-Caveat Lector-   <A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">
</A> -Cui Bono?-

Justice Department to review evidence after acquittal in Diallo
case

Albany, N.Y.(CNN) -- The Justice Department announced it will
review the evidence in the trial of four white New York City
police officers who were acquitted on Friday of all charges in
the death of Amadou Diallo, an unarmed black man who was hit by
19 of 41 shots fired at him in the vestibule of his Bronx home
last February.

The Justice Department released the following statement on behalf
of Mary Jo White, the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of
New York:

"Ms. White announced that, as in cases of this kind, her office,
in conjunction with the Civil Rights Division of the Department
of Justice, will review all of the available evidence with
respect to the death of Mr. Diallo, including the evidence
available to the District Attorney's Office in Bronx County, to
determine whether there were any violations of the federal
criminal civil rights laws."

The statement came shortly after the acquittal of the defendants
-- Kenneth Boss, Sean Carroll, Edward McMellon and Richard Murphy
-- who had all pleaded not guilty to the charge of second-degree
murder in the 1999 killing of Diallo, a 22-year-old immigrant
from the West African nation of Guinea.

Jurors also were allowed to consider lesser charges, including
first-degree manslaughter, criminally negligent homicide, and
reckless endangerment.

Before the verdicts were read, Supreme Court Justice Joseph
Teresi issued a warning against any emotional outbursts in the
courtroom and ordered everyone to remain seated until all motions
were heard.

Several officers wiped back tears as they heard the jury
exonerate them. Carroll gripped a rosary as he listened to each
decision from the jurors. The families of the officers and
Diallo's mother were in the courtroom to hear the verdicts.
Diallo's mother was silent but wept and gripped the hands of her
brothers as the verdicts were read. Teresi thanked the jurors and
told them the state of New York had strict laws protecting their
privacy and that they were under no obligation to explain their
decision. Jurors refused to comment after they left the
courtroom.

During the third day of deliberations, the judge reread -- at the
jury's request --the legal guidelines under which the officers
could justify the shooting of Diallo as an act of self-defense.
Jurors also requested a reading of testimony from criminologist
James Fyfe, who said the officers followed proper procedures when
they asked Diallo to speak to them and approached him. The
officers testified Diallo did not respond to police commands.

And for the second time during their deliberations, jurors asked
to hear a reading of testimony from officers Carroll and
McMellon, who were the first to approach Diallo and who each
fired 16 shots.

Juror dismissed

Jurors, who were not sequestered until deliberations began, were
instructed every day by State Supreme Court Justice Joseph Teresi
not to discuss the trial outside the jury room.

Just before deliberations began Wednesday, Teresi said he
dismissed a white woman juror and replaced her with an alternate,
a white man, after an investigation by state police revealed she
had talked about the case outside the courtroom.

The judge said the dismissed juror apologized for her actions,
saying if she had it to do over again, she would not have talked
about the case. The judge described the woman as "very
embarrassed" about it.

The re-configured jury consisted of four black women, one white
woman and seven white men.

The trial was moved from the New York City borough of the Bronx
to Albany, New York -- 150 miles away -- because of intensive
pretrial publicity.

Closing arguments

Defense attorneys said in closing arguments Tuesday that jurors
should appreciate the fear of the officers the night they shot
Diallo, as they faced someone they thought was a dangerous man.

"They made a mistake," John Patten, attorney for officer Carroll
said. "But they honestly believed this guy was shooting at them."

Diallo was struck by 19 of 41 bullets fired at him by the
defendants on February 4, 1999.

Eric Warner of the Bronx District Attorney's office asked jurors
to put themselves into Diallo's shoes, describing what he said
the immigrant must have felt as he was approached by the four
white police officers.

"There wasn't a hint of justification. Who wouldn't be afraid,
faced with four big men with guns?" he said.

But defense lawyers told jurors that the prosecution had failed
to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the four officers were
not justified in firing their weapons at Diallo as he stood in
the vestibule of his apartment building.

Officers: Diallo was 'acting suspiciously'

The officers had testified that Diallo was acting suspiciously
and did not respond to their commands when they approached him.
Defense lawyers said an object Diallo pulled out of his pocket
was perceived to be a gun. Diallo did not have a criminal record
and the object the officers saw in his right hand was actually a
wallet.

Murphy's attorney, James Culleton, said the officers followed
police procedure when they stopped to question Diallo.

"On February 4, 1999, these four police officers, they didn't
know who Mr. Diallo was. They didn't know he lived in that
building," Culleton said. "And they had an obligation, following
proper police procedure, to stop, to walk up to Mr. Diallo and
ask, 'Who are you?' and 'Why are you in this area?'

"Why Mr. Diallo acted the way he did to this simple request to
talk, we'll never know," Culleton added.

Prosecution: Diallo was 'doomed from the start'

Warner told jurors that Diallo "was being looked at in a way that
had him doomed from the start."

Defense attorney Steven Brounstein told the jury that his client,
Boss, believed Diallo had a gun and was firing at fellow officers
Carroll and McMellon. He said prosecutors had offered "not one
scintilla of proof" otherwise.

The facts that Diallo was at home and did not have a gun were
"Monday morning quarterbacking arguments" offered by prosecutors
desperate to prove their case, Brounstein said.

Brounstein also referred to the prosecution's "mantra of 41
bullets," and said, "Ken Boss did not fire 41 shots. He fired his
gun five times. He perceived a threat based on what he heard,
what he observed. ... This is not a case of 41 shots."

Patten argued that with bullets ricocheting around the vestibule
in the Bronx where Diallo died, the defendants thought they were
in a firefight. The officers "were wrong," he said. "They made a
mistake. But they honestly believed this guy was shooting at
them."

Added Culleton: "You know about the chaos that was going on, you
know why two officers fired 16 shots, one fired five and my
client four," he told the jury. "A series of events escalated and
what we are left with is a terrible tragedy that everyone feels
sorry for, but no crime was committed."

But Diallo's neighbors testified that they did not hear officers'
voices before sporadic gunfire erupted. And the coroner who
performed Diallo's autopsy told jurors that wounds showed he was
either falling or flat on his back when most of the rounds hit.

Correspondent Maria Hinojosa, The Associated Press and Reuters
contributed to this report.


=================================================================
             Kadosh, Kadosh, Kadosh, YHVH, TZEVAOT

  FROM THE DESK OF:                    <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
                      *Mike Spitzer*     <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
                         ~~~~~~~~          <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

   The Best Way To Destroy Enemies Is To Change Them To Friends
       Shalom, A Salaam Aleikum, and to all, A Good Day.
=================================================================

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soap-boxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to