-Caveat Lector-   <A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">
</A> -Cui Bono?-

http://www.ags.uci.edu/~dehill/witchhunt/ccla/pages/fijnje.htm

The following letter was written by the father of Bobby Fijnje, a 14 year-old
boy who met up with Janet Reno's style of "child protection." This "Open Letter
to the American People" documents his family's reaction when they heard with
disbelief that Janet Reno had been nominated to head the Justice Department. For
more info about this case, see: Armbrister, T., JUSTICE GONE CRAZY, Reader's
Digest, Jan. 1994, p. 33-40.

To the American people and their government:

It is with surprise, shock, dismay, and anger that the Fijnje family learned of
the nomination of Janet Reno as Attorney General of the United States of
America. After reading this letter I hope you will understand why our family
feels that way. I would like to describe how Ms. Reno persecuted our family.

After serving the government in Curacao, Netherlands Antilles, for almost 25
years, we decided that it would be a good experience for our children Nanette
and Bobby, Jr., to settle in Miami, Florida.

We bought a house there and the children entered school. We wanted to make our
new home our fatherland. When we arrived in Miami, Nanette was 8 and Bobby was
5. In late 1981 we joined Old Cutler Presbyterian Church, in which the whole
family participated in almost all church activities. I was honored to serve the
church for three years as deacon and three more years as an elder. For eight
years I sang in the choir, while my wife Vivian joined the bible classes, worked
in the kitchen, and helped in other ways. The kids went to Sunday-school
classes, and when the time came, they became members of the congregation.
Neither Vivian nor I was ever called to school or church because of any
misbehavior of either of the children. Nanette graduated from high school and
entered Dade Community College. Bobby was given an award as the best all-around
student of his class when he graduated from 6th grade. But in the fall of 1988
dark clouds began to gather.

We did not know what accusations were being made or who the accusers were.
Imagine our shock when, on the morning of 28 August 1989, I opened the door and
four policemen identified themselves and told me that they would like to talk to
Bobby. One of the four, Detective Martinez, told me that although they had no
search warrant, they wanted to search Bobby's room for pornography. I told them
there was no need to get a warrant and that they could go ahead and search the
room. We later learned that Detective Martinez had obtained an arrest warrant
for Bobby three days previously, but he told us that he had only come to "talk
to him." Two policemen turned Bobby's room upside down and of course found no
pornography because we have no such trash in our home.

I rode with Bobby, Detective Martinez, and Lieutenant Forster to the police
station where Bobby was interrogated from noon until dinner time. I was with him
for the first two hours, but I was then told that I must leave the room because
Detective Martinez wanted to talk to him alone.

On the evening of 28 August 1989, two months after his 14th birthday, Bobby was
taken to the Dade Juvenile Detention Center. He remained there until 4 May 1991
when he was released. During the frequent recesses which occurred throughout the
preliminary hearings and trial, Bobby was held in solitary confinement in a
holding cell at the courthouse. During Bobby's imprisonment, we twice asked for
him to be released on bond, the second time in the care of his aunt and uncle (a
retired Connecticut State Supreme Court judge), but this was refused because
"Bobby was a threat to the community" and because it was said that our family
would flee the country. Bobby pleaded not guilty, and was tried as an adult on
the motion of the Dade County prosecutor's office, headed by Ms. Reno.

The pre-trial hearings finally began in early August 1990 with Judge Norman
Gerstein presiding. Pre-trial hearings lasted until the middle of January 1991,
at which time a jury was selected. Before and during the trial, we were
repeatedly urged to accept a plea-bargain and warned of the dangers Bobby faced
in prison. We were told that he would have AIDS within a week after entering
prison. We were told what a horrible time he would have in prison, where the
jailers are mere administrators and the prison is actually ruled by the
prisoners. But we knew Bobby was innocent, and we refused to accept a plea
bargain.

During the trial, not a single witness ever testified that he or she had seen
anything improper. Over 800 members of the church stepped forward and offered to
testify on Bobby's behalf. At least 14 motions for mis-trial were filed by
Bobby's lawyers, Mr. Mel Black and Mr. Peter Miller. Over 500 sidebar
conferences were held in this case, which cost the taxpayers well over $3
million, money that could have been used to feed the poor, improve public
health, or shelter the many homeless people who roam the streets of Miami.
Instead, this money was spent on the longest trial ever held in Dade County, all
in an effort to send an innocent boy to jail for life.

On the morning of 4 May 1991, the jury advised Judge Gerstein that a verdict had
been reached, but we waited an hour and a half for that verdict to be read.
Judge Gerstein advised our lawyer that we must wait for Ms. Reno's arrival. She
wanted to be present when the verdict was read.

Bobby was acquitted on all counts.

During this period, our family had to endure daily attacks and lies in the
newspapers and on television. My wife and I were accused of being drug dealers
and ringleaders in a child pornography business. Death threats were sent to us
and left on our telephone answering machine. In addition to local and county
police departments, the FBI was also called in to investigate us. Unmarked
police cars cruised through our street, while a police helicopter with a
searchlight flew overhead at night. Television reporters knocked on every door
and window in the house, but we refused to give interviews because we believed
that the media would not truthfully report them.

Ms. Janet Reno was the Dade County Prosecutor at the time of the investigation
and prosecution of our son, and as such she must bear the primary responsibility
for what was done to him. Is Ms. Reno the right person to head the United States
Justice Department? Is she really a crusader against child abuse? Is she aware
the she abused my son by her actions and robbed him of one year, eight months,
and one week of his life?

I urge President Clinton and the American people to be wary of giving her this
high office. Any one of the 260 million Americans might run the risk of having
the same thing happen to them as happened to our son. If our efforts save even
one innocent child from Bobby's fate, it will have been worth the trouble. We
pray that President Clinton will hear the lone voice of a family that has
suffered at the hands of Ms. Reno.

In spite of all the injustices done to our family during this period, we wish
the people of the United States well.

Sincerely, B. Fijnje, Sr. The Netherlands



Return to:   Home Page  or  Across The Nation


--
-----------------------
NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is
distributed without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior
interest in receiving this information for non-profit research and
educational purposes only. For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
-----------------------


__________________________________________
NetZero - Defenders of the Free World
Get your FREE Internet Access and Email at
http://www.netzero.net/download/index.html

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance�not soap-boxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds�is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to