-Caveat Lector-   <A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">
</A> -Cui Bono?-

http://www.ashevilletribune.com/fishkill.htm

Feds Plan Trout Extermination Program
              For Smoky Mountains
              National Park Service bureaucrats consider
              using
              toxic chemicals to kill off non-native species
              By Dana Davis, The Asheville Tribune

              Using the toxic chemical, antimycin, The Great Smoky
              Mountain National Park Service is proposing to
              eliminate all rainbow and brown trout in as many as ten
              streams so that the indigenous brook trout can reclaim
              their once native habitat. Tennessee's Sams Creek has
              been designated as the initial testing area.

              Should this treatment be approved and deemed
              successful, the National Park Service tentatively plans
              to treat other area stream with the antimycin toxin,
              including Haywood County's Little Cataloochee Creek
              and Swain County's Bear, Desolation and Indian creeks',
              and a few others that have yet to be designated.
              "We are mandated to protect and preserve all native
              species," said Smoky Mountain National Park Fishery
              Biologist Steve Moore. "With all of our history (data)
              we know that the rainbow trout are having a bad
              effect."

              But local trout grower and owner of Sweet Water
              Farms, Mitchell Betty says, "Any time you introduce
              poison into nature's stream, I got a real problem with
              that. I would improve the habitat for both species above
              and below the naturally occurring waterfall. There were
              some people that tried to do this some time ago who
              were just trying to get the land back to the way it was a
              thousand years ago, for no apparent reason. We should
              continue to work on the habitat."

              Moore assured, "We've learned about this stuff and
              complied with law to make sure that we haven't done
              anything we're not supposed to do. This seems a little
              radical, but it's been used in National Parks and Forests
              throughout the U.S. for years."

              He claims that their proposal has been reviewed by
              biologists from area universities, the National Park
              Services commission, and Bruce Rosenlund, "the
              foremost expert in the nation for the use of antimycin
              for native restoration work."

              In order to carry this out, Moore said the National Park
              Service has performed an environmental assessment, as
              required by the National Environmental Protection Act,
              to make sure that no serious environmental impact will
              occur. "Now that we've recommended it, we put it out
              for public review and comment, and, if at all possible, it
              will be signed off by a regional director. Then we can do
              the project." Moore added, "We're not evaluating
              whether we should do it or not, we're evaluating how to
              best preserve the brook trout."

              The man who will make the ultimate decision,
              Southeast Regional Director Jerry Belson was
              unavailable, but according to his spokesman, Paul
              Winegar, "That's not a decision he would know a whole
              lot about," speaking in reference to the use of antimycin
              in the streams. "He would sign off on it after reading a
              memorandum, sent to him from the Smokies National
              Park. They're the experts in that area, so we would take
              their recommendation."

              Betty explains that in addition to rainbow and brown
              trout, that the brook trout, and all aquatic species for
              that matter, are feeling the negative impact from
              siltation. Siltation clouds the streams, making it hard
              for aquatic insects, a primary source of nutrients for
              fish, to thrive. The Smokies National Park Service only
              mentions the loggers as the culprits, but Betty says most
              siltation is caused by highway run-off from storms.
              Even so, most wildlife experts agree that early logging
              practices, dating to the beginning of the 20th century --
              in particular, building wooden dams and dynamiting
              them in the streams - contributed to the initial
              depopulation of the brook trout.

              The Smoky National Park says that to make up for their
              blunder, in the early 1900's loggers restocked the
              streams, mistakenly, with the dominant rainbow trout.
              However, Moore admits that it was the Smoky Park
              Service that continued to stock the rainbow trout for
              another forty years until the 1970's. This, in addition to
              logging practices of long ago, resulted in a 75 percent
              decline in the brook trout population over the years.

              As a result, larger, more aggressive rainbow and brown
              trout have weeded out the smaller brook trout by
              natural selection at elevations below 3,000 feet in this
              region. Brook trout still remain in the Smoky Mountain
              Park at elevations above 3,000 feet where competing
              sub-species of trout are unable to travel, due to natural
              barriers like waterfalls and cascades. However, Moore
              says that increased acidity from rain is harming the
              brook trout population surviving in the higher
              elevations, which is the reason why they want to
              remove the rainbow and brown trout below, so the
              brook trout can "reclaim" their territory.

              But Betty says it's the taxpayers and fisherman who
              purchase their licenses who own the park service lands
              and that tax paying fisherman don't want brook trout
              because they're too small to eat and there would not be
              enough legal catch for a meal at the end of the day.
              Betty also says that only about 1 in 1,000 rainbow and
              brown trout eggs survive to maturity, while brook trout
              have a high survival rate due to their size and current
              habitat, which he describes as high elevation, shallow
              streams.

              "We have people who think that this is the first step to
              eliminate all rainbow and brown trout, but that's false,"
              says Moore. "We're only doing this to ten streams and
              that's it. After that, the law says that we can't do
              anymore. Tax dollars may support the national park,
              but if you got a law on the book that says we are to
              protect and preserve naturally functioning ecosystems
              unaltered for present and future generations, then we
              must take action."

              Moore says that the law also instructs the park service
              to take "management actions, including eradication of a
              non-native species where its feasible. We are mandated
              and that's what makes us different from the state and
              national forest. This is not to eliminate all brown and
              rainbow, it's a proactive effort to restore streams at
              mid-level areas that are protected by natural barriers."

              If the project is approved, Moore says they will relocate
              as many brook trout as possible to upstream refuges
              and then perform a 4 to 5 day treatment on the
              mid-level and lower streams, which will essentially kill
              most aquatic life - though some species such as
              salamanders, mussels, and crayfish are said to be
              resistant to the toxin. However, aquatic insects, the
              primary food source for brook trout, are not resistant.

              "No bugs, no fish production," explained Betty.

              Moore admits, "It's not a silver bullet," in reference to
              the chemical antimycin. According to Moore, though,
              some insects could reappear as soon as one to two
              weeks after the treatment, in the upper streams where
              the brook refuges are located." Until then, "We're
              hoping that the terrestrial insects will sustain them until
              other insects come back. Also, he says the park service
              plans to perform the treatment in October, when the
              waters are cooler, so as to have the least impact on
              aquatic insects. According to additional research, "We
              know that even if they are hit pretty hard, they come
              back pretty rapidly. The tributaries and incoming
              streams will bring new insects back in. It will take 2 to 3
              months for many of the insects to return and 2 to 3
              years for them to fully restore their population."

              Still, Betty says "It's ridiculous. It will take 2 to 3 years

              to effectively (eradicate) the rainbow and brown trout,
              and these are the fish that the people want. There are
              plenty of streams that only have brook trout, but for the
              government to come in at tax payer expense and rid the
              rainbow and brown trout is a real bad idea because of
              the expense incurred through man hours, materials, and
              the monitoring for exclusive brook trout."

              Moore replied that they would check for rainbow and
              trout populations a year after treatment, but that he did
              not anticipate a high recovery rate.

              "I'm concerned about the objective of these people," says
              Betty. "They're obviously not sportsman. If they just
              want to return the land to the way it was 1,000 years
              ago, then that doesn't make any sense. And where does
              it stop - they need to make that clear."
               For more information, contact:
               Smokies National Park Acting Superintendent
               - Phillip Francis (423) 436-1200
               National Park Regional Director of Southeast
               Region
               - Jerry Belson (404) 562-3182
               Trout Unlimited has endorsed this project
               - David Stewart (704) 878-3560)
               Land of Sky President
               - Steve Legeay (828) 683-4978
               Aquabiotics Corporation, producer of 'Fintrol' or
               antimycin,
               - Nick Romeo (206) 842-1708
               Rocky Mountain National Park,
               - Bruce Rosenlund, expert in field of native restoration
               using antimycin (303) 275-2392.

--
-----------------------
NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is
distributed without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior
interest in receiving this information for non-profit research and
educational purposes only. For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
-----------------------





________________________________________________________
                           1stUp.com - Free the Web�
   Get your free Internet access at http://www.1stUp.com

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance�not soap-boxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds�is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to