April 15, 2000
Files in Question in Los Alamos Case Were
Reclassified
By WILLIAM J. BROAD
The computer files at the heart of the case against the former Los
Alamos scientist Wen Ho Lee were given higher security
classifications last year only after he was fired in the midst of an
espionage investigation at the weapons laboratory, defense lawyers and
federal officials say.
At the time Dr. Lee downloaded the files onto his computer, they were
classified but not designated secret or confidential, as the indictment
against him alleges. Instead, they were governed by a lower kind of
security precaution, according to both sides in the case, as well as a
document that federal prosecutors filed as evidence.
Mark Holscher, the lead lawyer for Dr. Lee, said the after-the-fact
change, which he said his team discovered while studying prosecution
evidence, would be a powerful weapon for the defense. But Mr. Holscher
would not say how he intended to use it, beyond declaring, "The indictment
is deceptive."
Though government officials conceded that the original security level was
low, they emphatically denied that the material Dr. Lee downloaded was
insignificant.
"We stand by our indictment and look forward to litigating this issue when
Dr. Lee is tried," said Myron Marlin, a Justice Department spokesman.
"What Lee stole was the crown jewels."
On Monday, The Albuquerque Journal reported the low level of security
for the downloaded data.
Since his indictment on Dec. 10, Dr. Lee has been held without bail, in
solitary confinement and under unusually tight security in Santa Fe, N.M.
Federal prosecutors have accused him of seizing the heart of the American
nuclear arsenal, but his backers maintain that his actions were nothing out
of the ordinary and that he is being singled out because of his ethnic
background. A native of Taiwan, Dr. Lee is a naturalized American
citizen.
The downloaded material had a security designation "protect as restricted
data," or PARD, a category applied to scientific data so voluminous and
changing so frequently as to be impossible to assess in terms of security. It
is not a security classification per se, but rather a rule for handling
potentially sensitive materials, and is governed by the secrecy provisions of
the nation's atomic energy laws.
While PARD material by definition is classified and the designation holds
out the possibility that some of it might be highly sensitive, it is not
subject
to the same stringent precautions applied to data designated secret or
confidential. For example, scientists working with it may leave it on their
desks overnight, rather than in a safe.
And careful records are kept on the disposal of all secret and confidential
data before its shredding and burning; PARD printouts required no such
accounting.
Still, PARD data must be kept in secure premises at the weapons
laboratory; by law it cannot be transferred onto unsecured computers, as
the government has charged Dr. Lee with doing.
Both sides in the case agree that the material Dr. Lee is accused of
downloading contained nuclear secrets.
A federal official intimately familiar with the legalities of the case and
strongly supportive of the government's position said the downloaded data
included computer instructions on how to simulate the design of a nuclear
warhead, including exact dimensions and other geometrical information that
when standing alone would be guarded assiduously.
"I don't think this is poking a major hole in the case," the official said of
the
PARD issue.
"What would be a problem is if things weren't as alleged in the indictment."
Stu Nagurka, an Energy Department spokesman, said the agency "can't
comment on the indictment in any way."
A senior administration weapons expert strongly contested the idea that the
PARD behind the Lee indictment was any less important than more
concentrated data on nuclear arms.
"A duck is a duck is a duck," the official said.
The defense team countered, though, that any critical information was
buried in a virtually indecipherable mass of benign data.
Commenting on the dispute, Steven Aftergood, a secrecy and classification
expert at the Federation of American Scientists, a private group in
Washington, said the development would throw the government on the
defensive.
"This takes some of the heat off Wen Ho Lee and puts it on the
government, and particularly on the security system," Mr. Aftergood said.
"The murkiness of the classification issue takes this out of the category of
'crown jewels,' 'worse than the Rosenbergs' and 'change the strategic
balance,' " he added, citing descriptions of the case. "It's much more
complicated than it seemed at first."
When Dr. Lee was arrested in December, after years of being
investigated as a possible Chinese spy, the government, in a 59-count
indictment, accused him of systematically endangering the design security
of virtually every nuclear warhead in the American arsenal through
unauthorized computer transfers of many of the most sensitive nuclear
secrets.
While he is not charged with espionage, the indictment claimed he acted
"with the intent to secure an advantage to a foreign nation." Most of the
data that Dr. Lee downloaded is missing. He claims it was destroyed and
insists that his actions were strictly in the line of scientific duty.
Stephen M. Younger, director of nuclear weapons at Los Alamos, told the
federal court at a December bail hearing that the downloaded data in the
wrong hands could "change the global strategic balance."
Specifically, the indictment said that in 1993, 1994 and 1997 Dr. Lee had
illegally transferred secret and confidential restricted data, the federal
term
for information on the design, manufacturing and use of atomic weapons.
But according to "Grand Jury Exhibit One," a 47-page Los Alamos analysis
of material that Dr. Lee downloaded in 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996 and 1998,
the downloading involved either unclassified or PARD data. The analysis
was filed in the federal courthouse in Albuquerque as prosecution
evidence.
A brief reference to PARD was made in Dr. Lee's bail hearings in
December when Paula Burnett, a federal prosecutor, asked Cheryl
Wampler, a prosecution witness and the author of the Los Alamos
analysis, what the term meant.
"Literally, it stands for 'protect as restricted data,' " Ms. Wampler replied,
"and that is converted into a numbering system" that in a computer
indicates the degree of security. "It would have been level five," she added.
The prosecutor questioned her no further, and defense lawyers did not
pursue the point.
Later, though, they discovered that PARD's security ranking was five on a
scale of nine, the highest level being reserved for secret restricted data.
A 1995 Los Alamos security manual defined PARD as "a handling method
for classified computer system output that is generated as numerical data
or related information and that is not readily recognized as classified or
unclassified because of the high volume of output and the low density of
potentially classified data."
But today, officials at the weapons laboratory say the category has long
been troublesome, given its ambiguous nature. Though it was once used
widely in the nation's nuclear weapons complex, the Energy Department,
which runs the laboratories, has faulted PARD as antiquated and risky in
terms of security and had moved to eliminate it, even before the Lee case,
said Jim Danneskiold, a Los Alamos spokesman.
Mr. Danneskiold said the department had ordered the PARD category
eliminated by June 30, 2002.
"It's going away," he said. "In practice, less and less has been generated
over the last five years. It's fairly rare at this point. New PARD has not
been created in years."
John D. Cline, an Albuquerque lawyer on Dr. Lee's legal team, recently
wrote a weapons scientist to say that "it appears from the evidence now
available that ALL of the files (including data files and input files) were
protected at the PARD level."
In an interview, Mr. Cline said, "We're examining this issue for its potential
benefit to the defense." Dr. Lee's trial is to begin on Nov. 6.
A federal official agreed with the defense's portrayal of the PARD
ubiquity. But he added that subsequent classification analysis showed that
it was littered with state secrets, many of them major.
"I'm fairly confident that there isn't anybody who's going to be saying it
was less than S.R.D.," or secret restricted data, the official said of expert
judgments about the downloaded data.
Asked why the security of the downloaded data was changed, a senior
official in the Justice Department referred the question to the Energy
Department. A senior official there said the investigators had evaluated the
material Dr. Lee had downloaded and then discovered it contained highly
sensitive material.
The evaluation "was done to determine the sensitivity of the files," resulting
in the higher security designations, the official said.
Mr. Holscher, Dr. Lee's lead lawyer, was highly critical of the
government's action. "The government did not disclose that the over 20
references to secret restricted data were classifications made after the
investigation started," he said in an interview. "That was never revealed in
court or to the public.
"Los Alamos rates these materials as a five on a scale of nine in terms of
sensitivity, and then tells two federal judges that they are the crown
jewels," he said. "So what do they call the millions of documents at higher
levels of classification?"
Dr. Lee's lawyers said the new development makes their client's actions
seem less like the systematic looting of the nation's top nuclear secrets, as
the government contends, and more like a research misdemeanor, as the
defense has argued.
The development is likely to fuel comparisons between the way the
government handled evidence of computer security lapses by a former
director of Central Intelligence, who lost his security clearance, and by Dr.
Lee, whose ankles and wrists are shackled during weekly visits he is
allowed to make with his family.
Robert M. Henson, a former weapons designer at Los Alamos who in
1995 sounded the first alarms about the possibility of Chinese spies at the
laboratory, said Dr. Lee had "probably stretched the rules" in downloading
PARD but no more. "Shame on him if he did," Dr. Henson said.
Dr. Henson also told of his own missteps with PARD, including once when
a flurry of paper blew out an open laboratory window.
He added that the category deserved to be eliminated as its goals of
achieving both high secrecy and relative openness were inherently
contradictory.
"It's probably illegal," he said of PARD, "and that's why they're trying to
make it go away."
###
P.S. If you are interested in a FREE high-speed DSL internet
service provider, and/or a FREE $200 DSL modem, then register AND
DOWNLOAD THE SOFTWARE (i.e., registration alone WON'T GET IT
DONE) at:
http://i.winfire.com/s/isapiEng.dll/wf.exe?cmd=rl&508,120031685&wf.exe
OH, and you've only got till the 30th of this month to get it
done.
=================================================================
Kadosh, Kadosh, Kadosh, YHVH, TZEVAOT
FROM THE DESK OF: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
*Mike Spitzer* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
~~~~~~~~ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The Best Way To Destroy Enemies Is To Change Them To Friends
Shalom, A Salaam Aleikum, and to all, A Good Day.
=================================================================
<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please! These are sordid
matters
and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds�is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
<A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
<A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
