I sent a copy of the warrant to a lawyer I know and he replied
with the problems as he saw them with the warrant as follows:


--begin--

<snip>

Note:

1) No Court Seal on document and no document stamps.

2) No Case number.

3) Conditions of the Warrant required delivery of a copy to the
household along with receipt for person or property taken. No
copy delivered, no receipt tendered. Three lawyers present in the
household attest to lack of warrant.

4) No affidavit acompanying warrant, court order, nor probable
cause sited.

5) Administration had requested a custody order from the 11th
Circuit Court and motion was denied.

6) Erik Holder made it clear no warrant was issued as, in his
opinion, none was required the executive branch "INS" could act
on their own authority.

7) Later statements by Administration, after the issue of warrant
was raised, was to the effect that a warrant was issued around 7
PM the prior evening. Time on the paper above is 1:30PM.

This administration is known to lie, to bury wrong doing in bogus
explaination and spin. Offering a fraudulent and invalid piece of
paper to the public as "valid warrant" is not beyond their proven
proclivity to lie and fabricate their way out of truth of the
situation.

The Clinton administration is corrupt beyond any reason and
cannot be relied upon to provide anything resembling the truth.

So far claims appear to be based on little more than the thought
as aposed to reality. No warrant was in evidence at the time of
the raid, the 11th Circuit had denied the governments motion for
such an order.  The supposed warrant that has subsequently
surfaced and is of questionable validity in view of the actions
taken with no law, no order backing their activities up.

<snip>

--end--

Also, I found this:

http://www.newsmax.com/showinsidecover.shtml?a=2000/4/22/164359

With Carl Limbacher and NewsMax.com Staff
For the story behind the story...

Saturday April 22, 2000

Legal Analysts Comment on Raid

Andrew Napolitano, legal analyst for Fox News and a
constitutional scholar had this exchange today on Fox with Eric
Holder, Reno's second in command at Justice:

Napolitano: Tell me, Mr. Holder, why did you not get a court
order authorizing you to go in and get the boy?

Holder: Because we didn't need a court order. INS can do this on
its own.

Napolitano: You know that a court order would have given you the
cloak of respectability to have seized the boy.

Holder: We didn't need an order.

Napolitano: Then why did you ask the 11th Circuit Court of
Appeals for such an order if you didn't need one?

Holder: [Silence]

Napolitano: The fact is, for the first time in history, you have
taken a child from his residence at gunpoint to enforce your
custody position, even though you did not have an order
authorizing it.


####


P.S. If you are interested in a FREE high-speed DSL internet
service provider, and/or a FREE $200 DSL modem, then register AND
DOWNLOAD THE SOFTWARE (i.e., registration alone WON'T GET IT
DONE) at:

http://i.winfire.com/s/isapiEng.dll/wf.exe?cmd=rl&508,120031685&wf.exe

OH, and you've only got till the 30th of this month to get it
done.

=================================================================
             Kadosh, Kadosh, Kadosh, YHVH, TZEVAOT

  FROM THE DESK OF:                    <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
                      *Mike Spitzer*     <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
                         ~~~~~~~~          <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

   The Best Way To Destroy Enemies Is To Change Them To Friends
       Shalom, A Salaam Aleikum, and to all, A Good Day.
=================================================================

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please!  These are sordid
matters
and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds�is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
<A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to