In a message dated 03/27/2000 6:21:17 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

<< |__/_|'.//'|_|\_|___|\_n_/|__/
 OSINT newsletter and discussion list
 Monday, March 27, 2000

 Motorola's pledge of allegiance -- to China?
 Corporate giant proud of strategic alliance with Beijing

 By Terence P. Jeffrey

 C 2000, Human Events
  WorldNetDaily

 When consumer advocate Ralph Nader a few years ago
 asked the managers of Motorola if they would please
 say the Pledge of Allegiance at their annual
 shareholders meetings, the company responded with
 indignation.

 "Motorola will not be adopting Mr. Nader's
 suggestion," said senior corporate counsel Carol
 Forsyte. "We believe that by doing so we would be
 introducing political and nationalistic overtones
 which have nothing to do [with] the true purpose of
 a stockholders meeting."

 This begged an obvious question: If Motorola will
 not pledge allegiance to the American republic --
 "one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and
 justice for all" -- to what will it pledge allegiance?

 One answer to that question can be found today on
 a website the company has posted in the People's
 Republic of China, which is linked to its U.S. website.
 A page on this Chinese site -- subtitled "China and
 Motorola reach for the sky" -- lists the company's
 achievements in the PRC under the following categories:


 "Investments and technology
 transfer"

 "Management localization and
 training"

 "Local sourcing"

 "Joint development: joint ventures
 and cooperative projects"

 "Cooperative projects:
 joint technology development"

 "Corporate citizenship"

 This is the sort of language one would expect from
 a nationalist corporation -- looking out for the
 interests of China. Just as General Motors could boast
 half a century ago, "What's good for General Motors is
 good for America," Motorola seems to be boasting today,
 "What's good for Motorola is good for China."
 On this Chinese website, the company brags that its
 policy of providing Chinese "suppliers with designs
 and new technology" helped those firms "export U.S.
 $480 million worth of products in 1999" and is "an
 initiative that dovetails with the China government's
 own strategy for upgrading state-owned enterprises."

 "Motorola has enjoyed solid support from the Chinese
 government at all levels" it says. "Motorola has
 received accolades and awards from the Chinese
 government for its responsible corporate citizenship,"
 it adds. And no wonder. The company boasts that, in
 China, it has:


 "committed more than U.S. $1.5 billion"

 "reinvest[ed] all profits ...
 back into the country"

 "committed to localizing the staff of its
 operations"

 "spent U.S. $1.02 billion ... last year on
 locally sourced materials, components and
 services"

 "accomplished this by forming partnerships
 with Chinese suppliers and helping them ...
 with designs and new technology"

 "established 6 joint ventures and
 10 cooperative projects with some of
 China's best enterprises and research
 facilities"

 "erected [an 18-story building] in Beijing's
 business hub"

 "set up 18 research and development centers
 in China with 650 researchers"

 "established three micro-processor/ micro-controller
 laboratories at universities in China, and will expand
 this program to 20 additional universities over the next
 five years."

 Topping the list of "Motorola Cooperative Projects in
 China" is the National Research Center for Intelligent
 Computing Systems in Beijing, which is dedicated to
 "[r]esearch and development of advanced computer
 technologies."
 What we have here is a strategic alliance.

 The managers of China's Communist regime and the managers
 of Motorola's for-profit corporation have formed a bond
 based on a broadening web of common financial interests.
 Their entente is further entrenched with each new economic
 fact on the ground: new factories, new products, new
 markets. They are co-combatants on the fields of global
 commerce where the destiny of nations is now decided.

 It is fair to ask, then, just what is the nature of this
 Motorola ally?

 On the military front, we know it has threatened to use
 force against Taiwan if it declares independence, and
 that it has intimated it would fire nuclear missiles at
 Los Angeles to punish the United States for interfering
 in such a conflict. But what about the domestic Chinese
 society, where Motorola is now embedded?

 The 1999 State Department "Country Report on Human
 Rights Practices in China," released February 25, answers
 some
 basic questions:


 Is there freedom of religion?
 "Police closed many 'underground' mosques, temples,
 seminaries, Catholic churches and Protestant 'house
 churches,' many with significant memberships,
 properties, financial resources, and networks.
 Some were destroyed. Leaders of unauthorized groups are
 often targets of harassment, interrogations, detention
 and physical abuse. ... [M]ost influential positions in
 government are reserved for party members, and Communist
 Party officials state that party membership and religious
 belief are incompatible. Party membership also is required
 for almost all high-level positions in government and in
 state-owned businesses and organizations."


 Is there freedom of speech?
 "The government does not permit citizens to publish or
 broadcast criticisms of senior leaders or opinions that
 directly challenge Communist Party rule. The party and
 government continue to control many -- and, on occasion,
 all -- print and broadcast media tightly and use them to
 propagate the current ideological line."


 Is there freedom of association?
 "Communist Party policy and government regulations require
 that all professional, social and economic organizations
 officially register with, and be approved by, the government.
 Ostensibly aimed at restricting secret societies and criminal
 gangs, these regulations also prevent the formation of truly
 autonomous political, human rights, religious, labor and
 youth organizations that directly challenge government
 authority."


 Is there a right to life?
 "Fines for giving birth without authorization vary. ...
 In Quanzhou, Fujian province, the fine for violating the
 birth quotas is three times a couple's annual salary. ...
 Local authorities in a Fujian town systematically used
 coercive measures such as force abortion, sterilization,
 detention and destruction of property to enforce birth
 quotas."


 Are there free elections?
 "The CCP [Chinese Communist Party] retains a tight rein
 on political decision-making and forbids the creation of
 new political parties. The government intensified efforts
 to suppress the China Democratic Party. ... Public security
 organs arrested nearly all of its most important leaders."


 Is there due process of law?
 "Arbitrary arrest and detention remain serious problems.
 ... At both the central and local levels, the government
 and the CCP frequently interfere in the findings of the
 judicial system and dictate court decisions."

 This is only the tip of the iceberg of Chinese tyranny.
 To read more about the 230,000 dissidents in "re-education
 through labor" camps, the scores of monks, priests, nuns
 and ministers murdered or imprisoned, and the reign of
 terror visited on China's little girls, see the entire
 report online.

 But it is enough to show that Motorola now maintains two
 distinct wings to its corporate work force: In the United
 States, it employs free people. In China, it employs unfree
 people.

 This could explain why the company objects to the
 "political and nationalistic overtones" of saying
 the Pledge of Allegiance at shareholders meetings.
 If a Chinese Motorola employee stood up at a Motorola
 factory in China and suggested that workers there
 pledge allegiance to making China "one nation under God,
 indivisible, with liberty and justice for all," he might
 very well be arrested. If his coworkers joined him, they,
 too, might be arrested.

 If all of Motorola's Chinese workers risked their lives
 to pledge allegiance to making China "one nation under
 God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all,"
 Motorola's $1.5-billion investment in China would be
 at risk. It would no longer "dovetail with the China
 government's strategy for upgrading state-owned enterprises."
 It likely would lose its "solid support from the Chinese
 government at all levels." It could forget about "accolades
 and awards from the Chinese government for its responsible
 corporate citizenship."

 A Lech Walesa in China today would have to strike against
 Motorola.

 So, what is Motorola doing now to alter China's political
 status? It has launched an all-out lobbying effort in
 Washington to give the Chinese regime Permanent Normal
 Trade Relations with the United States and membership
 in the World Trade Organization, where it would have
 a vote equal to that of the United States.

 0000000000000000000000000000000000000

 *** NOTICE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.
 Section 107, this material is distributed
 without profit to SPYNEWS eGroup members who
 have expressed a prior interest in receiving
 the included information for non-profit research
 and educational purposes only.

 For more information go to:
 http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

 Mario Profaca,
 SPY NEWS eGroup list owner,
 editor & moderator
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>



Mario's Cyberspace Station
http://mprofaca.cro.net/mainmenu.html
-__ ___ _ ___ __ ___ _ _ _ __
/'_|'0 \'V'/'\|'|'__|'|'|'/'_|
\_'\''_/\'/|'\\'|'_||'V'V'\_'\
|__/_|'.//'|_|\_|___|\_n_/|__/
OSINT newsletter and discussion list
Monday, March 27, 2000

Motorola's pledge of allegiance -- to China?
Corporate giant proud of strategic alliance with Beijing

By Terence P. Jeffrey

C 2000, Human Events
 WorldNetDaily

When consumer advocate Ralph Nader a few years ago
asked the managers of Motorola if they would please
say the Pledge of Allegiance at their annual
shareholders meetings, the company responded with
indignation.

"Motorola will not be adopting Mr. Nader's
suggestion," said senior corporate counsel Carol
Forsyte. "We believe that by doing so we would be
introducing political and nationalistic overtones
which have nothing to do [with] the true purpose of
a stockholders meeting."

This begged an obvious question: If Motorola will
not pledge allegiance to the American republic --
"one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and
justice for all" -- to what will it pledge allegiance?

One answer to that question can be found today on
a website the company has posted in the People's
Republic of China, which is linked to its U.S. website.
A page on this Chinese site -- subtitled "China and
Motorola reach for the sky" -- lists the company's
achievements in the PRC under the following categories:


"Investments and technology
transfer"

"Management localization and
training"

"Local sourcing"

"Joint development: joint ventures
and cooperative projects"

"Cooperative projects:
joint technology development"

"Corporate citizenship"

This is the sort of language one would expect from
a nationalist corporation -- looking out for the
interests of China. Just as General Motors could boast
half a century ago, "What's good for General Motors is
good for America," Motorola seems to be boasting today,
"What's good for Motorola is good for China."
On this Chinese website, the company brags that its
policy of providing Chinese "suppliers with designs
and new technology" helped those firms "export U.S.
$480 million worth of products in 1999" and is "an
initiative that dovetails with the China government's
own strategy for upgrading state-owned enterprises."

"Motorola has enjoyed solid support from the Chinese
government at all levels" it says. "Motorola has
received accolades and awards from the Chinese
government for its responsible corporate citizenship,"
it adds. And no wonder. The company boasts that, in
China, it has:


"committed more than U.S. $1.5 billion"

"reinvest[ed] all profits ...
back into the country"

"committed to localizing the staff of its
operations"

"spent U.S. $1.02 billion ... last year on
locally sourced materials, components and
services"

"accomplished this by forming partnerships
with Chinese suppliers and helping them ...
with designs and new technology"

"established 6 joint ventures and
10 cooperative projects with some of
China's best enterprises and research
facilities"

"erected [an 18-story building] in Beijing's
business hub"

"set up 18 research and development centers
in China with 650 researchers"

"established three micro-processor/ micro-controller
laboratories at universities in China, and will expand
this program to 20 additional universities over the next
five years."

Topping the list of "Motorola Cooperative Projects in
China" is the National Research Center for Intelligent
Computing Systems in Beijing, which is dedicated to
"[r]esearch and development of advanced computer
technologies."
What we have here is a strategic alliance.

The managers of China's Communist regime and the managers
of Motorola's for-profit corporation have formed a bond
based on a broadening web of common financial interests.
Their entente is further entrenched with each new economic
fact on the ground: new factories, new products, new
markets. They are co-combatants on the fields of global
commerce where the destiny of nations is now decided.

It is fair to ask, then, just what is the nature of this
Motorola ally?

On the military front, we know it has threatened to use
force against Taiwan if it declares independence, and
that it has intimated it would fire nuclear missiles at
Los Angeles to punish the United States for interfering
in such a conflict. But what about the domestic Chinese
society, where Motorola is now embedded?

The 1999 State Department "Country Report on Human
Rights Practices in China," released February 25, answers
some
basic questions:


Is there freedom of religion?
"Police closed many 'underground' mosques, temples,
seminaries, Catholic churches and Protestant 'house
churches,' many with significant memberships,
properties, financial resources, and networks.
Some were destroyed. Leaders of unauthorized groups are
often targets of harassment, interrogations, detention
and physical abuse. ... [M]ost influential positions in
government are reserved for party members, and Communist
Party officials state that party membership and religious
belief are incompatible. Party membership also is required
for almost all high-level positions in government and in
state-owned businesses and organizations."


Is there freedom of speech?
"The government does not permit citizens to publish or
broadcast criticisms of senior leaders or opinions that
directly challenge Communist Party rule. The party and
government continue to control many -- and, on occasion,
all -- print and broadcast media tightly and use them to
propagate the current ideological line."


Is there freedom of association?
"Communist Party policy and government regulations require
that all professional, social and economic organizations
officially register with, and be approved by, the government.
Ostensibly aimed at restricting secret societies and criminal
gangs, these regulations also prevent the formation of truly
autonomous political, human rights, religious, labor and
youth organizations that directly challenge government
authority."


Is there a right to life?
"Fines for giving birth without authorization vary. ...
In Quanzhou, Fujian province, the fine for violating the
birth quotas is three times a couple's annual salary. ...
Local authorities in a Fujian town systematically used
coercive measures such as force abortion, sterilization,
detention and destruction of property to enforce birth
quotas."


Are there free elections?
"The CCP [Chinese Communist Party] retains a tight rein
on political decision-making and forbids the creation of
new political parties. The government intensified efforts
to suppress the China Democratic Party. ... Public security
organs arrested nearly all of its most important leaders."


Is there due process of law?
"Arbitrary arrest and detention remain serious problems.
... At both the central and local levels, the government
and the CCP frequently interfere in the findings of the
judicial system and dictate court decisions."

This is only the tip of the iceberg of Chinese tyranny.
To read more about the 230,000 dissidents in "re-education
through labor" camps, the scores of monks, priests, nuns
and ministers murdered or imprisoned, and the reign of
terror visited on China's little girls, see the entire
report online.

But it is enough to show that Motorola now maintains two
distinct wings to its corporate work force: In the United
States, it employs free people. In China, it employs unfree
people.

This could explain why the company objects to the
"political and nationalistic overtones" of saying
the Pledge of Allegiance at shareholders meetings.
If a Chinese Motorola employee stood up at a Motorola
factory in China and suggested that workers there
pledge allegiance to making China "one nation under God,
indivisible, with liberty and justice for all," he might
very well be arrested. If his coworkers joined him, they,
too, might be arrested.

If all of Motorola's Chinese workers risked their lives
to pledge allegiance to making China "one nation under
God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all,"
Motorola's $1.5-billion investment in China would be
at risk. It would no longer "dovetail with the China
government's strategy for upgrading state-owned enterprises."
It likely would lose its "solid support from the Chinese
government at all levels." It could forget about "accolades
and awards from the Chinese government for its responsible
corporate citizenship."

A Lech Walesa in China today would have to strike against
Motorola.

So, what is Motorola doing now to alter China's political
status? It has launched an all-out lobbying effort in
Washington to give the Chinese regime Permanent Normal
Trade Relations with the United States and membership
in the World Trade Organization, where it would have
a vote equal to that of the United States.

0000000000000000000000000000000000000

*** NOTICE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.
Section 107, this material is distributed
without profit to SPYNEWS eGroup members who
have expressed a prior interest in receiving
the included information for non-profit research
and educational purposes only.

For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

Mario Profaca,
SPY NEWS eGroup list owner,
editor & moderator
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

0000000000000000000000000000000000000



------------------------------------------------------------------------
*__ ___ _ ___ __ ___ _ _ _ __
/'_|'0 \'V'/'\|'|'__|'|'|'/'_|
\_'\''_/\'/|'\\'|'_||'V'V'\_'\
|__/_|'.//'|_|\_|___|\_n_/|__/
http://mprofaca.cro.net/latest.html

------------------------------------------------------------------------
MAXIMIZE YOUR CARD, MINIMIZE YOUR RATE!
Get a NextCard Visa, in 30 seconds!  Get rates as low as
0.0% Intro or 9.9% Fixed APR and no hidden fees.
Apply NOW!
http://click.egroups.com/1/2122/0/_/7016/_/954156025/


eGroups.com home: http://www.egroups.com/group/spynews
http://www.egroups.com - Simplifying group communications






Reply via email to