>From www.wsws.org

WSWS : News & Analysis : North America : The Brutal Society
New Jersey conference exposes cases of wrongful conviction and imprisonment
By Andrea Grant-Friedman
10 May 2000

Back to screen version

A conference on wrongful convictions in the US criminal justice system was held
Saturday, May 6 in East Brunswick, New Jersey. Panelists at the Wrongful
Convictions Conference included lawyers and advocates for the wrongfully
convicted, as well as individuals who had been released from either life
sentences or death row.

In retelling the series of events that led to the wrongful convictions of Jimmy
Landano and Earl Berryman, advocates for the men emphasized the way in which
prosecutorial abuses of power altered the outcome of the trials. The inability
of the defendants�both working class men who lived in the New York metropolitan
area�to pay for expensive lawyers placed them in a highly disadvantaged
position.

While contending with the aggressive maneuvers of state attorneys out to secure
convictions, Landano and Berryman were forced to rely on the services of court-
appointed attorneys. While many of these individuals are able lawyers, they are
often overburdened with heavy caseloads and lack the financial and personnel
resources necessary to build a strong defense. The stories told by Landano and
Berryman reveal a great deal about the workings of a criminal justice system
that both feeds off and perpetuates legal and social inequalities.

Jimmy Landano�14 years in prison

On August 27, 1976, the FBI�armed with shotguns and high powered
weapons�swarmed the New York residence of Jimmy Landano. Landano was arrested
on charges of murder, armed robbery and car theft in connection with the recent
robbery of a check cashing business in New Jersey. The theft resulted in the
death of a police officer. In exchange for a lesser sentence, Alan Roller, a
second man arrested on charges for the robbery, named Jimmy Landano as his
accomplice in the crime.

Despite the fact that Landano in no way fit the physical description of the
suspect given by eyewitnesses, he was extradited to the state of New Jersey,
and was subsequently convicted of the charges and sentenced to death. Evidence
unearthed in the struggle to overturn Landano's conviction reveal a legal
system marked by various degrees of corruption.

After fighting the conviction for several years and losing his appeals at every
level of the court system (the Supreme Court refused to hear his case), a
federal judge ordered a raid on the files of all government agencies that
played a part in Landano's prosecution. The material uncovered revealed that
the prosecution consciously targeted an individual that they knew was not
guilty, with one document even explicitly stating this.

The prosecution pressured witnesses into testifying against Landano, despite
the fact that previous statements made by these people would have clearly
implicated someone else in the crime. In an interview conducted several years
after Landano's conviction, a truck driver who identified Landano as the
perpetrator at the trial admitted that until Landano's lawyer stood up to speak
at the trial, he was unsure which of the men sitting behind the defense table
was the supposed guilty person.

In reviewing evidence in the prosecution's files, Landano's advocates also
discovered that the book of photos used by the police for the identification of
criminals in the case contained two photographs of Landano, thereby increasing
the likelihood that someone would peg Landano for the crime.

Apparently, the owner of the check cashing business had called the police and
identified Alan Roller and another man, Victor Forney, as possible suspects in
the crime. The man was told by the police to keep quiet. While Forney has never
been tried for the 1976 robbery and murder, evidence uncovered as part of
Landano's attempt to overturn his conviction strongly implicated Forney in the
crime. At the conference, Landano speculated that Forney, who is known to be
involved with organized crime, was able to avoid arrest because he is an
informant for the Drug Enforcement Agency.

Paul Casteleiro, the lawyer who helped Landano overturn his conviction, stated
that he felt the bulk of wrongful convictions, and Landano's case in
particular, arose out of the willingness of the prosecution to rely on the
testimony of unscrupulous persons in order to secure a conviction. Roller, the
man who named Landano as his accomplice in the robbery, was active in the same
organized crime ring as Forney, and the prosecution failed to reveal this
information.

In the view of Casteleiro, Landano's conviction largely arose out of the fact
that the �prosecution makes deals with the devil.� While there is no doubt that
the aggressive and dishonest tactics on the part of the prosecution contributed
to Landano's conviction, this doesn't answer why Landano was not able to defend
himself in the face of a less than air-tight case against him. When this
reporter asked Landano what he thought prevented him and people like him from
securing acquittals, he stated, �Good attorneys�they want money. They [people
on death row] don't have money. They're not the Duponts of the world.�

The case of Earl Berryman

Earl Berryman, a resident of Newark, New Jersey, was charged with raping a
Brazilian woman. She claimed that three African-American men abducted her from
a street corner and then sexually assaulted her in an abandoned warehouse. A
full year and a half after the crime supposedly took place, the victim picked
Berryman, along with two other men, out of a book of police photos. Each of
these men's last names started with the letter �B.�

Jim Mccloskely, a panelist at the conference and the director of an
organization that takes on cases for the wrongfully convicted, speculated that
after being faced with the prospect of looking through photo books from A-Z,
the woman settled on three men in the �B� book. Despite the fact that several
people considered the woman's accusations highly questionable in the first
place, Berryman was eventually convicted and sentenced to life in prison.
Based on the material presented at the conference, it appears that Earl
Berryman's conviction arose out of a confluence of factors. His case epitomizes
the ways in which the legal system targets certain layers of the population.
When he was first arrested, police told Berryman that if he implicated Michael
Bunch, another man charged in the crime, the charges against him would be
dropped. Berryman refused. Berryman and Bunch never saw their court-appointed
attorneys before going to trial. Berryman's lawyer was later disbarred.

Earl Berryman's conviction seems to have been based on even less credible
evidence than that which led to Landano's conviction. During the trial it was
easily established by the prosecution that Michael Bunch had a long criminal
record. Lawyers for the state used this evidence to portray Bunch as a violent
person, a hardened criminal who, on the basis of his prior history, must have
committed the rape and kidnapping. Berryman's supposed guilt was then inferred
on the basis of the prosecution's incriminating character assassination of
Bunch.

Speaking at the conference, Casteleiro, who was hired by Bunch's family,
pointed out the way in which having a previous criminal record or a history of
drug addiction affects the outcome of a case. Casteleiro stated that the
problem with the Bunch's position was simply that �nobody believed him� at
trial. In the case of Berryman, the man had the misfortune of having taken a
joy ride in a stolen car as a teenager. While the charges against him were
dismissed, his picture remained in the police files. If it had not been for
this minor infraction, Berryman would never been identified by the victim
because he had no other criminal record.

Landano and Berryman fought for many years to have their convictions
overturned. When asked about the process he went through in order to reach an
advocate willing to take up his case, Landano stated, �I wrote to everybody you
could think of, every reporter, journalist, politician.� After about five years
in prison, Landano eventually made contact with Jim Mccloskey when the latter
began doing seminary work in the prison. Landano spent a total of 14 years in
prison.

After being released from death row, Landano was offered a deal by the
prosecutor's office that would have overturned the murder and armed robbery
convictions, if he pleaded guilty to car theft and accepted time served as a
sentence. Landano refused to admit guilt in any manner and spent another nine
years under house arrest before receiving a complete acquittal on all charges
in July of 1998.

Berryman spent time writing to people he knew in the city of Newark whom he
thought might be able to help. After several years he made contact with
Mccloskey who agreed to take up his case. Berryman spent 10 years in prison
fighting to have his conviction overturned before finally being released.
Despite spending years fighting his conviction with the aid of Paul Casteleiro,
Michael Bunch died in prison.

Several of those who spoke at the conference, both on the panel and in the
audience, adopted a hard-line towards criminals in general. The main organizer
of the event, Lorry Post, lamented the fact that �the system doesn't work ...
the guilty guys go free.� Many of those involved in the event appeared largely
concerned with the plight of the �wrongfully convicted� and only as a more
secondary interest with the way in which the criminal justice system operates
as a whole.

Professor Mike Israel stated, �The problem is not only social class.� He then
went on to remark that wrongful convictions were in large part the product of
�police culture and the general mood of getting down on crime.� But he failed
to make the point that the methods of the police and prosecution overwhelmingly
target workers and the poor.

In response to a question from the audience, Paul Casteleiro drew attention to
the passage in 1996 of the White House-sponsored Anti-Terrorism and Effective
Death Penalty Act. Arguing that the new law severely hindered attempts to
secure the overturning of wrongful convictions, Casteleiro stated that the
passage of this act �effectively suspended the writ of habeas corpus.�

Significantly, none of the lawyers or advocates at the conference explicitly
stated their opposition to the death penalty. While Jimmy Landano came within
four months of having his life ended, the conference organizers and the
panelists themselves never sought to raise the question whether or not such a
possibility should ever have existed in the first place. In discussions with
this reporter after the panel adjourned, both Jimmy Landano and Earl Berryman
stated that they unequivocally opposed the death penalty.

Copyright 1998-2000
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved

A<>E<>R
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Integrity has no need of rules. -Albert Camus (1913-1960)
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
The only real voyage of discovery consists not in seeking
new landscapes but in having new eyes. -Marcel Proust
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said
it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your
own reason and your common sense." --Buddha
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
It is preoccupation with possessions, more than anything else, that
prevents us from living freely and nobly. -Bertrand Russell
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Everyone has the right...to seek, receive and impart
information and ideas through any media and regardless
of frontiers." Universal Declaration of Human Rights
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Always do sober what you said you'd do drunk. That will
teach you to keep your mouth shut." Ernest Hemingway
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Forwarded as information only; no endorsement to be presumed
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material
is distributed without charge or profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this type of information
for non-profit research and educational purposes only.

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with major and
minor
effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
<A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to