What do we know about Cheney's bloodline?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Linda Minor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2000 8:48 AM
> To: Catherine Austin Fitts; kate; Lois Ann Battuello; Kris Millegan
> Subject: Union Pacific and Franklin Credit Union
>
>
> What's very intriguing about Bush's selection of Dick Cheney is the fact
> that Cheney was born in Lincoln, Nebraska in 1941, then went to Yale for a
> time, and now he sits on the board of directors of Union Pacific Railroad,
> which is based in Omaha.  Keep in mind that since the turn of the last
> century the UP Railroad was controlled by the Harriman family,
> the employers
> of George Bush's maternal grandfather and  his father.  It was George
> Herbert Walker who left St. Louis, where he had his own investment
> bank--G.H. Walker & Co., involved in the financing of railroads and the
> companies owned by those railroads--to relocate to set up Averell
> and Bunny
> Harriman's investment bank.  The two Yalie friends of Walker's (actually
> Skull and Bones friends) were the sons of E.H. Harriman, the old railroad
> tycoon.
>
> To assist the Harriman family in running the Union Pacific, they had a
> lawyer from Texas name Robert Scott Lovett, who for years ran the
> railroad.
> Robert S. Lovett's son was Robert A. Lovett, a partner at Brown Brothers
> Harriman, who was actually married to the daughter of one of the "Brown
> Brothers".  Although it has not yet been proven that Brown & Root was
> connected to the Brown Brothers firm, it is known that the
> founders of that
> industrial construction company, George and Herman Brown, who were born in
> Belton, Texas, were sons of a traveling banker in central Texas, who with
> his brother in Austin were engaged in making loans under the name of Brown
> Brothers bank in Austin prior to 1900.  According to birth records, George
> and Herman's father came to Texas from Baltimore, Md. which was also the
> location of the original bank called Brown Brothers.
>
> If the connection exists, then it may be no accident Cheney was
> selected for
> the boards he sits on, as Union Pacific and Halliburton each have
> a block of
> shareholders connected to the Bush family.
>
>
>
> The following excerpt from John DeCamp's book,
> ====
> From the DeCamp book, p. 146:
>
> "Donations to Franklin through the Union Pacific Foundation made the Union
> Pacific Railroad one of Larry King's biggest corporate backers.  Union
> Pacific Chairman John Kenefick, deposited funds at Franklin.
>
> "According to reports out of Omaha's homosexual community, the
> old Harriman
> family railroad overlaps other areas with King.  'The company is
> well-known
> for two things at the top:  homosexuality and freemasonry,' said one
> knowledgeable person.
>
> "Is there a tradition or obligation of homosexuality among top
> Union Pacific
> executives?
>
> "The Legislature's Franklin committee heard testimony from a
> former Franklin
> employee, implicating two Union Pacific executives in the recruitment of
> 'young kids for Larry King's friends.'  Robert Andresen, the
> pedophile whose
> brutality was so heavy-handed that even the Douglas County jury mentioned
> (but did not indict) him, worked for Union Pacific.
>
> "So did the foreman of the grand jury!  The Douglas County panel
> was headed
> by citizen Michael Flanagan, an employee of Union Pacific Railroad for 27
> years.  Given that Union Pacific personnel were implicated in the matters
> under consideration, there would have been a conflict of interest
> for any UP
> employee sitting on the grand jury.  In the case of Flanagan,
> there was more
> to it than that.
>
> "In the summer of 1990, while the Douglas County grand jury was sitting, I
> received a call from a person who identified himself as an executive at
> Union Pacific headquarters in Omaha.  He declined to give his
> name, saying,
> 'I am too old to start over.  I have too much vested in a good salary,
> position and pension.  But I do not feel I can sit idly by.'
> ...
> My caller's carefully chosen words quickly dispelled the notion that he
> meant insignificant incidents, and led me to ask, 'Are you
> talking about the
> head of Union Pacific, Mr. Walsh?"  While the information he provided
> satisfied me that my concern about Walsh might well be valid, the caller
> made it clear that this was not the immediate point of his contacting me.
>
> "What he had to say, was that the foreman of the grand jury had committed
> impropriety of such a nature and degree, that Union Pacific had to reach a
> private financial settlement to protect him.
>
> " 'I believe if you will check out a former very young male Union Pacific
> employee named Pike*,' said my caller, 'you will discover that
> Mr. Flanagan
> made improper sexual advances upon him, and he complained to Union Pacific
> officials.  A financial settlement was reached by Union Pacific and the
> young male individual was paid a substantial sum of money by Union Pacific
> to keep quiet, go about his business, and find other employment.'
>
> DeCamp's investigation proved the information to be accurate, and
> he used it
> in his court pleadings, stating that Union Pacific was directing the grand
> jury in the Larry King case.
>
>
>



Reply via email to