---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2000 09:50:42 -0600
From: spiker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <Recipient list suppressed>
Sent: Friday, June 16, 2000 8:12 AM
Subject: The Ghoul in Your Tank
The Ghoul in Your Tank
by Llewellyn H. Rockwell, Jr.
Welcome to June 2000, the month in which new federal gasoline
regulations have come into effect for a third of the country.
The mandate that some cities sell reformulated gasoline (RFG)
caused market supplies to drop, just at the time when gasoline
demand increased for summer travel.
No surprise, gas prices soared to over $2 a gallon in Chicago,
where the new regs hit the hardest. Everywhere, prices are
reaching above the $1.65 range, a post-Gulf War high. It's the
government's way of making sure that this summertime, the livin'
won't be easy.
During the winter months the Clinton administration worried more
intensely about the high price of oil. A few months back, when
prices were last spiraling upward, there was some concern about
low-income families in the Northeast not being able to heat their
homes. Gas prices also took a jump so Congress began talking
about repealing Clinton's 4.3 cents tax on gasoline.
But fortunately for the White House, super-cold weather never
materialized, so all talk of reducing artificially inflated
prices by any means ceased.
More decisively, someone told the Republicans that repealing the
Clinton gas tax would mean that Congress would have less money to
spend. They thought about that, and quickly changed their minds.
But now that summer is here, and oil prices are up again, there's
no more concern about poor people shivering their way through
winter; in summer, the only people harmed are middle-class
vacationers driving gas-guzzlers archetypical real Americans and
who cares about them?
And yet, consumers want answers and the government is glad to
give them, even when it means telling outrageous lies. "We think
the prices that are being charged are unfair and inappropriate,"
Robert Perciasepe, an assistant EPA administrator, told the
press, just before summoning oil producers before the DC
Politburo.
We know that no institution is in a better position to discover
and punish unfair and inappropriate behavior than the Clinton
administration. You merely compare the cost of production of gas
to its price. If there's a problem, you conclude, as has the
monstrous Energy Secretary Bill Richardson, that there's
something wrong with the market. In the tradition of "when did
you stop beating your wife," he said in a CNN interview: "Is it
collusion or is it price gouging? We need answers to those
questions."
Here's your answer, buddy: it's the misnamed Energy Department!
(And permit me a small technical point about the relationship
between cost and price:
accounting costs are historical data, while prices always reflect
present forecasts of the future that may or may not be right.
There is no fixed relationship between the two in the real
world.)
It's all very nice and easy to pick on the working-class folks
who go to the trouble of extracting the oil, turning it into
gasoline, and delivering it to your neighborhood station for you
to buy. When you are looking for someone to blame in these
times, it's always easiest to blast the businessman. No calumny,
no matter how implausible, is too far-fetched to pin on
capitalism. The press plays along, with most reporters failing
even to mention the new regulatory mandates, or any of the other
impositions that are driving prices sky-high.
Actually, when you consider all the government conspiracy to
drive gas prices up, it's a wonder and a credit to free
enterprise that they are not up to $5 a gallon by now. Most
importantly, there are the taxes, which today account for at
least 32 percent of the pump price of gasoline. According to the
American Petroleum Institute, gasoline taxes average over 41
cents per gallon. Gas taxes zoomed 100% in the 1980s, and 54% in
the 1990s.
Oil producers today are treated very poorly by the government.
Besides being among the most heavily regulated sectors, a
percentage of all revenue from oil produced on socialized land
must be forked over to the federal government in the form of
royalty payments. And the Clinton administration is trying to
make that payment more egregious by increasing it without regard
to the terms of the leasing contract.
This policy is consistent with the restrictions put on drilling
and leasing. The US is home to rich oil lands in Alaska and
offshore, to which oil producers are denied access. The excuse
is the environment, but that can't be the real reason; oil
producers long ago learned to make themselves virtually invisible
as they work to put nature to man's use. For the government,
high prices are their own reward.
Senate Majority leader Trent Lott says he will push for
legislation to open up some lands in Alaska for drilling. He
might even send out a few fundraising letters on the subject.
But we know how this will end. He'll shmooze with a
friends-of-the-earth-type lobbyist and table the whole idea in a
few weeks' time. Why do they tease us so? And why do we pretend
to go along?
The protectionist menace is also a factor in high gas prices, and
here is where the Republicans are really bad. It's been ten
years since the Gulf War and trade with Iraq is still seriously
restricted. Opening full trading relations would not only break
the back of OPEC; it would immediately unleash millions of
barrels of oil and cause prices to plummet. But for all the talk
about the merits of free trade, this is not even being
considered.
Repealing any one of these interventions would bring prices down
to less than a $1. But what if we repealed all of them? What if
taxes were wiped out, crazy regulations repealed, oil lands
opened up, and free trade established with Iraq? Gas would be
plentiful. What the price would be-75 cents? 25 cents? would
be anyone's guess. Many refineries would go out of business, of
course, but new ones would pop up. The market economy would find
the right price for gasoline and we'd never worry again about the
high price of gas.
But the Clinton administration, and the greens behind all these
bad policies, have a different idea in mind. Their model, for
now, is Germany, where an "ecology" tax has driven the price of
gasoline to $3.85 per gallon.
No more joy rides and traveler freedom. Just taking a Sunday
drive means spending a week's earnings. And the citizens are in
a fury over it, with 60 percent of those polled demanding a
repeal of the tax.
What are the effects of policies designed to deliberately drive
up the price of gas? Everything that involves transportation has
gone up in Germany.
Not just air fares, but also the price charged for school trips,
locksmith visits, and rent-a-cars. Even the price of having a
pizza delivered is up by 25 to 50 cents. Drivers are struggling
to provide consumers a great perk of the capitalist economy:
having a pizza delivered to your door.
It's crucial to remember that these are not side effects or
unintended consequences of bad policy. A high price for gas is
the policy. Less driving and less consumption generally is the
goal. The real ideal is Mao's China, where the entire population
crowded the streets with bicycles and gasoline powered only
public transportation, the bureaucracy, and the military to
enforce the edicts of the commissars. The left reminisces over
these scenes and thinks: look at the wondrous conservation of
resources that communism made possible.
Toward Germany and Mao's China is where the Clinton
administration would like to take us.
The response might be: "well, it hasn't killed Europe and US
prices are still cheap by international standards". But there's
a huge difference. With the vast amount of space in this country,
efficient travel is essential to prosperity and a high quality of
life. But try to explain that to ghouls who have deliberately
brought about high prices and then lied about it.
=================================================================
Kadosh, Kadosh, Kadosh, YHVH, TZEVAOT
FROM THE DESK OF: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
*Mike Spitzer* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
~~~~~~~~ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The Best Way To Destroy Enemies Is To Change Them To Friends
Shalom, A Salaam Aleikum, and to all, A Good Day.
=================================================================
<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and
minor
effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
<A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
<A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
