Thanks William.  I am a proponent for total legalization.  Please see my comments 
inserted below. . .


On Tue, 09 May 2000, William Shannon wrote:

>
> 10 Reasons to legalise all drugs
> 1 Address the real issues
> For too long policy makers have used prohibition as a smoke screen to avoid
> addressing the social and economic factors that lead people to use drugs.
> Most illegal and legal drug use is recreational. Poverty and despair are at
> the root of most problematic drug use and it is only by addressing these
> underlying causes that we can hope to significantly decrease the number of
> problematic users.

>>>>>(Tenebroust comments indented like this)  Indeed, but no one in office wants to 
>actually look to solve problems.  When there are problems it gives them a reason to 
>demand more money and to stay in office longer "to fix things"

> 2 Eliminate the criminal market place
>
> The market for drugs is demand-led and millions of people demand illegal
> drugs. Making the production, supply and use of some drugs illegal creates a
> vacuum into which organised crime moves. The profits are worth billions of
> pounds.
>
> Legalisation forces organised crime from the drugs trade, starves them of
> income and enables us to regulate and control the market (i.e. prescription,
> licensing, laws on sales to minors, advertising regulations etc.)

>>>>>This, of course would greatly curtail the amount of money the "Intelligence" 
>agencies have to spend on illegal operations since they are a major supplier.  Plus 
>when supply goes up as it would if legalized then the cost decreases, and that spells 
>less profit.


> 3 Massively reduce crime
>
> The price of illegal drugs is determined by a demand-led, unregulated market.
> Using illegal drugs is very expensive. This means that some dependent users
> resort to stealing to raise funds (accounting for 50% of UK property crime -
> estimated at £2 billion a year). Most of the violence associated with illegal
> drug dealing is caused by its illegality
>
> Legalisation would enable us to regulate the market, determine a much lower
> price and remove users need to raise funds through crime. Our legal system
> would be freed up and our prison population dramatically reduced, saving
> billions. Because of the low price, cigarette smokers do not have to steal to
> support their habits. There is also no violence associated with the legal
> tobacco market.
>
> 4 Drug users are a majority
>
> Recent research shows that nearly half of all 15-16 year olds have used an
> illegal drug. Up to one and a half million people use ecstasy every weekend.
> Amongst young people, illegal drug use is seen as normal. Intensifying the
> ‘war on drugs’ is not reducing demand. In Holland, where cannabis laws are
> far less harsh, drug usage is amongst the lowest in Europe.
>
> Legalisation accepts that drug use is normal and that it is a social issue,
> not a criminal justice one. How we deal with it is up to all of us to decide.
>
> In 1970 there were 9000 convictions or cautions for drug offences and 15% of
> young people had used an illegal drug. In 1995 the figures were 94 000 and
> 45%. Prohibition doesn’t work.
>
> 5 Provide access to truthful information and education
>
> A wealth of disinformation about drugs and drug use is given to us by
> ignorant and prejudiced policy-makers and media who peddle myths upon lies
> for their own ends. This creates many of the risks and dangers associated
> with drug use.
>
> Legalisation would help us to disseminate open, honest and truthful
> information to users and non-users to help them to make decisions about
> whether and how to use. We could begin research again on presently illicit
> drugs to discover all their uses and effects - both positive and negative.
>
> 6 Make all drug use safer
>
> Prohibition has led to the stigmatisation and marginalisation of drug users.
> Countries that operate ultra-prohibitionist policies have very high rates of
> HIV infection amongst injecting users. Hepatitis C rates amongst users in the
> UK are increasing substantially.
>
> In the UK in the ‘80’s clean needles for injecting users and safer sex
> education for young people were made available in response to fears of HIV.
> Harm reduction policies are in direct opposition to prohibitionist laws.
>
> 7 Restore our rights and responsibilities
>
> Prohibition unnecessarily criminalises millions of otherwise law-abiding
> people. It removes the responsibility for distribution of drugs from policy
> makers and hands it over to unregulated, sometimes violent dealers.
>
> Legalisation restores our right to use drugs responsibly to change the way we
> think and feel. It enables controls and regulations to be put in place to
> protect the vulnerable.


>>>>>>>This is the real issue.  Give us back the control over our own lives that these 
>ridiculous laws have taken away from us, including the right to be irresponsible once 
>in a while (as long as we hurt no one, or damage anyones property.



> 8 Race and Drugs
>
> Black people are over ten times more likely to be imprisoned for drug
> offences than whites. Arrests for drug offences are notoriously discretionary
> allowing enforcement to easily target a particular ethnic group. Prohibition
> has fostered this stereotyping of black people.
>
> Legalisation removes a whole set of laws that are used to disproportionately
> bring black people into contact with the criminal justice system. It would
> help to redress the over representation of black drug offenders in prison.
>
> 9 Global Implications
>
> The illegal drugs market makes up 8% of all world trade (around £300 billion
> a year). Whole countries are run under the corrupting influence of drug
> cartels. Prohibition also enables developed countries to wield vast political
> power over producer nations under the auspices of drug control programmes.
>
> Legalisation returns lost revenue to the legitimate taxed economy and removes
> some of the high-level corruption. It also removes a tool of political
> interference by foreign countries against producer nations.
>
> 10 Prohibition doesn’t work
>
> There is no evidence to show that prohibition is succeeding. The question we
> must ask ourselves is, "What are the benefits of criminalising any drug?" If,
> after examining all the available evidence, we find that the costs outweigh
> the benefits, then we must seek an alternative policy.
>
> Legalisation is not a cure-all but it does allow us to address many of the
> problems associated with drug use, and those created by prohibition. The time
> has come for an effective and pragmatic drug policy.
>
> "If the (drug) problem continues advancing as it is at the moment, we’re
> going to be faced with some very frightening options. Either you have a
> massive reduction in civil rights or you have to look at some radical
> solutions. The issue has to be, Can a criminal justice system solve this
> particular problem?"
>
> Commander John Grieve, Criminal Intelligence Unit, Scotland Yard, Channel 4
> 1997
>
> Britain declared war on China to protect its opium trade. Now the war has
> been declared on drug users in Britain.

"Welcome to the desert of the real."  Morpheus, in The Matrix

"My God it's full of stars!"  Dave Bowman, in 2001: A Space
Odyssey
_______________________________________________________________________

Why pay when you don't have to? Get AltaVista Free Internet Access now!
http://jump.altavista.com/freeaccess4.go

_______________________________________________________________________

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with major and
minor
effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
<A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to