From:

http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,36000,00.html

Government Wants Control of MS
by Declan McCullagh

3:00 a.m. Apr. 29, 2000 PDT

 BELLEVUE, Washington -- If Bill Gates was unhappy with early
reports of the government's antitrust punishments, he's going to
be plenty steamed when he reads the fine print this weekend.

In two lengthy filings on Friday, government attorneys said they
eventually hope to carve up Microsoft into two huge chunks. But
until that happens, their 40KB proposal would impose
extraordinarily strict government regulations on what the world's
largest software company may and may not do.

For instance:

* Microsoft wouldn't be able to sell computer makers discounted
copies of Windows, except for foreign language translations, but
would be ordered to open a "secure" lab where other firms may
examine the previously internal Windows specifications.

* Microsoft wouldn't be able to give discounts to hardware or
software developers in exchange for promoting or distributing
other company products. For instance, Microsoft would be banned
from inking a discount deal with CompUSA to bundle a copy of
Microsoft Flight Simulator with a Microsoft joystick.

* Microsoft would have to create a new executive position and a
new committee on its board of directors. The "chief compliance
officer" would report to the chief executive officer and oversee
a staff devoted to ensuring compliance with the new government
rules.

* If Microsoft hoped to start discarding old emails after its bad
experiences during the trial, it wouldn't be able to do so.
"Microsoft shall, with the supervision of the chief compliance
officer, maintain for a period of at least four years the email
of all Microsoft officers, directors and managers engaged in
software development, marketing, sales, and developer relations
related to platform software," the government's proposed
regulations say.

* Microsoft would have to monitor all changes it makes to all
versions of Windows and track any alterations that would slow
down or "degrade the performance of" any third-party application
such as Internet browsers, email client software, multimedia
viewing software, instant messaging software, and voice
recognition software. If it does not notify the third-party
developer, criminal sanctions would apply.

* State and federal government lawyers could come onto
Microsoft's campus here "during office hours" to "inspect and
copy" any relevant document, email message, collection of source
code or other related information.

* The same state and federal government lawyers would be allowed
to question any Microsoft employee "without restraint or
interference."

If U.S. District Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson adopts them, the
restrictions will last three years after his decision. The DOJ
suggests that they take effect 30 days after Jackson rules, which
trial observers expect will happen this summer.

It should be no surprise that Gates, Microsoft's chairman, was
characteristically testy when reacting to initial news reports of
the plan.

"People can disagree about some of the issues in this case, but
the government's proposals are clearly unreasonable and punitive
beyond reason. These regulations are out of touch with consumers
and are completely out of proportion to the issues in the case,"
Gates said.

"The net effect of these remedies is that they run against what
consumers want: products that are easy to use, work well
together, are innovative and affordable."

Microsoft's allies, most of which receive money from the company,
said much the same thing.

"The extreme plan presented this afternoon for the fragmentation
of Microsoft is economically, legally, and morally wrong. It
would be a disaster for consumers and innovation," said the
libertarian Competitive Enterprise Institute.

Microsoft's competitors, on the other hand, seemed to like the
idea of their chief rival being subject to day-to-day regulation
by antitrust officials.

"It is an appropriately serious response to the serious harms
caused by Microsoft's violation of the antitrust laws," Sun
Microsystems said in a statement.

Microsoft has, of course, said it will appeal Jackson's order,
though the DOJ hopes the regulations will stay in place during
that time.

While the government stands a good chance of convincing Jackson
that its suggestion is a wise one, it likely will have a much
tougher time persuading appeals courts. On every important issue
so far, a three-judge appeals panel has sided with Microsoft.

Microsoft employees seemed not as much shocked by the
government's filing as relieved that the uncertainty over what
would be in it was finally over.

One Microsoft employee said he was simply happy the stock price
didn't fall more than it did. Microsoft was trading at 71 in
after-hours trading Friday, up 1-1/4 from its close of 69-3/4 in
the regular trading session before the announcement. That's down
from a recent high of over 110 a month ago.

A Microsoft programmer who described himself as a liberal said
he's become convinced that antitrust laws are too vague.

"They're arguing about what the law is," the programmer said.
"Aren't you supposed to know about the law before you spend four
years in court?"

#####



P.S. If you are interested in a FREE high-speed DSL internet
service provider, and/or a FREE $200 DSL modem, then register AND
DOWNLOAD THE SOFTWARE (i.e., registration alone WON'T GET IT
DONE) at:

http://i.winfire.com/s/isapiEng.dll/wf.exe?cmd=rl&508,120031685&wf.exe

OH, and you've only got till the 30th of this month to get it
done.

=================================================================
             Kadosh, Kadosh, Kadosh, YHVH, TZEVAOT

  FROM THE DESK OF:                    <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
                      *Mike Spitzer*     <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
                         ~~~~~~~~          <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

   The Best Way To Destroy Enemies Is To Change Them To Friends
       Shalom, A Salaam Aleikum, and to all, A Good Day.
=================================================================

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please!  These are sordid
matters
and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds�is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
<A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to