------- Forwarded message follows -------
>From www.wsws.org

WSWS : News & Analysis : World Economy
Bank report points to financial storms
By Nick Beams
10 June 2000
Back to screen version

A reading of the latest annual report of the Bank for International Settlements
(BIS) on the state of the global economy and the international financial system
cannot fail to bring to mind a famous passage from the Communist Manifesto.

�Modern bourgeois society,� Marx wrote, �with its relations of production, of
exchange and of property, a society that has conjured up such gigantic means of
production and of exchange, is like the sorcerer, who is no longer able to
control the powers of the nether world whom he has called up by his spells.�

After more than 140 pages of analysis of growth trends, the state of financial
markets, the condition of so-called �emerging markets� and the financial
relations between the major capitalist powers, the BIS, sometimes referred to
as
the central bankers' central bank admits that it has no idea where the next
financial storm may erupt, much less how to do anything to prevent it.

�Financial failures in the 1930s,� it notes in the conclusion to its report,
�seriously aggravated the economic downturn in many industrial countries, and
led to a sharp tightening of the regulations governing financial activity. The
postwar period witnessed a progressive liberalisation as the memories of earlier
difficulties faded and the potential benefits of freer financial markets became
better recognised. However, recurring financial crises during the last three
decades, in both industrial countries and emerging market economies, have
focused renewed attention on three issues. How might future crises be avoided?
How might they be better managed when they occur? And how might crises
ultimately be resolved, including through debt reduction? With respect to each,
the actual progress made has been substantial, but is dwarfed by what remains to
be done. On some questions there is still no international consensus as to what
constitutes sensible policies. And in virtually all cases, the practical
challenges involved in actually implementing agreed proposals remain daunting.�

And as if to sum up the general confusion in leading financial circles, the BIS
proclaims: �There seems to be a widespread perception that the global economy
now stands on the brink, but the brink of what remains the question.� While
striking a generally optimistic note in the main body of the report�growth rates
are increasing, there has been a recovery from the Asian crisis, the financial
storms of the past two years have been weathered�the BIS warns that this
optimism itself could be a source of problems.

�Ironically, as history has repeatedly shown,� it notes in the introduction,
�even well founded optimism has the insidious tendency to transform itself into
excess. The probability of this happening seemed to increase during the period
under review.�

Significantly, the source of these dangers is not in the �emerging markets� but
resides in the relations between the two largest economies, the United States
and Japan.

According to the report a �disconcerting observation� is that various economic
and financial forces seem to be �unusually interrelated.� �For example, in the
United States rising stock prices (especially in the high-tech sector) added to
personal wealth and facilitated business financing, contributing in turn to
stronger consumer spending and investment respectively. Higher demand and
capital deepening raised measured productivity, which enhanced optimism about
future profits, further supported stock prices, and so on. Clearly, mutually
reinforcing processes of this sort can exaggerate both financial market and real
fluctuations, particularly if accentuated by supportive exchange rate shifts.

�A further reason for tempering optimism is that many of the imbalances and
structural deficiencies which had characterised the global economy in the
previous few years came no closer to being redressed. Indeed, in some respects
they worsened. Foremost among these imbalances was the unprecedented gap between
the record high rate of private saving in Japan and the record low rate in the
United States. While shifts in fiscal positions moderated the impact of these
extremes, albeit at the cost of a steep deterioration in the public finances of
Japan, large current account imbalances remained, carrying risks of exchange
rate consequences.�

The US and Japanese economies are in some ways mirror images of each other. In
the US government debt has been run down, while private debt, of both consumers
and corporations, has been increasing. The US balance of payments has reached a
record high and international debt is now around $1.9 trillion, or 20 percent of
gross domestic product.

By contrast, in Japan consumption demand has been falling, savings levels have
increased and the country continues to run a balance of payments surplus.
Government debt, however, has increased to record levels as a result of the
continued, and failed, attempts to boost the economy.

Both of these tendencies�the slide of the US into indebtedness and increased
Japanese government spending�are unsustainable in the long run. But the US and
Japan are locked into a mutual dependence. The US requires the high level of
savings in Japan (and consequent stagnation of the economy, requiring ever
greater levels of government spending) in order to finance its widening balance
of payments gap, while Japan requires high levels of US spending (and consequent
growing indebtedness) to provide export markets.

This relationship has been the subject of increasing concern about the
instability of the global financial system. As the billionaire international
financier George Soros recently predicted, the next financial storm is likely to
have its origins in the relationships between the major currencies.

And as Martin Wolf, the economics commentator of the Financial Times noted his
column published on June 6: �The US and Japan have, in effect, become an odd
couple, both dependent, in part, on the unsustainable behaviour of the other.
The US needs excessive Japanese savings, just as Japan needs excess US demand.
There are ways out of this mutual dependence on the excesses of the other. But
if the US adjustment were mishandled or ran out of control, the path ahead could
become very bumpy, for both. Soon people might conclude that the only thing
worse than unsustainable growth in US demand and the external deficit that
accompanies it would be their rapid disappearance.�

One of the scenarios presently being canvassed is the possibility of a rapid
decline in the value of the US dollar. As the BIS notes in the conclusion to its
report: �The US dollar ... appears to be stronger than is compatible with the
stabilisation of longer-term external debt ratios�.

Given the extent to which rising stock markets have driven capital flows in
recent period, �the possibility of a simultaneous adjustment in both markets
would seem greater than historical correlations might indicate.� In other words,
while the rising dollar and booming equity markets have combined to ensure an
inflow of capital, this tendency could operate in reverse�a decline in the
dollar leading to a fall in stock markets, resulting in an outflow of capital
and a further drop in the dollar's value.

So far, despite the widening balance of payments gap, the value of the dollar
has remained high. International investment funds have been attracted into the
US by the booming stock market and the profit opportunities provided by
investments in new technologies.

But the global nature of capital investment and competition could see the flow
of investment funds change direction. This possibility was raised in a comment
published in the Financial Times of June 5: �America's supremacy in the new
economy has supported both the stock market and the dollar over the past five
years as international money has poured into the US to finance an investment
boom. This is about to change. The success of the US economy has not gone
unnoticed and Europe and Japan are embarking on increasingly serious efforts to
catch up.�

While the US will continue to retain its preeminent position, its relative
supremacy over the rest of the world will tend to decline.

�This has two big, long-run implications for financial markets. The first is
that most of the untapped investment potential lies outside the US. The second
is dollar weakness. Despite a rising current account deficit, the greenback has
been to date buoyed by massive foreign direct investment and portfolio inflows.
As investors seek more profitable growth opportunities elsewhere, the dollar
will enter a period of structural decline.�

Cognisant of the possibility of such shifts, and the devastating impact they
could have on the US and other major economies, the BIS notes that in the
future, �the biggest policy challenge could be coping with a sudden reversal in
the fortunes of the dollar.�

But what program could be set in place? Here, the BIS, like Marx's over-powered
sorcerer, admits that the financial authorities, supposedly in control of global
markets, have none.

�As for contributions by market overseers to better market functioning,� the
report states in its conclusion, �there is evidence that markets are becoming
less atomistic, and potentially more subject to herding behaviour particularly
at times of stress. Growing concentration among market participants, common risk
management and regulatory schemes, increasing use of benchmarks and index
tracking, and the exploitation of common and instantaneously available
information may all be contributing to this. However, what supervisory
authorities might do about these underlying structural trends is significantly
less obvious. Finally, there is the most fundamental issue of all. Why do
markets overshoot, in effect failing to discipline themselves? In an ideal
world, those who pushed prices away from �equilibrium' levels would quickly lose
money as prices reverted to the mean. However, in the real world, this often
does not happen. ... it may be that market failures of this sort are simply one
of the costs to be borne when reaping the overall benefits of a market-based
economic system.�

Coming from one of the major institutions supposedly in control of the global
capitalist economy, there could hardly be a clearer admission of the historical
bankruptcy and utter irrationality of the profit system and its modus operandi,
the �free market�.

Copyright 1998-2000
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved

A<>E<>R
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Integrity has no need of rules. -Albert Camus (1913-1960)
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
The only real voyage of discovery consists not in seeking
new landscapes but in having new eyes. -Marcel Proust
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said
it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your
own reason and your common sense." --Buddha
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
It is preoccupation with possessions, more than anything else, that
prevents us from living freely and nobly. -Bertrand Russell
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Everyone has the right...to seek, receive and impart
information and ideas through any media and regardless
of frontiers." Universal Declaration of Human Rights
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Always do sober what you said you'd do drunk. That will
teach you to keep your mouth shut." Ernest Hemingway
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Forwarded as information only; no endorsement to be presumed
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material
is distributed without charge or profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this type of information
for non-profit research and educational purposes only.

------- End of forwarded message -------

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with major and
minor
effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
<A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to