-Caveat Lector-   <A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">
</A> -Cui Bono?-

New Website
http://www.conservativehq.com/chq/displayarticle?articleId=44

Date Posted: 01/13/2000
Constitutionally Right
Mark Fitzgibbbons  ConservativeHQ.com





INTERNET SALES TAX - GILMORE'S GOT IT RIGHT

Don't buy into the arguments that brick and mortar, mom and pop businesses
would be at a disadvantage if Internet sales aren't taxed. Just the opposite
is true, but a fair tax system will require some political fortitude.
Governor Jim Gilmore of Virginia has had the foresight and guts to recommend
a permanent moratorium on sales taxes on e-commerce. Gilmore was appointed by
the Congress as Chairman of the Advisory Commission Electronic Commerce.
Let's hope the other members of the Commission show the same wisdom, and back
Gilmore.

Applying the sales tax to any interstate commerce is a nightmare. The sales
tax was established as a convenient method for the government to get into
your pockets at the point of any sales transaction. The tax is applied at the
location where the transaction is made, i.e., the place at which the consumer
takes possession of the item. Sales taxes just don't fit well or make sense
when the sales are made interstate. Many small businesses are using the
Internet to expand their markets, in fact more than fifty percent of all
small businesses are already online. It would be crazy to require small
businesses to file sales tax returns in the 45 states that have sales taxes
or the 6,000-plus other taxing jurisdictions in the United States simply
because those mom and pop stores have a website and sell more products--more
conveniently--to more people. Compliance with the tangled web of the various
sales tax offices would do much more harm to small business than the
corporate conglomerates. And the notion that consumers should pay a use tax
in their state on items that they buy over the Internet from other states is
absurd, and begs for noncompliance by anyone but the most pious, honest--and
organized taxpayers.

The framers of the Constitution knew that the tendency of government is to
expand, often at the cost of common sense and the best interests of the
people. They created the commerce clause in recognition of our federalism so
that states would not set up barriers against, or too many burdens on,
interstate commerce. The commerce clause gave the Congress the sole power "to
regulate commerce among the several States". The framers knew early on that
state governments and smaller jurisdictions could make interstate commerce
too burdensome for a national economy. States can regulate commerce, but must
do so in a way that does not burden interstate commerce, certainly not more
than the commerce that takes place solely within the state.

Fortunately, the United States Supreme Court has already given some guidance
about sales taxes and interstate commerce. In Quill Corporation v. North
Dakota, the Supreme Court held that companies which sell products through the
mail using catalogues cannot be compelled to file sales tax returns, and pay
sales taxes, in states where they are not located but merely ship products to
consumers. The Court held that states cannot tax out of state companies that
don't have a "nexus" with the taxing state. Otherwise, such a tax system
would violate what has become known as the "dormant" commerce clause of the
Constitution. The dormant commerce clause, which is a concept created by the
Court, is what the courts have used to examine state regulation of interstate
commerce that the Congress has not already regulated (I know it's hard to
believe that some such commerce still exists). The dormant commerce clause
essentially means that states cannot place too many burdens on the flow of
interstate commerce in a manner that discriminates against interstate
commerce.

Like the direct mailers in the Quill case, businesses that engage in
interstate e-commerce have no nexus in the states where many of their buyers
are located. Therefore, they should not be compelled to file tax returns in
the myriad states where consumers, through online shopping, buy their
products. Those who advocate taxing interstate e-commerce are advocating
anti-constitutional goals.

Advocates of e-commerce sales taxes say that companies that sell online have
an advantage over those companies that do not sell products through a website
because the sales tax paid at brick and mortar stores is a disincentive to
shop there. They're right in that regard, but that doesn't mean that taxing
e-commerce sales is the solution. First of all, businesses--even small
ones--that don't have websites will probably go the way of the dinosaur. So
we shouldn't punish the small business owner who uses a web site to sell more
products.

Secondly, why can't states simply say that the fair thing to do is eliminate
the sales tax altogether? There are states that operate and provide all of
their needed services, and still don't have a state sales tax. We need not
worry about the "lost revenues" the e-commerce tax proponents fret about. One
thing we know for sure about government is that it knows many ways to
generate revenue for itself. Government always seems to find the trough.

Sales taxes were established as a convenient, almost camouflaged way for
businesses to play tax collector for the state. But a tax on e-commerce would
certainly not be convenient. And it would hurt small businesses the most
because they would need to hire accounting departments, rather than a sole
bookkeeper, to keep records and prepare tax returns simply because they have
the common sense to use a website to market and sell their products.

My favorite store in the world (not simply my favorite candy store) is the
Savannah Candy Kitchen. It's a relatively small operation that I happened to
stumble upon during my only visit to that beautiful city. They send me a
brochure every year, and I have made several purchases for myself and as
Christmas gifts. Their website does not yet allow me to buy my favorite candy
in the world, but I'm sure it won't be long before that changes. I'd hate to
think that I would need to file a sales and use tax return simply because I
love candy that I can get only in Savannah. And I certainly don't want that
small business to file a tax return in Virginia merely because one of its
most admiring customers is located there.

Any sales tax system cannot be applied to the new way of doing business
without harming consumers and small businesses in some way. Governor Gilmore
says it best in his Policy Statement, "No Internet Tax", found at the
Commission's web site (www.ecommercecommission.org). He says that "[i]n the
Internet economy, government at all levels must change its policies as well
as the way it operates." Governor Gilmore is not only advocating a pro-small
business position, but he is correct under the commerce clause. Utah Governor
Mike Leavitt, a Republican, and some of the other members of the Commission
who are advocating taxing e-commerce transactions simply don't get it. The
Internet, and e-commerce in particular, is not the place for flawed
principles and stale ideas.

---------

Mark Fitzgibbons is an attorney. He is President of Operations and General
Counsel for American Target Advertising, Inc., which is a direct marketing
agency, and is General Counsel to ConservativeHQ.com, Inc. He is former
chairman of the litigation committee of the Free Speech Coalition, a Virginia
organization that protects First Amendment rights for other advocacy
organizations.

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance�not soap-boxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds�is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to