Did L. Ron Hubbard rip-off Zecharia Sitchin when he wrote BATTLEFIELD EARTH?
Sitchin’s 12TH Planet is at the heart of the premise of BATTLEFIELD EARTH,
the second $100 million sci-fi movie to bomb in two months
by Paul Davids - 06/02/2000
Last week, on a particularly idyllic spring day, I drove up the California
coast north of Malibu to Paradise Cove, just south of Zuma Beach, hoping to
hide out where spectacular cliffs tower above surfer’s heaven. Expecting to
find it nearly deserted, as it often is on weekdays, I found that Twentieth
Century Fox had taken over the hideaway to film X-MEN. There were over a
dozen huge movie trucks in a small parking lot, and about a hundred
crewmembers enjoyed lunch beneath a huge tent. Though they were pretty
tight-lipped about what they were up to, and in spite of the fact that a
production manager warned me that no one would talk to "the press" (the
category this Internet site falls under), I did learn that the movie was
basically finished and that this vast army descended upon paradise to do "a
couple of pickup shots." They employed a couple dozen extras on the beach as
they filmed an intimate shot involving a mutant.
Here it is the year 2000, and I could still remember my conversations with
X-MEN creator, Stan Lee, back in 1986, when he was hoping that X-MEN would
FINALLY get off the ground that year. Now it is fourteen years later, and the
big lesson of those conversations with Stan Lee have sunk in. Big movies take
lots of years before cameras roll. I first met Stan Lee when I worked for
Marvel Productions as production coordinator of THE TRANSFORMERS television
series - I was aboard for about 90 episodes, some of which I also wrote!
("Autobots, Transform!" commanded Optimus Prime.)
X-MEN isn’t the only contemporary movie that took forever to make. I remember
another conversation in early 1980s with a friend who had been a fellow
student at the American Film Institute. He just optioned the rights to what
he said would be a fabulous family fantasy story called Stuart Little. He
then estimated that the picture would be out by 1983 or 1984. Those of you
who may have seen STUART LITTLE last year know that his estimate was wrong –
and he lost the option way before it ever got made.
And then we come to the film BATTLEFIELD EARTH, the $80 million dream-child
of John Travolta that took 15 years to be made. When he began his quest to
make the science-fiction film, he was going to play the fair-haired hero,
Jonnie Goodboy Tyler, who almost single-handedly liberates Earth from the
vile alien Psychlos. By the time the film was made, he no longer was the
lithe disco dancer of youth, and he ended up playing the stocky head of the
Psychlo security force, Terl, who supervises the human slaves that the aliens
enlisted for their gold mine operation on Earth.
For those astute AlienZoo fans who have read the brilliant, scholarly works
of the great expert in ancient Sumerian history, Zecharia Sitchin, the
connections between Sitchin’s theories of human origin and the premise of
BATTLEFIELD EARTH may be obvious. Unfortunately, though the movie is dead and
buried for a week now, and hundreds of reviews have been written that damn
the movie from the first frame to the last, I believe I’m the first
commentator to make this essential point. Scratch beneath the surface and
you’ll discover that there are more theories of Zecharia Sitchin in
BATTLEFIELD EARTH than any hint of the Scientology religion founded by its
author, L. Ron Hubbard. As John Travolta always claimed, it was a
science-fiction yarn, not promotion for the Church of Scientology. But
perhaps, like with so much science fiction, there is a whole lot of fact
intermingled with the fiction. I predict that Sitchin would be the first to
agree.
Sitchen first published The Twelfth Planet in 1978, two years before the 1980
copyright date on Battlefield Earth. For those who are rusty on Sitchen’s
theories and his magnificent books (which include Stairway to Heaven, The War
of Gods and Men, The Lost Realms, When Time Began and several others),
Sitchen is first and foremost a scholar on the ancient Sumerians, Hittites,
Assyrians, and Babylonians. Gifted in being able to translate the ancient
Sumerian and Akkadian texts, Sitchen made quite a number of profound
discoveries about ancient Sumerian beliefs about humankind’s origin. The
first of his scholarly findings, that the Sumerians believed there is an
undiscovered planet in our solar system with an orbit far beyond Pluto, has
found serious scientific support in the last year.
The Sumerians believed that planet, called Nibiru, to be populated by the
human-like beings called the Nefilim (the ancient "gods," if you will). They
believed the Nefilim created humankind for a specific purpose. Sumerians, who
understood that the planets of the solar system revolve around the sun,
thought that Nibiru makes an approach from beyond Pluto into the inner
regions near the sun approximately once every 20,000 years. As I recall,
Nibiru was considered the twelfth planet because, beyond the nine planets
that we know, our moon was once a planet, and there was once a planet in what
is now the asteroid belt that exploded. That would make Nibiru number twelve.
How beings could survive on a planet that spends most of its time beyond
Pluto is a mystery. The planet would require some intense source of heat,
perhaps from within the planet’s core, as well as an atmosphere and a source
of light other than the sun, which would be too distant. The theory raises
many unanswered questions.
However, in the last year, SCIENCE magazine reported that the mass and
physics of Pluto’s path around the sun couldn’t account for calculations of
aberrations in the revolutions of our known outer planets (Neptune, Uranus).
Many are starting to agree that there is an undiscovered outer planet.
Interestingly, its projected orbit closely matches what the ancient Sumerians
predicted, as Sitchin explains the Sumerian beliefs. How could the Sumerians
have known? Sitchin believes the Nefilim from Nibiru instructed them on
astronomy and many other fields of knowledge.
In 1978, in THE 12TH PLANET, Sitchen mapped out his theory of the Sumerians’s
belief that the Nefilim are the "giants of renown," referred to in the Bible,
who inhabited the earth in ancient days, and were the "sons of the gods who
cohabited with the daughters of Adam and they bore children unto them. They
were the mighty ones of eternity - the people of the Shem." Sitchen concluded
that humankind is a race created through genetic manipulation - that the
Nefilim introduced their genetic material into the primitive hominids, who
were the precursors of modern humanity. The Sumerians apparently believed
that humankind was created as a slave race that could be dominated,
instructed, and used to mine gold. Sitchen thus explains humankind’s
infatuation with gold through the centuries. He theorizes that Sumerian
legends (when taken account in relation to Biblical text) lead us to the
conclusion that aliens from our own solar system (from the yet undiscovered
12th planet, Nibiru) created humankind "in their own image" to subjugate us
as slaves for the purpose of mining gold for our alien masters, the Nibiru.
Though this brief synopsis hardly does justice to the depth and detail of
Sitchen’s vast research, it nevertheless lays out the bare framework. Two
years after publication of The Twelfth Planet, L. Ron Hubbard came out with a
1,000-page science-fiction book called Battlefield Earth. The plot is, in a
nutshell, that aliens subjugate the human race to the status of slaves for
the purpose of mining gold for their alien masters. Albeit Hubbard’s novel is
set in the future and does not claim that the fictional aliens in his story
(the evil Psychlos) actually created mankind. Nevertheless, the novel is, in
part, a sociological study of humankind’s slavery and attempts at survival
when controlled by technologically superior alien beings who use our species
to satisfy their requirements for gold. The many possible uses of gold for an
advanced species are topics that Sitchin addresses.
So much for literature - now, enter Hollywood. MISSION TO MARS, about a month
before the release of the film of BATTLEFIELD EARTH, inoculated the public
with ideas that are Hoaglandesque (please count that as a phrase I’ve
coined!) about the demise of an ancient civilization on Mars. Now the public
has had its second "shot" of new paradigm theories this spring, with
BATTLEFIELD EARTH planting the seeds of Sitchinism (another coined phrase!)
Unfortunately, though both films had high expectations from their creators,
neither found favor with the critics or the broad mass of the cinema-going
public.
A little eulogy for BATTLEFIELD EARTH is both necessary and required here,
particularly for a website called AlienZoo, which has a thematic obligation
to pry into all contemporary films with alien themes. As you probably know,
BATTLEFIELD EARTH qualified as one of the biggest commercial disasters in
motion picture history. Attendance levels at theaters dropped nearly 70% from
the first week to the second! And from the second week to the third – another
70% drop! The word "disaster" is not nearly strong enough to cover that kind
of catastrophe. Total box office has been about 20 million to date. The
studio (Warner Brothers) will recoup about half of that (the rest being
retained by the theater chains). This represents about a $10 million return
thus far on an investment of about 160 million (when you add the cost of
prints and ads to the cost of production). You have to do a lot of foreign
business and sell a lot of videos/DVD’s to recover from that kind of a
financial debacle.
Both the critics and public rejected BATTLEFIELD EARTH on nearly every ground
imaginable. It began when the Washington Post and other respected organs of
national news began to tie the film to the "cult" despised by the
Establishment, SCIENTOLOGY. They pried into John Travolta’s affiliation with
Scientology (which he credits with "clearing" him to enable his success in
life). They snickered over the fact that Scientologists believe that
humankind is a pawn of technologically superior alien species (though we know
that no self-respecting Fortean would disagree - and many ufologists would
agree, too). They made fun of Travolta’s appearance in the movie, and the
nasal appliances the Psychlos wear. Some critics called them "nose-plugs" and
Entertainment Weekly stated that the actors had to wear because they knew
"the movie stinks."
Without getting into matters of religion, politics, cults, beliefs, or what
have you, as a filmmaker, I would have to say that, judged only on the
grounds of art direction and special effects, BATTLEFIELD EARTH was a
masterpiece. If you forget the story, screenplay, ignore L. Ron Hubbard, and
dismiss the fact that perhaps Travolta’s appearance is out of the pages of
some overblown comic book, you are still left with stunning production values
and effects. Hangar 12 in Montreal, where much of the picture was filmed
under conditions of absolute secrecy, was the setting for some cinematic
miracles. Consider the fact that the city of Denver (in the film) was beneath
an "archology" like those that Richard Hoagland (www.enterprisemission.com)
theorizes exist on the lunar surface. The girder and glass structure that
encompassed the city, so its atmosphere could be controlled, was magnificent.
The scene of its destruction with shattered glass flying in every direction
was truly mind-boggling. It was one of the great special effects scenes of
all time, and it showed us precisely what Hoagland claims has happened to the
ancient "lunar" archologies that lunar astronauts discovered (he claims) but
have been prevented from disclosing. Add to the archology scenes the
incredible flying vehicles of the Psychlos, the visual conception of the
prisons where the human slaves were kept, the ruination of other earth cities
including Washington, D.C., and you get marvelous production values. All of
that was so extraordinary - I ask you, what science-fiction fan in his right
mind would not want to see this movie, in spite of all the litany of other
failings?
And yet I have read blistering, scathing, nearly unprintable reviews that
blast the special effects. One critic called the effects "horrible." He
doesn’t live in the same universe I inhabit, that is for sure. But even if
the special effects were extraordinary, L. Ron Hubbard and his philosophy
received no boost whatsoever from John Travolta’s efforts. I was in a major
supermarket last night that had a display rack consisting entirely of L. Ron
Hubbard’s book, Battlefield Earth. The rack held 27 books. The film came out
about three weeks ago, and not one single book had been sold.
So where does this leave us? In the short span of about two months, we have
seen the catastrophic failure of TWO mega-budget science-fiction films with
important themes. MISSION TO MARS, which started out with an impressive 23
million box-office gross the first weekend, was down 50% the second week. It
slowly clawed its way up to a 50 million domestic gross – not enough on a
$100 million feature. And BATTLEFIELD EARTH died on opening night. What is
going on here? Believe me, it took a lot less than this to BURY the genre of
Western movies. You all remember the last gasp of HEAVEN’S GATE (not the
Applewhite cult that committed suicide, I’m talking about the United Artists
western film directed by Michael Cimino, which buried United Artists for over
a decade and took all westerns to the grave with it). HEAVEN’S GATE was the
most expensive movie in history when it was made (about 30 million?) and
audiences rejected it as slow and boring. With the inflated production costs
of today’s world, 30 million is almost a modestly budgeted picture now. We
live in the era of 200 million dollar budgets for films such as WATERWORLD
and TITANIC. Nevertheless, MISSION TO MARS and BATTLEFIELD EARTH taken as a
pair, spell a certain kind of doom for a certain kind of film.
There’s one film left on the horizon, to be released in a couple of weeks,
which could turn around this trend or set the trend in stone. TITAN A.E. will
be the next test. Granted, it’s an animated feature, not live-action. But
"A.E." stands for "After Earth" and it will serve to remind us that our
planet is exposed, vulnerable and impermanent. It’s a story filled with
"human versus alien" themes. The trailers of this Don Bluth feature look
exciting. If it does not do well commercially, here’s what I foresee -
If the current downward spiral continues, I predict that only the franchised
big-budget sci-fi space/alien movies will continue intact. No harm from this
will rub off onto STAR WARS, for example. But I also predict that it’s going
to be more and more difficult to get the non-franchise science fiction/space
films approved for production. As with the stock market ups and downs, there
are cycles to the genres of Hollywood films, and the public votes on what
they want with their box-office dollars. SPHERE was another recent failure of
a serious film with a somewhat downbeat alien theme from a major writer
(Michael Crichton) and the mega-budget STARSHIP TROOPERS also failed to
perform up to expectations.
Humor may be the only way out of this predicament for the sci-fi space/alien
genre. We may be collectively tired of taking the "alien threat" so
seriously. Hollywood will still be opening its arms to those who want to
emulate funny space films such as GALAXY QUEST and MEN IN BLACK. However, to
keep space aliens on our movie screens in the near future, folks, we may have
to be able to laugh at them - and us! I hope I’m wrong, because I love many
of the films that grapple seriously with the big questions the New Paradigm
presents - for they examine the real challenges of what may be mankind’s
cosmic future.
<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please! These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with major and
minor
effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
<A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
<A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
