FBI system covertly searches e-mail

Superfast system called 'Carnivore' searches e-mails for messages from
criminal suspects, thus raising legal issues, privacy concerns.

By Neil King Jr. and Ted Bridis, WSJ Interactive Edition
July 11, 2000 6:01 AM PT

WASHINGTON -- The U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation is using a superfast
system called Carnivore to covertly search e-mails for messages from criminal
suspects.

Essentially a personal computer stuffed with specialized software, Carnivore
represents a new twist in the federal government's fight to sustain its
snooping powers in the Internet age. But in employing the system, which can
scan millions of e-mails a second, the FBI has upset privacy advocates and
some in the computer industry. Experts say the system opens a thicket of
unresolved legal issues and privacy concerns.



The FBI developed the Internet wiretapping system at a special agency lab at
Quantico, Va., and dubbed it Carnivore for its ability to get to "the meat"
of what would otherwise be an enormous quantity of data. FBI technicians
unveiled the system to a roomful of astonished industry specialists here two
weeks ago in order to steer efforts to develop standardized ways of complying
with federal wiretaps. Federal investigators say they have used Carnivore in
fewer than 100 criminal cases since its launch early last year.

Word of the Carnivore system has disturbed many in the Internet industry
because, when deployed, it must be hooked directly into Internet service
providers' computer networks. That would give the government, at least
theoretically, the ability to eavesdrop on all customers' digital
communications, from e-mail to online banking and Web surfing.

The system also troubles some Internet service providers, who are loath to
see outside software plugged into their systems. In many cases, the FBI keeps
the secret Carnivore computer system in a locked cage on the provider's
premises, with agents making daily visits to retrieve the data captured from
the provider's network. But legal challenges to the use of Carnivore are few,
and judges' rulings remain sealed because of the secretive nature of the
investigations.

Internet eavesdropping
Internet wiretaps are conducted only under state or federal judicial order,
and occur relatively infrequently. The huge majority of wiretaps continue to
be the traditional telephone variety, though U.S. officials say the use of
Internet eavesdropping is growing as everyone from drug dealers to potential
terrorists begins to conduct business over the Web.


The FBI defends Carnivore as more precise than Internet wiretap methods used
in the past. The bureau says the system allows investigators to tailor an
intercept operation so they can pluck only the digital traffic of one person
from among the stream of millions of other messages. An earlier version,
aptly code-named Omnivore, could suck in as much as to six gigabytes of data
every hour, but in a less discriminating fashion.

Still, critics contend that Carnivore is open to abuse.

Mark Rasch, a former federal computer-crimes prosecutor, said the nature of
the surveillance by Carnivore raises important privacy questions, since it
analyzes part of every snippet of data traffic that flows past, if only to
determine whether to record it for police.

"It's the electronic equivalent of listening to everybody's phone calls to
see if it's the phone call you should be monitoring," Rasch said. "You
develop a tremendous amount of information."

Others say the technology dramatizes how far the nation's laws are lagging
behind the technological revolution. "This is a clever way to use old
telephone-era statutes to meet new challenges, but clearly there is too much
latitude in the current law," said Stewart Baker, a lawyer specializing in
telecommunications and Internet regulatory matters.

Privacy and security concerns
Robert Corn-Revere, of the Hogan & Hartson law firm here, represented an
unidentified Internet service provider in one of the few legal fights against
Carnivore. He said his client worried that the FBI would have access to all
the e-mail traffic on its system, raising dire privacy and security concerns.
A federal magistrate ruled against the company early this year, leaving it no
option but to allow the FBI access to its system.

"This is an area in desperate need of clarification from Congress," said
Corn-Revere.

"Once the software is applied to the ISP, there's no check on the system,"
said Rep. Bob Barr (R., Ga.), who sits on a House judiciary subcommittee for
constitutional affairs. "If there's one word I would use to describe this, it
would be 'frightening."'

Marcus Thomas, chief of the FBI's Cyber Technology Section at Quantico, said
Carnivore represents the bureau's effort to keep abreast of rapid changes in
Internet communications while still meeting the rigid demands of federal
wiretapping statutes. "This is just a very specialized sniffer," he said.

He also noted that criminal and civil penalties prohibit the bureau from
placing unauthorized wiretaps, and any information gleaned in those types of
criminal cases would be thrown out of court. Typical Internet wiretaps last
around 45 days, after which the FBI removes the equipment. Thomas said the
bureau usually has as many as 20 Carnivore systems on hand, "just in case."

FBI experts acknowledge that Carnivore's monitoring can be stymied with
computer data such as e-mail that is scrambled using powerful encryption
technology. Those messages still can be captured, but law officers trying to
read the contents are "at the mercy of how well it was encrypted," Thomas
said.

Most of the criminal cases where the FBI used Carnivore in the past 18 months
focused on what the bureau calls "infrastructure protection," or the hunt for
hackers, though it also was used in counterterrorism and some
drug-trafficking cases.

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to