Tuesday, July 4, 2000

Bill permits U.S. troops to patrol border
Critics fear trend to use military for civilian law enforcement

by Jon E. Dougherty

  The House of Representatives has passed a measure that would allow U.S.
troops to be permanently deployed along the United States border to assist
the Border Patrol in the interdiction of drugs and illegal immigrants.
The bill authorizes the secretary of defense to "assign members of the Army,
Navy, Air Force and Marine Corps to assist" the Immigration and
Naturalization Service "in preventing the entry of terrorists and drug
traffickers into the United States."

The measure also would permit the military to assist the U.S. Customs
Service "in the inspection of cargo, vehicles and aircraft at points of
entry" into the U.S. "to prevent the entry of weapons of mass destruction,
components" thereof, "prohibited narcotics or drugs, or other terrorist or
drug trafficking items."


Rep. James Traficant, D-Ohio

The bill, HR 628, passed 243-183 with 8 abstentions on May 18. Sponsored by
Rep. James Traficant, D-Ohio, the measure was originally introduced in
February 1999.

If passed by the Senate and signed into law, the Traficant amendment would
amend Chapter 18 of Title 10, United States Code. Title 10 governs the use
of American military forces and personnel and already permits the use of
military personnel to operate equipment in support of domestic law
enforcement agencies, as well as the training of civilian law enforcement
personnel.

U.S. law currently prohibits, with exceptions, the "direct participation" of
U.S. military personnel in "search, seizure, arrest or other similar
activity unless participation in such activity by such member is otherwise
authorized by law."

While there remains support for the deployment of U.S. military forces in a
domestic border patrol capacity, not all officials who are engaged in border
enforcement welcome the addition of American military personnel.

The National Border Patrol Council, the country's largest Border Patrol
union, is opposed to the Traficant provision because the organization does
not believe U.S. troops are adequately trained for such a mission and
because of past experiences with troops on the border.

While the Traficant provision would require that any military personnel
deployed in a border-patrol capacity first receive training, the National
Border Patrol Council, in a statement, said, "We all know that the training
will last a few hours at most, in sharp contrast to the comprehensive
19-week training program that Border Patrol Agents must complete."

Also, the Border Patrol union is worried that another incident like the
death of 18-year-old Esequiel Hernandez, Jr., will occur. Hernandez was shot
and killed by U.S. Marines near Redford, Texas, on May 20, 1997. Marines
claimed the teen shot at them; they were later cleared, but the incident
drew sufficient outcry to force the Pentagon to drop deployment of military
forces along the border for the time being.

Supporters of the provision, however, point out that it specifically
prohibits U.S. troops from conducting "a search, seizure or other similar
law enforcement activity or to make an arrest," in accordance with Posse
Comitatus laws. It also requires the attorney general or secretary of the
treasury to notify local officials and state governors when forces are being
deployed in support of Border Patrol functions.

Controversy over the plan is as old as the bill itself. One year ago, in an
interview with WorldNetDaily, Gregory Nojeim, legislative counsel for the
Washington, D.C., chapter of the ACLU, said the sum total of the new
military roles in civilian law enforcement would eventually destroy "what
was left" of the Posse Comitatus Act.

"These provisions ... will blow a hole in Posse Comitatus large enough to
drive a thousand tanks onto our city streets," he said.

Nojeim said he is most concerned about language in the bill that gives much
more arbitrary judgement on the potential conditions in which the military
could be used in the hands of the secretary of defense, the attorney general
and the secretary of the treasury.

"They're trying to make it more of a routine thing to have the military
involved in enforcing American civil law," he added. "Imagine having troops
on your streets and in your back yard for an undetermined amount of time for
what could be an ambiguous reason."

Tim Lynch, a spokesman for the libertarian think tank, the CATO Institute,
said he believes it is a precursor to end the strict limitations on civilian
law-enforcement use of military assets and personnel.

Last year, he said that while the provision had not yet been passed into
law, he feared it was "a certainty" it would be. The fact that the measure
passed the House last month bears out his concerns.

"Not too many people are talking about it, not many are objecting to it, and
it looks like it's just going to sail through," he said. "That concerns us."
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/readerservice/printer_friendly.php3?item=http:/
/www.worldnetdaily.com/bluesky_dougherty/20000704_xnjdo_bill_permi.shtml

Bard

I Love My Country!
I Hate My Corrupt Government!

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to