-Caveat Lector- <A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">
</A> -Cui Bono?-
>>Careful what you say on the 'phone ... if someone gets an earful of any
disparaging remarks, the telecom company might have to accept damages. There
go the rates!!! A<>E<>R <<
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>From www.wsws.org
WSWS : News & Analysis : Europe : Britain
British Internet libel case threatens free speech internationally
By Mike Ingram
4 April 2000
Back to screen version
In an out-of-court libel settlement, Demon Internet, one of Britain's oldest
independent Internet service providers, has effectively accepted responsibility
for all material hosted on their servers. The case has major implications for
free speech on the Internet in Britain and beyond.
The libel case was brought by physicist Laurence Godfrey, who claimed he had
been defamed in two anonymous postings in discussion forums hosted by Demon.
The libel case began in January 1998, when Godfrey served a writ on Demon
demanding the removal of a message posted in the newsgroup soc.culture.thai a
year earlier.
Four days before the case was due to come to court, Demon agreed to pay Godfrey
�15,000 damages and his legal costs, estimated at �230,000. Demon will face
similar costs itself, bringing the total to nearly half a million pounds.
In earlier hearings Demon argued that they were not the publishers of the
material, and were not responsible for the posting in the same way a newspaper
would be responsible for an article. The court ruled out this defence in March
last year. Justice Moreland said the company had no protection under section 1
of the 1996 Defamation Act, which enables a provider to avoid liability if it
can prove �innocent dissemination�. The judge ruled that because Demon had
refused to remove the postings, it was, in effect, the publisher.
After initially stating that they would fight the ruling, Demon's owners Thus
plc. opted to settle out of court. In front of Justice Eady, the company
apologised for failing to remove the postings at the time Godfrey had
protested.
Godfrey has also sued several other Internet service providers and online
publications. His previous cases include settlements against New Zealand
TeleCom, the Melbourne PC users group, and the online edition of Canada's
Toronto Star. In October 1998 he filed suit against the University of
Minnesota, Minneapolis ISP StarNet, and Kritchai Quanchairut, a former
University of Minnesota student.
Demon argued that since they did not create the postings, the items were not
theirs to remove. As they were not the originators of the content, they could
neither verify nor refute its accuracy.
The company said it would press the government for recognition that Internet
service providers �should not be liable for the millions of items carried on
the Internet every day�. But that is precisely what has been established in
this case. Nick Braithwaite, Godfrey's lawyer, said the case �had established a
firm precedent that Internet service providers can be publishers in English
libel law�.
It has also established that under UK law an Internet service provider is
responsible for the material carried on its sites, regardless of the country of
origin. In the United States, ISPs are considered to be no more liable for the
messages posted on them than the post office would be for the contents of
letters it delivers.
But US-based ISPs are still threatened by this decision, according to London
media lawyer Mark Stephens. He told the New York Times that service providers
everywhere would be vulnerable to threats from the rich and litigious. ISPs,
�wherever they're located in the world and whether or not they're protected by
the free speech guarantees of the Bill of Rights in America� could be dealt
with �harshly, robustly and expensively in the British courts,� he said.
He described the situation created by the settlement as �open season� on ISPs:
�This exposes Internet companies to the ability on the part of the rich and
powerful to censor them. If you're rich and powerful, you could sue the
Internet company to take something off the Internet edition of an American
newspaper, because you know they're going to censor the newspaper even if the
newspaper doesn't censor itself.�
If ISPs are held liable for the content they carry on their servers, they will
be under tremendous pressure to become the censors of public opinion. As a
result of the Godfrey case, Demon Internet now routinely removes material that
it considers �unsuitable or defamatory,� according to a company spokeswoman.
Copyright 1998-2000
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved
A<>E<>R
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Integrity has no need of rules. -Albert Camus (1913-1960)
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
The only real voyage of discovery consists not in seeking
new landscapes but in having new eyes. -Marcel Proust
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said
it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your
own reason and your common sense." --Buddha
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
It is preoccupation with possessions, more than anything else, that
prevents us from living freely and nobly. -Bertrand Russell
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Everyone has the right...to seek, receive and impart
information and ideas through any media and regardless
of frontiers." Universal Declaration of Human Rights
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Always do sober what you said you'd do drunk. That will
teach you to keep your mouth shut." Ernest Hemingway
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Forwarded as information only; no endorsement to be presumed
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material
is distributed without charge or profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this type of information
for non-profit research and educational purposes only.
<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance�not soap-boxing! These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds�is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
