http://www.frontpagemag.com/dh/2000/david06-09-00.htm
Feminism's Dirty Secret

David Horowitz

FrontPageMag.com | June 9, 2000
get a printer-friendly version of this article


The prophetess of women's liberation has been revealed as a liar and spouse
abuser. If the personal is political � as feminists have long contended �
what are the implications of this for feminism?
Friedan accused her ex-husband Carl Friedan of beating up on her, in her
recent memoir Life So Far. The media ran with the story. Now Mr. Friedan has
responded with a website, carlfriedan.com, in which he charges that his
ex-wife was mentally disturbed and given to fits of violent rage. It was she
who abused him, says Mr. Friedan, not the other way around.

The ex-Mrs. Friedan, meanwhile, has softened her charges, telling Good
Morning America, "I almost wish I hadn't even written about it, because it's
been sensationalized out of context. My husband was no wife-beater, and I
was no passive victim of a wife-beater. We fought a lot, and he was bigger
than me."

If I am more inclined to believe Mr. Friedan's side of the story, it is only
because his ex-wife has a long and well-documented history of lying.

Betty Friedan presented herself in The Feminine Mystique�the 1963 book that
launched modern feminism�as a suburban housewife who had never given a
thought to "the woman question," until she attended a Smith College reunion
which revealed the dissatisfaction of her well-educated female classmates,
unable to balance traditional roles with modern careers.

But, as Smith College professor Daniel Horowitz (no relation) revealed in
his book Betty Friedan and the Making of the Feminist Mystique, Betty was
not very candid about the facts of her own life and the sources of her
radical perspective. She was hardly a suburban housewife when she wrote
those words, but a twenty-five year veteran of professional journalism in
the Communist Left, where she had been thoroughly indoctrinated in the
politics of "the woman question" and specifically the idea that women were
"oppressed."

As Horowitz's biography makes clear, Friedan, from her college days and
until her mid-thirties, was a Stalinist marxist (or a camp follower
thereof), the political intimate of leaders of America's Cold War fifth
column, and for a time even the lover of a young communist physicist working
on atomic bomb projects with J. Robert Oppenheimer.

Not at all a neophyte when it came to the "woman question" (the phrase
itself is a marxist construction), she was certainly familiar with the
writings of Engels, Lenin, and Stalin on the subject and had written about
it herself as a journalist for the official publication of the
communist-controlled United Electrical Workers union.

Friedan's secret was shared by hundreds of her comrades on the Left � though
not, of course, by the unsuspecting American public � who went along with
her charade presumably as a way to support her political agenda.

The actual facts of Friedan's life�that she was a professional marxist
ideologue, that her husband supported her full-time writing and research,
that she had a maid and lived in a Hudson river mansion, attending very
little to household duties�were inconvenient to the persona and the theory
she was determined to promote.

Even the much-abused Mr. Friedan � also a leftist -- continues to praise his
wife for her political "achievements." On his website, he writes, "I am
proud of what she did for the world� Betty being monstrous in pursuit of her
goals doesn't bother me at all. She changed the course of history almost
singlehandedly and it took a `monster' perhaps, a driven, super-aggressive,
egocentric, almost lunatic dynamo to rock the world the way she did.
Unfortunately, she was the same person at home, where this kind of conduct
does not work."

What Mr. Friedan seems to be saying is that it was all right for his wife to
abuse everyone else, but not to abuse him. This sort of thinking is typical
of the Left.

The example of Betty Friedan should be a wake-up call. If we are going to
restore civility and honesty to public discourse about issues like feminism,
it is necessary to insist on candor from people about their political
commitments. And it is important to call things by their right names.

Over and over again, the world vision of the left has failed in this century
not because the ideas behind it weren�t noble or seductive, but because in
practice they did not work. The vision of the left is by nature a romance of
good and evil, of liberators and oppressors. Is the requirement of
sustaining such a Manichaean vision the flattening of a reality that is so
much more complex, and the reshaping of its narrative truth? Is the vision
itself so at odds with what is, that it necessitates this lying; that it
requires an underpinning of fiction to sustain its romance? More practical
and prosaic minds will conclude that there is.



David Horowitz is editor-in-chief of FrontPage Magazine and president of the
Center for the Study of Popular Culture

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with major and
minor
effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
<A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to