In The
Name of God Most Gracious, Most Merciful
Waco Protest ALERT!
Since the release of the new Waco
video "X : A True Revelation" I have received a flood of mail
requesting further information on the current government control of Mt.Carmel
here in Waco. Also there has been a flood of attempts at the suppression of this
truth .
I have been trying to post the
review, written by Carol Valentine on a web site with my ISP. I just got off the
phone with a man who identified himself as Danny, from Stone Media that
threatened me that they can shut me down for any reason they chose.
Are they making a political
statement?
Hopefully the president at Stone
media is being forced into this situation. I have talked with him and he has
understanding of the reality that I am delivering a political message of great
intensity. He understood completely that there would by nature be an opposing
group, however he may have not realized how much pressure they are willing to
apply to me and those around me.
The freedom of speech was not won
by speech nor will it, in the end, be defended by speech.
They may, as they have said, shut me down anytime
they want to. This is the power that the government wants over us to. This is
also the power that the government HAS over some ISPs. Clearly if you
control the bridge you effectively control anyone that wishes to use that bridge
,regardless of what side they are on!
Ed McGoory wrote this concerning
earlier attempts to shut me down Hopefully he is still standing
strong.
-----Original Message-----
To: Ed M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Friday, March 24, 2000 9:32 PM
Subject: RE: Stonemedia policies
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Friday, March 24, 2000 9:32 PM
Subject: RE: Stonemedia policies
>......Allow me to explain myself . We had received several complaints
about
>Andrews E-mails being received as unsolicited e-mail. Sending unsolicited
>e-mail is a violation of our terms of service agreement that we have with
>all of our customers. The only intent we had in temporarily suspending his
>account (Which was dial up as well as e-mail) was to get in touch with him.
>I spoke with him about the issue and at that time decided that what he was
>doing was in fact not a violation of our agreement. I asked to be added to
>his list not to censor or moderate the content of his messages but to be
>aware so I could better answer the e-mails and complaints when they arrive.
>I understand this could be a controversial issue and this will make it
>easier for us to head off any complaints as they arrive . We are in no way
>trying to determine and or regulate what Andrew is sending or infringe on
>his right to free speech, only to ensure that We as a internet service
>provider are protected. We reviewed the situation and determined Andrew is
>not violating the terms of service in any way and full access has been
>restored to his account. Please feel free to post this response to any of
>the newsgroups you feel fit and e-mail me if you have any further questions.
>
>
>Ed McGory
>Vice President
>StoneMedia Communications
>Temple, Texas 76502
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Ed: Thanks for your nice note!
I expected your investigation would find Andrew innocent and I am happy his
service has been restored. I will certainly post your response to the
relevant Usenet groups.
>Andrews E-mails being received as unsolicited e-mail. Sending unsolicited
>e-mail is a violation of our terms of service agreement that we have with
>all of our customers. The only intent we had in temporarily suspending his
>account (Which was dial up as well as e-mail) was to get in touch with him.
>I spoke with him about the issue and at that time decided that what he was
>doing was in fact not a violation of our agreement. I asked to be added to
>his list not to censor or moderate the content of his messages but to be
>aware so I could better answer the e-mails and complaints when they arrive.
>I understand this could be a controversial issue and this will make it
>easier for us to head off any complaints as they arrive . We are in no way
>trying to determine and or regulate what Andrew is sending or infringe on
>his right to free speech, only to ensure that We as a internet service
>provider are protected. We reviewed the situation and determined Andrew is
>not violating the terms of service in any way and full access has been
>restored to his account. Please feel free to post this response to any of
>the newsgroups you feel fit and e-mail me if you have any further questions.
>
>
>Ed McGory
>Vice President
>StoneMedia Communications
>Temple, Texas 76502
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Ed: Thanks for your nice note!
I expected your investigation would find Andrew innocent and I am happy his
service has been restored. I will certainly post your response to the
relevant Usenet groups.
