>[EMAIL PROTECTED],Internet writes:
There is as much 'proof' for china as there is for ufo's -

There's plenty of proof for UFOs.

What's lacking is proof that they're extraterrestrial.

Unless, of course, there's something to this claim:

>in fact the physical proof of ets and their DNA already exists from a
strand of hair analysed after an abduction in australia etc

Show us this. I'll believe it when I see it, if in fact that is what it
is. Showing us an account of the matter will not suffice.  Show us the
actual code, as well as the evidence that it couldn't be of terrestrial
origin.

>Lets all rationally analyze the belief system that there are ETs
colluding with government agencies - an analysis prevented by the denial
of ETs.


The lack of ETs in no way prevents a belief system that is predicated on
their existence. Nor does it prevent a rational  analysis of that belief
system. Au contrair, rationally ascertaining the likelihood of the
presence of ETs is the first step in a rational analysis.

Note I said presence, and not existence. The existence of ETs is pretty
much a mathematical certainty. Count stars. Hell yes, there are ETs. We'd
be foolish and vain to assume there were no ETs. They're out there,
alright. But are they here? Maybe. But we have no proof. To proceed from
an a priori assumption is irrational.

The world is overrun with belief systems based on a priori assumptions.
They're all irrational.

>yet the hottest non-human UFO news on the planet as far as I'm concerned
is the ease with which we can talk about reptile life forms and dig up
piles of contemporary and archaeological evidence to qualify what we're
talking about.

OK, let's see the evidence of sentient reptiles, "shape shifting" or
otherwise. Trot it out. I'll look.

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and
minor
effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
<A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to