>>>Now all they have to do is get around to pre-parental responsibility (birth
control {drugs, abstinence, and other non-lethal means}) and THEN maybe
there'll be fewer Ritalin riddled rugrats raising rancorous riotousness.
Personally, I've been an advocate of this for about ten years. Kids are the
offspringers' responsibility, not my tax dollars'. A<>E<>R <<<
>From www.wsws.org
WSWS : News & Analysis : North America
New Jersey Senate passes "parental responsibility" legislation
By Joseph Tanniru
24 April 2000
Back to screen version
New legislation in New Jersey will make parents criminally responsible for the
actions of their children. Part of a growing trend throughout the United States
and internationally, a series of bills passing through the state Senate will
allow for the prosecution of adults for �neglectful� parenting.
So-called parental responsibility laws are part of the general push by the
political establishment for greater criminal prosecution in the wake of a
number of highly publicized violent crimes committed by youth. While all states
allow parents to be sued for the various actions of their children, criminal
legislation is a relatively new phenomenon.
A bill passed by the New Jersey State Senate on March 23 will automatically
hold parents financially responsible for all expenses associated with a second
false bomb threat or 911 call made by a child. It is estimated that each
associated evacuation costs the city upward of $7,000. Additionally, the
parents would be required to make lifetime payments to the families of any
police officers or firemen injured or killed during the evacuation process.
The �Parental Responsibility Act� currently being considered by the Senate
would make �parents' or guardians' inadequate supervision of their children a
criminal offense.� If the child commits a serious crime, the parent could be
incarcerated for up to 18 months and face a $10,000 fine plus restitution to
any victims.
The passage of another bill currently being processed would allow for similar
sentences to be meted out to �neglectful� parents whose child uses a gun owned
by the parent to commit a crime, while another bill generalizes this,
stipulating that the parents of a child who uses any gun to commit a crime can
be held criminally responsible. Under pending legislation, lesser criminal
charges (including time behind bars) could be handed out to parents whose
children fail to attend school or skip school more than 10 times in a year.
Frank Akin, founder of the Constitutional Litigation Clinic at Rutgers Law
School in Newark, points out that �[the legislation] is broad. It's vague. It's
bad policy. I suspect there are constitutional infirmities in the whole idea.�
Many, including the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), have argued that
parental responsibility laws violate a number of constitutional rights. The
definition of �neglectful� parenting is extremely subjective. Indeed the state
Supreme Courts of Connecticut, Louisiana, Oregon and Wyoming have declared such
laws to be too vague. Moreover, charges the ACLU, the laws attempt to prosecute
one individual (the parent) for the crimes of another (the child) and infringe
upon the privacy of the family.
Sponsors of the legislation justify the passage of such laws by claiming that
�parental delinquency should be prosecuted just as aggressively as juvenile
delinquency.� We really need to attack the issue at its origins, and that's
with the parents.� To claim, however, that the source of youth crime is the
family or �bad parenting� is to ignore the more basic socioeconomic causes of
this social illness, including the growing social inequality and the
destruction of many of the social programs that once provided a certain degree
of economic stability.
A system that forces parents to work long hours and multiple jobs in order to
provide for their families, while at the same time slashing education and
health care spending, is bound to have malevolent effects, including crime
among youth. Prosecuting parents for the crimes of their children, however, can
in no way solve these problems, and in fact will only exacerbate them.
Ironically, these parental responsibility laws seem to contradict another
growing trend�the prosecution of children as adults. Both forms of legislation
are part of a right-wing agenda that, in the face of the consequences of the
immense social inequality pervading American society, attempts to step up
criminal prosecution of the working class, the homeless and the poor.
The most recent, well-publicized attempt to prosecute a child as an adult
involved the case of Nathaniel Abraham, who was charged as an adult and
convicted of murder in 1999 for a shooting incident that took place when he was
11 years old.
The legislation being passed in New Jersey is by no means unique. Since 1988,
17 states and dozens of communities, with the support of both the Democratic
and Republican parties, have passed laws that hold parents responsible for
their children's crimes. California enacted its �Street Terrorism and
Prevention Act� in 1988. The act makes parents criminally responsible�with
sentencing of up to a year in prison and fines up to $2,500�when they �grossly�
or �culpably� deviate from the �normal� standard of supervision. The California
Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the act against challenges that
it infringed on privacy, and was vague and subjective.
In Canada, constitutional responsibility for criminal law rests solely on the
federal government, while in the US it is divided between federal and state
governments. Canadian Provinces (in particular, Ontario and Manitoba) are
pressuring the federal government to amend the �Young Offenders Act� to include
criminal parental responsibility clauses. The provinces have not, however,
failed to pursue civil responsibility laws on their own. In Manitoba, the
Progressive Conservative Party pushed through the �Parental Responsibility Act�
in 1996. The first of its kind in Canada, the act allows parents to be sued for
up to $5,000 for damages from child crime.
Copyright 1998-2000
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved
A<>E<>R
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Integrity has no need of rules. -Albert Camus (1913-1960)
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
The only real voyage of discovery consists not in seeking
new landscapes but in having new eyes. -Marcel Proust
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said
it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your
own reason and your common sense." --Buddha
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
It is preoccupation with possessions, more than anything else, that
prevents us from living freely and nobly. -Bertrand Russell
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Everyone has the right...to seek, receive and impart
information and ideas through any media and regardless
of frontiers." Universal Declaration of Human Rights
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Always do sober what you said you'd do drunk. That will
teach you to keep your mouth shut." Ernest Hemingway
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Forwarded as information only; no endorsement to be presumed
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material
is distributed without charge or profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this type of information
for non-profit research and educational purposes only.
<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please! These are sordid
matters
and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds�is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
<A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
<A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
