White House won't give timetable on lost e-mails, judge says

By GREG TOPPO, Associated Press

WASHINGTON (July 17, 2000 6:08 p.m. EDT
http://www.nandotimes.com) - A federal judge accused the White
House on Monday of failing to tell him how long it would take to
restore thousands of lost Clinton administration e-mails.

U.S. District Judge Royce Lamberth said the White House never
told him that revised estimates for the project were vastly
different from what administration lawyers had reported in a
lawsuit in the case.

White House officials earlier this year said thousands of
e-mails, including some from Vice President Al Gore's office,
were not properly archived. As a result, the messages were never
reviewed by White House lawyers to determine if they should be
turned over to investigators under subpoena in cases ranging from
the Monica Lewinsky scandal and Whitewater to campaign fund
raising.

Lamberth, who is holding hearings to determine how to retrieve
the messages and get them to investigators, has heard testimony
since Thursday from a handful of current and former White House
computer technicians.

On Monday, he angrily criticized the administration for failing
to notify him earlier that a series of unsuccessful computer
tests in the project have delayed it, resulting in estimates that
range from a few months to several years.

"You weren't going to admit that until it was drug out of you in
this hearing," Lamberth, a native Texan, told Justice Department
lawyer James Gilligan, who is arguing the case on behalf of the
White House. Gilligan is representing the Executive Office of the
President in the case.

Lamberth also complained that the White House couldn't give him a
firm figure on the number of computer backup tapes that must be
searched for missing e-mails.

"How does the number keep growing every day?" he asked Gilligan.

Gilligan replied that administration officials didn't mean to
mislead the judge, but said supervisors were struggling to manage
the complex e-mail case.

Judicial Watch, the conservative group that has brought the $90
million class action lawsuit, has accused the White House of
dragging its feet to delay retrieval of the messages until after
the presidential election.

The group also maintains that the White House intentionally hired
consultants with little expertise in restoring the data to delay
the investigation. Judicial Watch has even offered to conduct a
test of a computer system that wasn't chosen, maintaining that it
would be 10 times faster than the one the government is using.

Lamberth didn't immediately rule on the proposal. He planned to
hear more testimony later this week.

The White House last April told the judge it could deliver
results within 170 days - a figure quoted at the time by White
House counsel Beth Nolan at a hearing of the House Government
Reform Committee.

Since then, technicians testified, they have tested three
computer systems, all of which failed to produce acceptable
results. A fourth system was approved only last Thursday, and
workers have begun using it to copy backup tapes of the e-mails.
So far, the new system has produced two unacceptable copies and
two more that are being reviewed by the FBI.

Lamberth, a Reagan appointee, could appoint a special master to
oversee production of the e-mails or order another company to
perform the reconstruction. He also could let the White House
proceed with the job.



=================================================================
             Kadosh, Kadosh, Kadosh, YHVH, TZEVAOT

  FROM THE DESK OF:                    <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
                      *Mike Spitzer*     <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
                         ~~~~~~~~          <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

   The Best Way To Destroy Enemies Is To Change Them To Friends
       Shalom, A Salaam Aleikum, and to all, A Good Day.
=================================================================

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to