-Caveat Lector-   <A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">
</A> -Cui Bono?-

WJPBR Email News List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Peace at any cost is a prelude to war!


*****************************************************************
**********              SOLDIERS FOR THE TRUTH
**********            DEFENDING AMERICA NEWSLETTER
**********                 01 March 2000
**********

            "When we assumed the Soldier, we did not lay aside the Citizen."
      General George Washington, New York Legislature, 1775

  Soldiers For The Truth, PO Box 63840, Colorado Springs, CO 80962-3840
*****************************************************************

TABLE OF CONTENTS                       ARTICLES

Notes from the Prez

Hack's Column:
Moral Courage is the First Commandment                      1

Z-gram:
Of "Chem" Suits and other Scams - in the Defense Industry We can't Trust!   2

Big Picture:
5,500 U.N. Troops to Be Deployed to Congo                       3
Grange Gets Only One Star In Retirement                     4

*VOICE OF THE GRUNT*
Army - Some still doing it right?  Maybe NOT!                   5
USMC  -- Osprey or Albatross?                               6
More on the Decline of the Warrior Ethic…                   7
Nightmare "Kosovo", Part II                         8

Veterans' Issues:
Hepatitis C and Vietnam Vets                                9

Medal of Honor:                                 10
*WILLETT, LOUIS E
  Vietnam 1967

G.I Humor:
A Crappy Situation…                                 11
===========================================================
PREZ SITREP:

1.  Still working on making us fully operational in the State of Colorado. We
expect final authorization by the end of this week.

2.  Despite some bureaucratic obstacles, the merger moves continue behind the
scenes.  You will notice that our combined newsletter is now called the
DEFENDING AMERICA newsletter.  *Voice of the Grunt* is now our editorial
section, still echoing the voices from the field.

3.  Got a lot of mail on the LTG Kennedy piece.

Some of you thought we are becoming a sort of "Defense Enquirer" with some of
the rumors printed in that reader piece.  You know, the big brass always
preaches that perceptions become the truth.  Maybe the little guys'
perceptions are important too! If you know the truth, write us!!!

Some complained that I used the description MI troopers. I've been in the
military a couple of days too and know that there are CAV troopers and
paratroopers.  Maybe I just wanted to be polite and not call you MI
"Weenies."  Give me a break, will ya!

4.  Please keep writing us, so we can build that "Internet camaraderie" that
makes us grow stronger and helps us to keep our fingers on the pulse.

R.W. Zimmermann
President SFTT
==========================================================
ARTICLE 1 -- DEFENDING AMERICA
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Moral Courage is the First Commandment
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
BY DAVID H. HACKWORTH

Napoleon was right on target when he said, "In war the moral is to the
material as three to one."

Since Desert Storm, I've watched our Armed Forces go steadily downhill. Yet
for 10 years, not one general or admiral has had the moral courage to sound
off to the citizens of the republic about what's been going on.

Nor has one (and that includes Air Force Gen. Ronald Fogleman, who quit not
over principles but for very personal, private reasons) stood before Congress
and told the truth: It's not lack of funds that's busting the forces, but
wrongheaded, ever-expanding missions like Bosnia and Kosovo; misguided,
politically correct social engineering; and the constant lowering of
training, discipline and leadership standards -- mistakes that our warriors
will pay for in blood on a future battlefield.

Has the moral courage from stand-up guys like Nathan Hale, John Paul Jones
and Billy Mitchell been blown completely out of our military and America?
Have these giants of moral resolve been replaced by people who don't care how
they trample on values and principles, just as long as they get to the head
of the line?

Even though the two-fisted straight-shooters seldom make it to the top
anymore, I prefer to think moral courage in America is down but not out. It's
true the slickies who put self and bottom-line first seem to be running
America from the White House to Congress to virtually every big business in
the land. Less those few, brave, family-owned concerns that haven't yet
exchanged their values for fast-lane stock options.

I naively thought this sickness just prevailed in our military, but gradually
changed my mind because of the responses to a book I wrote. Over the years,
I've received thousands of letters from folks in every walk of life in this
country saying: What you described in "About Face" as the sickness that
destroyed our military and caused us to lose in Vietnam is rampant across the
board in the United States.

These letters bear witness that the same cancer that struck our Vietnam-era
military now infects almost every American entity -- from Wall Street to
education, from medicine to the media, from the police and fire departments
to the unions, etc., etc., et cetera.

But these letters also convinced me that there are more than a few good men
and women out there who aren't afraid to "Stand up and be counted" -- once a
standard Army officer fitness-report rating question in the pre-Vietnam era,
when speaking out was encouraged -- and fight for right over wrong.

Take Air Force Maj. Sonny Bates. He recently single-handedly took on the
Pentagon over anthrax. It was roll up your sleeves and take the needle or go
to jail. When the Air Force leaned on him, he chose to take a general
court-martial -- which in the military is about the same as spitting in the
judge's face and expecting a fair trial. Married with three kids and only
seven years from retirement, Bates had a lot to lose. Yet he fought for what
he thought was right and steered through the anthrax flak as smoothly as he's
flown his airplane during his brilliant career.  And the good news is the
brass backed down.

Another moral hero is Army sergeant David Gloer. After serving in Korea since
1994, he decided to retire. Petty people in his chain of command bumped back
his paperwork, saying "no way." For absolutely no reason, just an uncaring
bureaucracy doing its thing. After 20 years of exceptional service, 13 of
those in a South Korea on perpetual war-footing, a few jerks arbitrarily told
him to get lost. He pulled all plugs -- the media, Congress -- and even took
his case to the Army chief of staff. He fought for what was right, and like
Sonny Bates, he won. So Gloer's retiring from the Army with a smile and a
positive thought: "All that rule are not evil."

Moral leadership should be the top plank in the presidential elections. It's
more important than Social Security or campaign reform. Without the right
moral stuff, America is going to join Napoleon's France -- which swapped the
moral for the material and ended up at the bottom of the heap.
***
© 2000 David H. Hackworth
Distributed by King Features Syndicate Inc.

Hack

Http://www.hackworth.com is the address of David Hackworth's home page. Sign
in for the free weekly Defending America column at his Web site.
Send mail to P.O. Box 5210, Greenwich, CT 06831.
==================================================
ARTICLE 2 - Z-gram
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Of "Chem" Suits and other Scams - in the Defense Industry We can't Trust!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
By R. W. Zimmermann
                                         03/01/00

How's this one for building more trust in the Pentagon?

While the Defense Department strongly insists that Anthrax vaccinations are
absolutely critical for force protection and continues to do legal battle
with concerned soldiers and citizens, we are now confronted with a report
that hundreds of thousands of war-stock chemical suits are defective.

Essential for operations in chemical and biological environments, the shoddy
suits might have been delivered by Isatrex, a now bankrupt New York based
company, since 1989.  Maybe we were just lucky that Saddam didn't have the
guts to use chemical weapons against our troops in the Gulf in 1991. The
results could have been what he had only dreamed of -- massive US casualties,
almost self-inflicted by our own greed.

As reported in most of the nation's major newspapers, Isatrex's president and
production manager pleaded guilty in US District Court in New York to one
count of making false statements.  Others have been charged with conspiracy
to defraud the Government, major fraud, and false claims. Potentially, over
700,000 suits could be defective.

The chemical suit case, Anthrax and other incidents of fraud and price
overruns make you question if contracting and purchasing have really been
"reinvented" as claimed by al Gore and company.  More likely, we have again
fallen victim to good old greed and crooked business tactics.

It's very simple.  The cheapest and slickest bidder got the nod for the suit
contract.  No big deal for the "numbers-crunchers" in charge. The possible
consequence for our forces in the field -- troops could have died in combat
against any 3rd World Nation that decided to use chemicals or bio weapons. No
Anthrax vaccination would have prevented it!

It is appalling that we again made our troops believe that we would only send
them to war with the best equipment our money can buy.  Instead, we are ready
to sacrifice them for the almighty Dollar - greed still rules!

We have been there before:

In WWII we sent our soldiers out to kill German Panther and Tiger tanks with
adapted 75mm, low velocity naval guns and the bazooka.  Our grunts
experienced big shock when their anti-tank stuff bounced harmlessly off the
rolling tank fortresses.

In Korea, we repeated the folly and attacked Russian made T34/85 tanks with
the same deficient weaponry.  Maybe we believed that everything the "Ruskies"
built was greater junk than ours…

In Vietnam we gave our trusting grunts a new revolutionary weapon, the M16
assault rifle.  It probably wasn't as revolutionary as advertised, especially
since it came 20 years after the successful German "Sturmgewehr 44."
Contrary to the "Sturmgewehr," the M16 jammed when just slightly soiled.

We sold the F104 Starfighter interceptor to NATO.  A crash-prone "lawn-dart,"
equipped with a substandard ejection seat. Hundreds were lost; many Pilots
killed without combat action. I believe only the Japanese "Kamikaze Zero"
fighter had a worse flying record than the F104.

We fielded the "Dragon" anti-tank weapon and sold it to the Army as a 90% hit
capability weapon.  In reality the Dragon was a little "Lizard" and only
achieved about a 60% first round hit average.

We claim to have the best and finest main battle tank in the world, the M1.
But it is also a tank that can't deep ford more than 3 feet of water, guzzles
fuel, and in its latest version features a Cal.50 machine gun that can't be
fired from the inside by the tank commander. Thank God we fought Desert Storm
in the desert environment and against an incapable enemy!

And now -- faulty chemical suits!  And who is supposed to believe the Defense
Department's Anthrax story, and all the other procurement fairytales any
longer?

All the shady characters involved in these scams must to be held responsible,
in or out of uniform.  Putting the American soldier in harms way, without the
best of equipment available is not only unacceptable, it is criminal!

Maybe we need to apply the Airborne Rigger rule to anything produced by the
Defense Industry. Riggers must be prepared at any time, to jump with any
chute he or she has packed and certified for use.  If a similar rule existed
for to the guys that made the crappy chemical suits, I bet the suits would be
serviceable!

I would love to hear from the troops in the field on this topic.  How do you
feel about being sent to combat without the best gear?  Tell us about other
experiences with some of the "finest equipment" our hard-earned tax money has
bought?

Zimm
© R.W. Zimmermann, President SFTT 00
=========================================================



**COPYRIGHT NOTICE** In accordance with Title 17 U. S. C. Section 107,
any copyrighted work in this message is distributed under fair use
without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest
in receiving the included information for nonprofit research and educational
purposes only.[Ref. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml ]

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance�not soap-boxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds�is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to