http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/july2000/nf00707g.htm

PRIVACY MATTERS  BY MARCIA STEPANEK July 7, 2000

Now, Companies Can Track Down Their Cyber-Critics

A new service allows corporate spinmeisters to retailiate against outspoken
citizens with "reeducation" efforts -- or worse

Beware the public relations person with a modem. Now corporate spinmeisters,
too, can go online to track customers -- especially the disgruntled ones who
vent their spleen in cyberspace.

That's right. All those companies you love to hate now have a way to find out
who's griping about them, and they can target complainers for a little
reeducation. Thanks to a new product from Dallas-based eWatch -- and sold
through Edelman Interactive public relations agency and PR Newswire -- companies
can now monitor what people do or say on the Web and respond.

The result: So-called "anticorporate activism," as it's known in the flak trade,
will never be the same -- and neither will your sense of free speech as a
consumer.

INFO-CLEANSING. How does it work? Partly, eWatch says, through a little
info-cleansing. "We can neutralize the information appearing online, identifying
the perpetrators behind uncomplimentary postings and rogue Web sites," the
company's online promo material says. Then, eWatch can "remove offending
messages from where they appear in cyberspace."

This may mean something as simple as deleting a posting from a Web message board
on Yahoo! or it could mean "the shuttering of a terrorist Web site." The
objective? "To stop the spread of incorrect information and to ensure that what
has already spread is eliminated," eWatch states.

Tracking so-called "perpetrators" is also part of the service, says eWatch
National Product Manager Ted Skinner. That's done by "using a variety of
methods, such as following leads found in postings and Web sites, working with
ISPs, involving law enforcement, conducting virtual stings and other tactics,"
he says.

"We can post back to the message boards where original postings appeared to give
our side of the story, provide clarification, or debunk it," the eWatch
materials go on to say. "We can e-mail directly those we think were affected by
the incident." And, says eWatch, "in the name of identifying entities whose
motives are fraudulent, deceptive, or criminal, eWatch Cybersleuth will attempt
to identify the entity or entities behind the screen names targeting your
organization."

CHATROOM PERPS. Such snoop tools don't come cheap. eWatch says it can identify a
person or group behind a screen name that has targeted a particular company or
organization within 7 to 10 days for a price of up to $4,995 per screen name.
For an extra $1,995 per screen name, eWatch says it can give a company results
within 48 hours. Either way, Skinner says, companies that use eWatch "will
receive a dossier detailing all information gathered about the subject during
the inquiry."

The trouble with all this is that the so-called perpetrators being targeted are
often people like you and me exercising our right to free speech. Think about
it. Say you get lousy service from Barnes & Noble and you criticize it in your
favorite chatroom. Barnes & Noble, an eWatch customer, could -- if it wanted to
-- monitor that complaint, identify who you are, and get B&N's public relations
crew to send you an e-mail trying to change your mind.

But say you're so angry you write in a posting that you feel like strangling the
clerk at B&N's store at Union Square in Manhattan because she made you wait so
long to ring up your purchase. Chances are, the company would ignore you. But
eWatch Cybersleuth wouldn't. It could track you down -- and forward your name to
B&N executives for further attention. Or if you're spreading phony tips about
B&N stock in an online financial forum, B&N could "work with" an Internet
service provider to erase your comments from the site.

"TOO CLOSE." Still not convinced this is for real? eWatch's Skinner says
Northwest Airlines used his service earlier this year to help it track down the
identities of employees who organized a "sick-out" that nearly halted flights
over the last Christmas holiday. The company has since fired those employees,
and a court has upheld the legality of that action. The ruling is under appeal.
Northwest is now using eWatch to help it target -- for reeducation -- the most
teed-off of its fed-up fliers.

To be sure, the Net can make it rough out there for companies not used to the
consumer scrutiny it enables. According to Skinner, many companies like the way
the Net can bring them closer to consumers for marketing purposes. But when it
comes to dissatisfied consumers, the Net sometimes "can bring them too close,"
he says.

Consider all the Web sites created by consumers, for consumers, simply to vent
-- such as the Aetnasucks.com, ATTsucks.com, and Searssucks.com, to name a few.
Griping is hardly confined to those sites, Skinner says, and criticism of
companies often shows up in chatrooms or general discussion groups. "Say one
customer tells their bad experience to 20 other people, and then imagine 50
million people reading about it on the Internet," eWatch's marketing materials
warn.

OMINOUS IDEA. Adds Skinner: "From a public-relations standpoint, it becomes much
harder to safeguard shareholder value, improve customer service, protect
corporate reputation and brand integrity" when a customer goes online to
complain. "The Net is vast and fast," he says. Besides, Skinner adds, if
companies can use the Net to personalize customer service, why not use it to do
one-to-one public relations?

To me, there's something very troubling about cyberspinning. Good
public-relations personnel can quell panic and remind people of their company's
side of the story in the heat of a crisis. But personalized spin campaigns? The
potential for abuse seems too high, and the idea sounds ominous to those who
cherish free speech without risk of punishment.

Even at its most benign, the idea is unsettling. It used to be you could share
your opinion about a company with someone online without worrying that the
company would ever find out about it. Now, you run the risk of getting hassled
with corporate e-mail, not to mention being personally targeted for a cyber
reeducation campaign, or worse.

CRISIS COMING. How much will a private citizen say online, knowing that? What
will happen to online communities that form around a common experience with,
say, a lemon of a car or a harmful product? Maybe containment is the whole
point, but it's hard to believe that healthy and robust e-commerce, not to
mention the right of free speech, can be well-served with privacy-busting
products like these.

If they land in overaggressive hands, snoop tools and services like eWatch sound
like a PR crisis just waiting to happen.

Stepanek's column runs twice a month on Business Week Online. She invites you to
discuss these issues on our Privacy Matters forum

EDITED BY DOUGLAS HARBRECHT




--
-----------------------
NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is
distributed without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior
interest in receiving this information for non-profit research and
educational purposes only. For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
-----------------------





________________________________________________________
                           1stUp.com - Free the Web
   Get your free Internet access at http://www.1stUp.com

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to