-Caveat Lector-   <A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">
</A> -Cui Bono?-

http://www.jewishworldreview.com/michelle/malkin.html


 Buddhist temple untouchables

 Michelle Malkin
 Jewish World Review
 Feb. 10, 2000 /4 Adar I, 5760

 http://www.jewishworldreview.com -- WASHINGTON, D.C.
 -- Live, from the sixth floor of the U.S. District
 Courthouse, I watched the futility of campaign finance
 reform unfold before my eyes.  The federal criminal
 trial of Democratic fund-raiser Maria Hsia -- Vice
 President Al Gore's infamous Buddhist temple gal pal --
 opened here in the courtroom of Judge Paul Friedman on
 Monday.

 It's a case study in the senselessness of passing new
 laws to fix The System.

 Hsia, a Taiwan-born immigration consultant and longtime
 Friend of Gore, denies taking part in an elaborate
 conspiracy to funnel illegal campaign contributions
 worth more than $100,000 through the California-based
 Hsi Lai temple.  She is charged with five felony counts
 of causing false campaign finance reports to be filed.
 According to federal prosecutors, Hsia allegedly
 gathered dozens of checks from Buddhist monks, nuns and
 other temple supporters.

 Three of the nuns testified to Congress in 1998 that the
 temple reimbursed them and others for $55,000 in
 Democratic National Committee donations, which were
 drummed up by Hsia the day after Gore's two-hour visit
 to Hsi Lai in April 1996.

 Hsia's congenitally indignant attorney Nancy Luque
 argued in court this week that her client, a naturalized
 U.S. citizen, was simply a passionate "community
 activist" who cared about "safe streets and minority
 youth schools."  Soliciting straw donations from
 foreign monks and nuns isn't a crime, you see.
 It's free speech!  The noble Hsia "didn't do that for
 personal glory," Luque explained.  "She did that to
 support causes she believed in.  That activity is
 protected by the First Amendment."

 Luque further asserted that her cash-collecting client
 had no obligation whatsoever to find out whether the
 temple donors who forked over four-figure checks were
 true and legal sources of campaign dough:  "Maria Hsia
 is not responsible for what others do."  Besides,
 Luque rationalized, "Even if Maria Hsia knew that
 contributions came from somewhere else, how does just
 knowing cause a lie?"

 So Hsia is not responsible even if she knew laws were
 being broken because knowing a lie isn't telling one.
 The monks and nuns were not responsible because they
 were unwitting dupes who didn't know the laws.  The
 Democrat campaign treasurers who accepted the checks
 from Hsia were not responsible because they can't check
 every contribution.  And Al Gore is not responsible
 because there was no controlling legal authority.

 To fix this broken system, reformers led by John McCain
 and Bill Bradley would ban soft money contributions to
 political parties, increase public financing of
 campaigns, and guarantee free television time for
 candidates.  McCain and Bradley invoke the Buddhist
 temple scandal religiously in support of their plans.
 But their reform amounts to giving a new paint job to an
 old jalopy.  As any two-bit campaign finance scofflaw in
 America well knows, piling on more rules simply creates
 the illusion of reform.

 It is already against the law for nonprofit religious
 institutions to raise money for political candidates.
 Yet the Hsi Lai Temple is not on trial for violating
 existing federal law.

 It is already against the law for political candidates
 to raise money at temples.  Yet Al Gore is not on trial
 for violating existing federal law.

 It is already against the law for foreign nationals to
 make contributions in connection to any candidate.
 Yet the foreign donor who allegedly provided Hsia with
 temple-funneled money is not on trial for violating
 existing federal law.

 And it is already against the law to make contributions
 by one person in the name of another.  Yet none of the
 conduits or concealers named as participants in Hsia's
 unholy laundering scheme are on trial for violating
 existing federal law.

 "The system breaks down" because of deceitful
 fund-raisers like Hsia, lead prosecutor Eric Yaffe said
 in his opening statement.  But what about everyone else
 involved?  Thanks to the government's anemic, uneven,
 and incompetent enforcement of existing laws, our system
 of campaign finance disclosure was a sorry joke long
 before Hsia came along.

 Hsia's trial has just begun, but the verdict is already
 in.  No matter what the jury finds, it's business as
 usual for the untouchable money shakers, foreign straw
 donors, politicians with pointless legislative remedies,
 and hapless government officials who can barely enforce
 the glut of campaign finance rules already on the books.



 � 2000, Creators Syndicate




.

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance�not soap-boxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds�is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to