Well Michael Spitzer:  I think Clinton is playing The Beast in the
Bible, and as the Jehovah Witnesses writes every generation has its own
Beast and multilanguage pentacostal dream.   It would be interesting to
read what Sigmund Freud would say to this today.

All the signs are there and every religious nut in the country knows it.
The problem is, those following these so called "cults" do not know how
they play the game.

This Century the USA if the UN has its way, will be the Beast - see the
foul language coming from its mouth by virtue of the news/television
media.   See the latest Arnold Schwartnegger movie and remember he is
married to Maria Shriver, who knows all and tells him all.

Clinton went to Russia with typical good guy, bad guy routine.   It is
too late for him to recover from the damage done; he is wounded, and his
intellect now is challenged.   He will be denied any greatness he
conferred upon himself.

I do not like games, and I do not play games.  Religion has no place in
government with the exception of a simple prayer in school, and to each
his own.

Strange only the Jehovah Witnesses seemingly have access to this NWO
plan.   They see a Utopia in our Future; me, I see a Medussa in Hilliary
Clinton,  and it will take a Perseus on a white horse, to save us.

Now Pat Buchanan I think is a good Perseus.  George Bush Jr. takes lead
in polls, as Gore wallows in Clinton's mistakes, the biggest and fattest
being Monica Lewinsky who without a doubt had some Cathy O'Brien
training.

Buchanan is a clean candidate.   I wish Bush and Buchanan would get on
the same horse for it would be adequate representation for all.

 So even Russia dislikes Clinton.   He seeks a friend someone who will
cheer him as they did JFK.   JFK's smile playing with his children was
worth a thousand words.    Bill Clintons playing with the lives of
children in war games at Waco, smiling with his thumb in his mouth,  in
typical of mental regard when they choke or set a cat on fire.   Good
cases histories too on pyromania being sex associated crimes.    Refer
to Los Alamos, and somebody high up gave word to light that torch.

California loved Robert F. Kennedy and Dallas the last words John F.
Kennedy heard were "you can' t say Dallas doesnt love you, Mr.
President".

Would Mexico care to give a portion of their corrupt country to the USA
or will there be another Alamo in California.



AS


[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:    California Loves Buchanan - The
Wash Post Can't Bear It  http://www.InsideTheWeb.com/mbs.cgi/mb1075995

California Loves Buchanan - The Wash Post Can't Bear It

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Patrick J. Buchanan)

June 5, 2000
Mr. Leonard Downie
Executive Editor
Washington Post

Dear Mr. Downie:
Sunday morning, your newspaper ran on page A7 one of the few stories
that you have carried on my campaign for the Reform Party nomination.
"Buchanan is Meeting Resistance in California," blared the headline,
over the dramatic subhead: "State Reform Party May Break Away." It was a
legitimate and important story about a dissident scheme to derail our
campaign.

So important was it, your reporter-pundit David Broder rushed to his
post on the highly-rated Sunday NBC show, Meet the Press, to gush about
the devastating blow about to fall:

Well, Nader is doing much better...he is running well ahead of Pat
Buchanan in the polls....The other interesting thing with Buchanan is
that he is now for the first time running into real resistance from some
elements in the Reform Party....The California Reform Party is on the
verge of rejecting the Buchanan candidacy. I think our friend Mr.
Buchanan may have some problems within his own party.

Sunday afternoon, however, the Buchanan forces, joined by Reform allies,
rolled back and routed the threat. On Monday, the New York Times and
Washington Times gave extensive coverage to our victory. The Post, which
had trumpeted the threat, ignored our triumph. Not one word.

Now, this is not another complaint about the anti-Buchanan animus of the
Post. That is not news. This is rather a request that you review the
inherent conflict-of-interest your newspaper, given its bias, has in the
2000 presidential race.
Consider:
The Washington Post owns and operates one of the key polls that is
charged with measuring whether our campaign has reached the 15%
threshold for participation in the presidential debates. The Post is
also one of the media companies that will determine whether our campaign
is fully and fairly covered - the only way we have a chance to reach
15%. In brief, the media companies that control the polls - NBC, CBS,
CNN, Washington Post, etc. - also control our TV and press coverage, the
decisive factor in whether we reach 15%.

To sum up: you have the power to fix the election of 2000; our fate is
in the hands of our Big Media adversaries. You are standing on our
windpipe, Mr. Downie.

Now, this is a lesser problem for Governor Bush. His party stands to
take in $250 million in "soft money" from the corporate buyers of public
policy; and his campaign will get $65 million in federal funds. He will
have the cash to compensate for media bias. But this situation does
represent one hellish problem for us, as our campaign will get only
$12.5 million; and I do not take "soft money." So, we are, to an
extraordinary degree, dependent on fair and comprehensive coverage by
Big Media institutions that also own and operate the polls that will
determine if we get that critical 15%.

That, Mr. Downie, is why I am bringing up the transparently one-sided
coverage of that California battle. You may guffaw at the suggestion,
but, to us, a hostile press is the greatest impediment we face to
getting in the debates, which is the only opportunity we will have to
get our case before the American people. In conclusion, I hope you will
reflect on the inherent conflict of interest in your newspaper's
operating one of the polls that will determine whether we get in the
debates, and your newspaper also deciding whether we get the coverage
required to reach the poll threshold. The conflict is as obvious as is
the conflict in having the Commission on Presidential Debates itself
controlled by partisan Democrats and Republicans, with no Reform Party
representation.

In Mexico, all six candidates took part in the first presidential
debate. And whenever U.S. and UN observers go abroad to monitor
elections, a lack of media coverage for challengers is considered a
cause for decertifying that election. Should not the United States try
to live up to election standards that it insists be met in Tadjikistan,
Bosnia, and Peru?

Thank you for considering our concerns,

Patrick J. Buchanan
----------------------------------------------
Buchanan, Patrick, Presidential Candidate, Reform Party


One June 4/5, 1969 Robert F. Kennedy having won the California votes,
was gunned down at midnight by a Christian brainwashed Jordania, high on
hypnotic drugs and programmed to kill should Kennedy win.

Pat Buchanan and George Bush would do well to stand back to back, for
the road ahead is a very dangerous road.

A. Saba
Dare To Call It Conspiracy

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with major and
minor
effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
<A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to