventually enough radiant heat will leak into deep space that the energy density out there will equal that of whatever stars are left by that time. Nothing will be able to lose heat by radiation anymore because the heat radiation coming from space to the object will equal the radiation going back out into it. That's the heat death of the universe, one of the popular theories as to the end of everything. The good news is that current measurements seem to indicate that the universe will never stop expanding, so there will always be more room for that waste energy to spread itself over. The bad news is that if it is expanding too quickly, it will cool off too much (sloppy wording, I admit. Just relax) and end everything by freezing. The good news is that the human race will be long dead and forgotten before any of this matters on a personal level. Or maybe that's bad news. I've never been sure. David (Plus, the universe may be infinite, but that's a whole 'nother post.) ----- Aloha, He'Ping, Om, Shalom, Salaam. Em Hotep, Peace Be, All My Relations. Omnia Bona Bonis, Adieu, Adios, Aloha. Amen. Roads End <A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A> DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are not allowed. Substance�not soap-boxing! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at: http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
