-Caveat Lector- <A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">
</A> -Cui Bono?-
www.wsws.org
WSWS : News & Analysis : Europe : Ireland
Suspension of Northern Ireland Assembly reveals undemocratic nature of "peace
process"
By Chris Marsden
16 February 2000
Back to screen version
Westminster's decision to suspend the nine-week-old Northern Ireland Assembly
and reinstate direct rule from Britain has thrown a question mark over the
future of the so-called �peace process�.
The move was ostensibly prompted by the Irish Republican Army's failure to
begin decommissioning its weapons. But a key concern of the secretary of state
for Northern Ireland, Peter Mandelson, was to save Ulster Unionist Party (UUP)
leader and First Minister David Trimble from being ousted by those in his party
who oppose the Good Friday Agreement that established the Assembly.
The same day Mandelson announced his decision, a hurriedly issued report from
General John de Chastelain's international disarmament commission revealed that
the IRA had said it was prepared to begin arms decommissioning, in the context
of "the full implementation of the Good Friday agreement and ... the removal of
the causes of conflict." London, Dublin and Washington welcomed the IRA
statement, but Mandelson said the IRA had still not answered the critical
questions of whether it intended to disarm, and how and when it proposed to do
so. In response to the suspension of the Northern Ireland Assembly, the IRA
announced Tuesday it was withdrawing from participation in the de Chastelain
commission.
The �collapsing� of the Assembly had the desired effect, strengthening
Trimble's position inside the UUP. At the previous meeting of the party's 860-
member ruling council in December last year, Trimble had provided post-dated
letters of resignation for himself and other UUP ministers, in order to secure
the deeply divided council's support for Sinn Fein, the political wing of the
IRA, taking up ministerial seats on the Assembly Executive in advance of IRA
decommissioning.
At last Saturday's re-convened UUP council meeting, Trimble told the press the
resignation letters were now "invaluable historical documents". Trimble's
resignation as first minister in the Assembly would have spelt the end of the
new body, since anti-Agreement Unionists could prevent him being re-appointed.
The resignation threat was held over Sinn Fein and the IRA in an attempt to
produce a definitive move towards decommissioning.
To all appearances, the brinkmanship of the British government seems to have
paid off, for the moment. Sinn Fein has not walked away from talks on re-
establishing the Assembly, despite their humbling at Trimble's behest. But
major problems concerning the new political arrangements still exist. Opponents
of power-sharing within the UUP and Ian Paisley's Democratic Unionist Party
(DUP) feel strengthened by recent events and could yet move against Trimble.
For his part, Sinn Fein head Gerry Adams faces opposition from Republican hard-
liners who, though small in number, still have the ability to conduct terrorist
actions. This is particularly the case, given that Adam's place in the
negotiations is predicated on his ability to bring the IRA on board and end
bombings in Belfast and Britain. Adams warned that the decision to suspend the
Assembly "has shaken confidence among nationalists and republicans" in the
British government.
Recent events once again underscore the essentially undemocratic character of
the 1998 Good Friday Agreement and the impossibility of overcoming the social
and democratic problems of Ireland through the political mechanisms it
established. That the new Assembly, its Executive and the North-South bodies
established by the Agreement can be cast aside at the behest of a British
cabinet minister, without consulting the thousands of ordinary working people
on both sides of the present border who voted to bring them into being, is
testament to this fact.
The Northern Ireland Assembly was finally set up last December, after extensive
secret talks between representatives of the Republican and Unionist parties,
together with the British and Irish governments, presided over by former US
Senator George Mitchell. The negotiations never extended beyond these parties
and their own narrow concerns.
Both before and since the signing of the Agreement there has been a complete
lack of involvement by the mass of working people. In the referendums held
north and south of the border, Irish workers were asked to vote for the
Agreement as the only alternative to a continuation of sectarian conflict, and
did so overwhelmingly. Since then, they have been excluded from a process
characterised by unprincipled manoeuvres between the major imperialist powers
and the various sectarian parties.
The �peace process� was not only presented as a means of ending sectarian
violence, but of addressing the wider problems of economic deprivation
confronting working people. However, it has been shaped by the needs of big
business alone.
The old political mechanisms through which the British government exercised its
rule over the six northern counties were proving increasingly ineffective. In
order to maintain its rule through the Unionist bourgeoisie, Britain had to
expend enormous amounts of public finance and maintain a costly police and army
presence.
Northern Ireland had become a growing economic burden, as traditional
industries such as shipbuilding and engineering went into decline. Since 1981,
the north has had a continuous trade deficit with the Irish Republic, rising to
�284 million in 1997. From 1973 unemployment in the province rose steadily from
4.5 percent to a peak of 16.8 percent in 1986 and 12.6 percent in 1994, when
the then-Tory government set the peace process in motion.
Without the problem of armed conflict on the streets, the Irish Republic has
succeeded in becoming a prime European location for transnational corporations.
If this success was to be emulated in the North, the "Troubles" had to be dealt
with. Dublin would also benefit from a rapprochement with Britain by gaining
easier access to European markets, either through Belfast or an expanded rail
and road network linking Dublin with Britain, and was prepared to give up its
historic claim to the six counties in order to do so.
The US was the central driving force behind the Good Friday Agreement and stood
to be its major beneficiary. North American corporations are the major
investors in the Irish Republic and also made up 52 of the 152 overseas
companies operating in Northern Ireland in 1997. This compared with 47 from
Britain, 14 from the rest of Europe, 13 from the Irish Republic and 10 each
from the Asia/Pacific and Germany. In order to safeguard and extend these
commercial interests the Clinton administration pushed for a settlement to be
reached with Sinn Fein.
In their efforts to secure the backing of Sinn Fein for the Agreement, the
three governments were kicking at an open door. The Republican movement had
arrived at a dead end. Three decades of fruitless sectarian conflict had widely
disillusioned Catholic workers in the IRA's promise that the armed struggle
would bring a united Ireland. There was even greater disbelief that it could
bring decent jobs, housing and democratic rights. Ordinary Catholics and
Protestants alike were sick and tired of the constant threats of sectarian
violence, of life surrounded by barbed wire, constant army and security checks,
and the urban decay and social problems produced by economic decline,
compounded by civil unrest.
No concessions were necessary regarding Sinn Fein's nominal goal of a united
Ireland. They were fully prepared to accept a role in government in the North
alongside their traditional Unionist rivals, within an Assembly explicitly
based on the recognition of partition and the preservation of the Unionist
veto.
As for the Unionists, unlike the last attempt at power-sharing in the 1970s,
they were now incapable of rejecting out of hand the demand for new
arrangements. The Unionist grip on the Protestant working class was
historically based on the ability of the northern bourgeoisie to utilise
patronage and nepotism in the allocation of jobs and housing, while spreading
the fear that Protestants would become a persecuted minority within a unified
(Catholic) state.
Beginning with the Thatcher/Major Conservative Party administrations, the
British government made clear that it was no longer prepared to continue
subsidising Northern Ireland, and that the survival of the northern bourgeoisie
depended on creating conditions for an influx of international investment and
establishing the necessary relations with their southern counterparts. Once the
Republic's government made clear its willingness to renounce its claim on the
northern six counties, the UUP agreed in principle to power-sharing with Sinn
Fein, leaving only the DUP and some smaller parties to oppose the Agreement.
Sinn Fein and the UUP were given a constitutional guarantee that would provide
the basis for an effective duopoly of power within the six counties. Parties in
the new Assembly would be designated as Unionist, Republican or �Other.� Those
designated as representing the two officially recognised �communities� in the
North�Protestant/Unionist or Catholic/Republican�would be allotted a joint veto
on all contentious legislation. This provision would give them a joint share in
the exploitation of the working class by the major corporations which Britain
promised would locate in the North, once peace was established.
Given the circumstances of its birth, it is little wonder that the 22 months
since the Agreement was signed have been dominated by a continued struggle
between Unionist and Republican politicians for power and influence. Conflict
between the UUP/DUP on one side, and Sinn Fein on the other, has never been
over questions of economic policy, education, housing, democratic rights or any
of the things that would be regarded as pressing concerns by people in the
North. Rather, neither side has been content with the guarantees of political
influence enshrined in the Assembly's provisions. Both know that their standing
amongst their traditional supporters is at best precarious. The essential issue
has been the preservation of the ability to resort to armed terror, while
limiting their opponents' capacity to respond in kind.
For the Unionists, IRA decommissioning and the preservation of the Royal Ulster
Constabulary as a bastion of Protestant ascendancy is the ground on which the
Agreement must either stand or fall. For their part, Sinn Fein have been
prepared to abandon everything but the IRA's weapons caches. This is not only
to counter the danger posed by an RUC monopoly of arms and the loyalist thugs
with whom the RUC collude. The IRA's own control of working class Catholic
neighbourhoods relies to a far greater degree on their possession of weapons
than to any political standing they may possess. Relinquishing these weapons
might not only allow a free development of oppositional political currents
amongst Catholic workers, it could well bring reprisals for the countless IRA
punishment beatings and other acts of intimidation carried out over the years.
The central political lesson to be drawn from the past two years is that the
prerequisite for resolving the democratic and social problems of Ireland, north
and south, is the active and unified political mobilisation of broad masses of
working people. The future of the Irish people cannot be left to the
representatives of British, Irish and US capital, and the selfish concerns of
the Unionist and Republican parties. An independent movement of the working
class requires a rejection of the divisive politics of Republicanism and
Unionism, and the advancing of a socialist programme that meets the
requirements of Catholic and Protestant working people alike.
The abolition of discrimination against Catholics in the North�the issue that
first provoked three decades of conflict�cannot be achieved by counterposing
the interests of Catholics and Protestants, as is the case within the Northern
Ireland Assembly. This premise enforces the artificial division of the working
class and, as is the case with the explicitly Roman Catholic constitution of
the Irish Republic, plays into the hands of the sectarian Orange bigots.
The securing of democratic rights is indissolubly bound up with the struggle
for social equality and an end to all forms of exploitation and poverty.
Copyright 1998-2000
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved
A<>E<>R
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Integrity has no need of rules. -Albert Camus (1913-1960)
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
The only real voyage of discovery consists not in seeking
new landscapes but in having new eyes. -Marcel Proust
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said
it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your
own reason and your common sense." --Buddha
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
It is preoccupation with possessions, more than anything else, that
prevents us from living freely and nobly. -Bertrand Russell
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Everyone has the right...to seek, receive and impart
information and ideas through any media and regardless
of frontiers." Universal Declaration of Human Rights
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Always do sober what you said you'd do drunk. That will
teach you to keep your mouth shut." Ernest Hemingway
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Forwarded as information only; no endorsement to be presumed
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material
is distributed without charge or profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this type of information
for non-profit research and educational purposes only.
<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance�not soap-boxing! These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds�is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
