.............................................................. >From the New Paradigms Project [Not Necessarily Endorsed]: Conspiracy Shopping Cart: http://a-albionic.com/shopping.html From: Ian Goddard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Waco Update (4/23/00) Date: Sunday, April 23, 2000 8:30 PM (following: http://users.erols.com/igoddard/flir01.htm) A Dallas Morning News report [1] gives us some numbers to work with from the official FLIR (forward-looking infrared) camera study being conducted by defense- contractor-owned Vector Data Research. The Morning News states that flashes on the test FLIR from the six guns tested lasted up to one fiftieth of a second (1/50 = .02 seconds), while reflections off debris lasted up to 19 times longer (.02 * 19 = .38 seconds). Dr. Edward Allard recorded the duration of flashes on the 1993 Waco FLIR to be as short as one thirtieth of a second (1/30 = .03 seconds). [2] Here then are the reported durations of flashes from these sources: (A) TEST-GUNS .02 sec (B) WACO FLIR .03 sec (C) REFLECTIONS .38 sec Of the three, A and B are most similar. While the duration of B is only 1.5 times longer than that of A, the duration of C is 19 times longer than A. Logic therefore clearly indicates that the reported duration of flashes on the 1993 Waco FLIR is significantly more similar to the flashes on the test FLIR from test-guns than from reflections off debris. It should be noted that the Dallas Morning News report lists four of the six guns tested, and only two were machine guns, the CAR-15 assault rifle used by the FBI's hostage rescue team and the large M-60 machine gun. Any machine guns seen on the 1993 Waco FLIR could be different types, explaining the minor discrepancy in flash durations. AND THEN there's the matter of the rate at which series of flashes appear on the 1993 Waco FLIR. While a reflective surface would reflect only one beam of radiation that a moving camera would pass through only once, resulting in the occurrence of only one flash, flashes on the 1993 Waco FLIR coming from one spot occur at a rate of 7 to 10 times per second, exactly matching the cyclic rate of a machine gun. [3] No reflective surface could reasonably replicate such a rate of flashing. The inherent inability of a reflective surface to replicate the rapid flashing seen in the 1993 FLIR is by itself an insurmountable problem for the FBI's defense, and with the addition of the flash-duration analysis above, the evidence before points clearly in only one direction: machine-gun fire directed at Mount Carmel is seen on the 1993 Waco FLIR. It's reprehensible that virtually all major media are spreading the false claim that shooters are not visible on the 1993 Waco FLIR, when in fact sometimes shooters are visible: http://www.erols.com/igoddard/flir01.htm . It staggers my imagination that none of the professional journalists assigned to cover this case have bothered to study the FLIR or to even simply watch the documentary, Waco: A New Revelation, that put Waco back in the news, in which case they'd know that shooters ARE sometimes visible and thus that what they're writing is false. See the Waco FLIR yourself: http://waco-anewrevelation.com _________________________________________________________ [1] Dallas Morning News (4/23/00): "Flashes from gunfire on the test video were also far shorter in duration, lasting at most one-fiftieth of a second while those from debris lasted up to 19 times as long, the sources said." http://dallasnews.com/texas_southwest/68442_WACO23.html [2] Dr Edward Allard states: "We've measured the actual time of the individual flashes, and they occur at a fraction of a second, in same cases a thirtieth of a second. There is absolutely nothing in nature that can cause thermal flashes to occur in a thirtieth of a second." Source: Waco, A New Revelation (waco-anewrevelation.com) [3] Dr Edward Allard's Affidavit: "I note five flashes from one point, appearing and disappearing at the rate of 7-10 per second." http://www.indirect.com/www/dhardy/allard.html ============================================================ If the axiom "power corrupts" is a reliable axiom, then the Official Story must be suspect on its face. ------------------------------------------------------------ GODDARD'S JOURNAL: http://www.erols.com/igoddard/journal.htm ____________________________________________________________ Asking the "wrong questions," challenging the Official Story Shop for Cars On-Line: http://a-albionic.com/ads/srch.html Forwarded for info and discussion from the New Paradigms Discussion List, not necessarily endorsed by: *********************************** Lloyd Miller, Research Director for A-albionic Research (POB 20273, Ferndale, MI 48220), a ruling class/conspiracy research resource for the entire political-ideological spectrum. Quarterly journal, book sales, rare/out-of-print searches, New Paradigms Discussion List, Weekly Up-date Lists & E-text Archive of research, intelligence, catalogs, & resources. To Discuss Ideas: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://msen.com/~lloyd/ For Ordering Info & Free Catalog: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://a-albionic.com/formaddress.html For Discussion List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] text in body: subscribe prj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> **FREE RARE BOOK SEARCH: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ** Explore Our Archive: <http://a-albionic.com/a-albionic.html> Every Diet Has Failed! What Can I do? Click Below to "Ask Dr. Kathleen"! http://www.radiantdiet.com/cgi-bin/slim/deliver.cgi?ask-1364 *********************************** <A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A> DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at: http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html <A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of [EMAIL PROTECTED]</A> http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
