http://www.usdefense.com/june2000/B/9/story7.htm

     US was close to ground invasion of Yugoslavia

       Friday, 9 June 2000

       EUROPE | After 71 days of U.S.-led NATO bombing against Yugoslavia last
year  without producing results, U.S. National Security Advisor Sandy Berger had
written a  memo urging President Clinton to send in 175,000 ground troops,
two-thirds of which  would have been Americans.

       According to a Los Angeles Times report on Friday, Berger worked late
into the  evening of June 2, 1999, preparing a short memo urging Clinton to take
the action. Berger,  who described that night as one of his longest thus far,
said he was disillusioned  because he had been an advocate of an air-only
campaign against Belgrade.

       With the memo freshly typed and ready to be delivered to the Oval Office,
news  came that Yugoslavian President Slobodan Milosevic would agree to NATO's
peace terms,  thereby ending the action against and -- thankfully -- Berger's
suggested use of ground  troops for an invasion that experts say would have been
costly.

       According to Berger's account -- the first since the war by a
high-ranking U.S.  official who has publicly said how close America came to
invading Kosovo -- the attack might  not have happened anyway. NATO allies had
said they would require three months to  assemble an invasion force and the
Clinton administration had already planned a final peace  mission to Belgrade.

       But all along, U.S. officials -- including Berger -- maintained that the
war against Yugoslavia wasn't supposed to be that difficult. "We believed that
the air  campaign would work," Berger said.

       "In the air, we had a thousand-to-one advantage. Once we got on the
ground, we  still would have had an advantage, but what was it, three to one? .
. . Milosevic would  have been happy to see a force come in on the ground,
because it would have allowed  him to wage a war of attrition," he added.

       A year earlier, Gen. Wesley Clark, NATO's supreme commander, had drawn up
contingency plans for invading Yugoslavia. Prodded by British Prime Minister
Tony Blair, NATO's leading hawk, and frustrated by the alliance's inability to
break  Milosevic in the air, NATO authorized Clark to update the plans.

       U.S. officials informed Russian diplomats about Clinton's serious
consideration in  April, 1999 of using ground troops to end the conflict.
Officials knew that the warning  would be carried back to Milosevic.

       One Russian diplomat, former Prime Minister Viktor Chernomyrdin, was
described as "apocalyptic" after hearing the news, and warned that NATO-Russian
relations  would plummet. Also, he said the Serbs may prove to be tough fighters
when acting in  defense of their homes.

       But Berger said there would have been no consensus within NATO to fight
a  ground war. He told the LA Times he was sure Britain, France and Germany
would contribute  forces, but Greece would not and Italy was "a question mark."



                              � 2000 USDefense.com. All rights reserved.





--
-----------------------
NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is
distributed without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior
interest in receiving this information for non-profit research and
educational purposes only. For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
-----------------------





________________________________________________________
                           1stUp.com - Free the Web
   Get your free Internet access at http://www.1stUp.com

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with major and
minor
effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
<A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to