The Prince of Darkness
By Dr. Gilbert Ross
Continuing an almost five-century old British tradition of mixing Church and
State, the Prince of Wales has again tried to reverse the tide of scientific
inquiry and exploration—a move many will equate with King Canute's futile
attempt to hold back the ocean tides 1,000 or so years ago.
In a radio address last week, Prince Charles called for a return to
spirituality as a guiding philosophy for human endeavors, with an associated
downplaying of technology and science. He warned of the dangers of
unrestrained scientific research and the perils of "tampering" with nature.
He was inspired to pen these thoughts during a recent pilgrimage to a remote
Greek monastery.
Besides calling for a restoration of the "essential unity" between the living
and the spiritual world, he attacked old bugaboos of his, biotechnology
(genetic modification, GM) and GM food. He decided to ignore the fact that
both his own government, as well as the leader of the Roman Catholic Church,
Pope John Paul ll, have come out in support of this technology as a potential
means to help alleviate malnutrition and starvation in the developing world.
The British population has taken his warnings, as well as those of other
environmental extremists, more seriously than scientists or the American
public—GM food is shunned throughout the U.K. and many areas of Europe. But
they still benefit from drugs produced through the same methods—no one has
yet called for the removal of biopharmaceuticals such as insulin, and many
other GM-drugs.
In his speech, he supported the "precautionary principle," which advocates
the elimination of any substance or technique which cannot be proven to be
absolutely safe. However, it is well known scientifically that proving
something 100% safe is often impossible, and essentially meaningless anyway.
Is driving completely safe? Are medications completely safe? Of course
not—even crossing the street can be dangerous, yet we go about our daily
activities anyway. If hundreds, or thousands, of useful products were banned
because proving them "safe" would be impossible, take years, or be too
expensive, what would replace them?
By calling "excessive" scientific rationalism an affront to "the creator,"
and stating that science should be used to "understand how nature works, but
not to change what it is," he seemed to be calling for a reversal of all the
accomplishments of mankind, dating back....who knows how far? He assumes that
there must be an inherent conflict between spirituality and science—never
mind that scientific discoveries and technical innovations have made our
lives so much better, both in quality and quantity, over the centuries.
Thanks to these discoveries, those of us in the developed world are no longer
at the whim of a fickle nature, hoping for adequate rain, sun, etc., to eke
out a subsistence living.
These benefits are, unfortunately, still not commonplace in the poor areas of
Asia and Africa. Yet "environmentalists" in well-off areas, who have never
been hungry or coaxed a crop out of an unforgiving field, try to cut off new
methods that show great promise for easing their lives. They are against
science, and seem to be against humans in favor of forests. Yet their
favorite agricultural approach, "organic" farming, is so inefficient it would
force much more forest acreage into cultivation than using modern methods.
After reading the text of Prince Charles' speech, Dr. James Watson, Nobel
Prize winning co-discoverer of the structure of DNA, stated, "He is one of
the people who are worried that the world is moving too fast. But the world
is really rather wretched for a lot of people and science and technology can
improve their lives....We will be able to improve the quality of food."
These miracle will occur in any event, but they will be here sooner if
science is allowed to overcome fear and superstition in high places. It is as
foolish to try to turn back the hands of time, as it is to try to reverse the
tides.
<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please! These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with major and
minor
effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
<A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
<A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
