-Caveat Lector- <A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"> </A> -Cui Bono?- From: Mike Balog [U.A.I.C.-VT.] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Special Receipant List: Date: Wed., April 5, 2000 11:00:00 Am EDT. **************************************************************************** ********* Subject: THE MEDICAL PROFESSION CENSUS - VIOLATES PRIVACY: IMPROTANT TO READ: FORWARD TO OTHERS: **************************************************************************** ********* From: The Republican <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2000 9:03 PM Subject: Truly Scary > FWD via Jim Hardin. > > Note: I can attest somewhat to the article below, but > my experience was not nearly as troubling. Five years > ago when my then 8 year old son had an appendectomy > we were presented with a form that asked point blank > if we had firearms in the home and if so if they were > locked up. I responded that it was not their business > and questioned them as to why the interest in firearms. > They stated that it was because of the danger that > guns present in the home. I wrote to the administrator > with some firearm facts, including that bicycles and pools > were more of a danger and presented no protection > benefits as did firearms, pointing out that they did not > ask about pools or bikes, or alcohol for that matter. I > received no response. - Tony > > Friends, > > Forget the census. The medical profession is much more intrusive. > The medical profession has long been opposed to gun ownership. > And, leadership at the National Center for Disease Control, in > Atlanta, was recently shaken up after their dis-information on gun > ownership was exposed for what it was. > > Also, doctors have, for several years, been informants for > law enforcement. There have been many cases where doctors, > required by law, have reported suspected cases of abuse that > were found to be baseless. Nevertheless, lives and families were > sometimes destroyed when families went to a "doctor" for help. > > Now, we see the foundation of "abuse" being defined as a > parent who owns a gun. What happened to the first duty of > a doctor: "Cause no harm". > > Jim Hardin > > The Freedom Page > http://freedompage.home.mindspring.com > To receive Freedom Page mail, put "Subscribe" > as subject to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To be removed, put "Remove" as subject. > > Alabama Committee To Get Us Out of the UN > http://themustardseed.home.mindspring.com > > From: "helenhendrickson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > -----Original Message----- > From: Dave Wagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: [wa-ccw] OT: Truely scary > > >This, from the American Academy of Pediatrics has me really worried. > > > >http://www.cnn.com/2000/HEALTH/children/04/03/kids.firearms/index.html > > > >Within the article is the following: > > > >"The Chicago-based group representing 55,000 children's doctors urged > >pediatricians to ask questions about guns as they take their > >patients' histories and to suggest that parents remove guns from the > >home." > > > >Is this the first step toward declaring parents with guns in the > >house "unfit", and that the pediatritions will be calling social > >services in to monitor children in houses that might contain guns? > >Given the almost carte-blance power that we give to authorities to > >investigate child abuse (e.g. Winatchi), this really has me worried. > >It doesn't seem to far fetched, given this, to have Dr's. declare > >that having guns in the house is a form of child endangerment that > >needs to be overseen by authorities. > > > >Dave Wagner > > [Forwarded For Information Purposes Only - Not > Necessarily Endorsed By The Sender - A.K. Pritchard] > ------------------------------ > A.K. Pritchard > http://www.ideasign.com/chiliast/ > http://rosie.acmecity.com/songfest/189/ > > To subscribe to "The Republican" email list - just ask! > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > "The Bill of Rights was provided as a barrier, to protect > the individual against arbitrary exactions of... legislators, > (and) courts... it is the primary distinction between > democratic and totalitarian way." ReStoller, Supreme > Court of Florida, en blanc, 36 SO. 2ND 433, 445 (1948) <A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A> DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soap-boxing! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at: http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
