------- Forwarded message follows -------
Date sent:              Sun, 30 Apr 2000 11:57:55 -0700
From:                   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:                IUFO: Report: USA Mass Mind Control
To:                     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Send reply to:          [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Courtesy of Nicola Molloy (armageddon or new age-L):

Aerial Mind-Control
http://home.nas.net/~raven1/commsolo.htm >

The Threat to Civil Liberties
by Judy Wall, Editor/Publisher Resonance
Newsletter of the MENSA Bioelectromagnetics Special Interest Group
NEXUS Magazine, October-November 1999
Vol. 6, No. 6

Judy Wall can be contacted by mail at:
Judy Wall, Editor/Publisher
684 County Road 535
Sumterville FL
USA 33585

** She has stated that her interest is in objective reports only - not
victim testimonials.**


Eleanor White's comments: This hard hitting article by Judy Wall, who is
a mind control victim and in fact avoids victim testimonials in favour
of only factual objective material, contains some POWERFUL items not
widely known among involuntary mind control experimentees. These items
in her article below have had the font size increased a notch so that
the visitor can scroll down and see just those items if time or interest
is short.

WAY TO GO, Judy!



The United States Air Force uses aerial mind-control broadcasts against
civilian population as well as enemy troops. Some of these actions
against civilians are done with the intent of influencing public opinion
and the  outcome of elections.

In a previous article, we examined mind-control technology, especially
that utilizing Silent Sound [TM], in which radio-frequency broadcasts
carry subliminal patterns that entrain the listener's brainwaves into a
pre-selected emotional state. According to ITV wire service reports,
this technology was used during Operation Desert Storm in 1991, as part
of the US Psychological Operations (PsyOps) directed against Iraqi
troops. [1,2]

To the Desert Storm offensive we can now add several other incidents.
Alex Horvat, editor of The Probe, calls to our attention the 1998
video, Exotic Weapons of Mass Control, produced by Bob Fletcher.

"The excerpt played on Fletcher's video is from TLC (The Learning
Channel) and clearly states that Commando Solo was used in Haiti for
what was called Operation Uphold Democracy. As the general populace was
violently opposed to Aristide and most in favor of his ouster, it took
nearly a year  of this clandestine counter-programming to get them to
change their minds. Instead of butchering a population physically, we
can no manipulate them mentally, virtually enslaving their thoughts with
a criss-cross pattern of flights by an EC-130 (which is just a C-130
heavily laden with electronic hardware.) [3]

We were not at war with the citizens of Haiti, yet the U.S. Government
directed military weapons against this friendly, or at least neutral,
civilian population. The U.S. Government sanction the "rigging" of the
Haitian election by mental control of the people, programming them to
cast their votes for the Americans' favored candidate. And they had the
nerve to call it "Operation Uphold Democracy". Some sense of humor!
Stalin would have loved it. Hitler would have loved it. Why is the U.S.
Government doing this? Who is behind this flagrant violation of civil
liberties? Is it the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) which has a
long history of interfering in foreign government politics? Or has this
become standard military procedure?

The rationale is always the same: "to make the world safe for
democracy". Yet what is democracy if not freedom? Freedom to think your
own thoughts;  freedom to express your own opinions; freedome to vote
for the candidate  of your own choice.

Fletcher's video also mentions that the same technology was used against
the Bosnia population for a week to influence their election. [4] This
was probably done during Operation Joint Guard in 1995. [5]

The questions arise: If they have used mind-control broadcasts against
foreign civilian populations to influence elections, will they use them
against American citizens or have they already? What other countries may
be the recipients of this innovative technology?

Just what is this EC-130E Commando Solo? The United States Air Force has
helpfully published a fact sheet that describes the Lockheed built
aircraft. [6] This 1995 bulletin states that the "unit flyaway cost" is
more than US $100 million each, and that there are eight in the
inventory. Its primary function is "Psychological operations
broadcasts". The crew consists of four officers (pilot, copilot,
navigator, control chief/EWO) and seven enlisted members (flight
engineer, loadmaster, five mission crew.)

According to the fact sheet:

"Air Force Mission: Commando Solo conducts psychological operations and
civil affairs broadcast missions in the standard AM, FM, HF, TV and
military communications bands. Missions are flown at maximum altitudes
possible to ensure optimum propagation patterns. The EC-130 flies during
either day or night scenarios with equal success, and is air
refuealable. A typical mission consists of a single ship orbit which is
offset from the desired target audience. The targets may be either
military or civilian personnel.

"Secondary missions include command and control communications
countermeasures (C3CM) and limited intelligence gathering.

"Air Force Features: Highly specialized modifications have been made to
the latest version of the EC-130. Included in these modifications are
enhanced navigation systems, self-protection equipment, and the
capability of broadcasting color television on a multitude of world-wide
standards throughout the TV VHF/UHF ranges.

"Air Force Background: Air National Guard EC-130 aircraft flown by the
193rd Special Operations Group were deployed to both Saudi Arabia and
Turkey in support of Desert Storm. Their missions included broadcasts of
'Voice of the Gulf' and other programs intended to convince Iraqi
soldiers to surrender.

"The EC-130 was originally modified using the mission electronic
equipment from the EC-121, known at the time as the Coronet Solo. Soon
after the 193rd SOG received its EC-130s, the unit participated in the
rescue of US citizens in Operation Urgent Fury, acting as an airborne
radio station informing those people on Granada of the US military

"Volant Solo, as the mission is now known, was instrumental in the
success of coordinated psychological operations in Operation Just Cause,
again broadcasting continuously throughout the initial phases of the

Operation Just Cause? this is another propaganda name, applied to the
U.S. invasion of Panama to take out that country's leader, General
Noreiga, the CIA's erstwhile partner in drug smuggling. Apparently the
General had made someone mad--how else to account for the massive
invasion of this tiny tourist country? To wit: "A superpower whipped the
poop out of 10 percent of the police force of a Third World nation. You
are supposed to be able to do that. It was done well, and I credit those
who did it. But it is important that we draw the right lessons from it"
according to an anonymous US Marine. [7]

Our Commander-in-Chief had another point of view: "...the roll call of
glory, the roster of great American campaigns -- Yorktown, Gettysburg,
Normandy, and now Panama."
--President George Bush, March 1990 [8]


In a phone call to the USAF Special Operations Command Public Affairs
Office, I questioned the legitimacy of using these subliminal broadcasts
against civilian populations. [9]

[Judy Wall's article on Silent Sound for details.]

I was told that it was all perfectly legal, having been approved by the
U.S. Congress (!). It may be okay by Congress, but I sincerely doubt
that it would be approved by the recipient populations.

That conversation also elicited more information concerning the Commando
Solo units. For instance, the Air National Guard of the individual
states in the U.S. can also operate Commando Solo aircraft, should the
Governor of a state request assistance. That means the PsyOps
mind-control technology can be directed against U.S. citizens.

The Commando Solo aircraft have participated in the following
missions--possibly more, as the early missions of Volant Solo 1 were not
known to this spokesperson:

- Operation Urgent Fury (Grenada, Oct-Nov 1983, Jan-Jun 1985)
- Operation Just Cause (Panama, late December 1989)
- Operation Desert Shield (Kuwait, Iraq, from August 1990)
- Operation Desert Storm (Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Iraq, 1991)
- Operation Uphold Democracy (Haiti, 1994-1995)
- Operation Joint Guard (Part of a UN oepration in Bosnia-Herzegovina,
- Operation Desert Thunder (part of a UN operation in Iraq)
- Operation Desert Fox (Iraq, 2 to 3 days in December 1998)

Other countries are known to have a similar aircraft, but the PR officer
declined to identify them, suggesting that I check out Jane's Defence
Weekly for such information. Not having access to that particular
publication, I searched through my copy of Jane's Radar and Electronic
Warfare Systems 1993094. [10]

The Commando Solo unit was not listed, but a browse through the book was
informative as to the numerous types of electronic offence and defence
systems available. These include stationary and mobile land units (many
housed in large trucks), shipboard and airborne models as well as well
as space-based technology. If the military is spending US $100 million
per airborne unit (times eight, we're talking US $800 million here), I
think it is safe to assume that they have tried out mind control
equipment with less expensive, roving land units (trucks), but use the
airplanes to cover wider areas and hard-to-reach locations of the world.

And I might add, we can asume that they have tried out the efficacy of
this mind-control technology. Even the US military would not waste $800
million on something unless it has been proven to work, and work
effectively, even under the adverse situation of military combat. This
is an important point.

The initial research into mind control in the USA was conducted udner
the auspices of the CIA. The flagrant abuse of human rights in
experimenting on unsuspecting persons was based on the supposition that
the veracity of experiments would be compromised if a subject knew that
he was participating in an experiment. In the case of mind-control
technology, this supposition might very well be true. But that does not
justify its use -- or so said the Nuremburg Code, the tenets of which
were used as a legal basis to prosecute Nazi scientists for war crimes.
However the US seems to have excused its own military and scientific
community from adhering to that Code. [11]

The next logical step in mind control would be to incorporate this
technology into satellite communications. Since other countries are
known to have similar capabilities, there could occur a sitution in
which electronic mind control warfare is waged against a civilian
population, receiving conflicting mental manipulation from both sides.
What would be the mental state of individuals so targetted? Would it
cause a rise in mental aberrations and schizophrenia? And what are the
limits of mind manipulations? Can people be forced to commit suicide?
Can physical ailments or psychosomatic illnesses be induced?

A March 1990 report from Bosnia-Herzegovina in the former Yugoslavia
sug-gests the latter may have already happened. The report concerns
2,990 ethnic Albanians who were admitted to hospital with complaints of
lung and skin problems for which doctors could find no physical cause.

It is not a far step from manipulating a person's emotional state to
influencing bodily functions. Indeed, much of the literature on
documenting microwave effects on biological systems deals with precisely
this phenomenon. In fact, studies of the physical effects of microwave
exposure (including radio frequencies) generally preceeded studies of
mental effects.

A meeting sponsored by Defense & Foreign Affairs and the International
Strategic Studies Association was held in Washington DC in 1983.
High-level officials from many countries met for this conference. They
discussed psychological strategies related to government and
policymaking. A summary of the agenda reads: "The group will be
discussing the essence of future policymaking, for it msut be
increasingly clear to all that the most effective tool of government and
strategy is the mind...

If it's any consolation to the weapons-oriented among defense
policymakers, the new technologies of communications -- satellites,
television, radio, and mind-control beams -- are 'systems' which are
more tangible than the more  philosophically based psychological
strategies and operations.

[Eleanor White's comment: Anyone know where to get a copy?]

"But we should make no mistake; it will be the 'psychologically based'
systems which determine the world's fate in coming years: the condition
of the minds of populations and leaders. And we should not ignore the
fact that the USSR [this was in 1983] is working on electronic systems
to 'beam' messages directly into the brain. What good, then, are
conventional systems if these types of weapons are not countered? And,
on a more basic level, what good is a weapon system if public opinion or
political constraints prohibit its deployment?" [13]

It is obvious that they found the answer to that last question. If the
public does not know about a weapon system, it cannot prohibit its
deployment. This is the situtation that applies to mind-control


The US military is aware that certain actions or procedures may not be
acceptable to the American public. Metz and Kievit express these
concerns  in their paper, "The Revolution in Military Affairs and Short
Conflict War."[14]

"The use of new technology may also run counter to basic American
values. Information age -- and in particular, information warfare --
technologies cause concerns about privacy... American values also make
the use of directed-energy weapons ... morally difficult, perhaps

Later they state: "We must decide whether innovative military
capabilities are, in fact, acceptable and desirable. That can only
happen through open debate. The military must be a vital participant,
but not the sole one."

But there has been no open debate.

On July 21, 1994, the US Department of Defense proposed that non-lethal
weapons be used not only against declared enemies, but against anyone
engaged in activities that the DOD opposed. That could include almost
anybody and anything. Note that the mind-control technology is
classified under non-lethal weapons. [15]

A 1998 news item states that US Air Force General John Jumper "predicts
that the military will have the tools to make potential enemies see,
hear,  and believe things that do not exist" and that "The same idea was
contained in a 15-volume study by the USAF Scientific Advisory Board,
issued in 1996, on how to maintain US air and space superiority on the
battlefields of the 21st century". [16,17]

It seems that, in miltary parlance, a "prediction" means: "Don't be
surprised when you find out we've already got this, but it's classified
and we can't admit to it just yet."

Notice that General Jumper predicts that mind control technology will be
used against potential enemies. The military and government agencies may
apply this term to any group or individual they perceive as a threat to
their own interests. Potential enemies may be counter-culture
individuals, those of opposing political viewpoints, economic or
financial competitors, biological undesirables, etc. It is part of the
military agenda to identify potential threats so as to be prepared to
meet them. Experience has shown that the US Government (the CIA and FBI,
for example) has moved against these people or groups, slandering,
harassing, even killing them, without adequate cause or legal sanction.

A weapon that can be used in secret lends itself to abuse by unethical
individuals in positions of power. The military and secret services have
shown themselves often to be lacking in ethical constraints. After all,
the job of the military is war; it is killing people; and so, just how
this is accomplished may be considered irrelevant. Lesser evils, like
mind control, pale by comparison.

Of course, it can be argued that it is far more humane to brainwash a
person via mind control technology than it is to torture or kill them.
Others vehemently deny this. They'd rather be dead than a mental slave
to Big Brother! That is what revolutions are about. And if I recall
correctly, that is the idea behind the US Bill of Rights.


Awareness of the existence of mind-control technology, and hence its
dangers and possibility for misuse, seems to be more prevalent in Europe
than in other areas. The European Parliament recently passed a
"Resolution on environment, security, and foreign policy". [18] This
document includes these articles:

"23. Calls on the European Union to seek to have the new 'non-lethal'
weapons technology and the development of new arms strategies also
covered and regulated by international conventions...

"27. Calls for an international convention introducing a global ban on
all developments and deployments of weapons which might enable any form
of manipulation of human beings."

The United States will ignore these resolutions, of course, as it has
other EP requests; for example, as mentioned in the same document:

"24. Considers HAARP (High Frequency Active Auroral Research Project) by
virtue of its far-reaching impact on the environment to be a global
concern and calls for it's legal, ecological and ethical implcations to
be examined by an international independent body before any further
research and testing; regrets the repeated refusal of the United States
Administration to send anyone in person to give evidence to the public
hearing or any subsequent meeting to be held by its competent committee
into the environmental and public risks connected with the HAARP
programme currently being funded in Alaska..."

One of HAARP's potential uses is a communications system. The military
officially acknowledges two communications-related applications: (1) to
replace the existing Extremely Low Frequency (ELF) submarine
communications system now operating in Michigan and Wisconsin; (2) to
provide a way  to wipe out communications over an extremely large area,
while keeping the miltary's own communications system working. [19]

As we have seen, the mind-control subliminal messages are carried on
radiofrequency broadcasts.

[Judy Wall's article on Silent Sound for details.]

The HAARP facility could be used to broadcast global mind-control
messages, or such messages could simply be inserted into existing

Dr. Igor Smirnov, of the Institute of Psycho-correction in Moscow, says
in regard to this technology: "It is easily conceviable that some
Russian 'Satan', or let's say Iranian [or any other 'Satan'], as long as
he owns the appropriate means and finances, can inject himself [intrude]
into every conceivable computer network, into every conceivable radio or
television broadcast, with relative technological ease, even without
disconnecting cables. You can intercept the [radio] waves in the aether
and then [subliminally] modulate every conceivable suggestion into it.
If this transpires over a long enough time period, it accumulates in the
heads of people. And eventually they can be artificially manipulated
with other additional measurements, to do that which this perpetrator
wants [them to do]. This is why [such technology] is rightfully feared."


To return to the USAF Fact Sheet, it concludes: "In 1990 the EC-130
joined the newly formed Air Force Special Operations Command and has
since been designated Commando Solo, with no change in mission. This one
of a kind aircraft is consistently improving its capabilities.

The next few years should see continued enhancements to the EC-130 and
its  worldwide mission."

About the Author:
Judy Wall is the Editor of RESONANCE, the newsletter of the
Bioelectromagnetics Special Interest Group of American MENSA Ltd.
Viewpoints expressed here are her own personal views.

1. Wall, Judy, "Military Use of Mind Control Weapons", NEXUS,  5/06,
Oct-Nov 1998

2. "Psychological operations" are defined as:  "Planned operations to
convery selected information and indicators to foreign audiences to
influence their emotions,  motives, objective reasoning, and ultimately
the behavior of foreign governments, organizations, groups and
individuals. The purpose of psychological operations is to induce or
re-inforce foreign attitudes and behavior favorable to the originator's
objectives. Also called PsyOps." From "Joint Doctrine for Information
Operations", Joint publication 3-13, 9 October 1998. Thanks to Harlan
Girard of the International Committee on Offensive Microwave Weapons (PO
Box 58700, Philadelphia PA 19102-8700, USA) for the excerpt.

3. Horvat, Alex, "Commando Solo", The Probe, vol. 4, No. 1, Winter
1998/99, p.44; available from PO Box 905, St. Peters, MO 63376, USA.

4. Fletcher, Bob, Exotic Weapons of Mass Control;  video available from
The Probe (see above) or Global Insights, A675 Fairview Dr. #246, Carson
City NV, 89701 USA, tel 1-800-729-4131.

5. An item of interest is that the US had a new type of aerial
reconnaissance plane positioned over the former Yugoslavia from July 14,
1995, about six months before  the US officially intervened. The
10-million-dollar  unmanned saucer-shaped spy craft is nicknamed "Dark
Star".  Information from C-Com (Classified Communications > 3(12), Dec
1995; Erich A. Aggen, Jr., (editor), citing CE Chronicles nos. 1 and 2
and Raising Awareness newsletter.

6. Fact Sheet, dated March 1995. The address on the publication is AF
Special Operations Command Public Affairs Office, 100 Bartley Street,
Hurlburt Field, FL 32544-5273, USA. They no longer supply printed
copies, but you can access the document at http://www.hurlburt.af.mil 7.
Morrison Taw, Jennifer, "Operation Just Cause: Lessons For Operations
Other Than War", Rand Corp., 1996, p. vii; quoting from "Some Questions
Whether the US Is Ready for LIC", Navy News and Undersea Technology,
August 27, 1990, p.7.

8. Morrison Taw, Jennifer, ibid,. p.1.

9. Telephone conversation of February 26, 1999, with AF Special
Operations Command Public Affairs Office; voice (850) 884-5515, email
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 10. Blake, Bernard (ed.) Jane's Radar and
Electronic Warfare Systems 1993-94, Jane's Information Group Inc., 1340
Braddock Place, Suite 300, Alexandria VA 22314-1651, USA; also Jane's
Information Group, Sentinel House, 163 Brighton Road, Couldson, Surrey
CR5 2NH, UK.

11. (a) "US Nullifies Nuremburg Law", Earth Island Journal, Winter
1996-97. (b) Hightower, Jim, "Unregulated Experiments on Humans", New
Times, June 19-25, 1997; cites Stolberg, Sheryl Gay, "Unchecked Research
People Raises Concern on Medical Ethics", New York Times, May 14, 1997.
(c) See "Ban on Medical Experiments Without  Consent is Relaxed", New
York Times, November 5, 1996, p.1; copy available for 50 cents from
David Park Brooks, 3456 17th St., San Francisco CA 94110. (d) Also  see
Senator John Glenn's bill S-193, "Human Subjects Research Protection Act
of 1997", Congressional Record, US Senate, January 22, 1997. (e) "In
1994, a congressional subcommittee found up to 500,000 Americans between
1940 and 1974 were endangered by secred defense-related tests including
radiation experiments, mustard gas, LSD  and biological agents." See
Pitch Weekly, April 17-23, 1997.

12. Schaefer, Paul, "Experimentation and Warfare", article citing The
Kansas City Star, between March 25 and 31, 1990.

13. Summary, The Perth Corporation, Defense & Foreign Affairs, November

14. Metz, Steven, and James Kievit, "The Revolution in Military Affairs
and Conflict Short of War", US Army War College, Carlisle Barracks, PA
17013-5050, USA, pp. 15-16 and 29. [See also Krawczyk, Glenn, "Big
Brother's Recipe for 'Revolution in Military Affairs'",  NEXUS 2/26,
June-July 1995.]
15. Schaefer, Paul, "Psyops: Invisible Warfare", Zuni  Mountain Citizen
(precise date unknown, late 1998/  early 1999), p.5.

16. "Microwave Weapons", Microwave News, March/April  1998; Louis Slesin
(editor), citing Aviation Week,  March 9, 1998.

17. Same article as above, citing Microwave News,  January/February

18. "Environment, Security, and Foreign Affairs", Resolution A40005/99,
Minutes of 28/01/99 - Provisional Edition,  European Parliament. For
copy, thanks to Grattan Healy,  Advisor on Energy & Research, Green
Group in the European  Parliament, LEO 2C35, Rue Wiertz Straat, B-1047
Bruxelles, Belgium, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

19. For more info on HAARP, see Begich, Nick and Jeanne  Manning, Angels
Don't Play This HAARP, Earthpulse  Press, PO Box 201393, Anchorage AK
99520, USA, Tel. (907)  249-9111.

20. From a German documentary, "Geheimes Russland: Moskau - Die Zombies
dr roten Zaren" ("Secret Russia: Moscow - The Zombies of the Red Czars")
aired on German TV network  ZDF on December 22, 1998. Script translation
by Jan  Weisemann. The full text is to be published in  Resonance, No.

21. Reed, Chris, Lockheed C-130 Hercules and Its Variants,  Schiffer
Publishing Ltd, Atglen, PA, 1999.

earthradioTV.com - Alternative News Forum for ecology, politics &
consciousness.  MIRROR SITES:
USA     http://www.earthradioTV.com/
CZECH   http://mujweb.cz/www/ecologynews/
UK      http://members.tripod.co.uk/ecologynews/
Canada http://www.ecologynews.com/

------- End of forwarded message -------




<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are sordid
and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
Archives Available at:
<A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of

 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:


Reply via email to